Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar Mark Forums Read
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 05-20-2005, 09:21 PM   #1
pr0
rockin tha trailerpark
 
pr0's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2001
Location: ~Coastal~
Posts: 23,088
Which sponsors will be offering full ID info for webmasters?

So who will be sending out ID packets to webmasters in order to comply with this new bullshit....is it even possible?

It doesn't bother me, i work with all text for the most part, but in the future should i decide to do things other than seo/optin-mailers etc. i'd like to know who will be there to step it up & take care of my needs?

Anyone started to make plans on how to keep their affiliates in the U.S. as of yet?
pr0 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2005, 11:27 PM   #2
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
A good question.

Some licenses from content providers do not allow the sponsor to give out the 2257 documentation.

The next few months will be interesting.
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2005, 12:03 AM   #3
Dirty Dane
Sick Fuck
 
Dirty Dane's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: www
Posts: 9,491
Quote:
Originally Posted by pr0
It doesn't bother me, i work with all text for the most part..
You really think text links will keep you out of jail? That is naive.
Dirty Dane is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2005, 12:17 AM   #4
clickhappy
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,027
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirty Dane
You really think text links will keep you out of jail? That is naive.
why? youre not hosting porn images on your site, only hyperlinks.
how can anyone ask for id's is there are no images?
clickhappy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2005, 12:24 AM   #5
TheJimmy
ICQ- five seven 0 2 5 5 0
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 10,747
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirty Dane
You really think text links will keep you out of jail? That is naive.

ok counselor...

so sure RICO & parts of 2257 can get someone on conspiracy shit, but unless you're hosting/publishing 'sexually explicit' content how would this affect a text link?

I'd love to hear more on this...

how about text links or redirects to non-nude pages? Are those not safe in your opinion?

interesting...
__________________
Investor with 5m - 15m USD to invest. Do you have a site or network of sites earning 50k - 200k a month income? Email your contact and preliminary data to: domain.cashventures (at) gmail.com....Please...no tire kickers...serious offers and inquiries only.
TheJimmy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2005, 12:27 AM   #6
Dirty Dane
Sick Fuck
 
Dirty Dane's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: www
Posts: 9,491
Quote:
Originally Posted by clickhappy
why? youre not hosting porn images on your site, only hyperlinks.
how can anyone ask for id's is there are no images?
§ 2251 still apply to you, as defined in § 2256. And with even harder penalties.
Dirty Dane is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2005, 12:41 AM   #7
Lensman
GFY Chaperone
 
Lensman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Adult.com
Posts: 9,846
You can safely promote RealityCash, we are ready for the new regulations and have all of they records online to give to affiliates as soon as it is required.

See sig.
Lensman is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2005, 12:43 AM   #8
newbreed
Confirmed User
 
newbreed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: ThatOneProgram.com
Posts: 9,898
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lensman
You can safely promote RealityCash, we are ready for the new regulations and have all of they records online to give to affiliates as soon as it is required.

See sig.
Juciy is a sexy mofo.

Oh, and nice job on keeping shit straight and ready with RC!
__________________

Loryn ‎(3:16 PM):
I love it, just as long as we keep the bedroom door closed from all ears then we can have throw down hard core sex that makes us money haha
fuck it we can have sex on money never did that before
newbreed is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2005, 12:53 AM   #9
Dirty Dane
Sick Fuck
 
Dirty Dane's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: www
Posts: 9,491
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheJimmy
ok counselor...

so sure RICO & parts of 2257 can get someone on conspiracy shit, but unless you're hosting/publishing 'sexually explicit' content how would this affect a text link?

I'd love to hear more on this...

how about text links or redirects to non-nude pages? Are those not safe in your opinion?

interesting...
Non-nude pages should be safe, as long they are not sexually explicit.

But what I mean, is that if you textlink to a website/FHG for commercial purposes, it makes you an advertiser, as defined in § 2256.
Further, if the sponsor don't comply with the new § 2257, you should have reason to believe that the site could be illegal. That can get you in trouble, because § 2251 then apply to you, no matter if you use text or image links.

This is common sense and not new. I think the new 2257 makes it even easier to use 2251 against you.

Last edited by Dirty Dane; 05-21-2005 at 12:55 AM..
Dirty Dane is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2005, 01:04 AM   #10
clickhappy
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,027
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lensman
You can safely promote RealityCash, we are ready for the new regulations and have all of they records online to give to affiliates as soon as it is required.

See sig.
Awesome. Its nice to finally get some good news in all of this.
clickhappy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2005, 06:57 AM   #11
pr0
rockin tha trailerpark
 
pr0's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2001
Location: ~Coastal~
Posts: 23,088
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lensman
You can safely promote RealityCash, we are ready for the new regulations and have all of they records online to give to affiliates as soon as it is required.

See sig.

Awsome!

I'll be running dating sites & pushing reality cash.

Biotchs
pr0 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2005, 07:01 AM   #12
xxxice
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,042
Quote:
Originally Posted by pr0
So who will be sending out ID packets to webmasters in order to comply with this new bullshit....is it even possible?

It doesn't bother me, i work with all text for the most part, but in the future should i decide to do things other than seo/optin-mailers etc. i'd like to know who will be there to step it up & take care of my needs?

Anyone started to make plans on how to keep their affiliates in the U.S. as of yet?
i am all text too could you contact me when you have a chance
xxxice is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2005, 07:10 AM   #13
pr0
rockin tha trailerpark
 
pr0's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2001
Location: ~Coastal~
Posts: 23,088
bump........
pr0 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2005, 07:24 AM   #14
andrej_NDC
Registered User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 7,760
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirty Dane
You really think text links will keep you out of jail? That is naive.
the lawsuit against google would be funny
andrej_NDC is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2005, 07:26 AM   #15
xxxice
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,042
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirty Dane
You really think text links will keep you out of jail? That is naive.
Yes I do!
xxxice is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2005, 07:27 AM   #16
chadglni
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: PEI, Canada
Posts: 6,924
Quote:
Originally Posted by andrej_NDC
the lawsuit against google would be funny
Heh, I'm just gonna establish "service provider" status for all my sites.
chadglni is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2005, 07:55 AM   #17
emmanuelle
Confirmed User
 
emmanuelle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Oh Canada!
Posts: 3,662
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lensman
have all of they records online to give to affiliates as soon as it is required.

See sig.

A sad day for talent indeed. When the lifeless bodies of our models start turning up, I hope that webmasters will be more sympathetic than the US gov
emmanuelle is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2005, 12:22 PM   #18
TheDoc
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
TheDoc's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Currently Incognito
Posts: 13,827
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lensman
You can safely promote RealityCash, we are ready for the new regulations and have all of they records online to give to affiliates as soon as it is required.

See sig.
I'm not being an ass or trying to call you out, but are you saying that you are fully compliant? I was under the impression that a huge source of your content is shot outside of the United States. Does that mean you have a passport for every model?
__________________
~TheDoc - ICQ7765825
It's all disambiguation
TheDoc is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2005, 12:27 PM   #19
Basic_man
Programming King Pin
 
Basic_man's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Montreal
Posts: 27,360
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lensman
You can safely promote RealityCash, we are ready for the new regulations and have all of they records online to give to affiliates as soon as it is required.

See sig.
Reality Cash rocks big time ! See sig
__________________
UUGallery Builder - automated photo/video gallery plugin for Wordpress!
Stop looking! Checkout Naked Hosting, online since 1999 !
Basic_man is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2005, 01:58 PM   #20
Nate-MM2
So Fucking Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Vancouver, CANADA
Posts: 263
While we won't be able to keep US webmasters fully compliant we will be able to offer them options to reduce their risk to a great degree.

Watch for a new program to hit if these 2257 regulations break.

Anybody that wants to get on the mailing list for advance info & updates can hit me up at natemm AT shaw.ca

Will keep everyone posted in good time.
Nate-MM2 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2005, 02:09 PM   #21
Nate-MM2
So Fucking Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Vancouver, CANADA
Posts: 263
Just to add, those 'options' mentioned in the above post won't include going all softcore or switching to text links. You will be able to run your business in the same way you did before the new regulations.
Nate-MM2 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2005, 02:12 PM   #22
Nate-MM2
So Fucking Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Vancouver, CANADA
Posts: 263
You won't have to keep any records at your place of business either, or post that info on the web.

This is a great option for affiliates that work from home and would like to keep their privacy intact.

Sorry about the multiple posts, damn 3-minute post editing rule...
Nate-MM2 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2005, 02:13 PM   #23
uvort
Confirmed User
 
uvort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Metalcash.com
Posts: 3,580
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lensman
You can safely promote RealityCash, we are ready for the new regulations and have all of they records online to give to affiliates as soon as it is required.

See sig.
Where can this be found in your affiliate area?

edit: Ahh... "records online to give to affiliates as soon as it is required."

me = blind

__________________
See Sig.
199907143

Last edited by uvort; 05-21-2005 at 02:14 PM..
uvort is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2005, 02:45 PM   #24
jayeff
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 2,944
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nate-MM2
While we won't be able to keep US webmasters fully compliant...
Be honest, if you were a US webmaster facing (if I remember the proposals correctly) 5 years imprisonment for a first offense, would you be satisfied with something which only offered to "reduce the risk"?

I don't think so. I don't think you would want to rely on online records either (such as someone else proposed in this thread), at least not before seeing a positive outcome from at least one case involving such records. It may well be that some of the "creative" solutions coming from sponsors and content producers could prove acceptable, but who wants the risk they will face if they are unlucky enough to be a test case? Even a successful defendant will face serious financial costs in taking on the federal government.

I don't believe that the content producer - purely for example - who says he is going to black out the parts of documents that he doesn't consider relevant, is really facing up to the situation (assuming the new laws do largely reflect the initial proposals). I'm sure as heck not going to risk being hauled off just so that he can go on doing business almost as normal. Sure it doesn't specifically say that you cannot black out someone's name and address - again for example - but do we seriously expect investigators to be satisfied with documents showing only a stage name and birthdate? Ditto online records: if the regs say they want to be able to visit my workplace and check my records, is it really likely I can pass them on to someone a thousand miles away?
jayeff is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2005, 03:12 PM   #25
Nate-MM2
So Fucking Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Vancouver, CANADA
Posts: 263
Quote:
Originally Posted by jayeff
Be honest, if you were a US webmaster facing (if I remember the proposals correctly) 5 years imprisonment for a first offense, would you be satisfied with something which only offered to "reduce the risk"?
I understand your concerns.

The practical matter here is that even if some sponsors are willing to provide all required documentation there are some affiliates that don't want to be responsible for the record-keeping requirements and do not want the DOJ given full permission to enter their homes to check on records on any given day out of the year.

We are trying to offer something to these webmasters while leaving them at as close to no risk as we possibly can.

We will not be doing ANY reporting to the US government agencies and will not be providing model documentation for inspection to any US government agencies either.
Nate-MM2 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks
Thread Tools



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.