Which sponsors will be offering full ID info for webmasters? - GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

X

pr0

rockin tha trailerpark

Join Date: May 2001

Posts: 23088
Share

Post
#1

Which sponsors will be offering full ID info for webmasters?

05-20-2005, 08:21 PM

So who will be sending out ID packets to webmasters in order to comply with this new bullshit....is it even possible?

It doesn't bother me, i work with all text for the most part, but in the future should i decide to do things other than seo/optin-mailers etc. i'd like to know who will be there to step it up & take care of my needs?

Anyone started to make plans on how to keep their affiliates in the U.S. as of yet?

__________
Loadedca$h - get sum! - Revengebucks - mmm rebills! - webair (gotz sErVrz)
Tags: None
Paul Markham

Too old to care

Join Date: Jun 2001

Posts: 52942
Share

Post
#2

05-20-2005, 10:27 PM

A good question.

Some licenses from content providers do not allow the sponsor to give out the 2257 documentation.

The next few months will be interesting.

Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70
Comment
Dirty Dane

Sick Fuck

Join Date: Feb 2004

Posts: 9491
Share

Post
#3

05-20-2005, 11:03 PM

Originally posted by pr0

It doesn't bother me, i work with all text for the most part..

You really think text links will keep you out of jail? That is naive.
Comment
clickhappy

Confirmed User

Join Date: Mar 2004

Posts: 4027
Share

Post
#4

05-20-2005, 11:17 PM

Originally posted by Dirty Dane

You really think text links will keep you out of jail? That is naive.

why? youre not hosting porn images on your site, only hyperlinks.
how can anyone ask for id's is there are no images?
Comment
TheJimmy

ICQ- five seven 0 2 5 5 0

Join Date: Jan 2001

Posts: 10747
Share

Post
#5

05-20-2005, 11:24 PM

Originally posted by Dirty Dane

You really think text links will keep you out of jail? That is naive.

ok counselor...

so sure RICO & parts of 2257 can get someone on conspiracy shit, but unless you're hosting/publishing 'sexually explicit' content how would this affect a text link?

I'd love to hear more on this...

how about text links or redirects to non-nude pages? Are those not safe in your opinion?

interesting...

Investor with 5m - 15m USD to invest. Do you have a site or network of sites earning 50k - 200k a month income? Email your contact and preliminary data to: domain.cashventures (at) gmail.com....Please...no tire kickers...serious offers and inquiries only.
Comment
Dirty Dane

Sick Fuck

Join Date: Feb 2004

Posts: 9491
Share

Post
#6

05-20-2005, 11:27 PM

Originally posted by clickhappy

why? youre not hosting porn images on your site, only hyperlinks.
how can anyone ask for id's is there are no images?

§ 2251 still apply to you, as defined in § 2256. And with even harder penalties.
Comment
Lensman

GFY Chaperone

Join Date: Jan 2001

Posts: 9846
Share

Post
#7

05-20-2005, 11:41 PM

You can safely promote RealityCash, we are ready for the new regulations and have all of they records online to give to affiliates as soon as it is required.

See sig.
Comment
newbreed

Confirmed User

Join Date: Nov 2003

Posts: 9898
Share

Post
#8

05-20-2005, 11:43 PM

Originally posted by Lensman

You can safely promote RealityCash, we are ready for the new regulations and have all of they records online to give to affiliates as soon as it is required.

See sig.

Juciy is a sexy mofo.

Oh, and nice job on keeping shit straight and ready with RC!

Want to promote SUCCUBUS? Click HERE!!!! | Want to buy SUCCUBUS? Click HERE!!!!

Yeah, yeah, you know, That One Program! | Want to trade links with StompBunny.com?

Loryn ‎(3:16 PM):
I love it, just as long as we keep the bedroom door closed from all ears then we can have throw down hard core sex that makes us money haha
fuck it we can have sex on money never did that before
Comment
Dirty Dane

Sick Fuck

Join Date: Feb 2004

Posts: 9491
Share

Post
#9

05-20-2005, 11:53 PM

Originally posted by TheJimmy

ok counselor...

so sure RICO & parts of 2257 can get someone on conspiracy shit, but unless you're hosting/publishing 'sexually explicit' content how would this affect a text link?

I'd love to hear more on this...

how about text links or redirects to non-nude pages? Are those not safe in your opinion?

interesting...

Non-nude pages should be safe, as long they are not sexually explicit.

But what I mean, is that if you textlink to a website/FHG for commercial purposes, it makes you an advertiser, as defined in § 2256.
Further, if the sponsor don't comply with the new § 2257, you should have reason to believe that the site could be illegal. That can get you in trouble, because § 2251 then apply to you, no matter if you use text or image links.

This is common sense and not new. I think the new 2257 makes it even easier to use 2251 against you.

Last edited by Dirty Dane; 05-20-2005, 11:55 PM.
Comment
clickhappy

Confirmed User

Join Date: Mar 2004

Posts: 4027
Share

Post
#10

05-21-2005, 12:04 AM

Originally posted by Lensman

You can safely promote RealityCash, we are ready for the new regulations and have all of they records online to give to affiliates as soon as it is required.

See sig.

Awesome. Its nice to finally get some good news in all of this.
Comment
pr0

rockin tha trailerpark

Join Date: May 2001

Posts: 23088
Share

Post
#11

05-21-2005, 05:57 AM

Originally posted by Lensman

You can safely promote RealityCash, we are ready for the new regulations and have all of they records online to give to affiliates as soon as it is required.

See sig.

Awsome!

I'll be running dating sites & pushing reality cash.

Biotchs

__________
Loadedca$h - get sum! - Revengebucks - mmm rebills! - webair (gotz sErVrz)
Comment
xxxice

Confirmed User

Join Date: Feb 2002

Posts: 5042
Share

Post
#12

05-21-2005, 06:01 AM

Originally posted by pr0

So who will be sending out ID packets to webmasters in order to comply with this new bullshit....is it even possible?

It doesn't bother me, i work with all text for the most part, but in the future should i decide to do things other than seo/optin-mailers etc. i'd like to know who will be there to step it up & take care of my needs?

Anyone started to make plans on how to keep their affiliates in the U.S. as of yet?

i am all text too could you contact me when you have a chance
Comment
pr0

rockin tha trailerpark

Join Date: May 2001

Posts: 23088
Share

Post
#13

05-21-2005, 06:10 AM

bump........

__________
Loadedca$h - get sum! - Revengebucks - mmm rebills! - webair (gotz sErVrz)
Comment
andrej_NDC

Registered User

Join Date: May 2004

Posts: 7760
Share

Post
#14

05-21-2005, 06:24 AM

Originally posted by Dirty Dane

You really think text links will keep you out of jail? That is naive.

the lawsuit against google would be funny
Comment
xxxice

Confirmed User

Join Date: Feb 2002

Posts: 5042
Share

Post
#15

05-21-2005, 06:26 AM

Originally posted by Dirty Dane

You really think text links will keep you out of jail? That is naive.

Yes I do!
Comment
chadglni

Confirmed User

Join Date: Dec 2002

Posts: 6924
Share

Post
#16

05-21-2005, 06:27 AM

Originally posted by andrej_NDC

the lawsuit against google would be funny

Heh, I'm just gonna establish "service provider" status for all my sites.

Sign up here - Dating Site affiliate program
Comment
emmanuelle

Confirmed User

Join Date: Mar 2003

Posts: 3662
Share

Post
#17

05-21-2005, 06:55 AM

Originally posted by Lensman

have all of they records online to give to affiliates as soon as it is required.

See sig.

A sad day for talent indeed. When the lifeless bodies of our models start turning up, I hope that webmasters will be more sympathetic than the US gov
Comment
TheDoc

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Jul 2001

Posts: 13827
Share

Post
#18

05-21-2005, 11:22 AM

Originally posted by Lensman

You can safely promote RealityCash, we are ready for the new regulations and have all of they records online to give to affiliates as soon as it is required.

See sig.

I'm not being an ass or trying to call you out, but are you saying that you are fully compliant? I was under the impression that a huge source of your content is shot outside of the United States. Does that mean you have a passport for every model?

~TheDoc - ICQ7765825
It's all disambiguation
Comment
Basic_man

Programming King Pin

Join Date: Oct 2003

Posts: 27360
Share

Post
#19

05-21-2005, 11:27 AM

Originally posted by Lensman

You can safely promote RealityCash, we are ready for the new regulations and have all of they records online to give to affiliates as soon as it is required.

See sig.

Reality Cash rocks big time ! See sig

UUGallery Builder - automated photo/video gallery plugin for Wordpress!
Stop looking! Checkout Naked Hosting, online since 1999 !
Comment
Nate-MM2

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Sep 2002

Posts: 263
Share

Post
#20

05-21-2005, 12:58 PM

While we won't be able to keep US webmasters fully compliant we will be able to offer them options to reduce their risk to a great degree.

Watch for a new program to hit if these 2257 regulations break.

Anybody that wants to get on the mailing list for advance info & updates can hit me up at natemm AT shaw.ca

Will keep everyone posted in good time.
Comment
Nate-MM2

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Sep 2002

Posts: 263
Share

Post
#21

05-21-2005, 01:09 PM

Just to add, those 'options' mentioned in the above post won't include going all softcore or switching to text links. You will be able to run your business in the same way you did before the new regulations.
Comment
Nate-MM2

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Sep 2002

Posts: 263
Share

Post
#22

05-21-2005, 01:12 PM

You won't have to keep any records at your place of business either, or post that info on the web.

This is a great option for affiliates that work from home and would like to keep their privacy intact.

Sorry about the multiple posts, damn 3-minute post editing rule...
Comment
uvort

Confirmed User

Join Date: Mar 2003

Posts: 3580
Share

Post
#23

05-21-2005, 01:13 PM

Originally posted by Lensman

You can safely promote RealityCash, we are ready for the new regulations and have all of they records online to give to affiliates as soon as it is required.

See sig.

Where can this be found in your affiliate area?

edit: Ahh... "records online to give to affiliates as soon as it is required."

me = blind

Last edited by uvort; 05-21-2005, 01:14 PM.

See Sig.
199907143
Comment
jayeff

Confirmed User

Join Date: May 2001

Posts: 2944
Share

Post
#24

05-21-2005, 01:45 PM

Originally posted by Nate-MM2

While we won't be able to keep US webmasters fully compliant...

Be honest, if you were a US webmaster facing (if I remember the proposals correctly) 5 years imprisonment for a first offense, would you be satisfied with something which only offered to "reduce the risk"?

I don't think so. I don't think you would want to rely on online records either (such as someone else proposed in this thread), at least not before seeing a positive outcome from at least one case involving such records. It may well be that some of the "creative" solutions coming from sponsors and content producers could prove acceptable, but who wants the risk they will face if they are unlucky enough to be a test case? Even a successful defendant will face serious financial costs in taking on the federal government.

I don't believe that the content producer - purely for example - who says he is going to black out the parts of documents that he doesn't consider relevant, is really facing up to the situation (assuming the new laws do largely reflect the initial proposals). I'm sure as heck not going to risk being hauled off just so that he can go on doing business almost as normal. Sure it doesn't specifically say that you cannot black out someone's name and address - again for example - but do we seriously expect investigators to be satisfied with documents showing only a stage name and birthdate? Ditto online records: if the regs say they want to be able to visit my workplace and check my records, is it really likely I can pass them on to someone a thousand miles away?
Comment
Nate-MM2

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Sep 2002

Posts: 263
Share

Post
#25

05-21-2005, 02:12 PM

Originally posted by jayeff

Be honest, if you were a US webmaster facing (if I remember the proposals correctly) 5 years imprisonment for a first offense, would you be satisfied with something which only offered to "reduce the risk"?

I understand your concerns.

The practical matter here is that even if some sponsors are willing to provide all required documentation there are some affiliates that don't want to be responsible for the record-keeping requirements and do not want the DOJ given full permission to enter their homes to check on records on any given day out of the year.

We are trying to offer something to these webmasters while leaving them at as close to no risk as we possibly can.

We will not be doing ANY reporting to the US government agencies and will not be providing model documentation for inspection to any US government agencies either.
Comment

Previous template Next

Working...