Help me to remove ugly girls from my site

[Peace]

www.PeaceNudes.com Who is ugly?

[GFX Wiz]

http://www.peacenudes.com/galleries/.../smcov_228.jpg
http://www.peacenudes.com/galleries/.../smcov_238.jpg
http://www.peacenudes.com/galleries/.../smcov_236.jpg
http://www.peacenudes.com/galleries/.../smcov_237.jpg
http://www.peacenudes.com/galleries/.../smcov_234.jpg -- great body though

[Ramos]

http://www.peacenudes.com/galleries/...rs/cov_228.jpg

[Peace]

Originally Posted by GFX Wiz

http://www.peacenudes.com/galleries/.../smcov_228.jpg
http://www.peacenudes.com/galleries/.../smcov_238.jpg
http://www.peacenudes.com/galleries/.../smcov_236.jpg
http://www.peacenudes.com/galleries/.../smcov_237.jpg
http://www.peacenudes.com/galleries/.../smcov_234.jpg -- great body though

Thank you will check..So you think ugly chicks will hurt site?

[ronaldo]

Ugly is quite subjective. There's a couple on there that "I" don't find particularly attractive, but that doesn't mean someone else won't find them attractive.

However, looking at your webmaster section and seeing "the world's most beautiful young nude teens", maybe half of the models there could actually pass for teens. Perhaps go that route and filter out the older looking models. I'd lose the word "Young" in that particular sentence as well.

[Pleasurepays]

Originally Posted by ronaldo

Ugly is quite subjective. There's a couple on there that "I" don't find particularly attractive, but that doesn't mean someone else won't find them attractive.

However, looking at your webmaster section and seeing "the world's most beautiful young nude teens", maybe half of the models there could actually pass for teens. Perhaps go that route and filter out the older looking models. I'd lose the word "Young" in that particular sentence as well.

i think people tend to overstate this a little all the time and particularly so on this board. beauty is subjective to a point... but for the most part, i would argue that there is pretty much universal agreement on what beauty is and what a beautiful woman is. just because some toad somewhere likes some pic of a girl does not make her "beautiful" on someones eyes - it just means that someone clicked a link for whatever reason. and i would also argue that fat, ugly people with low self esteem don't typically shoot for the stars either... so just because they might be attracted to someone that they might feel with more within their league, i would not say that makes the other party "beautiful".

tastes are far more subjective than the concept of "beauty".

[ronaldo]

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

i think people tend to overstate this a little all the time and particularly so on this board. beauty is subjective to a point... but for the most part, i would argue that there is pretty much universal agreement on what beauty is and what a beautiful woman is. just because some toad somewhere likes some pic of a girl does not make her "beautiful" on someones eyes - it just means that someone clicked a link for whatever reason. and i would also argue that fat, ugly people with low self esteem don't typically shoot for the stars either... so just because they might be attracted to someone that they might feel with more within their league, i would not say that makes the other party "beautiful".

tastes are far more subjective than the concept of "beauty".

Good post, with an interesting point.

[Peace]

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

i think people tend to overstate this a little all the time and particularly so on this board. beauty is subjective to a point... but for the most part, i would argue that there is pretty much universal agreement on what beauty is and what a beautiful woman is. just because some toad somewhere likes some pic of a girl does not make her "beautiful" on someones eyes - it just means that someone clicked a link for whatever reason. and i would also argue that fat, ugly people with low self esteem don't typically shoot for the stars either... so just because they might be attracted to someone that they might feel with more within their league, i would not say that makes the other party "beautiful".

tastes are far more subjective than the concept of "beauty".

That true...for example on my content sites I always keep kinds of models..One client say ugly another say princess...That applies also to Editosr of major magazines..You e-mail them pics and you here such different opinion on the same girl...LOL

[3M TA3]

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

i think people tend to overstate this a little all the time and particularly so on this board. beauty is subjective to a point... but for the most part, i would argue that there is pretty much universal agreement on what beauty is and what a beautiful woman is. just because some toad somewhere likes some pic of a girl does not make her "beautiful" on someones eyes - it just means that someone clicked a link for whatever reason. and i would also argue that fat, ugly people with low self esteem don't typically shoot for the stars either... so just because they might be attracted to someone that they might feel with more within their league, i would not say that makes the other party "beautiful".

tastes are far more subjective than the concept of "beauty".

who let this guy in?

good post, and a great read

[Sam Granger]

Ugly chicks? Fuck that I aint looking.

[GFX Wiz]

Originally Posted by Peace

Thank you will check..So you think ugly chicks will hurt site?

Ronaldo and Pleasurepays hit it on the head...I was merely subjecting you to my subjective tastes.

I, for one, do not think that just because a girl is on the Internet & naked that that makes her hot or worth "hitting." Some of the girls people find most hot I would certainly hit...in the face...with a brick...so they can get thier shit fixed up a little nicer than when they started.

[SilentKnight]

Some good points being made here.

Everyone has to consider that there are surfers who have grown tired of the glamour/runway models - with the silicone, Maybelline and perfectly coifed hair...they're simply not realistic much of the time. Instead, they may prefer the more natural girl-next-door types that they might actually stand a chance of meeting at the local convenience store or Walmart checkout-girl.

As said a few times above, beauty is subjective - and everyone has a different opinion of what constitutes attractiveness. Intangibles are a difficult thing to explain. Some folks like skinny waifs, others prefer plumpers or BBWs. Some like'em homely, others enjoy someone with vitality and sparkle. Small titties...or big racks. Heart-shaped asses or chewed bubble gum.

Some folks enjoy and appreciate imperfections. We don't live in a flawless world. To me, sometimes imperfections add character and dimension to a person.

I only hope the models shown on your website don't see themselves called out as "ugly" in this thread. For what its worth, I think its rather callous, unprofessional and disrespectful to publically insinuate they're ugly.

Wouldn't it be much better to simply keep track of traffic stats and see what girls are receiving the most attention - and go from there? And quietly eliminate those at the bottom of the ranking.

[Pleasurepays]

Originally Posted by SilentKnight

Some good points being made here.

Everyone has to consider that there are surfers who have grown tired of the glamour/runway models - with the silicone, Maybelline and perfectly coifed hair...they're simply not realistic much of the time. Instead, they may prefer the more natural girl-next-door types that they might actually stand a chance of meeting at the local convenience store or Walmart checkout-girl.

As said a few times above, beauty is subjective - and everyone has a different opinion of what constitutes attractiveness. Intangibles are a difficult thing to explain. Some folks like skinny waifs, others prefer plumpers or BBWs. Some like'em homely, others enjoy someone with vitality and sparkle. Small titties...or big racks. Heart-shaped asses or chewed bubble gum.

Some folks enjoy and appreciate imperfections. We don't live in a flawless world. To me, sometimes imperfections add character and dimension to a person.

I only hope the models shown on your website don't see themselves called out as "ugly" in this thread. For what its worth, I think its rather callous, unprofessional and disrespectful to publically insinuate they're ugly.

Wouldn't it be much better to simply keep track of traffic stats and see what girls are receiving the most attention - and go from there? And quietly eliminate those at the bottom of the ranking.

you are the type of person i am talking about... because "tastes" vary... does not mean that "beauty" is subjective. you are confusing the two. tastes vary for a wide variety of reasons. what is "beautiful" is pretty much universal in every culture. you can watch some discovery channel show about an amazon tribe and notice that their idea of who is the most beautiful girl in the village is the same as anyone elses. Miss Mongolia is just as hot as any other girl on the planet. I can go on and on.

your logic dictates that a 3 year old child is "beautiful" in a sexual way because pedophiles like them.

[Peace]

I can say as well that here all based on feelings...We feel better then we think..And if model is a person not personless then we can fell it. I guess also some models pose for money and some to prove something...So we fell sexy or not and may be chabby girl with right motivation is better then slim one coming to make money and not thinking of the real motivation of ART and Sex which is Art and Sex...But market is mostly made of animals and they do not feel what we feel that is why i have to get rid of some non atractive models.

[SilentKnight]

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

your logic dictates that a 3 year old child is "beautiful" in a sexual way because pedophiles like them.

How the fuck you can take what I said and spin it to include this pedo analogy above....is WAYYYY beyond my comprehension.

Unfucking believable.

That's probably more response than your assertion merits.

[Pleasurepays]

Originally Posted by SilentKnight

How the fuck you can take what I said and spin it to include this pedo analogy above....is WAYYYY beyond my comprehension.

Unfucking believable.

That's probably more response than your assertion merits.

you are saying that a model can be beautiful just because someone finds her to be beautiful. a pedo can look at an infant and say the same thing. a guy who fucks horses can use your logic and say the horse is "beautiful" in a sexual way- whats beyond your comprehension? logic?

[SilentKnight]

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

you are saying that a model can be beautiful just because someone finds her to be beautiful. a pedo can look at an infant and say the same thing. a guy who fucks horses can use your logic and say the horse is "beautiful" in a sexual way- whats beyond your comprehension? logic?

No.

What's unbelievable is how you take my words and use them in an analogous way to bring pedophilia and beastiality in to the discussion.

Simply ridiculous. Sometimes I just don't know what motivates people.

[giftedtwisted]

Shit I'll fuck ugly chicks any day

My dad did... how do you think I came about?

[Pleasurepays]

Originally Posted by SilentKnight

No.

What's unbelievable is how you take my words and use them in an analogous way to bring pedophilia and beastiality in to the discussion.

Simply ridiculous. Sometimes I just don't know what motivates people.

its quite simple... its the same logic to say beauty is subjective and defend an ugly model by saying "beauty is in the eye of the beholder" - that logic also demands that a horse can be beautiful in the same way just because someone fucks it and gets turned on by it and is sexually attracted to it. its no different. and the point... since you are too moronic to get it is that beauty is not subjective and this example shows that in the same way that you think the fact that some 50 year old slob living in his mothers basement might find a girl i think is ugly to be quite attractive.

you are confusing "beauty" with personal preferrence and taste. a person might be turned on by and jerk of to one legged midgets who are shitting all over themselves... that doesn't make the midget beautiful.

[DEViANCE]

How about I just tell you who's NOT ugly

[SilentKnight]

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

its quite simple... its the same logic to say beauty is subjective and defend an ugly model by saying "beauty is in the eye of the beholder" - that logic also demands that a horse can be beautiful in the same way just because someone fucks it and gets turned on by it and is sexually attracted to it. its no different. and the point... since you are too moronic to get it is that beauty is not subjective and this example shows that in the same way that you think the fact that some 50 year old slob living in his mothers basement might find a girl i think is ugly to be quite attractive.

you are confusing "beauty" with personal preferrence and taste. a person might be turned on by and jerk of to one legged midgets who are shitting all over themselves... that doesn't make the midget beautiful.

You bring pedophilia and beastiality in to the discussion...and *I'm* the moron.

We'll leave it at that.

[Peace]

Originally Posted by DEViANCE

How about I just tell you who's NOT ugly

sure do please

[camouflaged123]

http://www.peacenudes.com/galleries...ers/cov_228.jpg
she sure is...