GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum
Page 4 of 4 < 123 4
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Why Can't Iran Have a Nuclear Weapon? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=427821)

kenny 02-07-2005 06:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan
And yes, Iran/US _WILL_ be much much more of a fight if the US is actually stupid enough to invade.

I think it would be even less off a fight. It would be a different type of war.

They wouldn't be establishing a new government they would be setting back Iran's infrastructure to the point where they comply.

The first thing to go would be Iran's communications through US air surperiority. After that taking out key military defense and strategic supply/infrastructure targets.

They wouldn't be using marines for police officers like they are doing in Iraq.

About the only thing Iran would be able to do is attack Iraq as a indirect attempt to set back the US.

kenny 02-07-2005 06:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Almighty Colin
Would Iran even put their air force in their air? Can they fight a war against an opponent with high altitude planes beaming signals back to M1A1's as to the location of every ground vehicle in the field? Basically an XBox shootout for US tank commanders.

The US would gain air surperiority in a matter of days.

You can't hit what you can't see.

Drake 02-07-2005 06:41 AM
So that's what Persian girls look like. Hot.

kenny 02-07-2005 06:41 AM
The US has $2 billion dollar stealth bombers that can carry as many laser guided weapons as 75 of the jets used in Iraq.

They didn't even have to use it during the Iraq war because there was no need to risk such a plane.

They also have conventional bombs several times as potent as the one used in Iraq.. again there was no need to use them.


This is only a couple examples across a array of technological surperior aspects that are worth mentioning.

With that I will add that I don't think it would ever come down to a war with Iran. Diplomacy is still in its infancy in regards to the situation with them.

Rhino22 02-07-2005 10:39 AM
hHly moly christy! This thread is hot

beergood 02-07-2005 10:42 AM
You assfucks need to shut it about the US being not able to handle Iran like a redheaded stepchild. They wouldn't stand a chance.

Persius 02-07-2005 04:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by beergood
You assfucks need to shut it about the US being not able to handle Iran like a redheaded stepchild. They wouldn't stand a chance.
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

clubchics 02-07-2005 04:44 PM
because the US hates competition

sonofsam 02-07-2005 04:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by clubchics
because the US hates competition
cha-ching

theking 02-07-2005 06:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Almighty Colin
Name one other military in history that travelled as far in 21 days as the US military did. What about the planning and the logistics that made that possible? It's absolutely historic. It's up there with the World War II German invasion of Yugoslavia.

You're right. The US did bomb Iraq into the stone age 10 years ago. That ground war lasted 3 days. Remember the claims of the pundits that the US couldn't fight a war in the desert against battle-hardened troops?
You are correct on all points...NATHAN is not.

theking 02-07-2005 06:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Almighty Colin
Why did Athens fight Sparta after their alliance against the Persians? Why did the Italians switch sides in World War I? Why did the USSR and USA stare each other down in the Cold War after fighting together in World War II?

What did Thucydides say? "Honor, fear and interest". Has human nature changed?
You are correct...changing alliances is nothing new.

theking 02-07-2005 06:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kenny
I think it would be even less off a fight. It would be a different type of war.

They wouldn't be establishing a new government they would be setting back Iran's infrastructure to the point where they comply.

The first thing to go would be Iran's communications through US air surperiority. After that taking out key military defense and strategic supply/infrastructure targets.

They wouldn't be using marines for police officers like they are doing in Iraq.

About the only thing Iran would be able to do is attack Iraq as a indirect attempt to set back the US.
You are correct...NATHAN is not.

theking 02-07-2005 06:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kenny
The US would gain air surperiority in a matter of days.

You can't hit what you can't see.
You are correct...no contest.

theking 02-07-2005 06:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by beergood
You assfucks need to shut it about the US being not able to handle Iran like a redheaded stepchild. They wouldn't stand a chance.
You are correct...not contest.

theking 02-07-2005 06:16 PM
In response to the thread title...have you not heard of non-proliferation...which many nations of the world have signed the treaty?

Sami 02-07-2005 06:17 PM
akhavi..... oona kheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeli kosan :thumbsup


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:55 PM.
Page 4 of 4 < 123 4
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123