Open to Opinions - 18USC2257 IDS - GoFuckYourself.com

fetishpix · 05-30-2005, 02:34 PM

DON?T PUT YOU LIFE AT STAKE!

In view of the recent changes in federal law pertaining to the recording by the adult industry of personal identification as defined in 18 USC 2257, your safety may be at risk! If you have performed as an adult entertainer since 1993, you may be at severe risk and may be vulnerable to identity theft, stalkers and assault.

With the approval of changes to the regulations implementing 18 USC 2257on May 23rd, 2005, all primary producers of adult entertainment are now required to give away unedited copies of your personal identification to anyone the Government deems to be a secondary producer!

Who is a Primary Producer?

?(c) Producer means any person, including any individual,
corporation, or other organization, who is a primary producer or a secondary producer.?

Who are secondary producers you may ask?

?(2) A secondary producer is any person who produces, assembles, manufactures, publishes, duplicates, reproduces, or reissues a book, magazine, periodical, film, videotape, digitally- or computer- manipulated image, picture, or other matter intended for commercial distribution that contains a visual depiction of an actual human being engaged in actual sexually explicit conduct, or who inserts on a computer site or service a digital image of, or otherwise manages the sexually explicit content of a computer site or service that contains a visual depiction of an actual human being engaged in actual sexually explicit conduct, including any person who enters into a contract, agreement, or conspiracy to do any of the foregoing.?

What is a secondary producer required to do with your personal identification:

?(b) A producer who is a secondary producer as defined in Sec. 75.1(c) may satisfy the requirements of this part to create and maintain records by accepting from the primary producer, as defined in Sec. 75.1(c), copies of the records described in paragraph (a) of this section. Such a secondary producer shall also keep records of the name and address of the primary producer from whom he received copies of the records.?

SAVE YOUR LIFE

If you have worked for any company that distributes ?content? for the Internet, that company is now required to provide unedited copies of your identification to ANYONE who purchases or licenses images of you that the producer distributes.

Think about it. Anyone that purchases a photo set from any of the hundreds of content distribution sites on the Internet will now be giving away your home address, Social Security Number or any other pertinent personal information published on the identification you provide.

The Government defines Identifications as the following:

?Sec. 75.1 Definitions.
(b) Picture identification card means a document issued by the United States, a State government or a political subdivision thereof, or a United States territory, that bears the photograph and the name of the individual identified, and provides sufficient specific information that it can be accessed from the issuing authority, such as a passport, Permanent Resident Card (commonly known as a ''Green Card''), or other employment authorization document issued by the United States, a driver's license issued by a State or the District of Columbia, or another form of identification issued by a State or the District of Columbia; or, a foreign government-issued equivalent of any of the documents listed above when both the person who is the subject of the picture identification card and the producer maintaining the required records are located outside the United States.?

What can you do to help protect yourself?

You can do a few things immediately.

The first we recommend is to immediately apply for a United States Passport! This is an acceptable Identification under Sec 75.1 of the Regulations and a

Passport DOES NOT contain the following information about you:
? No personal address listed on a Passport.
? No Social Security Number Published on a Passport.
? No Phone Numbers are published on a Passport

We recommend you get a Passport NOW!

A US Passport is easy to apply for and can be received in as little as week!

For information pertaining to getting an United States Passport:
http://travel.state.gov/passport/passport_1738.html

Simply follow this link and download the application:
http://travel.state.gov/passport/forms/forms_847.html

If you prefer to apply in person here is a link to the application requirements:
http://travel.state.gov/passport/get...first_830.html

Complete the application and take it with your Picture ID, Birth Certificate and other pertinent documents to a United State Post Office that accepts Passport Applications. Pay the Clerk for the service and wait for it to arrive in your mailbox!

As for your second identification we strongly urge you to carry a copy of your Birth Certificate.

This document contains no pertinent information except your date and country of birth. It shows nothing that will generally track back to you 18 years or more after the fact.

BE SAFE ? use these identifications and keep as much of your life personal and safe as possible.

NaughtyRob · 05-30-2005, 05:05 PM

Sounds like good advice to me.

dready · 05-30-2005, 05:12 PM

Makes sense.

Mutt · 05-30-2005, 05:17 PM

very good advice for girls.

Major (Tom) · 05-30-2005, 06:34 PM

agreed,

duke

wjxxx · 05-30-2005, 06:38 PM

sounds like really good idea

my2257 · 05-30-2005, 10:40 PM

Sixty-two commenters commented that revealing personal information
of performers, for example, in the form of their addresses on drivers'
licenses used as identification documents in compliance with this
regulation, is an invasion of performers' privacy and could lead to
identity theft or violent crimes. Forty commenters commented that
including the names and addresses of businesses where the records at
issue are located would similarly lead to crimes against those
businesses. The Department declines to adopt these comments. While the
Department is certainly concerned about possible crimes against
performers and businesses that employ them, the necessity of
maintaining these records to ensure that children are not exploited
outweighs these concerns. Furthermore, specifically regarding personal
information about performers required to be provided to primary
producers, the Department notes that the information required is no
different from that required by other forms of employee or business
records, such as social security numbers and dates of birth required
for tax reporting purposes, emergency contact numbers in case of health
problems, or addresses used to transmit paychecks. Regarding
information about producers, such as their physical location, that
those producers must include in their statements, the Department notes
that producers are already required, under the current Part 75
regulations, to include that information. Finally, regarding personal
information about performers that must be transmitted to secondary
producers, the Department again notes, first, that such information is
already required by the current Part 75 regulations, and, second, that
none of the commenters presented any evidence that a hypothetically
possible crime, such as the stalking of a performer, was in any way
tied to the dissemination of the information about a performer provided
to a producer in compliance with Part 75.

my2257 · 05-30-2005, 10:44 PM

THIS SHOULD SCARE ALL TALENT

The Department declines to adopt these comments. While the
Department is certainly concerned about possible crimes against
performers and businesses that employ them, the necessity of
maintaining these records to ensure that children are not exploited
outweighs these concerns.

Webby · 05-30-2005, 10:57 PM

OK.. Cummon and quit the crap!! :-) WTF has this got to do with protecting children??

Sadly is it little more than a fucking fantasy dream't up by a mentally retarded control freak and, because it is the US and everyone in the US instantly thinks "Is it legal?" each time they breath, - these assholes are actually accepted.

Got news for ya! Next month Fed Govt is gonna cut off your bollocks as part of a DNA sample for a new National ID system. You know the enormous benefits? No more identity theft blah... So, can you please make yourself available for the bollocks removal surgery?

Webby · 05-30-2005, 11:17 PM

OK.. I'm gonna add to the post above...

(a) The US DOJ never once since the 90's when 2257 was introduced, instigated one action under this code for the protection of children. How many years do they need to act???

(b) Six months ago, for the first time ever, the Govt that was so concerned about exploited children, actually handed over a pedo body for trial in another nation. That was after over two years of "negotiation" and finally a threat of embarassing them internationally.

(c) Currently.. least one's I know of.. there are two specific cases regarding child abuse/pedo shit placed into the hands of US law enforcement. It is agreed these matters are offenses. What have they done (after about 50 phone calls chasing em up)??? FUCK ALL.

For fuck's sake... are they now claiming they have an interest in children? If they do, - they are utter hypocrites.

Why the hell should anyone (apart from US citizen's) pay the slightest attention to the utter crap from the US Admin/DOJ when they can't even clean up their own backyard.

It's personal... but I do put the values of children above any US/DOJ bullshit or the porn industry as a whole.

Sarah_Jayne · 05-31-2005, 03:10 AM

as much as I value a child, I don't see why the life of someone that might be a mother or father and is caring for a child is less valued?

05-30-2005, 02:34 PM	#1
fetishpix Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: San Diego, CA Posts: 100	Open to Opinions - 18USC2257 IDS DON?T PUT YOU LIFE AT STAKE! In view of the recent changes in federal law pertaining to the recording by the adult industry of personal identification as defined in 18 USC 2257, your safety may be at risk! If you have performed as an adult entertainer since 1993, you may be at severe risk and may be vulnerable to identity theft, stalkers and assault. With the approval of changes to the regulations implementing 18 USC 2257on May 23rd, 2005, all primary producers of adult entertainment are now required to give away unedited copies of your personal identification to anyone the Government deems to be a secondary producer! Who is a Primary Producer? ?(c) Producer means any person, including any individual, corporation, or other organization, who is a primary producer or a secondary producer.? Who are secondary producers you may ask? ?(2) A secondary producer is any person who produces, assembles, manufactures, publishes, duplicates, reproduces, or reissues a book, magazine, periodical, film, videotape, digitally- or computer- manipulated image, picture, or other matter intended for commercial distribution that contains a visual depiction of an actual human being engaged in actual sexually explicit conduct, or who inserts on a computer site or service a digital image of, or otherwise manages the sexually explicit content of a computer site or service that contains a visual depiction of an actual human being engaged in actual sexually explicit conduct, including any person who enters into a contract, agreement, or conspiracy to do any of the foregoing.? What is a secondary producer required to do with your personal identification: ?(b) A producer who is a secondary producer as defined in Sec. 75.1(c) may satisfy the requirements of this part to create and maintain records by accepting from the primary producer, as defined in Sec. 75.1(c), copies of the records described in paragraph (a) of this section. Such a secondary producer shall also keep records of the name and address of the primary producer from whom he received copies of the records.? SAVE YOUR LIFE If you have worked for any company that distributes ?content? for the Internet, that company is now required to provide unedited copies of your identification to ANYONE who purchases or licenses images of you that the producer distributes. Think about it. Anyone that purchases a photo set from any of the hundreds of content distribution sites on the Internet will now be giving away your home address, Social Security Number or any other pertinent personal information published on the identification you provide. The Government defines Identifications as the following: ?Sec. 75.1 Definitions. (b) Picture identification card means a document issued by the United States, a State government or a political subdivision thereof, or a United States territory, that bears the photograph and the name of the individual identified, and provides sufficient specific information that it can be accessed from the issuing authority, such as a passport, Permanent Resident Card (commonly known as a ''Green Card''), or other employment authorization document issued by the United States, a driver's license issued by a State or the District of Columbia, or another form of identification issued by a State or the District of Columbia; or, a foreign government-issued equivalent of any of the documents listed above when both the person who is the subject of the picture identification card and the producer maintaining the required records are located outside the United States.? What can you do to help protect yourself? You can do a few things immediately. The first we recommend is to immediately apply for a United States Passport! This is an acceptable Identification under Sec 75.1 of the Regulations and a Passport DOES NOT contain the following information about you: ? No personal address listed on a Passport. ? No Social Security Number Published on a Passport. ? No Phone Numbers are published on a Passport We recommend you get a Passport NOW! A US Passport is easy to apply for and can be received in as little as week! For information pertaining to getting an United States Passport: http://travel.state.gov/passport/passport_1738.html Simply follow this link and download the application: http://travel.state.gov/passport/forms/forms_847.html If you prefer to apply in person here is a link to the application requirements: http://travel.state.gov/passport/get...first_830.html Complete the application and take it with your Picture ID, Birth Certificate and other pertinent documents to a United State Post Office that accepts Passport Applications. Pay the Clerk for the service and wait for it to arrive in your mailbox! As for your second identification we strongly urge you to carry a copy of your Birth Certificate. This document contains no pertinent information except your date and country of birth. It shows nothing that will generally track back to you 18 years or more after the fact. BE SAFE ? use these identifications and keep as much of your life personal and safe as possible.

05-30-2005, 05:05 PM	#2
NaughtyRob Two fresh affiliate progs Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Inside teen pussy Posts: 29,602	Sounds like good advice to me. __________________ [email protected] Skype: 17026955414 Vacares Web Hosting - Protect Your Ass with Included Daily Backups

05-30-2005, 05:12 PM	#3
dready Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Toronto, ON Posts: 5,247	Makes sense. __________________ ICQ: 91139591

05-30-2005, 05:17 PM	#4
Mutt Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 34,431	very good advice for girls. __________________ I moved my sites to Vacares Hosting. I've saved money, my hair is thicker, lost some weight too! Thanks Sly!

05-30-2005, 06:34 PM	#5
Major (Tom) Boomer Woffen Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Null Posts: 30,553	agreed, duke __________________ My mother said, to get things done You'd better not mess with Major Tom

05-30-2005, 06:38 PM	#6
wjxxx So Fucking Banned Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 4,448	sounds like really good idea

05-30-2005, 10:40 PM	#7
my2257 Confirmed User Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 110	Sixty-two commenters commented that revealing personal information of performers, for example, in the form of their addresses on drivers' licenses used as identification documents in compliance with this regulation, is an invasion of performers' privacy and could lead to identity theft or violent crimes. Forty commenters commented that including the names and addresses of businesses where the records at issue are located would similarly lead to crimes against those businesses. The Department declines to adopt these comments. While the Department is certainly concerned about possible crimes against performers and businesses that employ them, the necessity of maintaining these records to ensure that children are not exploited outweighs these concerns. Furthermore, specifically regarding personal information about performers required to be provided to primary producers, the Department notes that the information required is no different from that required by other forms of employee or business records, such as social security numbers and dates of birth required for tax reporting purposes, emergency contact numbers in case of health problems, or addresses used to transmit paychecks. Regarding information about producers, such as their physical location, that those producers must include in their statements, the Department notes that producers are already required, under the current Part 75 regulations, to include that information. Finally, regarding personal information about performers that must be transmitted to secondary producers, the Department again notes, first, that such information is already required by the current Part 75 regulations, and, second, that none of the commenters presented any evidence that a hypothetically possible crime, such as the stalking of a performer, was in any way tied to the dissemination of the information about a performer provided to a producer in compliance with Part 75.

05-30-2005, 10:44 PM	#8
my2257 Confirmed User Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 110	THIS SHOULD SCARE ALL TALENT The Department declines to adopt these comments. While the Department is certainly concerned about possible crimes against performers and businesses that employ them, the necessity of maintaining these records to ensure that children are not exploited outweighs these concerns.

05-30-2005, 10:57 PM	#9
Webby Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Far far away - as possible Posts: 14,956	OK.. Cummon and quit the crap!! :-) WTF has this got to do with protecting children?? Sadly is it little more than a fucking fantasy dream't up by a mentally retarded control freak and, because it is the US and everyone in the US instantly thinks "Is it legal?" each time they breath, - these assholes are actually accepted. Got news for ya! Next month Fed Govt is gonna cut off your bollocks as part of a DNA sample for a new National ID system. You know the enormous benefits? No more identity theft blah... So, can you please make yourself available for the bollocks removal surgery? __________________ XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.

05-30-2005, 11:17 PM	#10
Webby Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Far far away - as possible Posts: 14,956	OK.. I'm gonna add to the post above... (a) The US DOJ never once since the 90's when 2257 was introduced, instigated one action under this code for the protection of children. How many years do they need to act??? (b) Six months ago, for the first time ever, the Govt that was so concerned about exploited children, actually handed over a pedo body for trial in another nation. That was after over two years of "negotiation" and finally a threat of embarassing them internationally. (c) Currently.. least one's I know of.. there are two specific cases regarding child abuse/pedo shit placed into the hands of US law enforcement. It is agreed these matters are offenses. What have they done (after about 50 phone calls chasing em up)??? FUCK ALL. For fuck's sake... are they now claiming they have an interest in children? If they do, - they are utter hypocrites. Why the hell should anyone (apart from US citizen's) pay the slightest attention to the utter crap from the US Admin/DOJ when they can't even clean up their own backyard. It's personal... but I do put the values of children above any US/DOJ bullshit or the porn industry as a whole. __________________ XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.

05-31-2005, 03:10 AM	#11
Sarah_Jayne Now with more Jayne Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 40,077	as much as I value a child, I don't see why the life of someone that might be a mother or father and is caring for a child is less valued?