GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   I want this guy's traffic levels (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=460476)

ePinks 04-26-2005 07:38 PM

Sounds more like he exploited the system, but did it well within the rules. Maybe you should of waited for definitave proof that his signup was fraud before entering "OMFG 35k ban him now" mode. All in all this seems real shady, and I wouldn't hold your breathe for their decision to be overturned iwantchixx. Just my 2 cents, not that anyone cares. ;)

nofx 04-26-2005 07:38 PM

crazy threadddd

fuzebox 04-26-2005 07:39 PM

He got his payout bumped to $1/click because of a 1:1 ratio with one signup?

This sounds like an oversight, or a bug in the system. If I were IWantU I would definitely not pay the $35k.

SomeCreep 04-26-2005 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by iwantchixx
This is complete bullshit. I knwo the guy who sent all that traffic. Acusing him of spamming is a fucking copout. It's all clicked traffic he purchased.

SO let me get this straight. When an affiliate follows the rules to the "T" but makes too much money you close his fucking account and acuse him of spam?

:1orglaugh

This is what every single spammer says when they get termed for spamming. "I wasnt spamming, I was sending my traffic from <legit source 1> and <legit source 2>". Usually, the situation is that 90% of their traffic was spam, and 10% was from legit sources. That is still grounds for termination.

Napolean 04-26-2005 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fuzebox
He got his payout bumped to $1/click because of a 1:1 ratio with one signup?

This sounds like an oversight, or a bug in the system. If I were IWantU I would definitely not pay the $35k.

I might have beleived that if they didnt make up multiple excuses on why they werent paying the guy.

WiredGuy 04-26-2005 07:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brujah
iwantu, you guys may want to change that idea of paying future traffic for past traffic productivity. what if that 1 signup was legit and the person only sent 1 hit that week ? then the next week he sends 100k clicks, you owe him $100k no matter the productivity that week.

I agree. Its not hard to send a single legitimate signup on the last day of a period and then bombard the program with tgp traffic for the next period and clean up.

WG

slapass 04-26-2005 07:51 PM

Guys, if I was getting a buck a click I could find 36k clicks to send in to the program. But he sent one click and got one signup? How normal is that?

Napolean 04-26-2005 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slapass
Guys, if I was getting a buck a click I could find 36k clicks to send in to the program. But he sent one click and got one signup? How normal is that?

who knows.. at first he was spamming, but now he just sent one sale

maybe next he used a user id that interfered with their payment processor generating false income from chargebacks and refunds?

SomeCreep 04-26-2005 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by iwantu
I guess this thread is only about iwantchixx, so I will reply to you.

My apologies for not being clear earlier. The affiliate did not spam, thus his account was not blocked, however, he sent one click and one signup last week. Thus, he qualified, this week for the $1 per click ratio.
However, his signup turned out to be a fraud out of a 1:1 ratio!!!!!

The affiliate's revenues have been revoked and reset to the minimum payout. Because the only signup he had last week was obvisouly not a legitimate signup.

So last week, the affiliate sent 1 click which got 1 signup, then this week he sent 36,000 clicks which got 0 signups, is that correct? Or did his 36,000 clicks generate sales?

Napolean 04-26-2005 07:57 PM

iwantu got quiet =/

Odie 04-26-2005 07:59 PM

holy smokes that's some serious traffic..tell him to hit me up.. I know a couple companies who'll take that traffic!!! ;)

Brujah 04-26-2005 07:59 PM

if he got 0 legitimate signups the previous week, it doesn't matter. he'd get minimum payout, which is what they look like they're going to pay him.. although, he definitely was out to exploit the program. most programs would terminate him for that.

JD 04-26-2005 08:01 PM

what if 2 weeks from now 500 of those uniques actually sign up? The the guy got screwed and iwantu gets paid.

total crap. I'll never send traffic to iwantu after this. I mean I understand that the circumstances are fishy but to totally flush him.....why not hold onto the payout for a while and see if any of the people he refered sign up?

OzMan 04-26-2005 08:01 PM

I know one thing for sure. I am now on a Russian Mafia hit list somewhere for pointing this out :uhoh

Napolean 04-26-2005 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OzMan
I know one thing for sure. I am now on a Russian Mafia hit list somewhere for pointing this out :uhoh

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Hornydog4cooter 04-26-2005 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OzMan
I know one thing for sure. I am now on a Russian Mafia hit list somewhere for pointing this out :uhoh


:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Brujah 04-26-2005 08:03 PM

Sperminator, name 1 program who would pay for someone abusing or exploiting their payout system, which results in frauding them to the tune of $35,000+

Napolean 04-26-2005 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hornydog4cooter
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

you owe me a coke :winkwink:

Hornydog4cooter 04-26-2005 08:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Napolean
you owe me a coke :winkwink:

:thumbsup

MrJackMeHoff 04-26-2005 08:10 PM

I only see $10k for the whole month? I dont get it. Thats chump change..

Am I missing something?

Brujah 04-26-2005 08:11 PM

100 russians after Ozman!

JD 04-26-2005 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brujah
Sperminator, name 1 program who would pay for someone abusing or exploiting their payout system, which results in frauding them to the tune of $35,000+

I know, but why not put his shit on hold to see if it pans out?

iwantu 04-26-2005 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SPeRMiNaToR
what if 2 weeks from now 500 of those uniques actually sign up? The the guy got screwed and iwantu gets paid.

total crap. I'll never send traffic to iwantu after this. I mean I understand that the circumstances are fishy but to totally flush him.....why not hold onto the payout for a while and see if any of the people he refered sign up?

Then, his payout will increase for the week after!

We did not block his account. We only reset his payout to the minimum. When his traffic will convert into paid signup, his payout will increase (for next week).

pxxx 04-26-2005 08:18 PM

Interesting thread for sure. What a turn.

iwantchixx 04-26-2005 08:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SomeCreep
:1orglaugh

This is what every single spammer says when they get termed for spamming. "I wasnt spamming, I was sending my traffic from <legit source 1> and <legit source 2>". Usually, the situation is that 90% of their traffic was spam, and 10% was from legit sources. That is still grounds for termination.

I can asure you it was not spam. I've always been known to be truthful and honnest.

Paparazzi 04-26-2005 08:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by iwantu
Good point.

We are going to fix that in the future by applying the ratio DAILY. So for the pay per click program only, afiliates will earn a PPC based on the day ratio.

As for other programs, they are all based on the number of signups sent.

Thanks for the comment.

You guys didn't think about that before? :1orglaugh

wdsguy 04-26-2005 08:41 PM

Pay the man his money u wankers

iwantchixx 04-26-2005 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by iwantu
Then, his payout will increase for the week after!

We did not block his account. We only reset his payout to the minimum. When his traffic will convert into paid signup, his payout will increase (for next week).

and then you'll drop them all because they will be fraudulant?

:)

That's precisely what happend here :)

iwantu 04-26-2005 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SomeCreep
So last week, the affiliate sent 1 click which got 1 signup, then this week he sent 36,000 clicks which got 0 signups, is that correct? Or did his 36,000 clicks generate sales?

That is correct. 36,000 clicks this week with no signup at all! (not yet anyway)

Hornydog4cooter 04-26-2005 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by iwantu
Then, his payout will increase for the week after!

We did not block his account. We only reset his payout to the minimum. When his traffic will convert into paid signup, his payout will increase (for next week).


You got to be kidding me! It was your payscale and structue that IWANTU put into place. Now because you had a $35k payout the webmaster has to be penalized. I am usally in favor of sponors most of the time but i honestly think you guys put the screws to this webmaster. Because IWANTU did not think ahead and have a full proof game plan this webmaster should be paided.

Rich 04-26-2005 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrJackMeHoff
I only see $10k for the whole month? I dont get it. Thats chump change..

Am I missing something?

Yeah, page 2.

BVF 04-26-2005 09:13 PM

It's legit...

I remember watching a Jeffersons episode when I was a child...George's dry cleaning competitor said in a tv commercial that if a customer brought in a certain poundage of clothes, he would clean them for free..So George brought in ALL of the clothes from his dry cleaning store and the owner had to clean every last outfit and it saved George thousands of dollars...I never forgot that episode.

It's the same thing here...He found a flaw in your logic and he should be paid.

Hornydog4cooter 04-26-2005 09:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BVF
It's legit...

I remember watching a Jeffersons episode when I was a child...George's dry cleaning competitor said in a tv commercial that if a customer brought in a certain poundage of clothes, he would clean them for free..So George brought in ALL of the clothes from his dry cleaning store and the owner had to clean every last outfit and it saved George thousands of dollars...I never forgot that episode.

It's the same thing here...He found a flaw in your logic and he should be paid.


Haha i remember that epidode. Man i am geting old :Oh crap

iwantu 04-26-2005 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hornydog4cooter
You got to be kidding me! It was your payscale and structue that IWANTU put into place. Now because you had a $35k payout the webmaster has to be penalized. I am usally in favor of sponors most of the time but i honestly think you guys put the screws to this webmaster. Because IWANTU did not think ahead and have a full proof game plan this webmaster should be paided.

As I mentionned, his only signup last week turned out to be a fraud. Thus, his commission structure for this week is the minimum one. Please read my replies in this thread.

Fukeneh 04-26-2005 09:57 PM

interesting thread.

many lessons to be learned in it.

Doctor Dre 04-26-2005 10:06 PM

I totally understand the program position . But if you make some rules, you gotta stick by it :)

35k clicks for 35k bucks ? omfg that's some good click / $ ratio there :)

Doctor Dre 04-26-2005 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by iwantu
As I mentionned, his only signup last week turned out to be a fraud. Thus, his commission structure for this week is the minimum one. Please read my replies in this thread.

Ok now that's the reason ... hey ... I'm really not hating on you right now . Because I totally understand you don't wanna pay 35k bucks for 35k clicks and zero sales . But stop bullshitting . Just tell the truth .

35k for 35 000 clicks make no sence, I agree . But your bullshit don't make any sence either . Stop changing your story back and forth and just tell people that you won't pay him a buck a click and you made a mistake making your own rules . Cauz right now you just look like a guy that is totally lost in his bullshit .

Even if his last week signup wasn't fraud, you wouldn't have paid the guy a buck a click ...

Hornydog4cooter 04-26-2005 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by iwantu
As I mentionned, his only signup last week turned out to be a fraud. Thus, his commission structure for this week is the minimum one. Please read my replies in this thread.


So if that one signup would of been legit you would of payed him his $35k on 35k of clicks?

will76 04-26-2005 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by iwantchixx
This is complete bullshit. I knwo the guy who sent all that traffic. Acusing him of spamming is a fucking copout. It's all clicked traffic he purchased.

SO let me get this straight. When an affiliate follows the rules to the "T" but makes too much money you close his fucking account and acuse him of spam?


LOL, see to all of those of you who rip on clickcash for closing accounts for spam, if you read here long enough most sponsors do this and most spammers get pissed and lash out at them here.

Lex Bed 04-26-2005 10:25 PM

http://www.porn-room.com/321.gif
So.. I made 1 Paid Sign Up + 1 Rebill.

And now I ask iwantu for proof of a frauduant signup


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:20 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123