View Single Post
Old 05-21-2005, 12:53 AM  
Dirty Dane
Sick Fuck
 
Dirty Dane's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: www
Posts: 9,491
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheJimmy
ok counselor...

so sure RICO & parts of 2257 can get someone on conspiracy shit, but unless you're hosting/publishing 'sexually explicit' content how would this affect a text link?

I'd love to hear more on this...

how about text links or redirects to non-nude pages? Are those not safe in your opinion?

interesting...
Non-nude pages should be safe, as long they are not sexually explicit.

But what I mean, is that if you textlink to a website/FHG for commercial purposes, it makes you an advertiser, as defined in § 2256.
Further, if the sponsor don't comply with the new § 2257, you should have reason to believe that the site could be illegal. That can get you in trouble, because § 2251 then apply to you, no matter if you use text or image links.

This is common sense and not new. I think the new 2257 makes it even easier to use 2251 against you.

Last edited by Dirty Dane; 05-21-2005 at 12:55 AM..
Dirty Dane is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote