GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Why Can't Iran Have a Nuclear Weapon? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=427821)

Pete 02-06-2005 04:55 PM

because we said they arent allowed to.

Persius 02-06-2005 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sonofsam
i'm persian and majority of the girls are so/so ... but when they are hot.. they arn't just hot.. they're fucking gorgeous :):):)

your living at the wrong place....

woj 02-06-2005 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Almighty Colin
I will tell you the truth. Because if they get them we can't invade them if they piss us off. It's that simple.

That's exactly the reason... :thumbsup

sonofsam 02-06-2005 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Persius
your living at the wrong place....


i don't know how persians in LA are.. but here in vancouver... everyones in eachothers business.... and always gossiping... and hating on eachother..

ADL Colin 02-06-2005 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nico-t
exactly.
As far as i know the US is the only country that ever used an atomic bomb. And they have the nerve to say other countries cant have them....

Let's get to the heart of it. Nations with power - political, economic and military tend to enter into alliances and agreements in order to preserve that power. Nations without power tend to enter into alliances and agreements in order to gain power and mitigate the actions of the more powerful. It has always been that way - from Sparta and Athens allying against Persia or the formation of the Delian and Peloponnesian Leagues to the Cold War's Warsaw Pact and NATO to the modern Arab League and EU.

The nuclear powers have attempted to keep nuclear power in their control and their allies' control while restricting its potential enemies from acquiring them. It's the way it is. It has never had anything to do with fairness and equality for all nations and still doesn't.

Powerful nations like the United States and UK will act outside of organizations like the UN because they can. The USSR did this a number of times during the Cold War. France and Britain did it in the 50's. Less powerful nations will band together with their political power and argue that all actions must happen within a framework of international law and agreement - without THEIR consent such actions are "illegal".

VIPimp 02-06-2005 05:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sonofsam
i don't know how persians in LA are.. but here in vancouver... everyones in eachothers business.... and always gossiping... and hating on eachother..

its like that here in the Bay Area as well... most of them look like shit here and when you fuck one the whole town knows.

LA has hot persian girls.

woj 02-06-2005 05:13 PM

only on gfy you would see a political discussion turn into a "would you hit it thread" :1orglaugh

Chris Malais 02-06-2005 05:13 PM

They can't have nukes because we don't want them to launch them at a certain small little Jewish country.

kenny 02-06-2005 05:50 PM

Building nuclear weapons historically leads to escalation. Building even more nuclear weapons or leading to pressure for another government to build nuclear weapons.

To understand why thats so undesirable would require you to understand how powerfull todays nuclear bombs are.

The terms are thrown around so loosely.

When they dropped those bombs of Japan. There was nothing left of some people but their shadows edged into concrete from massive x-ray emissions..

The weapons these days are several hundred times as powerfull as those.

Giorgio_Xo 02-06-2005 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KRL
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Dude I'm just fucking with you. Don't take anything on this board to heart.

:helpme

:thumbsup

ADL Colin 02-06-2005 06:51 PM

I have a persian girls fetish now.

mahoney 02-06-2005 06:51 PM

Yo Giorgio hit me up on icq 192065572 when you get a minute. I need to talk with you :)

sonofsam 02-06-2005 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kenny
Building nuclear weapons historically leads to escalation. Building even more nuclear weapons or leading to pressure for another government to build nuclear weapons.

To understand why thats so undesirable would require you to understand how powerfull todays nuclear bombs are.

The terms are thrown around so loosely.

When they dropped those bombs of Japan. There was nothing left of some people but their shadows edged into concrete from massive x-ray emissions..

The weapons these days are several hundred times as powerfull as those.

...so essentially... what you're saying is.... if we were to put a nuke today in a kinder suprise egg.. it would possibly BREAK the egg?

paxton 02-06-2005 06:54 PM

The BEST nuclear weapons discussion thread, EVER!

:thumbsup

Webby 02-06-2005 07:01 PM

Quote:

Why Can't Iran Have a Nuclear Weapon?
No reason why not!

The main "anti" reasons are valid - ie of nukes ending up in the hands of idiots etc. But any country is fully entitled to do as it sees fit to protect it's people - especially if threatened or has neighbors with nuclear capability.

Ironic that the holder of the largest load of nuclear and bio weapons on the planet is the most vocal on why others should not have them.

fl_prn_str 02-06-2005 07:04 PM

Oh my Allah..... :thumbsup

sean416 02-06-2005 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by colpanic
The problem with nukes in unstable countries is they get overthrown, or sell them to *other* unstable countries, and then we have actual terrorists with them. (notice that I'm not calling Iran terrorists)

I think this answer is the best yet. If it was someone in office whom people trusted, this answer would be enough. But with all the inuendo and alterior motives, thats a tough sell.

H.I.G 02-06-2005 07:34 PM

http://photos.e46fanatics.com/data/5...17011188_l.JPG


I AM IN LOVE!! :upsidedow :upsidedow :upsidedow

Persius 02-06-2005 07:34 PM

more pics!!!!!!! loooool

assneck 02-06-2005 07:51 PM

khanomhaayeh irooni kheely geshangan vally pormoo hastan va mamoolan boo midan!

woj 02-06-2005 07:52 PM

100 reasons why Iran can't have nuclear weapons...

bigang04 02-06-2005 07:58 PM

Thats Hot!

BigAng
http://curemyproblem.com

69pornlinks 02-06-2005 07:58 PM

because they say so....http://www.asbandeiras.hpg.ig.com.br/03asia/israel.JPG


:)

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE 02-06-2005 08:08 PM

Fuck the nukes.
Fuck the oil.

America wants the women.

beergood 02-06-2005 08:17 PM

Because we said they can't have them. Thats why

FTVGirls 02-06-2005 08:18 PM

Hey Assneck, chee gofti? Harfet kharabeh.

Googooly 02-06-2005 08:19 PM

The only thing about persia is the Fucking shity Regim. They DONT let people have freedom, there is no freedom of speech. They can even get killed or jaild for life for just something simple wich is no crim in any other countries. Even with all those people still try to have as much fun as they can. I hope that regim fall so people in iran can have freedom!
so to end this:
Persian people are VERY NICE & COOL!
Persian Goverment/Regim is FUCKING SHIT, I HOPE THEY ALL DIE IN THE WORSE WAY!!

p.s If you can be botherd read the History of persia and YOU will love it!!

p.s.s Persian People Rules! ^_^

Googooly 02-06-2005 08:22 PM

OMG they are hot, I think I need to come to where you live mate!!

corvette 02-06-2005 09:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Almighty Colin
I have a persian girls fetish now.

same here, got it a minute ago

goBigtime 02-06-2005 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kaliboy2g
Good job dumbshit. Keep playing the race card.
Have you ever heard of crazy or unsafe.

Crazy or unsafe to who?

When has Iran been an agressor?

I've seen a fair load of "crazy" and "unsafe" over the past few years & it sure the fuck wasn't coming from Iran.

sonofsam 02-06-2005 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by goBigtime
Crazy or unsafe to who?

When has Iran been an agressor?

I've seen a fair load of "crazy" and "unsafe" over the past few years & it sure the fuck wasn't coming from Iran.

exactly....

dcortez 02-06-2005 11:55 PM

In the Iran-Contra Affair, United States President Ronald Reagan's administration secretly sold arms to Iran, which was engaged in a bloody war with its neighbor Iraq from 1980 to 1988, and diverted the proceeds to the Contra rebels fighting to overthrow the leftist and allegedly democratically-elected Sandinista government of Nicaragua.

Those sales thus had a dual goal: appeasing Iran, which had influence with militant groups that held several American hostages in Lebanon and supported bombings in Western European countries, and funding a guerrilla war aimed at aborting Nicaraguan independence from US hegemony.

Both transactions were contrary to acts of Congress, which prohibited the funding of the Contras and the sale of weapons to Iran. In addition, both activities violated UN sanctions.

I guess the love affair (with Iran) is officially over now.

The usa also supported Iraq before it became an 'official' enemy.

Why arm these nations if you're going to go to war with them afterwards? Arms dealers make fortunes (at the expense of taxpayers and civillian lives) from these fair weather friend foreign policies.

It sure is a good thing that the us executive has no ties to any arms dealers or one might get suspicious...

-Dino

Lykos 02-07-2005 02:14 AM

Persian girls are very beautifull!
And i think that non of countries in world shouldn't have nuck wepons...

DWB 02-07-2005 02:16 AM

I would fuck EVERY girl in this thread, mask or not, with no rubber. These brauds are HOT HOT HOT!!! I fell in love 3 times already.

Praise Allah !!!!!

nico-t 02-07-2005 05:47 AM

well i dont really dig the persian girls... they look to much like turkish girls to me and around here the turkish girls yell and act like guys, at least the ones who have been 'westerned'... give me the white and the asian hotties and im fine :)

ADL Colin 02-07-2005 05:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Googooly
p.s If you can be botherd read the History of persia and YOU will love it!!

p.s.s Persian People Rules! ^_^

I've only read the Greek's version of Persian history. That's quite limiting. Are you aware of any good English translations of ancient Persian accounts?

Nathan 02-07-2005 06:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Almighty Colin
So ...

The US occupied Iraq's capital city in 21 days and has occupied the entire country for nearly two years with less than 2000 casualties. That's pretty historic. Iraq fought Iran to a standoff for ten whole years. Some of you think Iran/US would be a fight?

How is it difficult to fight an army that did not really want to fight and on top of that was under blockade for 10+ years?? And on top of that were bomb to the stoneage in most parts 10 years ago also.

Seriously, there is nothing historic about that.

And yes, Iran/US _WILL_ be much much more of a fight if the US is actually stupid enough to invade.

ADL Colin 02-07-2005 06:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dcortez
Why arm these nations if you're going to go to war with them afterwards?

Why did Athens fight Sparta after their alliance against the Persians? Why did the Italians switch sides in World War I? Why did the USSR and USA stare each other down in the Cold War after fighting together in World War II?

What did Thucydides say? "Honor, fear and interest". Has human nature changed?

ADL Colin 02-07-2005 06:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nathan
How is it difficult to fight an army that did not really want to fight and on top of that was under blockade for 10+ years?? And on top of that were bomb to the stoneage in most parts 10 years ago also.

Seriously, there is nothing historic about that.

And yes, Iran/US _WILL_ be much much more of a fight if the US is actually stupid enough to invade.

Name one other military in history that travelled as far in 21 days as the US military did. What about the planning and the logistics that made that possible? It's absolutely historic. It's up there with the World War II German invasion of Yugoslavia.

You're right. The US did bomb Iraq into the stone age 10 years ago. That ground war lasted 3 days. Remember the claims of the pundits that the US couldn't fight a war in the desert against battle-hardened troops?

ADL Colin 02-07-2005 06:24 AM

Would Iran even put their air force in their air? Can they fight a war against an opponent with high altitude planes beaming signals back to M1A1's as to the location of every ground vehicle in the field? Basically an XBox shootout for US tank commanders.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:55 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123