View Single Post
Old 11-22-2005, 06:27 PM  
SilentKnight
Megan Fox's fluffer
 
SilentKnight's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: shooting pool in Elysium
Posts: 24,818
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pleasurepays
its quite simple... its the same logic to say beauty is subjective and defend an ugly model by saying "beauty is in the eye of the beholder" - that logic also demands that a horse can be beautiful in the same way just because someone fucks it and gets turned on by it and is sexually attracted to it. its no different. and the point... since you are too moronic to get it is that beauty is not subjective and this example shows that in the same way that you think the fact that some 50 year old slob living in his mothers basement might find a girl i think is ugly to be quite attractive.

you are confusing "beauty" with personal preferrence and taste. a person might be turned on by and jerk of to one legged midgets who are shitting all over themselves... that doesn't make the midget beautiful.
You bring pedophilia and beastiality in to the discussion...and *I'm* the moron.

We'll leave it at that.
SilentKnight is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote