Question for any of the mods! - GoFuckYourself.com

DeanCapture · 02-09-2006, 10:48 PM

How big can people post their pics on GFY now without them getting automatically resized?

That feature really degrades the look of the picture

Pete-KT · 02-09-2006, 10:50 PM

you cant but the pic is clickable, so if they click it they see the full size

DeanCapture · 02-09-2006, 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pete-KT

you cant but the pic is clickable, so if they click it they see the full size

Yea...I'm aware of that. But I would like to post pics without requiring people to jump thru hoops to see what they really look like

3M TA3 · 02-09-2006, 10:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeanCapture

Yea...I'm aware of that. But I would like to post pics without requiring people to jump thru hoops to see what they really look like

good point, I think they are using Magik compression.

let's use this thread to test it...

800x602

3M TA3 · 02-09-2006, 10:59 PM

599x449

3M TA3 · 02-09-2006, 11:04 PM

628x471
looks like this is it

DeanCapture · 02-09-2006, 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3M TA3

628x471
looks like this is it

That's a damn weird size man - my camera doesn't shoot that size

I want to hear from one of the mods and get an official comment to my question

3M TA3 · 02-09-2006, 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeanCapture

That's a damn weird size man - my camera doesn't shoot that size

I want to hear from one of the mods and get an official comment to my question

i think it goes by max width, and they set the width at 628

628x1000

DeanCapture · 02-10-2006, 12:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3M TA3

i think it goes by max width, and they set the width at 628

Ahhhh - cool beans then. I'll resize future images to 628 on the width. Thanks for experimenting and figuring that shit out. I guess all the mods turned in early tonight

3M TA3 · 02-10-2006, 12:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeanCapture

Ahhhh - cool beans then. I'll resize future images to 628 on the width. Thanks for experimenting and figuring that shit out. I guess all the mods turned in early tonight

heh, no prob, something i wanted to know as well....better to resize it with good compression instead of having the board do it, my fire pic turned all grainy

TexasDreams · 02-10-2006, 12:20 AM

Ooops! was working on some other things and didn't see this thread till now. The exact trigger point is 630-pixels on the width. Came to that number because if you run a top-spot banner in your sig that can be 624-pixels. So it gives a little margin of error between the two. Couldn't do it under 624 because that would kill any ref-code links on the sig banners.

It would have been a nicer fix if some people would have learned to resize images instead of just posting them right off their 5+ Mega-pixel camera's.

Never can please everybody.

DeanCapture · 02-10-2006, 12:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TexasDreams

Ooops! was working on some other things and didn't see this thread till now. The exact trigger point is 630-pixels on the width. Came to that number because if you run a top-spot banner in your sig that can be 624-pixels. So it gives a little margin of error between the two. Couldn't do it under 624 because that would kill any ref-code links on the sig banners.

It would have been a nicer fix if some people would have learned to resize images instead of just posting them right off their 5+ Mega-pixel camera's.

Never can please everybody.

Thanks TD - makes perfect sense

Dagwolf · 02-10-2006, 12:46 AM

02-09-2006, 10:48 PM	#1
DeanCapture Haters & Trolls SUCK! Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Los Angeles, CA Posts: 9,275	Question for any of the mods! How big can people post their pics on GFY now without them getting automatically resized? That feature really degrades the look of the picture __________________ Twitter: @DeanCapture Instagram: @TheDeanCapture DeanCapture "at" Gmail.com

02-09-2006, 10:59 PM	#5
3M TA3 Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: So Cal Posts: 2,972	599x449 __________________ Dedicated and colo hosting: ICQ 291313057 "A problem cannot be solved from the same consciousness that created it. We must learn to see the world anew." - Albert Einstein

02-09-2006, 11:04 PM	#6
3M TA3 Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: So Cal Posts: 2,972	628x471 looks like this is it __________________ Dedicated and colo hosting: ICQ 291313057 "A problem cannot be solved from the same consciousness that created it. We must learn to see the world anew." - Albert Einstein

02-10-2006, 12:20 AM	#11
TexasDreams former Miserable Admin :) Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Somewhere in Cali Posts: 4,700	Ooops! was working on some other things and didn't see this thread till now. The exact trigger point is 630-pixels on the width. Came to that number because if you run a top-spot banner in your sig that can be 624-pixels. So it gives a little margin of error between the two. Couldn't do it under 624 because that would kill any ref-code links on the sig banners. It would have been a nicer fix if some people would have learned to resize images instead of just posting them right off their 5+ Mega-pixel camera's. Never can please everybody. __________________ ICQ: 168-914-369 >>> sysop [at] TexasDreams [dot] com

02-10-2006, 12:46 AM	#13
Dagwolf President of Canada Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Leaving Hell, Entering Limbo Posts: 23,141	__________________ Sleep well, and dream of large women.

02-09-2006, 10:50 PM	#2
Pete-KT Workin With The Devil Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: West Bloomfield, MI Posts: 51,532	you cant but the pic is clickable, so if they click it they see the full size