![]() |
google bans CNET
take that bitches http://money.cnn.com/2005/08/05/tech...ex.htm?cnn=yes
Google Inc. has blacklisted all CNET reporters for a year, after the popular technology news website published personal information of one of Google's founders in a story about growing privacy concerns for the Internet search engine, according to a CNET statement. damn..blacklisted through the whole system |
Ohhhh snap
|
umm cnet is still on google though
|
Quote:
|
If they ban CNET from search results... You have the beginning of a POLICE STATE.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If I owned Google I would so manipulate it :thumbsup |
I believe they only banned the reporters from talking to Google reps.
|
Quote:
|
They were blackballed.
"CNET on Friday reported "Google representatives have instituted a policy of not talking with CNET News reporters until July 2006 in response to privacy issues raised by a previous story." They are not banned from listings. Sheesh! Save the outrage for a real issue. |
Kind of a misleading title. Google banning anything from their results would be a huge can of worms that they don't want opened.
|
I agree with Google on this issue, I am not siding with the shitty reporters.
|
Results as of this minute...
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...=Google+Search Results 1 - 10 of about 29,600,000 for cnet. (0.04 seconds) I wish Google would BAN me in such a way! :Oh crap |
Google is a bunch of hypocites!
Hmmmmmmm let's see Schmidt is officially Google's chief champion and defender, and has publicly said that there has to be a trade-off between privacy concerns and functionality. then To underscore its point about how much personal information is available, the CNET report published some personal information about Google's CEO Eric Schmidt -- his salary; his neighborhood, some of his hobbies and political donations -- all obtained through Google searches. then NEW YORK (CNN/Money) - Google Inc. has blacklisted all CNET reporters for a year, after the popular technology news website published personal information of one of Google's founders in a story about growing privacy concerns for the Internet search engine, according to a CNET statement. So what Google is saying is that WE have to sacrifice privacy, not them. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
You're right . . . now turn on your ICQ please |
Quote:
|
Damn, that's messed up CNET did that.
|
Quote:
so true :upsidedow |
fuck Cnet is going to lose alot of money from this.
|
thats typical for gfy
fuckers are too stupid to read lol |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
looks like they did :) http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...=Google+Search Results 1 - 10 of about 2,130 for TexasDreams. (0.26 seconds) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
People still aren't reading the entire thread or story.
Oh well. I agree with what GatorB said (http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showpo...&postcount=14). Seems they are getting a taste of there own medicine. Its part of the business they should get back to work they need to keep the stock high and find those 2 chefs. |
I spoke to Eric when I was a headhunter, very nice guy.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:28 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123