|
|
|
||||
|
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
rockin tha trailerpark
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2001
Location: ~Coastal~
Posts: 23,088
|
Which sponsors will be offering full ID info for webmasters?
So who will be sending out ID packets to webmasters in order to comply with this new bullshit....is it even possible?
It doesn't bother me, i work with all text for the most part, but in the future should i decide to do things other than seo/optin-mailers etc. i'd like to know who will be there to step it up & take care of my needs? Anyone started to make plans on how to keep their affiliates in the U.S. as of yet?
__________________
__________ Loadedca$h - get sum! - Revengebucks - mmm rebills! - webair (gotz sErVrz)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Too old to care
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
|
A good question.
Some licenses from content providers do not allow the sponsor to give out the 2257 documentation. The next few months will be interesting. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Sick Fuck
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: www
Posts: 9,491
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,027
|
Quote:
how can anyone ask for id's is there are no images? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
ICQ- five seven 0 2 5 5 0
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 10,747
|
Quote:
ok counselor... so sure RICO & parts of 2257 can get someone on conspiracy shit, but unless you're hosting/publishing 'sexually explicit' content how would this affect a text link? I'd love to hear more on this... how about text links or redirects to non-nude pages? Are those not safe in your opinion? interesting...
__________________
Investor with 5m - 15m USD to invest. Do you have a site or network of sites earning 50k - 200k a month income? Email your contact and preliminary data to: domain.cashventures (at) gmail.com....Please...no tire kickers...serious offers and inquiries only. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Sick Fuck
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: www
Posts: 9,491
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
GFY Chaperone
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Adult.com
Posts: 9,846
|
You can safely promote RealityCash, we are ready for the new regulations and have all of they records online to give to affiliates as soon as it is required.
See sig. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: ThatOneProgram.com
Posts: 9,898
|
Quote:
Oh, and nice job on keeping shit straight and ready with RC!
__________________
Want to promote SUCCUBUS? Click HERE!!!! | Want to buy SUCCUBUS? Click HERE!!!! Yeah, yeah, you know, That One Program! | Want to trade links with StompBunny.com? Loryn (3:16 PM): I love it, just as long as we keep the bedroom door closed from all ears then we can have throw down hard core sex that makes us money haha fuck it we can have sex on money never did that before |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Sick Fuck
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: www
Posts: 9,491
|
Quote:
But what I mean, is that if you textlink to a website/FHG for commercial purposes, it makes you an advertiser, as defined in § 2256. Further, if the sponsor don't comply with the new § 2257, you should have reason to believe that the site could be illegal. That can get you in trouble, because § 2251 then apply to you, no matter if you use text or image links. This is common sense and not new. I think the new 2257 makes it even easier to use 2251 against you. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,027
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
rockin tha trailerpark
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2001
Location: ~Coastal~
Posts: 23,088
|
Quote:
Awsome! I'll be running dating sites & pushing reality cash. Biotchs ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,042
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
rockin tha trailerpark
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2001
Location: ~Coastal~
Posts: 23,088
|
bump........
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Registered User
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 7,760
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,042
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: PEI, Canada
Posts: 6,924
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Oh Canada!
Posts: 3,662
|
Quote:
A sad day for talent indeed. When the lifeless bodies of our models start turning up, I hope that webmasters will be more sympathetic than the US gov ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Too lazy to set a custom title
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Currently Incognito
Posts: 13,827
|
Quote:
__________________
It's all disambiguation ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Programming King Pin
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Montreal
Posts: 27,360
|
Quote:
__________________
UUGallery Builder - automated photo/video gallery plugin for Wordpress! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
So Fucking Banned
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Vancouver, CANADA
Posts: 263
|
While we won't be able to keep US webmasters fully compliant we will be able to offer them options to reduce their risk to a great degree.
Watch for a new program to hit if these 2257 regulations break. Anybody that wants to get on the mailing list for advance info & updates can hit me up at natemm AT shaw.ca Will keep everyone posted in good time. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
So Fucking Banned
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Vancouver, CANADA
Posts: 263
|
Just to add, those 'options' mentioned in the above post won't include going all softcore or switching to text links. You will be able to run your business in the same way you did before the new regulations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
So Fucking Banned
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Vancouver, CANADA
Posts: 263
|
You won't have to keep any records at your place of business either, or post that info on the web.
This is a great option for affiliates that work from home and would like to keep their privacy intact. Sorry about the multiple posts, damn 3-minute post editing rule... |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Metalcash.com
Posts: 3,580
|
Quote:
edit: Ahh... "records online to give to affiliates as soon as it is required." me = blind |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 2,944
|
Quote:
I don't think so. I don't think you would want to rely on online records either (such as someone else proposed in this thread), at least not before seeing a positive outcome from at least one case involving such records. It may well be that some of the "creative" solutions coming from sponsors and content producers could prove acceptable, but who wants the risk they will face if they are unlucky enough to be a test case? Even a successful defendant will face serious financial costs in taking on the federal government. I don't believe that the content producer - purely for example - who says he is going to black out the parts of documents that he doesn't consider relevant, is really facing up to the situation (assuming the new laws do largely reflect the initial proposals). I'm sure as heck not going to risk being hauled off just so that he can go on doing business almost as normal. Sure it doesn't specifically say that you cannot black out someone's name and address - again for example - but do we seriously expect investigators to be satisfied with documents showing only a stage name and birthdate? Ditto online records: if the regs say they want to be able to visit my workplace and check my records, is it really likely I can pass them on to someone a thousand miles away? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
So Fucking Banned
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Vancouver, CANADA
Posts: 263
|
Quote:
The practical matter here is that even if some sponsors are willing to provide all required documentation there are some affiliates that don't want to be responsible for the record-keeping requirements and do not want the DOJ given full permission to enter their homes to check on records on any given day out of the year. We are trying to offer something to these webmasters while leaving them at as close to no risk as we possibly can. We will not be doing ANY reporting to the US government agencies and will not be providing model documentation for inspection to any US government agencies either. |
|
|
|
|