Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SilentKnight
Some good points being made here.
Everyone has to consider that there are surfers who have grown tired of the glamour/runway models - with the silicone, Maybelline and perfectly coifed hair...they're simply not realistic much of the time. Instead, they may prefer the more natural girl-next-door types that they might actually stand a chance of meeting at the local convenience store or Walmart checkout-girl.
As said a few times above, beauty is subjective - and everyone has a different opinion of what constitutes attractiveness. Intangibles are a difficult thing to explain. Some folks like skinny waifs, others prefer plumpers or BBWs. Some like'em homely, others enjoy someone with vitality and sparkle. Small titties...or big racks. Heart-shaped asses or chewed bubble gum.
Some folks enjoy and appreciate imperfections. We don't live in a flawless world. To me, sometimes imperfections add character and dimension to a person.
I only hope the models shown on your website don't see themselves called out as "ugly" in this thread. For what its worth, I think its rather callous, unprofessional and disrespectful to publically insinuate they're ugly.
Wouldn't it be much better to simply keep track of traffic stats and see what girls are receiving the most attention - and go from there? And quietly eliminate those at the bottom of the ranking.
|
you are the type of person i am talking about... because "tastes" vary... does not mean that "beauty" is subjective. you are confusing the two. tastes vary for a wide variety of reasons. what is "beautiful" is pretty much universal in every culture. you can watch some discovery channel show about an amazon tribe and notice that their idea of who is the most beautiful girl in the village is the same as anyone elses. Miss Mongolia is just as hot as any other girl on the planet. I can go on and on.
your logic dictates that a 3 year old child is "beautiful" in a sexual way because pedophiles like them.