They are really 18?? - GoFuckYourself.com

Nikita · 10-15-2001, 04:04 AM

http://www.mosteroticteens.com/
They seems like 14 years old...

mika · 10-15-2001, 05:25 AM

You REALLY need someone to convince you that yes, they are 14 years or so? Well, I can do that.

Gary · 10-15-2001, 06:22 AM

Who can tell.

------------------
Like strippers? I used to spend all my welfare check on strippers, now i just go to strippers.com. Start promoting it to more horny bastards like myself.

Strippers.com webmasters

12clicks · 10-15-2001, 06:32 AM

they're foriegn so who cares.

TheFLY · 10-15-2001, 06:40 AM

i've seen that site before -- I'm pretty sure some of the babes are underage...

here's the thing -- you can shoot pics of anyone under 18 -- nude -- as long as the pics are not sexually suggestive in nature -- and of course a nude body does not=sex... also if you look at the photos it seems that great care is taken for them to be works of art... so the pics are totally legal and these pics are nothing new..

MY PROBLEM WITH "Most Erotic Teens" is the fact that they are *obviously* buying traffic from websites with a "sexual theme" -- at least to me, then you have changed the context of the pics. I can stop there and you figure out the rest.

In any case I have an obvious respect for art and the human body -- and there are very famous paintings and photographs of underage girls in museums all over the world... but I think trying to appeal to the porno surfer is a little too risky. I'd say unless you have a real art nude photography site -- I wouldn't risk using their program.

If you're looking for a more tasteful "pretty young girls" site -- try domai.com -- I've known the webmaster for a long time -- he even has a revshare program now.

------------------
<A HREF="http://www.thefly.net/topfly.html" TARGET=_blank>

Boneprone-4-Life Family Approved</A>

mika · 10-15-2001, 06:51 AM

Doesn't domai.com have underage nudity, too?

TheFLY · 10-15-2001, 06:57 AM

Yeah didn't you just read what I said?

Anyway DOMAI has an entire FAQ devoted to the legality of the pics...

12clicks · 10-15-2001, 07:00 AM

are you two morons for real?

Gary · 10-15-2001, 07:02 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks:
are you two morons for real?

Hey, it has a FAQ. LOL

------------------
Like strippers? I used to spend all my welfare check on strippers, now i just go to strippers.com. Start promoting it to more horny bastards like myself.

Strippers.com webmasters

mika · 10-15-2001, 07:02 AM

Of course I read! But why is it more tasteful then? Its name is "Dirty Old Men's" something does that refer to art lovers? And it has galleries at least in Wild Cherries, which is a porn site isn't it?

Heinz · 10-15-2001, 07:17 AM

I guess, if they call the site mostEROTICteens, then they run a porn site.

TheFLY · 10-15-2001, 07:34 AM

Take a good look at both sites and then you decide which is "more tasteful". I rest my case.

Nobody is forcing you to look at the site -- I figured as long as you are talking about MET, I should at least mention DOMAI -- because DOMAI is the product of a webmaster's love of his work -- and not just some money making scheme. Email the webmaster and I can guarantee you he will be willing to talk to you at length about his site... He's not a money hungry, manipulating prick like a lot of you people. Hehe...

10-15-2001, 08:38 AM

Same thing with http://www.lolita-porn.com

Some of those girls don't look 18 to me either

Hot Tropical Babes · 10-15-2001, 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by TheFLY:
here's the thing -- you can shoot pics of anyone under 18 -- nude -- as long as the pics are not sexually suggestive in nature -- and of course a nude body does not=sex... also if you look at the photos it seems that great care is taken for them to be works of art... so the pics are totally legal and these pics are nothing new..

I am so sick of this fucking excuse to post cp. People should protect children and not post them nude. FOR any reason. ART does not = nude children.

[This message has been edited by Hot Tropical Babes (edited 10-15-2001).]

sandman! · 10-15-2001, 09:54 AM

Equinox: I know the owner of lolita-porn all those models are over 18.

------------------

Make More $$ Today!

Viper2K1 · 10-15-2001, 10:16 AM

True, some of these girls certainly don't look like they are 18 or older.

I know some girls that are 18-19 but certainly don't look like they are that age either.

Those pics are kinda fuzzy, that makes it even harder to tell

TheFLY · 10-15-2001, 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Hot Tropical Babes:
I am so sick of this fucking excuse to post cp. People should protect children and not post them nude. FOR any reason. ART does not = nude children.

[This message has been edited by Hot Tropical Babes (edited 10-15-2001).]

pornography = "sexually explicit" and "intended to arouse sexual passion"

If you become sexually aroused when you see nude children -- I'm very sorry for you... That's called "perversion" -- learn some vocab and then grow a brain before you make accusations.

What the fuck do you know about art anyway.

Gary · 10-15-2001, 12:21 PM

So fly, you're saying you are merely an admirer of nude children but do not get aroused. Is that right?

------------------
Like strippers? I used to spend all my welfare check on strippers, now i just go to strippers.com. Start promoting it to more horny bastards like myself.

Strippers.com webmasters

12clicks · 10-15-2001, 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by TheFLY:

pornography = "sexually explicit" and "intended to arouse sexual passion"

If you become sexually aroused when you see nude children -- I'm very sorry for you... That's called "perversion" -- learn some vocab and then grow a brain before you make accusations.

What the fuck do you know about art anyway.

I've never seen a cp defence that DIDN'T cry "ART"

what are you hiding fly? you know why too much about the subject and spend way too much time defending it.

12clicks · 10-15-2001, 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by TheFLY:

pornography = "sexually explicit" and "intended to arouse sexual passion"

If you become sexually aroused when you see nude children -- I'm very sorry for you... That's called "perversion" -- learn some vocab and then grow a brain before you make accusations.

What the fuck do you know about art anyway.

I've never seen a cp defence that DIDN'T cry "ART"

what are you hiding fly? you know why too much about the subject and spend way too much time defending it.

tenletters · 10-15-2001, 12:35 PM

While some people can look at a nude child and see art... it's doubtful that anyone looking for art would signup to a site that only has photos of nude children.

Each photo by itself may indeed be art but collectively their are intended to make money from people who are turned on by underage nudity.

TheFLY · 10-15-2001, 12:36 PM

I don't paint nude children but I am an artist...

I think it's unhealthy for people to equate nudity with pornography... That sort of demented way of thinking comes from religious training -- people raised from birth to be ashamed of their bodies.

tenletters · 10-15-2001, 12:47 PM

Fly, I think you missed my post.

It's no longer art when the sole purpose of the site is to show nude children.

If all they wanted to do was show art... there would be a heluva lot more kinds of art on those sites.

Any way you slice it.. it's just not art anymore... it's there to make cash off pedophiles (spelling?).

TheFLY · 10-15-2001, 12:49 PM

You people miss the point.

Something is not art, until you make it into art. An artist does not look at a child and then see art -- an artist makes art. Art is the product. If the subject of the art is a child -- then the completed work *is* art.

Look at Michelangelo -- he painted and sculpted plenty of nude children -- go study some Art History. It was the Victorian era and the hypocrisy of religious institutions that resulted in most of the sexual perversions that we have today.

The reason that artists have always been fascinated by anatomy -- is because (supposedly) God created our bodies... the language of anatomy is spoken truth beyond socially constructed perversions as you have all so easily subscribed to.

Hot Tropical Babes · 10-15-2001, 12:54 PM

and your point is?

TheFLY · 10-15-2001, 12:59 PM

12Clicks just wanted to know why I felt strongly about this subject... That was my point. Artists should be free to paint or photograph or sculpt whatever the fuck they want to.

Maybe if you were an artist that felt passionately about your ideas -- and then you were censored -- then you would understand where I am coming from.

But I do not support websites that make money off the exploitation of young models... You will not find the word "teen" anywhere on my website.

TheFLY · 10-15-2001, 01:00 PM

12Clicks just wanted to know why I felt strongly about this subject... That was my point. Artists should be free to paint or photograph or sculpt whatever the fuck they want to.

Maybe if you were an artist that felt passionately about your work and ideas -- and then you were censored -- then you would understand where I am coming from.

But I do not support websites that make money off the exploitation of young models... You will not find the word "teen" anywhere on my websites.

10-15-2001, 04:04 AM	#1
Nikita Registered User Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Kharkov Ukraine Posts: 3	They are really 18?? http://www.mosteroticteens.com/ They seems like 14 years old...

10-15-2001, 05:25 AM	#2
mika Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Finland Posts: 1,561	You REALLY need someone to convince you that yes, they are 14 years or so? Well, I can do that.

10-15-2001, 06:22 AM	#3
Gary Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Kimmykims couch Posts: 6,110	Who can tell. ------------------ Like strippers? I used to spend all my welfare check on strippers, now i just go to strippers.com. Start promoting it to more horny bastards like myself. Strippers.com webmasters

10-15-2001, 06:32 AM	#4
12clicks Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: God's right hand Posts: 19,789	they're foriegn so who cares.

10-15-2001, 06:40 AM	#5
TheFLY So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: http://www.thefly.net/ --- Quit your job and live off steady traffic. Posts: 11,856	i've seen that site before -- I'm pretty sure some of the babes are underage... here's the thing -- you can shoot pics of anyone under 18 -- nude -- as long as the pics are not sexually suggestive in nature -- and of course a nude body does not=sex... also if you look at the photos it seems that great care is taken for them to be works of art... so the pics are totally legal and these pics are nothing new.. MY PROBLEM WITH "Most Erotic Teens" is the fact that they are obviously buying traffic from websites with a "sexual theme" -- at least to me, then you have changed the context of the pics. I can stop there and you figure out the rest. In any case I have an obvious respect for art and the human body -- and there are very famous paintings and photographs of underage girls in museums all over the world... but I think trying to appeal to the porno surfer is a little too risky. I'd say unless you have a real art nude photography site -- I wouldn't risk using their program. If you're looking for a more tasteful "pretty young girls" site -- try domai.com -- I've known the webmaster for a long time -- he even has a revshare program now. ------------------ <A HREF="http://www.thefly.net/topfly.html" TARGET=_blank> Boneprone-4-Life Family Approved</A>

10-15-2001, 06:51 AM	#6
mika Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Finland Posts: 1,561	Doesn't domai.com have underage nudity, too?

10-15-2001, 06:57 AM	#7
TheFLY So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: http://www.thefly.net/ --- Quit your job and live off steady traffic. Posts: 11,856	Yeah didn't you just read what I said? Anyway DOMAI has an entire FAQ devoted to the legality of the pics...

10-15-2001, 07:00 AM	#8
12clicks Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: God's right hand Posts: 19,789	are you two morons for real?

10-15-2001, 07:02 AM	#10
mika Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Finland Posts: 1,561	Of course I read! But why is it more tasteful then? Its name is "Dirty Old Men's" something does that refer to art lovers? And it has galleries at least in Wild Cherries, which is a porn site isn't it?

10-15-2001, 07:17 AM	#11
Heinz Registered User Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Legoland Posts: 95	I guess, if they call the site mostEROTICteens, then they run a porn site.

10-15-2001, 07:34 AM	#12
TheFLY So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: http://www.thefly.net/ --- Quit your job and live off steady traffic. Posts: 11,856	Take a good look at both sites and then you decide which is "more tasteful". I rest my case. Nobody is forcing you to look at the site -- I figured as long as you are talking about MET, I should at least mention DOMAI -- because DOMAI is the product of a webmaster's love of his work -- and not just some money making scheme. Email the webmaster and I can guarantee you he will be willing to talk to you at length about his site... He's not a money hungry, manipulating prick like a lot of you people. Hehe...

10-15-2001, 08:38 AM	#13
X37375787 Guest Posts: n/a	Same thing with http://www.lolita-porn.com Some of those girls don't look 18 to me either

10-15-2001, 09:54 AM	#15
sandman! Icq: 14420613 Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: chicago Posts: 15,432	Equinox: I know the owner of lolita-porn all those models are over 18. ------------------ Make More $$ Today!

10-15-2001, 10:16 AM	#16
Viper2K1 Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2001 Posts: 1,006	True, some of these girls certainly don't look like they are 18 or older. I know some girls that are 18-19 but certainly don't look like they are that age either. Those pics are kinda fuzzy, that makes it even harder to tell

10-15-2001, 12:21 PM	#18
Gary Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Kimmykims couch Posts: 6,110	So fly, you're saying you are merely an admirer of nude children but do not get aroused. Is that right? ------------------ Like strippers? I used to spend all my welfare check on strippers, now i just go to strippers.com. Start promoting it to more horny bastards like myself. Strippers.com webmasters

10-15-2001, 12:35 PM	#21
tenletters Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: the deep south Posts: 2,079	While some people can look at a nude child and see art... it's doubtful that anyone looking for art would signup to a site that only has photos of nude children. Each photo by itself may indeed be art but collectively their are intended to make money from people who are turned on by underage nudity.

10-15-2001, 12:36 PM	#22
TheFLY So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: http://www.thefly.net/ --- Quit your job and live off steady traffic. Posts: 11,856	I don't paint nude children but I am an artist... I think it's unhealthy for people to equate nudity with pornography... That sort of demented way of thinking comes from religious training -- people raised from birth to be ashamed of their bodies.

10-15-2001, 12:47 PM	#23
tenletters Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: the deep south Posts: 2,079	Fly, I think you missed my post. It's no longer art when the sole purpose of the site is to show nude children. If all they wanted to do was show art... there would be a heluva lot more kinds of art on those sites. Any way you slice it.. it's just not art anymore... it's there to make cash off pedophiles (spelling?).

10-15-2001, 12:49 PM	#24
TheFLY So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: http://www.thefly.net/ --- Quit your job and live off steady traffic. Posts: 11,856	You people miss the point. Something is not art, until you make it into art. An artist does not look at a child and then see art -- an artist makes art. Art is the product. If the subject of the art is a child -- then the completed work is art. Look at Michelangelo -- he painted and sculpted plenty of nude children -- go study some Art History. It was the Victorian era and the hypocrisy of religious institutions that resulted in most of the sexual perversions that we have today. The reason that artists have always been fascinated by anatomy -- is because (supposedly) God created our bodies... the language of anatomy is spoken truth beyond socially constructed perversions as you have all so easily subscribed to.

10-15-2001, 12:54 PM	#25
Hot Tropical Babes Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Orlando FL Posts: 3,014	and your point is?

10-15-2001, 12:59 PM	#26
TheFLY So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: http://www.thefly.net/ --- Quit your job and live off steady traffic. Posts: 11,856	12Clicks just wanted to know why I felt strongly about this subject... That was my point. Artists should be free to paint or photograph or sculpt whatever the fuck they want to. Maybe if you were an artist that felt passionately about your ideas -- and then you were censored -- then you would understand where I am coming from. But I do not support websites that make money off the exploitation of young models... You will not find the word "teen" anywhere on my website.

10-15-2001, 01:00 PM	#27
TheFLY So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: http://www.thefly.net/ --- Quit your job and live off steady traffic. Posts: 11,856	12Clicks just wanted to know why I felt strongly about this subject... That was my point. Artists should be free to paint or photograph or sculpt whatever the fuck they want to. Maybe if you were an artist that felt passionately about your work and ideas -- and then you were censored -- then you would understand where I am coming from. But I do not support websites that make money off the exploitation of young models... You will not find the word "teen" anywhere on my websites.