How big can people post their pics on GFY now without them getting automatically resized?
That feature really degrades the look of the picture
That feature really degrades the look of the picture
-
-
you cant but the pic is clickable, so if they click it they see the full size -
Yea...I'm aware of that. But I would like to post pics without requiring people to jump thru hoops to see what they really look likeOriginally posted by Pete-KT
Comment
-
good point, I think they are using Magik compression.Originally posted by DeanCaptureYea...I'm aware of that. But I would like to post pics without requiring people to jump thru hoops to see what they really look like
let's use this thread to test it...
800x602
Dedicated and colo hosting: ICQ 291313057
"A problem cannot be solved from the same consciousness that created it. We must learn to see the world anew." - Albert EinsteinComment
-
599x449
Dedicated and colo hosting: ICQ 291313057
"A problem cannot be solved from the same consciousness that created it. We must learn to see the world anew." - Albert EinsteinComment
-
628x471
looks like this is it
Dedicated and colo hosting: ICQ 291313057
"A problem cannot be solved from the same consciousness that created it. We must learn to see the world anew." - Albert EinsteinComment
-
That's a damn weird size man - my camera doesn't shoot that sizeOriginally posted by 3M TA3
I want to hear from one of the mods and get an official comment to my question
Last edited by DeanCapture; 02-09-2006, 09:08 PM.Comment
-
Originally posted by DeanCaptureThat's a damn weird size man - my camera doesn't shoot that size
I want to hear from one of the mods and get an official comment to my question
i think it goes by max width, and they set the width at 628
628x1000
Dedicated and colo hosting: ICQ 291313057
"A problem cannot be solved from the same consciousness that created it. We must learn to see the world anew." - Albert EinsteinComment
-
Ahhhh - cool beans then. I'll resize future images to 628 on the width. Thanks for experimenting and figuring that shit out. I guess all the mods turned in early tonightOriginally posted by 3M TA3
Comment
-
heh, no prob, something i wanted to know as well....better to resize it with good compression instead of having the board do it, my fire pic turned all grainyOriginally posted by DeanCaptureAhhhh - cool beans then. I'll resize future images to 628 on the width. Thanks for experimenting and figuring that shit out. I guess all the mods turned in early tonight
Dedicated and colo hosting: ICQ 291313057
"A problem cannot be solved from the same consciousness that created it. We must learn to see the world anew." - Albert EinsteinComment
-
Ooops! was working on some other things and didn't see this thread till now. The exact trigger point is 630-pixels on the width. Came to that number because if you run a top-spot banner in your sig that can be 624-pixels. So it gives a little margin of error between the two. Couldn't do it under 624 because that would kill any ref-code links on the sig banners.
It would have been a nicer fix if some people would have learned to resize images instead of just posting them right off their 5+ Mega-pixel camera's.
Never can please everybody.
ICQ: 168-914-369 >>> sysop [at] TexasDreams [dot] comComment
-
Thanks TD - makes perfect senseOriginally posted by TexasDreamsOoops! was working on some other things and didn't see this thread till now. The exact trigger point is 630-pixels on the width. Came to that number because if you run a top-spot banner in your sig that can be 624-pixels. So it gives a little margin of error between the two. Couldn't do it under 624 because that would kill any ref-code links on the sig banners.
It would have been a nicer fix if some people would have learned to resize images instead of just posting them right off their 5+ Mega-pixel camera's.
Never can please everybody.
Comment
-
Sleep well, and dream of large women.
Comment
Comment