GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   executive stats article in avn (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=483896)

XPays 06-23-2005 03:20 PM

so todd- do you think brad is smoking crack?

sextoyking 06-23-2005 03:21 PM

I am not cool evan I am simply Todd, LOL

BradShaw 06-23-2005 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by XPays
OK -

SO, is Brad out of his mind like usual with his legal threats here?


This is coming from the guy who 2 months ago threatened to sue me right here on GFY.

sextoyking 06-23-2005 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by XPays
so todd- do you think brad is smoking crack?


hmm, How should I take this question??? Literally or??

BradShaw 06-23-2005 03:24 PM

Evan and the rest of the sheep, the entirety of the situation has not been posted publicly. We have interesting server logs that have been turned over. This was not a case of just guessing a url and getting lucky. The end.

XPays 06-23-2005 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BradShaw
This is coming from the guy who 2 months ago threatened to sue me right here on GFY.

Yes - and you make one more post claiming I snort drugs or do anything other than smoke a doob in jamaica - you will get sued!

Shouldn't you be in therapy?

Alex 06-23-2005 03:24 PM

Shit page three?

no one is getting sued. End of story.

XPays 06-23-2005 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BradShaw
Evan and the rest of the sheep, the entirety of the situation has not been posted publicly. We have interesting server logs that have been turned over. This was not a case of just guessing a url and getting lucky. The end.

post proof.

XPays 06-23-2005 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sextoyking
hmm, How should I take this question??? Literally or??

call it a thinly veiled attempt to solicit objectivity from you in regards to your opinion about brad's legal threats and position.

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE 06-23-2005 03:27 PM

After reviewing my records I did technically start on the FPA.

WITHOUT AN INVOICE!
Imagine that.

The FPA beginning concept

I was being really nice to you.

And you came in this thread right out the gate insulting me.


Nice character.

XPays 06-23-2005 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AlienQ
After reviewing my records I did technically start on the FPA.

WITHOUT AN INVOICE!
Imagine that.

The FPA beginning concept

I was being really nice to you.

And you came in this thread right out the gate insulting me.


Nice character.

start a new thread. nobody cares.

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE 06-23-2005 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by XPays
start a new thread. nobody cares.

LOL.

Nah...

Gonna tend to my paying clients now for the next 26 hrs.
Toodles big boy.

Shok 06-23-2005 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by V_RocKs
You are so fucking clueless...

Let me explain it to you the way a gov't employee should be so you can see the extent of what he did.

You get a letter in the mail from the IRS saying you owe money pay up. You remove the bottom portion (payment voucher) and throw away the top portion (the letter detailing your tax woes). Fris comes along and digs through your trash after you left it by the street (world readable files in world readable directories). He offers you a credit counseling service and a home equity loan and other financial offers. Says he can fix you up real nice if you pay him to.

You decide not to and apply for credit somewhere and they check your report and say your credit stinks. You cannot blame Fris and call him an extortionist because he won't help you with your debt unless you pay him to do so.

He also didn't trespass (hack you) because he access information that in its current form was publically available.

He never hacked you and you obviously don't know what hacking is.





V_RocKs gets a letter in the mail from the IRS saying he owes money pay up. He removes the bottom portion (payment voucher) and throw away the top portion (the letter detailing his tax woes). Fris comes along and digs through his trash after you left it by the street (world readable files in world readable directories). He offers you a credit counseling service and a home equity loan and other financial offers. Says he can fix you up real nice if you pay him to.

V_RocKs decides not to and then Fris places an ad in the paper letting everyone know that V_RocKs leaves his door unlocked.
He then stands at the door and holds it open so the whole town can come inside. V_RocKs calls the cops because strangers have entered his home with the help of poor ole Fris.

BradShaw 06-23-2005 03:32 PM

Evan, proof will be presented in due course. The evidence will be handled in criminal and civil court, not on GFY.

XPays 06-23-2005 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BradShaw
Evan, proof will be presented in due course. The evidence will be handled in criminal and civil court, not on GFY.

i think you are b.s.'ng

if anything criminal was done (which i do not believe) then good luck to you and XPays does not endorse any type of hacking and especially condemns the posting of private info on public forums.

on the flip-side, if you are bluffing then expect to never hear the end of it.

ninavain 06-23-2005 03:37 PM

classic :(

Shok 06-23-2005 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by XPays
i think you are b.s.'ng

if anything criminal was done (which i do not believe)


If I was walking down the street turning random doorknobs and came to your home and the door happened to be unlocked, then it would be legal for me to enter and look around?

Then publish items I found in your house to thousands of people?
Actually I think that is a criminal act, but I'm no lawyer.

XPays 06-23-2005 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shok
If I was walking down the street turning random doorknobs and came to your home and the door happened to be unlocked, then it would be legal for me to enter and look around?

Then publish items I found in your house to thousands of people?
Actually I think that is a criminal act, but I'm no lawyer.

hi shok,

the internet and publicly accessible webpages are not an apples to apples comparison so the question needs to be reworked.

i did consult a lawyer out of curiosity and brad should have thanked fris and not gotten emotional.

until there is proof- it's b.s.'s word vs. fris and fris' story is more credible based on everything published thus far.

XPays 06-23-2005 03:51 PM

here is a better comparison:

xpays uploads a new celeb video and forgets to set permissions on it in any way. surfers grab the file.

xpays has no recourse.

this ain't going to happen and has not happened btw.

BradShaw 06-23-2005 03:53 PM

Evan, I think you have smoked too much weed, fallen on too many skate ramps, and listened to shitty DJ music. All those brain cells.

Please do not sue me.

BradShaw 06-23-2005 03:54 PM

For the final time Evan, everything that happend on the server is not public info. It will be in the near future. You are talking to yourself.

sextoyking 06-23-2005 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by XPays
here is a better comparison:

xpays uploads a new celeb video and forgets to set permissions on it in any way. surfers grab the file.

xpays has no recourse.

this ain't going to happen and has not happened btw.


Unless you put it on a page saying here is a free video, etc I do belive you could go after people, at least try the movie studio deal where they want ip'
s of surfers d/ling wares, mp3's, etc.

If the celeb video wasn't put out the for the public and they some how found it in a public_html - web area, I still think they are infringing on (c) material??

Of course I am no lawyer....

XPays 06-23-2005 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BradShaw
Evan, I think you have smoked too much weed, fallen on too many skate ramps, and listened to shitty DJ music. All those brain cells.

Please do not sue me.

You are learning! Mazel!

XPays 06-23-2005 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sextoyking
Unless you put it on a page saying here is a free video, etc I do belive you could go after people, at least try the movie studio deal where they want ip'
s of surfers d/ling wares, mp3's, etc.

If the celeb video wasn't put out the for the public and they some how found it in a public_html - web area, I still think they are infringing on (c) material??

Of course I am no lawyer....

all you could do is demand take-down's. only if somebody repeatedly ignored you and failed to comply would you have even the start of a civil action.

dunefield 06-23-2005 03:58 PM

"Shaw said he has since made a report to the secret service and plans to prosecute McCoy."

errrr...

swami 06-23-2005 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ebus_dk
may I please visit your website?


idiot...

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

XPays 06-23-2005 04:04 PM

btw, brad - i am sitting on plenty of personal slams on you but will stick with the business slams. and, you are not qualified to debate tech with me fyi.

i have dirt on you but who needs it when you dig your own holes deep enough yourself.

XPays 06-23-2005 04:06 PM

in case anyone is curious as to why i continue on this anti trail. i never forgave brad for trying to assualt juicy that time.

V_RocKs 06-23-2005 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by XPays
here is a better comparison:

xpays uploads a new celeb video and forgets to set permissions on it in any way. surfers grab the file.

xpays has no recourse.

this ain't going to happen and has not happened btw.

Awesome example...

Brad, you are so full of horse shit that I think you actually have started to think you are riding on a pig in Israel....

will76 06-23-2005 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AlienQ
I will give you two fucking guesses why I am here.


Sorry I couldn't help myself. I will take you up on those guesses:

1. You have no clients and no work to do so you are here because you are bord?
2. You thought this thread was a contest? :1orglaugh

Too bad you didn't say 10 guesses, i have more....

ok, I am done, carry on.

nofx 06-23-2005 06:30 PM

fris fucking rocks, ES sucks

one - five - zero

GigoloJustin 06-23-2005 06:35 PM

I want a break down of ES compared to NATS - Goods and Bads of both. Hook A WiGGA Up yO

will76 06-23-2005 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sextoyking
Unless you put it on a page saying here is a free video, etc I do belive you could go after people, at least try the movie studio deal where they want ip'
s of surfers d/ling wares, mp3's, etc.

If the celeb video wasn't put out the for the public and they some how found it in a public_html - web area, I still think they are infringing on (c) material??

Of course I am no lawyer....


Big difference.. No one "took" any info from Brad's server. He didn't steal or download content, etc.. All he did was point to a public URL.

On the net any url that is not password protected is public. What if Google happen to spider his unsecure pages, would he sue google too.

To use your example earlier with with people checking door nobs for unlocked doors. What Fris did was post the address of someone's house that had a door unlocked. Saying, 123 Park St. has an unlocked door is not a crime. But thats even a bad example since the house is on private property and unsecured url has no expectation of privacy.

GigoloJustin 06-23-2005 06:44 PM

There is no way im reading this whole thread, but I will see that it was fucking AWESOME of Fabian to not jump on the chance to bash a competitor.

GonZo 06-23-2005 07:43 PM

Wonder it John wants a free security audit?

BradShaw 06-23-2005 08:21 PM

Gonzo, I am sure Kevin will appreciate you associating him with hacking. You may want to check with his probation officer before I do.

fireorange 06-23-2005 09:28 PM

:warning

GonZo 06-23-2005 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BradShaw
Gonzo, I am sure Kevin will appreciate you associating him with hacking. You may want to check with his probation officer before I do.

Feel free Brad. Personally if I were you Id be plugging the rest of the holes we both know you have. You know someone will be auditing your clients next. What will method of deflection will you use then?

Talk that smack to Fris and AVN. It doesnt fly with me.

newbreed 06-23-2005 09:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GonZo
Feel free Brad. Personally if I were you Id be plugging the rest of the holes we both know you have. You know someone will be auditing your clients next. What will method of deflection will you use then?

Talk that smack to Fris and AVN. It doesnt fly with me.

There are that many obvious holes?

BradShaw 06-23-2005 09:33 PM

The only holes Gonzo knows are in his donuts.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:08 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123