hehehe

Britney nude is not malicious you savage!

heheh

:thumbsup

:glugglug

:stoned

The only real cybersquatting issue that is causing problems is when non adult names and names that are clearly targeted to kids are sent to porn sites.

And wanna know whats more useless than tgp traffic? typo traffic :winkwink:

If you guys ever come up to the Toronto area you have to try Licks burgers, they blow away any other burgers :thumbsup

Britneyspearsnude.com may be malicious beings it is a celebrity and someone wants to profit on the name.

But for those sites that have been bought say like barbiedollcollector.com ....with no intent on using the site for profit....someone who just collects dolls and offer a classified for others to communicate of dolls they have is not mailicious. Because there is no intent on profiting from the site.


of course that was an example. But for real even fan site sites ...band sites. If they are being bought for malicious purposes yes.....BUT the law is too broad in description.....it also says if your making a profit it's cybersquatting if not then it's not...

But yet they still want a name I have bought....with not malicious intent for profit. the law is too broad in what is allowed and what is not. and to the people who buy names not for malicious purposes always get screwed:2 cents: