|
|
|
|
||||
|
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
 |
|
|||||||
| Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
05-03-2005, 03:30 PM
|
#1 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,648
|
FreeBSD 4 or 5? Apache 1 or 2?
It's been a while since I last used Linux/FreeBSD (1998-2003)
 Usage: 100k/day Thumb TGP I've been recommended this setup: thumbnails.domain.com = Apache 2.x (heavily stripped out with keep-alive ON) www.domain.com = Apache 1.3.x (with keep-alive OFF and mod_php) Thoughts? |
|
|
|
05-03-2005, 03:40 PM
|
#2 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,648
|
C'mon geeks, where are you all? Getting laid?
|
|
|
|
|
05-03-2005, 03:46 PM
|
#3 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Command Central, West Palm Beach, Fl
Posts: 1,794
|
I like a little FreeBSD 5.3 or 5.0 and apache 1.3
__________________
I do stuff - aIm CS_Jay_D |
|
|
|
|
05-03-2005, 03:50 PM
|
#4 |
|
salad tossing sig guy
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: mrthumbs*gmail.com
Posts: 11,702
|
^^ what he said.
|
|
|
|
|
05-03-2005, 03:56 PM
|
#5 |
|
Too lazy to set a custom title
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Punta Cana, DR
Posts: 29,927
|
Apache 2 is buggy ... Stick with 1.3.33
__________________
I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT ! But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time .... |
|
|
|
|
05-03-2005, 04:01 PM
|
#6 |
|
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: amerinoc.com
Posts: 419
|
FreeBSD 5.3, Apache 1.3.33
|
|
|
|
|
05-03-2005, 04:14 PM
|
#7 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,066
|
FreeBSD 4.11 and Apache 1.3 no doubt. Apache 2.0 is buggy and so is FreeBSD 5.X.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
05-03-2005, 04:17 PM
|
#8 |
|
So Fucking Banned
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 5,464
|
FreeBSD 5.3 has been solid for us, along with Apache 1.3.33
|
|
|
|
|
05-03-2005, 04:26 PM
|
#9 |
|
So Fucking Banned
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: At My Desk
Posts: 2,904
|
It should not even be a question,
freebsd 4.11 apache 1.3.33 Why would anyone want to lose security, stabality, and endless years of support development for a newer version where you are going to be constantly changing and going thru bugs and not have support in every desired area, and lose all the modules available? |
|
|
|
