GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   To all the fucking idiots blaming Bush for the London attack. QUESTION: (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=489486)

BRISK 07-08-2005 08:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alexg
everyone knows that it's only a matter of time until "innocent" countries get attacked.

most won't admit they were wrong and probably make up new excuses, such as the "head scarf" issue, or that canada sent 2 soldiers and 4 guns to afghanistan...

Canada is not an "innocent" country in the eyes of islamic terrorists, why do you keep suggesting that it is? If it got attacked it would be understandable why it happened. Canada was a bad example to use as an "innocent" country.

In November 2002 Canada was specifically mentioned as a prime al-Qaida target by Osama bin Laden.

"What business do your governments have to ally itself in attacking us in Afghanistan -- and I mention specifically Britain, France, Italy, Canada, Germany and Australia," Bin Laden said on an audiotape obtained by Arab Al-Jazeera TV before warning of impending attacks.

By the way, I'm not one of the people that blamed Bush for the London attack, I'm simply replying to the premises in your argument because they're weak and you've used poor examples to support your argument. The premise that Canada is an innocent country is extremely weak.

You may have had a decent point to make (conclusion) in your original post, but you fucked it up because you used an incredibly weak premise to support your conclusion, and it's obvious that you've realized this because your attempts to belittle Canada's contribution to the war in Afghanistan shows the great lengths you're going to attempt to prop up the weakness in your argument. It's a sign of desperation.

theking 07-08-2005 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EviLSuperstaR
The Bush and Bliar failure in the absolute scam what they call War On Terror is that with their incompetence policies in Iraq and Afghanistan they are turning even the more moderate muslims into extremists.
Consequence: Moslim extremism is growing rapidly, even US sources (CIA) are confirming this.

The idiot in the white house and his corporate scamming friends are achieving the complete opposite of what they tell us they want to achieve. And don't even intend to review their ineffective strategies.
Meanwhile his old friend Osama remains free and gets rewarded a new training ground for his terrorists and a nice chance to blow up about 2 US soldiers a day. Time to bring all these fuckers down.

Why do you keep stating that Osama and the President are friends...let alone the other pig shit that you spew forth.

alexg 07-08-2005 09:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BRISK
Canada is not an "innocent" country in the eyes of islamic terrorists, why do you keep suggesting that it is? If it got attacked it would be understandable why it happened. Canada was a bad example to use as an "innocent" country.

In November 2002 Canada was specifically mentioned as a prime al-Qaida target by Osama bin Laden.

"What business do your governments have to ally itself in attacking us in Afghanistan -- and I mention specifically Britain, France, Italy, Canada, Germany and Australia," Bin Laden said on an audiotape obtained by Arab Al-Jazeera TV before warning of impending attacks.

By the way, I'm not one of the people that blamed Bush for the London attack, I'm simply replying to the premises in your argument because they're weak and you've used poor examples to support your argument. The premise that Canada is an innocent country is extremely weak.

You may have had a decent point to make (conclusion) in your original post, but you fucked it up because you used an incredibly weak premise to support your conclusion, and it's obvious that you've realized this because your attempts to belittle Canada's contribution to the war in Afghanistan shows the great lengths you're going to attempt to prop up the weakness in your argument. It's a sign of desperation.

I know that... it's just that you fail to understand that NO western country is innocent in the eyes of the terorrists.
there will always be excuses, but if canada gets attacked, only the absolute biggest idiots will still justify it and blame it on bush.
Idiots such as Rich probably...

seven 07-08-2005 09:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BRISK
Canada is not an "innocent" country in the eyes of islamic terrorists, why do you keep suggesting that it is? If it got attacked it would be understandable why it happened. Canada was a bad example to use as an "innocent" country.

In November 2002 Canada was specifically mentioned as a prime al-Qaida target by Osama bin Laden.

"What business do your governments have to ally itself in attacking us in Afghanistan -- and I mention specifically Britain, France, Italy, Canada, Germany and Australia," Bin Laden said on an audiotape obtained by Arab Al-Jazeera TV before warning of impending attacks.

By the way, I'm not one of the people that blamed Bush for the London attack, I'm simply replying to the premises in your argument because they're weak and you've used poor examples to support your argument. The premise that Canada is an innocent country is extremely weak.

You may have had a decent point to make (conclusion) in your original post, but you fucked it up because you used an incredibly weak premise to support your conclusion, and it's obvious that you've realized this because your attempts to belittle Canada's contribution to the war in Afghanistan shows the great lengths you're going to attempt to prop up the weakness in your argument. It's a sign of desperation.

what he said.. bad example. you could give better example than that or could you alexg? :1orglaugh

seven 07-08-2005 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alexg
I know that... it's just that you fail to understand that NO western country is innocent in the eyes of the terorrists.
there will always be excuses, but if canada gets attacked, only the absolute biggest idiots will still justify it and blame it on bush.
Idiots such as Rich probably...

bush has brainwashed you well "oh! it's not cos of our foreign policy, it's just that those terrorists couldn't get laid lately so they are grouchy and groggy and just wants to kill us cos they've been pussy deprived" peep peep! :1orglaugh

seven 07-08-2005 09:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking
Why do you keep stating that Osama and the President are friends...let alone the other pig shit that you spew forth.

awh they were not old business buddies/family friends? damn! someone needs to sue ALL the news medias :winkwink:

BRISK 07-08-2005 09:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alexg
you fail to understand that NO western country is innocent in the eyes of the terorrists

Did I ever say they were? No.

theking 07-08-2005 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by seven
awh they were not old business buddies/family friends? damn! someone needs to sue ALL the news medias :winkwink:

They have never met...let alone being friends.

directfiesta 07-08-2005 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking
They have never met...let alone being friends.


never did , never were :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Bush & Bin Laden - George W. Bush Had Ties to Billionaire bin Laden Brood

http://www.webdejob.com/images/the_king.jpg

theking 07-08-2005 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta

Where in the article does it state that Osama and the President met? Where in the article does it state that Osama and the President are friends?

Post the quote please? Post a quote from any "reliable" source.

EviLSuperstaR 07-08-2005 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta

The Bush clan and Bin Laden clan are business partners. That is enough for any intelligent person to make it all a very fishy matter...

Even without regarding the fact that he let all the Bin Ladens and some other Saudi business partners fly out of the country directly after 9/11 in which most hijackers were Saudis and their leader: a Bin Laden.

theking 07-08-2005 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EviLSuperstaR
The Bush clan and Bin Laden clan are business partners. That is enough for any intelligent person to make it all a very fishy matter...

Even without regarding the fact that he let all the Bin Ladens and some other Saudi business partners fly out of the country directly after 9/11 in which most hijackers were Saudis and their leader: a Bin Laden.

Why do you persist in spreading misinformation. The President did not make a decision to let the Bin Laden family fly out. The man that made the decision testified before a Senate Committee...and he stated that he cleared it with the FBI...and no it was not when air traffic was under suspension.

Dominic_M 07-08-2005 11:50 AM

What's really sad about all this, is that 10 years from now, a bunch of orphaned Iraqi kids are going to grow up hating the West for killing their parents/relatives and possibly strike back at an Allied city. Morons with no sense of history will say "Those bastards! They attacked us because they're jealous of our freedom...yeah, that's it!". Then we'll attack them back (by 'them', I mean the entire country even though it's a select group responsible) and feel all self-rightious.

Terrorists aren't just born terrorists. Something happens to create this sort of fanaticism, whether it's a potato famine, separatists, bombings in the '70's or whatever. We're guilty of the same sort of attitude. Our culture today (thanks to Oprah and Dr. Phil) is programming us to be irresponsible little babies with no regard for our actions, because we can always blame others ("I'm overweight because my parents didn't hug me", "I ate my neighbours because Daddy worked late") for the way we behave rather than just 'be a man and take it on the chin' or 'think for yourself' :)

rickholio 07-08-2005 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dominic_M
What's really sad about all this, is that 10 years from now, a bunch of orphaned Iraqi kids are going to grow up hating the West for killing their parents/relatives and possibly strike back at an Allied city. Morons with no sense of history will say "Those bastards! They attacked us because they're jealous of our freedom...yeah, that's it!". Then we'll attack them back (by 'them', I mean the entire country even though it's a select group responsible) and feel all self-rightious.

"Political extremism involves two prime ingredients: an excessively simple diagnosis of the world's ills, and a conviction that there are identifiable villains back of it all." - John W. Gardner


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:41 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123