FTC Cracks down on Illegal ?X-rated? Spam - GoFuckYourself.com

Juicy D. Links · 07-20-2005, 11:16 AM

h--p://www.ftc.gov/opa/2005/07/alrsweep.htm

FTC Cracks down on Illegal ?X-rated? Spam

E-Mail Exposed Children, Others, to Graphic Content

In a crackdown on operations that illegally expose unwitting consumers to graphic sexual content, the Federal Trade Commission has charged seven companies with violating federal laws requiring warning labels on e-mail that contains sexually-explicit content. U.S. District Court suits filed against three operations seek civil penalties and a permanent bar on the illegal marketing. Settlements with four other operations have imposed $1.159 million in civil penalties. The settlements bar the illegal marketing practices in the future and require that the defendants monitor their affiliates to ensure they are not violating the law.

?This x-rated e-mail is electronic flashing,? said Lydia Parnes, Director of the Bureau of Consumer Protection. ?It exposes kids and other unwary consumers to graphic sexual content, and it is unwanted, offensive, and illegal.?

?The Adult Labeling Rule was designed to protect consumers who don?t want to be exposed to random assaults of sexual material and others, like kids, for whom it is inappropriate. It?s the law, and we intend to enforce it,? Parnes said.

The FTC?s Adult Labeling Rule and the CAN-SPAM Act require commercial e-mailers of sexually-explicit material to use the phrase ?SEXUALLY EXPLICIT: ? in the subject line of the e-mail message and to ensure that the initially viewable area of the message does not contain graphic sexual images. The Rule and the Act also require that unsolicited commercial e-mail contain an opportunity for consumers to opt out of receiving future e-mail and provide a postal address, among other things. The FTC charged that the companies sent sexually-explicit e-mail messages that:

violated the Adult Labeling Rule requirements;
violated the requirement to provide a clear and conspicuous opt-out mechanism; and
violated the requirement to provide a postal address.
While the defendants did not send e-mail directly to consumers, they operated ?affiliate marketing? programs in which they paid others to send spam on their behalf. Under the CAN-SPAM Act, the defendants are liable for the illegal spam sent by their affiliates because the defendants ?initiated? the e-mail by paying others to send it on their behalf.

The settlements bar future violations of the CAN-SPAM Act and the Adult Labeling Rule. They also require that the defendants closely monitor the practices of their affiliate marketers to insure that they are not violating the law. BangBros.com Inc., based in Florida, will pay $650,000 in civil penalties; MD Media, a Michigan corporation, will pay $238,743; APC Entertainment, Inc., a Florida corporation, will pay $220,000; and Pure Marketing Solutions, LLC, a Florida company, and Internet Matrix Technology, a corporation based in Louisiana, will together pay $50,000. The settlements contain record-keeping provisions to allow the FTC to monitor the defendants? compliance with the orders.

In addition to the settlements, at the request of the FTC, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has filed suit in U.S. District Courts citing three other operations for violations of the CAN-SPAM Act and the Adult Labeling Rule: TJ Web Productions, LLC, a Nevada company; Cyberheat, Inc., an Arizona Corporation; and Impulse Media, a Washington corporation.

Microsoft Corporation provided valuable technical assistance in the investigation of these cases.

The Commission votes to file the complaints in the Cyberheat, Impulse Media and TJ Web Productions cases were 5-0. Votes in the other matters were 4-0.

NOTE: The Commission files a complaint when it has ?reason to believe? that the law has been or is being violated, and it appears to the Commission that a proceeding is in the public interest. The complaint is not a finding or ruling that the defendant actually has violated the law. The case will be decided by the court.

The proposed stipulated final judgments and orders will be filed by the DOJ at the request of the FTC. They are subject to court approval.

NOTE: Stipulated final judgments and orders are for settlement purposes only and do not constitute an admission by the defendant of a law violation. Consent judgments have the force of law when signed by the judge.

Juicy D. Links · 07-20-2005, 11:17 AM

The fuzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz is cracking their whips

Manowar · 07-20-2005, 11:18 AM

http://www.businessvoyeur.com/2005-0...with-ftc-fines

Shortened version with sponsor names if your too lazy to read full announcements.

NY_TIM · 07-20-2005, 11:18 AM

?X-rated? Spam is illegal

Bugbee · 07-20-2005, 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NY_TIM

?X-rated? Spam is illegal

http://xbiz.com/news_piece.php?id=9598

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE · 07-20-2005, 11:22 AM

I have warned about the FTC and Govrnment comming in and hitting Affiliates program that deploy or have spammers for how long now?
I called this a long time ago and been saying so alot even recently.

sperbonzo · 07-20-2005, 11:30 AM

Wait a minute.... Don't a lot of the people on this board FREAK OUT when they get spam from somebody and then post all these grrrrrrs... about getting spam in their inbox?

I'm confused... Are you guys pro-spam or anti-spam?

Personally, I don't have a problem with spam, of any type.... sure, it can be annoying, but then so are commercials on TV and roadside billboards, but business is business. \

But when someone on this board complains about spam, everyone piles on to say how they hate it, so you do you guys only hate non-x-rated spam?

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE · 07-20-2005, 11:35 AM

Oh but wait...

I was called an idiot for saying so!

Looks like this idiot was right again.
Those companies will be found guilty as charged and will be held responsible even for rogue affiliates.

Tough times are ahead.

Juicy D. Links · 07-20-2005, 11:37 AM

I hate getting SPAM in my regular mail asking me about gutter cleaning

MickeyG · 07-20-2005, 11:39 AM

if people followed the rules they wouldnt have so much trouble:

The FTC charged that the companies sent sexually-explicit e-mail messages that:

* violated the Adult Labeling Rule requirements;
* violated the requirement to provide a clear and conspicuous opt-out mechanism; and
* violated the requirement to provide a postal address.

CheneyRumsfeld · 07-20-2005, 11:45 AM

people doing the complaining to the FTC are not webmasters.
they are the average person who has email at work and email form an isp for surfing the net at home. they get bombarded with this crap, get pissed off and start to look for a way to stop it. finally the wind up at the ftc website and complain. ftc has a mailbox just for this stuff and they just let the complaints build until they have a case.

07-20-2005, 11:16 AM	#1
Juicy D. Links So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: N.Y. -Long Island -- Posts: 122,992	FTC Cracks down on Illegal ?X-rated? Spam h--p://www.ftc.gov/opa/2005/07/alrsweep.htm FTC Cracks down on Illegal ?X-rated? Spam E-Mail Exposed Children, Others, to Graphic Content In a crackdown on operations that illegally expose unwitting consumers to graphic sexual content, the Federal Trade Commission has charged seven companies with violating federal laws requiring warning labels on e-mail that contains sexually-explicit content. U.S. District Court suits filed against three operations seek civil penalties and a permanent bar on the illegal marketing. Settlements with four other operations have imposed $1.159 million in civil penalties. The settlements bar the illegal marketing practices in the future and require that the defendants monitor their affiliates to ensure they are not violating the law. ?This x-rated e-mail is electronic flashing,? said Lydia Parnes, Director of the Bureau of Consumer Protection. ?It exposes kids and other unwary consumers to graphic sexual content, and it is unwanted, offensive, and illegal.? ?The Adult Labeling Rule was designed to protect consumers who don?t want to be exposed to random assaults of sexual material and others, like kids, for whom it is inappropriate. It?s the law, and we intend to enforce it,? Parnes said. The FTC?s Adult Labeling Rule and the CAN-SPAM Act require commercial e-mailers of sexually-explicit material to use the phrase ?SEXUALLY EXPLICIT: ? in the subject line of the e-mail message and to ensure that the initially viewable area of the message does not contain graphic sexual images. The Rule and the Act also require that unsolicited commercial e-mail contain an opportunity for consumers to opt out of receiving future e-mail and provide a postal address, among other things. The FTC charged that the companies sent sexually-explicit e-mail messages that: violated the Adult Labeling Rule requirements; violated the requirement to provide a clear and conspicuous opt-out mechanism; and violated the requirement to provide a postal address. While the defendants did not send e-mail directly to consumers, they operated ?affiliate marketing? programs in which they paid others to send spam on their behalf. Under the CAN-SPAM Act, the defendants are liable for the illegal spam sent by their affiliates because the defendants ?initiated? the e-mail by paying others to send it on their behalf. The settlements bar future violations of the CAN-SPAM Act and the Adult Labeling Rule. They also require that the defendants closely monitor the practices of their affiliate marketers to insure that they are not violating the law. BangBros.com Inc., based in Florida, will pay $650,000 in civil penalties; MD Media, a Michigan corporation, will pay $238,743; APC Entertainment, Inc., a Florida corporation, will pay $220,000; and Pure Marketing Solutions, LLC, a Florida company, and Internet Matrix Technology, a corporation based in Louisiana, will together pay $50,000. The settlements contain record-keeping provisions to allow the FTC to monitor the defendants? compliance with the orders. In addition to the settlements, at the request of the FTC, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has filed suit in U.S. District Courts citing three other operations for violations of the CAN-SPAM Act and the Adult Labeling Rule: TJ Web Productions, LLC, a Nevada company; Cyberheat, Inc., an Arizona Corporation; and Impulse Media, a Washington corporation. Microsoft Corporation provided valuable technical assistance in the investigation of these cases. The Commission votes to file the complaints in the Cyberheat, Impulse Media and TJ Web Productions cases were 5-0. Votes in the other matters were 4-0. NOTE: The Commission files a complaint when it has ?reason to believe? that the law has been or is being violated, and it appears to the Commission that a proceeding is in the public interest. The complaint is not a finding or ruling that the defendant actually has violated the law. The case will be decided by the court. The proposed stipulated final judgments and orders will be filed by the DOJ at the request of the FTC. They are subject to court approval. NOTE: Stipulated final judgments and orders are for settlement purposes only and do not constitute an admission by the defendant of a law violation. Consent judgments have the force of law when signed by the judge.

07-20-2005, 11:18 AM	#4
NY_TIM Confirmed User Join Date: May 2004 Location: Long Island, NY Posts: 2,975	?X-rated? Spam is illegal __________________ ICQ 252838547 TNTBUCKS Musicians Click Here

07-20-2005, 11:22 AM	#6
AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE best designer on GFY Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: IALIEN.COM - High Definition Video and Photographic Productions -ICQ 78943384 Posts: 30,307	I have warned about the FTC and Govrnment comming in and hitting Affiliates program that deploy or have spammers for how long now? I called this a long time ago and been saying so alot even recently. __________________ NAKED HOSTING FTW!11 I'm On The INSANE PLAN $9.95/mo! \| The Alien Blog Adult News Worth Reading Updated Daily \| Content For Sale! 641 PICS 216 MINUTES OF VIDEO $350.00 \|ICQ: 78943384 \| Last edited by AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE; 07-20-2005 at 11:24 AM..

07-20-2005, 11:30 AM	#7
sperbonzo I'd rather be on my boat. Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Location: Miami, FL Posts: 9,748	Wait a minute.... Don't a lot of the people on this board FREAK OUT when they get spam from somebody and then post all these grrrrrrs... about getting spam in their inbox? I'm confused... Are you guys pro-spam or anti-spam? Personally, I don't have a problem with spam, of any type.... sure, it can be annoying, but then so are commercials on TV and roadside billboards, but business is business. \ But when someone on this board complains about spam, everyone piles on to say how they hate it, so you do you guys only hate non-x-rated spam? __________________ Michael Sperber / Acella Financial LLC/ Online Payment Processing [email protected] / http://Acellafinancial.com/ ICQ 177961090 / Tel +1 909 NET BILL / Skype msperber

07-20-2005, 11:35 AM	#8
AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE best designer on GFY Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: IALIEN.COM - High Definition Video and Photographic Productions -ICQ 78943384 Posts: 30,307	Oh but wait... I was called an idiot for saying so! Looks like this idiot was right again. Those companies will be found guilty as charged and will be held responsible even for rogue affiliates. Tough times are ahead. __________________ NAKED HOSTING FTW!11 I'm On The INSANE PLAN $9.95/mo! \| The Alien Blog Adult News Worth Reading Updated Daily \| Content For Sale! 641 PICS 216 MINUTES OF VIDEO $350.00 \|ICQ: 78943384 \|

07-20-2005, 11:17 AM	#2
Juicy D. Links So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: N.Y. -Long Island -- Posts: 122,992	The fuzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz is cracking their whips

07-20-2005, 11:18 AM	#3
Manowar jellyfish Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 71,528	http://www.businessvoyeur.com/2005-0...with-ftc-fines Shortened version with sponsor names if your too lazy to read full announcements.

07-20-2005, 11:37 AM	#9
Juicy D. Links So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: N.Y. -Long Island -- Posts: 122,992	I hate getting SPAM in my regular mail asking me about gutter cleaning

07-20-2005, 11:39 AM	#10
MickeyG Confirmed User Join Date: May 2004 Location: South Florida Posts: 4,134	if people followed the rules they wouldnt have so much trouble: The FTC charged that the companies sent sexually-explicit e-mail messages that: * violated the Adult Labeling Rule requirements; * violated the requirement to provide a clear and conspicuous opt-out mechanism; and * violated the requirement to provide a postal address.

07-20-2005, 11:45 AM	#11
CheneyRumsfeld Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2004 Posts: 1,341	people doing the complaining to the FTC are not webmasters. they are the average person who has email at work and email form an isp for surfing the net at home. they get bombarded with this crap, get pissed off and start to look for a way to stop it. finally the wind up at the ftc website and complain. ftc has a mailbox just for this stuff and they just let the complaints build until they have a case.