Another dumb 2257 question - GoFuckYourself.com

Dailydiapers · 05-30-2005, 06:03 PM

Most of my sites are clothing fetish related, so the majority of the content is not "sexualy explicit" and shows no nudity. But some sets have topless women, and a few sets are sexually explicit.

So, my dumb question is... do I need 2257 paperwork for everything on the site, or just the 'actually sexually explicit' portions?

kernelpanic · 05-30-2005, 06:05 PM

2257 regulations cover sexually explicit material, champ. If its a picture of a clothed model, no 2257 needed. If she's shoving a 2' hickory smoked summer sausage up her ass, be sure to get the 2257 info for that.

69pornlinks · 05-30-2005, 06:07 PM

talk with a lawyer, i would take anyone else advice with a grain of salt

69pornlinks · 05-30-2005, 06:08 PM

.....8 ....

Dailydiapers · 05-30-2005, 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kernelpanic

2257 regulations cover sexually explicit material, champ. If its a picture of a clothed model, no 2257 needed. If she's shoving a 2' hickory smoked summer sausage up her ass, be sure to get the 2257 info for that.

That's what I thought - and will check with a lawyer - I just don't trust the government, so wasn't sure if they had a "one rotten apple" rule where everything had to be covered if even one image was sexually explicit.

Dailydiapers · 05-30-2005, 06:10 PM

Also.... is there a definition for "sexually explicit" yet or is it still a 'community standard' thing?

kernelpanic · 05-30-2005, 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dailydiapers

Also.... is there a definition for "sexually explicit" yet or is it still a 'community standard' thing?

It is specifically defined in a paragraph of legalese.....just look at the regs.

tony286 · 05-30-2005, 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kernelpanic

2257 regulations cover sexually explicit material, champ. If its a picture of a clothed model, no 2257 needed. If she's shoving a 2' hickory smoked summer sausage up her ass, be sure to get the 2257 info for that.

with her pants on or off lol

JD · 05-30-2005, 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kernelpanic

......If she's shoving a 2' hickory smoked summer sausage up her ass, .............

hahahhHAhhahHAHhhHAhhhahahahhHAHhahaha a

CHMOD · 05-30-2005, 06:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dailydiapers

Also.... is there a definition for "sexually explicit" yet or is it still a 'community standard' thing?

[sarcastic]

If you consider that Clinton never had
any sexual relationship with Miss Lewinsky, you should be ok.

[/sarcastic]

Dailydiapers · 05-30-2005, 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CHMOD

[sarcastic]

If you consider that Clinton never had
any sexual relationship with Miss Lewinsky, you should be ok.

[/sarcastic]

LOL, good point.

$5 submissions · 05-30-2005, 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dailydiapers

Most of my sites are clothing fetish related, so the majority of the content is not "sexualy explicit" and shows no nudity. But some sets have topless women, and a few sets are sexually explicit.

So, my dumb question is... do I need 2257 paperwork for everything on the site, or just the 'actually sexually explicit' portions?

Just the sexually explicit portions. Segregate these materials into a link. As mentioned before, consult with an attorney.

Sarah_Jayne · 05-31-2005, 03:18 AM

I mostly do clothing fetish sites too and I am still going to comply even for those pics because I don't want to find out later that some court thinks her nipples were too erect or something. If I just do it across the board life will hopefully be easier.

05-30-2005, 06:03 PM	#1
Dailydiapers Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: USA Posts: 1,079	Another dumb 2257 question Most of my sites are clothing fetish related, so the majority of the content is not "sexualy explicit" and shows no nudity. But some sets have topless women, and a few sets are sexually explicit. So, my dumb question is... do I need 2257 paperwork for everything on the site, or just the 'actually sexually explicit' portions? __________________ Mike http://www.dailydiapers.com/

05-30-2005, 06:05 PM	#2
kernelpanic Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 2,961	2257 regulations cover sexually explicit material, champ. If its a picture of a clothed model, no 2257 needed. If she's shoving a 2' hickory smoked summer sausage up her ass, be sure to get the 2257 info for that. __________________ ZangoCash - Turn Your Traffic Into Ca$h. $.40 Per Install - No Tier

05-30-2005, 06:07 PM	#3
69pornlinks Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Heranus Posts: 5,560	talk with a lawyer, i would take anyone else advice with a grain of salt __________________ It IS what it IS

05-30-2005, 06:08 PM	#4
69pornlinks Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Heranus Posts: 5,560	.....8 .... __________________ It IS what it IS Last edited by 69pornlinks; 05-30-2005 at 06:08 PM.. Reason: double post

05-30-2005, 06:10 PM	#6
Dailydiapers Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: USA Posts: 1,079	Also.... is there a definition for "sexually explicit" yet or is it still a 'community standard' thing? __________________ Mike http://www.dailydiapers.com/

05-31-2005, 03:18 AM	#13
Sarah_Jayne Now with more Jayne Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 40,077	I mostly do clothing fetish sites too and I am still going to comply even for those pics because I don't want to find out later that some court thinks her nipples were too erect or something. If I just do it across the board life will hopefully be easier.