google bans CNET - GoFuckYourself.com

TDF · 08-05-2005, 10:45 PM

take that bitches http://money.cnn.com/2005/08/05/tech...ex.htm?cnn=yes

Google Inc. has blacklisted all CNET reporters for a year, after the popular technology news website published personal information of one of Google's founders in a story about growing privacy concerns for the Internet search engine, according to a CNET statement.

damn..blacklisted through the whole system

wedouglas · 08-05-2005, 10:49 PM

Ohhhh snap

wedouglas · 08-05-2005, 10:50 PM

umm cnet is still on google though

riddler · 08-05-2005, 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wedouglas

umm cnet is still on google though

have to wait for the next dance for it to show..

leg4 · 08-05-2005, 10:53 PM

If they ban CNET from search results... You have the beginning of a POLICE STATE.

riddler · 08-05-2005, 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by leg4

If they ban CNET from search results... You have the beginning of a POLICE STATE.

why? if you owned google and someone posted your info on a huge news network you would be pissed too, no matter if its public domain or not its a point..

baddog · 08-05-2005, 11:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by riddler

why? if you owned google and someone posted your info on a huge news network you would be pissed too, no matter if its public domain or not its a point..

If I owned Google I would so manipulate it

Quickdraw · 08-05-2005, 11:04 PM

I believe they only banned the reporters from talking to Google reps.

Michael O · 08-05-2005, 11:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quickdraw

I believe they only banned the reporters from talking to Google reps.

Yeah thats what the story on CNN says.

mikeyddddd · 08-05-2005, 11:12 PM

They were blackballed.

"CNET on Friday reported "Google representatives have instituted a policy of not talking with CNET News reporters until July 2006 in response to privacy issues raised by a previous story."

They are not banned from listings.

Sheesh! Save the outrage for a real issue.

High Plains Drifter · 08-05-2005, 11:13 PM

Kind of a misleading title. Google banning anything from their results would be a huge can of worms that they don't want opened.

leg4 · 08-05-2005, 11:14 PM

I agree with Google on this issue, I am not siding with the shitty reporters.

TexasDreams · 08-05-2005, 11:24 PM

Results as of this minute...

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...=Google+Search

Results 1 - 10 of about 29,600,000 for cnet. (0.04 seconds)

I wish Google would BAN me in such a way!

GatorB · 08-06-2005, 12:49 AM

Google is a bunch of hypocites!

Hmmmmmmm let's see

Schmidt is officially Google's chief champion and defender, and has publicly said that there has to be a trade-off between privacy concerns and functionality.

then

To underscore its point about how much personal information is available, the CNET report published some personal information about Google's CEO Eric Schmidt -- his salary; his neighborhood, some of his hobbies and political donations -- all obtained through Google searches.

then

NEW YORK (CNN/Money) - Google Inc. has blacklisted all CNET reporters for a year, after the popular technology news website published personal information of one of Google's founders in a story about growing privacy concerns for the Internet search engine, according to a CNET statement.

So what Google is saying is that WE have to sacrifice privacy, not them.

The Sultan Of Smut · 08-06-2005, 01:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB

Google is a bunch of hypocites!

Hmmmmmmm let's see

Schmidt is officially Google's chief champion and defender, and has publicly said that there has to be a trade-off between privacy concerns and functionality.

then

To underscore its point about how much personal information is available, the CNET report published some personal information about Google's CEO Eric Schmidt -- his salary; his neighborhood, some of his hobbies and political donations -- all obtained through Google searches.

then

NEW YORK (CNN/Money) - Google Inc. has blacklisted all CNET reporters for a year, after the popular technology news website published personal information of one of Google's founders in a story about growing privacy concerns for the Internet search engine, according to a CNET statement.

So what Google is saying is that WE have to sacrifice privacy, not them.

That's exactly what I was thinking. Shitheads.

$5 submissions · 08-06-2005, 01:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by leg4

If they ban CNET from search results... You have the beginning of a POLICE STATE.

Google is a private (ie., not government-owned) company. They can restrict freedom of speech as much as they want. The US Constitution only protects people from STATE (ie., government) actions.

baddog · 08-06-2005, 01:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by $5 submissions

Google is a private (ie., not government-owned) company. They can restrict freedom of speech as much as they want. The US Constitution only protects people from STATE (ie., government) actions.

You're right . . . now turn on your ICQ please

High Plains Drifter · 08-06-2005, 01:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by $5 submissions

Google is a private (ie., not government-owned) company. They can restrict freedom of speech as much as they want. The US Constitution only protects people from STATE (ie., government) actions.

Maybe I'm giving him too much credit, but I think he's implying that google has so much power over the internet that they're a government-like entity.

Sparks · 08-06-2005, 01:53 AM

Damn, that's messed up CNET did that.

Manowar · 08-06-2005, 01:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB

Google is a bunch of hypocites!

Hmmmmmmm let's see

Schmidt is officially Google's chief champion and defender, and has publicly said that there has to be a trade-off between privacy concerns and functionality.

then

To underscore its point about how much personal information is available, the CNET report published some personal information about Google's CEO Eric Schmidt -- his salary; his neighborhood, some of his hobbies and political donations -- all obtained through Google searches.

then

NEW YORK (CNN/Money) - Google Inc. has blacklisted all CNET reporters for a year, after the popular technology news website published personal information of one of Google's founders in a story about growing privacy concerns for the Internet search engine, according to a CNET statement.

So what Google is saying is that WE have to sacrifice privacy, not them.

so true

Wiggles · 08-06-2005, 04:31 AM

fuck Cnet is going to lose alot of money from this.

Trax · 08-06-2005, 06:08 AM

thats typical for gfy
fuckers are too stupid to read lol

XxXotic · 08-06-2005, 06:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

If I owned Google I would so manipulate it

if you owned google you'd have more money then you could imagine spending, why waste your time manipulating SERPS to make what in comparison would be a piss boy's wages to what you're already get....

mardigras · 08-06-2005, 06:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hostive

Damn, that's messed up CNET did that.

Would be messed up if CNET had published private information gained from a private source, not a Google search

mardigras · 08-06-2005, 06:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB

So what Google is saying is that WE have to sacrifice privacy, not them.

Pretty much what it sounds like to me

xclusive · 08-06-2005, 06:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TexasDreams

Results as of this minute...

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...=Google+Search

Results 1 - 10 of about 29,600,000 for cnet. (0.04 seconds)

I wish Google would BAN me in such a way!

looks like they did

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...=Google+Search

Results 1 - 10 of about 2,130 for TexasDreams. (0.26 seconds)

messiah1 · 08-06-2005, 07:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by $5 submissions

Google is a private (ie., not government-owned) company. They can restrict freedom of speech as much as they want. The US Constitution only protects people from STATE (ie., government) actions.

That is our future - slaves of the corporation, some are already living it. Thanks for the reminder

.

pr0 · 08-06-2005, 07:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by riddler

why? if you owned google and someone posted your info on a huge news network you would be pissed too, no matter if its public domain or not its a point..

Yea denny's tried banning all black people for a bit, it didn't work out too well.

Shoehorn! · 08-06-2005, 07:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB

So what Google is saying is that WE have to sacrifice privacy, not them.

Are you surprised?

Shoehorn! · 08-06-2005, 07:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pr0

Yea denny's tried banning all black people for a bit, it didn't work out too well.

wedouglas · 08-06-2005, 07:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pr0

Yea denny's tried banning all black people for a bit, it didn't work out too well.

haha... not to shabby

Furious_Male · 08-06-2005, 09:11 AM

People still aren't reading the entire thread or story.

Oh well. I agree with what GatorB said (http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showpo...&postcount=14). Seems they are getting a taste of there own medicine. Its part of the business they should get back to work they need to keep the stock high and find those 2 chefs.

tony286 · 08-06-2005, 09:41 AM

I spoke to Eric when I was a headhunter, very nice guy.

The Ghost · 08-06-2005, 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by XxXotic

if you owned google you'd have more money then you could imagine spending, why waste your time manipulating SERPS to make what in comparison would be a piss boy's wages to what you're already get....

I was thinkin' the same thing.

08-05-2005, 10:45 PM	#1
TDF Triple OG nigga on GFY Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: in the BP4L family compound Posts: 27,296	google bans CNET take that bitches http://money.cnn.com/2005/08/05/tech...ex.htm?cnn=yes Google Inc. has blacklisted all CNET reporters for a year, after the popular technology news website published personal information of one of Google's founders in a story about growing privacy concerns for the Internet search engine, according to a CNET statement. damn..blacklisted through the whole system __________________ Sig heil

08-05-2005, 10:53 PM	#5
leg4 Confirmed User Join Date: May 2003 Location: Texas Posts: 4,429	If they ban CNET from search results... You have the beginning of a POLICE STATE. __________________ >>> Contact me here email me here

08-05-2005, 11:12 PM	#10
mikeyddddd Viva la vulva! Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: you can't please everyone, so you got to please yourself Posts: 16,557	They were blackballed. "CNET on Friday reported "Google representatives have instituted a policy of not talking with CNET News reporters until July 2006 in response to privacy issues raised by a previous story." They are not banned from listings. Sheesh! Save the outrage for a real issue. __________________ AdultStarProfits AmbyaCash AnilosCash AzianiGold ColdHardCash FlashTheMoney IdolBucks MediumPimpin NSCash Nubiles PussyCash ScoreCash Sextronix SpunkyCash TubeTitans Twistys

08-05-2005, 11:13 PM	#11
High Plains Drifter Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: ♠ ♣ ♥ Posts: 2,341	Kind of a misleading title. Google banning anything from their results would be a huge can of worms that they don't want opened. __________________

08-05-2005, 11:14 PM	#12
leg4 Confirmed User Join Date: May 2003 Location: Texas Posts: 4,429	I agree with Google on this issue, I am not siding with the shitty reporters. __________________ >>> Contact me here email me here

08-05-2005, 10:49 PM	#2
wedouglas So Fucking Banned Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Dearborn, MI Posts: 5,921	Ohhhh snap

08-05-2005, 10:50 PM	#3
wedouglas So Fucking Banned Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Dearborn, MI Posts: 5,921	umm cnet is still on google though

08-05-2005, 11:04 PM	#8
Quickdraw Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: → → → Posts: 1,717	I believe they only banned the reporters from talking to Google reps.

08-05-2005, 11:24 PM	#13
TexasDreams former Miserable Admin :) Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Somewhere in Cali Posts: 4,700	Results as of this minute... http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...=Google+Search Results 1 - 10 of about 29,600,000 for cnet. (0.04 seconds) I wish Google would BAN me in such a way! __________________ ICQ: 168-914-369 >>> sysop [at] TexasDreams [dot] com

08-06-2005, 12:49 AM	#14
GatorB The Demon & 12clicks Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: SallyRand is a FAGGOT Posts: 18,208	Google is a bunch of hypocites! Hmmmmmmm let's see Schmidt is officially Google's chief champion and defender, and has publicly said that there has to be a trade-off between privacy concerns and functionality. then To underscore its point about how much personal information is available, the CNET report published some personal information about Google's CEO Eric Schmidt -- his salary; his neighborhood, some of his hobbies and political donations -- all obtained through Google searches. then NEW YORK (CNN/Money) - Google Inc. has blacklisted all CNET reporters for a year, after the popular technology news website published personal information of one of Google's founders in a story about growing privacy concerns for the Internet search engine, according to a CNET statement. So what Google is saying is that WE have to sacrifice privacy, not them.

08-06-2005, 01:53 AM	#19
Sparks Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Southern CA Posts: 2,466	Damn, that's messed up CNET did that.

08-06-2005, 04:31 AM	#21
Wiggles Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 14,423	fuck Cnet is going to lose alot of money from this. __________________ no sig

08-06-2005, 06:08 AM	#22
Trax [----------------------] Join Date: Aug 2001 Posts: 14,486	thats typical for gfy fuckers are too stupid to read lol

08-06-2005, 09:11 AM	#32
Furious_Male Doing the grind since 99 Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Buffalo NY Posts: 16,883	People still aren't reading the entire thread or story. Oh well. I agree with what GatorB said (http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showpo...&postcount=14). Seems they are getting a taste of there own medicine. Its part of the business they should get back to work they need to keep the stock high and find those 2 chefs. __________________ Living in Virtual Reality Contact: Email (preferred): furiousmale .at. gmail - Skype: live:shanedws

08-06-2005, 09:41 AM	#33
tony286 lurker Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: atlanta Posts: 57,021	I spoke to Eric when I was a headhunter, very nice guy.