Over half of Americans dont believe in evolution - Page 9 - GoFuckYourself.com

Drake · 11-05-2004, 05:59 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by CET
Evolution gets tested all the time. The peppered moth experiment in England, thousands of experiments on germs, virus' and fruit flies.

You never did explain why we need a new flu vaccine every year if there is no such thing as evolution.

Nor did you ever answer how there can be natural selection without mutation.

The moth experiment has been discredited. They discovered that their were two kinds of moths. It's not astounding that the dark moth that could not be seen would live while the one that stuck out like a sore thumb was picked off by predators.

Fruit flies was interesting, but again, it only shows natural selection.

Johny Traffic · 11-05-2004, 05:59 AM

Quote:

Now I know what it must have been like trying to convince people that the earth revolves around the sun and not vice versa.

It does, fuck, thats messed everything up

Joe Citizen · 11-05-2004, 05:59 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by punkworld
I'm not gonna bother to read this trainwreck of a thread, and will instead just state the obvious: evolution is a logical necessity.

Thank you for your drive-by wisdom.

stocktrader23 · 11-05-2004, 06:00 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Joe Citizen
More creation 'scientists'

lol

http://www.str.org/free/commentaries...n/phnotsci.htm

ADL Colin · 11-05-2004, 06:00 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by stocktrader23
Wow, no offense but this article really sums up the attitude here today.

http://www.icr.org/pubs/imp/imp-332.htm

"The fact is that evolutionists believe in evolution because they want to. It is their desire at all costs to explain the origin of everything without a Creator."

It's funny how the religious try to insult science by calling it, of all things, "religious".

Libertine · 11-05-2004, 06:01 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mike33
I've been in my share of classes. EVERYTHING can be broken down into English that can be understood by the common man. you think universities are packed with people with big brains that understand things you and I are incapable of? No, most are average students and we can understand just as much as they do. So, I ask you again, to break this one down for me. The fact that it's a subset, a specific area, could even mean it's easier to do so. Don't give me the cop out.

So you're claiming no such thing as intelligence exists?

Joe Citizen · 11-05-2004, 06:01 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mike33
The moth experiment has been discredited. They discovered that their were two kinds of moths. It's not astounding that the dark moth that could not be seen would live while the one that stuck out like a sore thumb was picked off by predators.

Oh Mike... even the seven-day creationists agree that the peppered moth is an example of a species adapting to its environment.

You're reaching here.

stocktrader23 · 11-05-2004, 06:01 AM

Do they still give out longest thread prizes?

CET · 11-05-2004, 06:03 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mike33
CET, if you were me and people starting asssuming I was religious, calling me names, just because I challenge evolution, maybe you would see that their is a similarity of it being dogmatic.

Most of the people, not including you or joe, have no idea what evolution is all about yet their willing to jump down my throat because it is believed to be the truth today. There was a guy earlier in the thread trying to convince me that aging was evolution. I was the "ignorant" one for correcting him because that's completely false.

People claiming I'm religious or believe in aliens or other dubious alternatives just because I don't succumb to evolutionary theory. That's like osctrazigng somebody or labelling them.

So, I'm not playing the victim at all.

I'm not going to make excuses for those who have not read the entire thread. Assholes are assholes.

However, when the entire scientific community says "this is the best explaination we have of X," it's kind of arrogant to tell the entire scientific community that they don't know what they're talking about. I'm not going to tell me doctor he doesn't know what he's doing. These men and women spend their entire lives educating themselves on a subject that we get MAYBE one year of basic education in, and many of us don't even get that. Yet we're going to tell them that we know better then them?

Johny Traffic · 11-05-2004, 06:03 AM

Quote:

Do they still give out longest thread prizes?

I hope so

Joe Citizen · 11-05-2004, 06:05 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by stocktrader23
lol

http://www.str.org/free/commentaries...n/phnotsci.htm

Tell me, what are "Greg's" scientific credentials?

CET · 11-05-2004, 06:05 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by stocktrader23
Wow, no offense but this article really sums up the attitude here today.

http://www.icr.org/pubs/imp/imp-332.htm

"The fact is that evolutionists believe in evolution because they want to. It is their desire at all costs to explain the origin of everything without a Creator."

That explains exactly what a creationist does 180. We are what we accuse others of being.

BTW, these same creationists (usually preachers) tell biologists, geologists and physicsts that they know these subjects better then these entire scientific communities combined. Who is really trying to explain things a certain way at all costs?

stocktrader23 · 11-05-2004, 06:07 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by CET
I'm not going to make excuses for those who have not read the entire thread. Assholes are assholes.

However, when the entire scientific community says "this is the best explaination we have of X," it's kind of arrogant to tell the entire scientific community that they don't know what they're talking about. I'm not going to tell me doctor he doesn't know what he's doing. These men and women spend their entire lives educating themselves on a subject that we get MAYBE one year of basic education in, and many of us don't even get that. Yet we're going to tell them that we know better then them?

Sorry, when their best explanation requires more assumptions than I can count I won't accept it at face value.

Do you really find it possible that there is a person alive today that can tell you X happened 10 million years ago and be correct? These guys are so enlightened that they can trace things to millions of years? Carbon dating or not, I can't make myself just believe them because it's the best explanation they have.

Johny Traffic · 11-05-2004, 06:07 AM

Quote:

These men and women spend their entire lives educating themselves on a subject that we get MAYBE one year of basic education in, and many of us don't even get that. Yet we're going to tell them that we know better then them?

In 1492 a sailor called Christopher Columbus went sailing to discover new lands. The wisest and cleverist scientist of the day said he would fall off the side of the earth because it is flat. He didnt. They were wrong

Drake · 11-05-2004, 06:08 AM

I stated 3 conditions in this beginnging of the thread upon which I would agree with the evolution as the explanation of all life as we see it and experience it today. If all these were met I would have no problem with it.

But when you talk about millions of years, you're asking for mass extrapolations, each of which come into question.

SlutFinder · 11-05-2004, 06:09 AM

wow this thread got long!

CET · 11-05-2004, 06:09 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mike33
I've been in my share of classes. EVERYTHING can be broken down into English that can be understood by the common man. you think universities are packed with people with big brains that understand things you and I are incapable of? No, most are average students and we can understand just as much as they do. So, I ask you again, to break this one down for me. The fact that it's a subset, a specific area, could even mean it's easier to do so. Don't give me the cop out.

Cop out. I've read up on molecular biology, pondered it, asked questions and moved on. It's not a subject I think about very much anymore because it doesn't have much bearing on computers. It has some bearing on fitness and nutrition, but not in an evolutionary sense. I don't remember it that well and you would learn a lot more if you learned it on your own. If I spent a shit load of time researching it and reporting to you, you wouldn't learn much if you learned anything without just blowing off my work. Sorry, but that's happened way too often to me on public forums. I've done my studying and learning, you haven't and it's your turn to do it if you want to understand the subject, because you obviously don't understand it now.

stocktrader23 · 11-05-2004, 06:10 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mike33

But when you talk about millions of years, you're asking for mass extrapolations, each of which come into question.

And impossible to prove or disprove which is my hang up with the entire thing.

Johny Traffic · 11-05-2004, 06:10 AM

Quote:

wow this thread got long!

It evolved

Joe Citizen · 11-05-2004, 06:10 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mike33
I stated 3 conditions in this beginnging of the thread upon which I would agree with the evolution as the explanation of all life as we see it and experience it today. If all these were met I would have no problem with it.

But when you talk about millions of years, you're asking for mass extrapolations, each of which come into question.

So you are saying evolution is impossible because it's been happening for too long?

Drake · 11-05-2004, 06:11 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Johny Traffic
In 1492 a sailor called Christopher Columbus went sailing to discover new lands. The wisest and cleverist scientist of the day said he would fall off the side of the earth because it is flat. He didnt. They were wrong

Scientists can't be wrong according to these guys. Because just about all scientists are in agreement on a theory that is interesting and does provide hope for explanations (which is the bedrock of science), they cannot be wrong. You know, it is possible for everybody on earth to be wrong about something and a handful of people to be right.

Let's just summarize this by saying evolutionary theory is tentative. It holds promise and is the most likely explanation for what we see in the world. It is not absolutely certain, but worth investigating for years to come.

stocktrader23 · 11-05-2004, 06:12 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mike33
Scientists can't be wrong according to these guys. Because just about all scientists are in agreement on a theory that is interesting and does provide hope for explanations (which is the bedrock of science), they cannot be wrong. You know, it is possible for everybody on earth to be wrong about something and a handful of people to be right.

Let's just summarize this by saying evolutionary theory is tentative. It holds promise and is the most likely explanation for what we see in the world. It is not absolutely certain, but worth investigating for years to come.

I'll just choose God as my end all to this topic and leave it at that.

Nysus · 11-05-2004, 06:13 AM

Holy folks.

It's quite simple.

There is such a thing as intelligence, please don't deny it - and there are different levels of intelligence.

There are also things called comprehension, logic, and analysis skills.

If you lack in any of the 4 above then it will be hard for you to accept evolution.

I could counter ever argument in that it's a baseless reply because they're ignoring facts that were already put out in the thread.

Not being educated doesn't mean it doesn't exist - though that's 50% of American's problems. I wish Gore had run. Kerry was too soft.

Matt

Drake · 11-05-2004, 06:13 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Joe Citizen
So you are saying evolution is impossible because it's been happening for too long?

No I said if those 3 conditions could be met it's very possible.

CET · 11-05-2004, 06:13 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mike33
The moth experiment has been discredited. They discovered that their were two kinds of moths. It's not astounding that the dark moth that could not be seen would live while the one that stuck out like a sore thumb was picked off by predators.

Fruit flies was interesting, but again, it only shows natural selection.

EXACTLY!!! The darker moth survived better and perpetuated itself more in the are with darker trees, and vice versa. It was all about natural selection. Therefore it was NOT discredited, it was a display of natural selection. AGAIN, you've shown us that you really need to get educated in this subject if you want to discuss it and claim it is not scientific.

There have been LOTS of experiments with fruit flies which showed evolution through natural selection. Pesticide companies do it constantly.

Joe Citizen · 11-05-2004, 06:13 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mike33
Scientists can't be wrong according to these guys.

Sure they can. Lamarck was wrong.

There are lots of discarded scientific theories... because they have been falsified by other scientists.

theking · 11-05-2004, 06:14 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by CET
I'm not going to make excuses for those who have not read the entire thread. Assholes are assholes.

However, when the entire scientific community says "this is the best explaination we have of X," it's kind of arrogant to tell the entire scientific community that they don't know what they're talking about. I'm not going to tell me doctor he doesn't know what he's doing. These men and women spend their entire lives educating themselves on a subject that we get MAYBE one year of basic education in, and many of us don't even get that. Yet we're going to tell them that we know better then them?

The consensus of the scientific community...not the entire scientific community...and I have told doctors that they did not know what they were doing...on several occasions...and I was proved to be correct...and yet I do not have any formal medical training.

BTW...the scientific community is in flux in almost all areas of science (if not all)...and often discard parts of an old theory with what becomes to be deemed a better theory...thus what is accepted today may not be accepted at a later point in time.

CET · 11-05-2004, 06:15 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by stocktrader23
Sorry, when their best explanation requires more assumptions than I can count I won't accept it at face value.

READ THE SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE.

Johny Traffic · 11-05-2004, 06:15 AM

You know the thing Im most supprised about is that the thread turned into a discusion about evolution and not the fact that 50% of Americans dont beleive it and dont want it taught in schools.

That frightens me. It looks like the religious wacos are taking over America.

CET · 11-05-2004, 06:16 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Johny Traffic
In 1492 a sailor called Christopher Columbus went sailing to discover new lands. The wisest and cleverist scientist of the day said he would fall off the side of the earth because it is flat. He didnt. They were wrong

Not true, only uneducated peasants believed the earth was flat. The earth was proven to be round over 2,000 years before columbus sailed.

ADL Colin · 11-05-2004, 06:16 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Johny Traffic
In 1492 a sailor called Christopher Columbus went sailing to discover new lands. The wisest and cleverist scientist of the day said he would fall off the side of the earth because it is flat. He didnt. They were wrong

This is a myth. The earth was known to not be flat since ancient Greece. Educated people of Columbus' day already knew this.

SlutFinder · 11-05-2004, 06:17 AM

it would take me a year to read through this thread now!

ADL Colin · 11-05-2004, 06:17 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by CET
Not true, only uneducated peasants believed the earth was flat. The earth was proven to be round over 2,000 years before columbus sailed.

"Jinx" ;-)

CET · 11-05-2004, 06:17 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mike33
Scientists can't be wrong according to these guys.

I call "bullshit" on your strawman argument! No one said that. The rest is null and void as a result.

ADL Colin · 11-05-2004, 06:18 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Johny Traffic
That frightens me. It looks like the religious wacos are taking over America.

They just never went away.

CET · 11-05-2004, 06:19 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Colin
This is a myth. The earth was known to not be flat since ancient Greece. Educated people of Columbus' day already knew this.

The grecians got the idea of a round earth from the egyptians, who were able to measure the earth's circumfrence from a well at the equator and the length of a shadow cast by a pole. The measurement wasn't exact, but it was pretty damn close.

Johny Traffic · 11-05-2004, 06:21 AM

Quote:

This is a myth. The earth was known to not be flat since ancient Greece. Educated people of Columbus' day already knew this.

Point conceded. But the point I was trying to make is that what we think today isnt what we think tommorow, however clever we are.

To that end, the fact that Americans are turning to blind religious faith instead of science, is a worry. The most worrying part is that Biology teachers are under preasure not to even teach evolution in some places. Thats not healthy. It seems they are going backward not forward, as the recent election I think showed.

Seeing all those religious extremists on telly is a worry.

CET · 11-05-2004, 06:22 AM

OK folks, it's way passed my bedtime. It's been fun and keep fighting the good fight. Just don't go for religious propoganda.

"In religion, to question is herasy. In science, to question is required." - Anonymous

Nysus · 11-05-2004, 06:24 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mike33
No I said if those 3 conditions could be met it's very possible.

You should re-read this thread and put down the points people stated.

I'm curious though - assuming you're right, and 'evolution' doesn't exist ... who or what started the first micro-organism?

Did it just happen? Well, you need amino acids, and in the right environment, given MILLIONS or BILLIONS of tries, at some point they might combine, make a chemical reaction, and become living. And well, they did combine, and now after trillions of more alternate environments the strongest species have thrived.

Dinosaurs used to be the thriving species until (many theories still) their food source shrunk due to climate change so less food, or a big rock smashed into the earth throwing dust into the air, blocking out the sun for 2-3 years, which is why some believe alligators / crocs / etc. still exist from those times because it is known now (from research / observation) that their species can live without eating for 2, 3 even 4-5 years depending on their size WITHOUT FOOD; because they drop their heartrate.

So anyway, that's one case of evolution - alligators survived most other dinosaurs / species from the dinosaur age because of how their species evolved into (reptiles, cold blooded, which allowed them to almost stop their heart and conserve energy). Them surviving is evolution; they're alive now, and the other species are not (most of them anyway); that's what evolution is.

Mike - I think you're not understanding the definition of evolution.

Matt

ADL Colin · 11-05-2004, 06:28 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by CET
The grecians got the idea of a round earth from the egyptians, who were able to measure the earth's circumfrence from a well at the equator and the length of a shadow cast by a pole. The measurement wasn't exact, but it was pretty damn close.

Erastothenes did that. He was Greek but lived in Alexandria which was technically Greek at the time because it has been conquered by Alexander - hence the name. Did an Egyptian do this before him?

Drake · 11-05-2004, 06:29 AM

Nysus, will tackle this later. It's late here

CET, Colin, Stock, Johnny, guys, nice discussion. I'm happy you can take what I gave you and support your arguments. Let us keep questioning.

I will re-iterate. Science is the key as far as I'm concerned. I ONLY take issue with evolutionary theory. None of us are going to the stake because none of us are religious. This was merely a learning exercise. Thanks, and g'night phew

ADL Colin · 11-05-2004, 06:31 AM

Same here. Heading to the gym. Thanks for the discussion. See ya all later.

Mike, try this book and let me know what you think. "The Ancestor's Tale" by Dawkins. Brand new.

sacX · 11-05-2004, 06:31 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Johny Traffic
In 1492 a sailor called Christopher Columbus went sailing to discover new lands. The wisest and cleverist scientist of the day said he would fall off the side of the earth because it is flat. He didnt. They were wrong

oh what i posted was already said.

Basic_man · 11-05-2004, 06:32 AM

And 51% of them voted for Bush !

Joe Citizen · 11-05-2004, 06:34 AM

titmowse · 11-05-2004, 06:36 AM

it was a good thread.

Joe Citizen · 11-05-2004, 06:39 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by titmowse
it was a good thread.

Whenever there is another evolution thread we should just link to this one and save people the trouble.

Johny Traffic · 11-05-2004, 07:19 AM

This has been my longest thread so far

Thanks everyone, shame I couldnt push it over the ten page mark

Nysus · 11-05-2004, 07:29 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mike33
Nysus, will tackle this later. It's late here

...

I will re-iterate. Science is the key as far as I'm concerned. I ONLY take issue with evolutionary theory. None of us are going to the stake because none of us are religious. This was merely a learning exercise. Thanks, and g'night phew

Okay, cool!

Just keep in mind, evolution doesn't require science, evolution is a definition of a process that says,

1. A gradual process in which something changes into a different and usually more complex or better form. See Synonyms at development.

2. a) The process of developing. b) Gradual development.

3. Biology. a) Change in the genetic composition of a population during successive generations, as a result of natural selection acting on the genetic variation among individuals, and resulting in the development of new species. b) The historical development of a related group of organisms; phylogeny.

4. A movement that is part of a set of ordered movements.

5. Mathematics. The extraction of a root of a quantity.

A definition doesn't require belief or not, it's just a definition of describing something, what all of the above states.

Good old Google for evolution resulted in this URL;

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/evol...efinition.html

A quote from 1986 pretty well describes all variations of evolution;

"In the broadest sense, evolution is merely change, and so is all-pervasive; galaxies, languages, and political systems all evolve. Biological evolution ... is change in the properties of populations of organisms that transcend the lifetime of a single individual. The ontogeny of an individual is not considered evolution; individual organisms do not evolve. The changes in populations that are considered evolutionary are those that are inheritable via the genetic material from one generation to the next. Biological evolution may be slight or substantial; it embraces everything from slight changes in the proportion of different alleles within a population (such as those determining blood types) to the successive alterations that led from the earliest protoorganism to snails, bees, giraffes, and dandelions."

- Douglas J. Futuyma in Evolutionary Biology, Sinauer Associates 1986

Hope this helps some.

Matt

Danny_C · 11-05-2004, 08:24 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mike33
Btw, rejecting Evolutionary theory does not mean one is rejecting science. I'm a firm believer in science. Biology, astrology, chemistry, math, physics. Those are all wonderful sciences.

The problem with evolution is that it's based on millions of unverifiable assumptions of which few if any have actually been demonstrated.

Perhaps you should read more about science. The only scientists who reject evolution are the Christian ones. Evolution is 100% proven.

11-05-2004, 06:01 AM	#408
stocktrader23 Let's do some business. Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: The dirty south. Posts: 18,781	Do they still give out longest thread prizes? __________________ Hands Free Adult - Join Once, Earn For Life "I try to make a habit of bouncing my eyes up to the face of a beautiful woman, and often repeat “not mine” in my head or even verbally. She’s not mine. God has her set aside. She’s not mine. She’s His little girl, and she needs me to fight for her by keeping my eyes where they should be."

11-05-2004, 06:09 AM	#416
SlutFinder Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: UK Posts: 2,273	wow this thread got long! __________________ Legit mailing and optin databases - Adult,Casino&Pharmacy. ICQ: 272-745-001 - EMail:[email protected] Adult payments allowed! on your site or between webmasters! www.YowCow.com

11-05-2004, 06:13 AM	#423
Nysus Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2001 Posts: 7,817	Holy folks. It's quite simple. There is such a thing as intelligence, please don't deny it - and there are different levels of intelligence. There are also things called comprehension, logic, and analysis skills. If you lack in any of the 4 above then it will be hard for you to accept evolution. I could counter ever argument in that it's a baseless reply because they're ignoring facts that were already put out in the thread. Not being educated doesn't mean it doesn't exist - though that's 50% of American's problems. I wish Gore had run. Kerry was too soft. Matt __________________ What name is pr0 / Untouched Markets using these days? Untouched Markets - pr0 - Refund My Money Now Someone owes me $2,000 because they didn't do any work that was paid for pointing at pr0 / William / UntouchedMarkets See https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-business-discussion/948258-untouchedmarkets-pr0-refund-money-post16744521.html and for more detailed see https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-business-discussion/948645-re-recent-bullshit-drama-explained-detail-pr0-untouched-markets.html

11-05-2004, 06:15 AM	#429
Johny Traffic Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 5,461	You know the thing Im most supprised about is that the thread turned into a discusion about evolution and not the fact that 50% of Americans dont beleive it and dont want it taught in schools. That frightens me. It looks like the religious wacos are taking over America. __________________ hosted flv's, hosted galleries, morphing rss feeds, free content, free sites, hosted blog

11-05-2004, 06:17 AM	#432
SlutFinder Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: UK Posts: 2,273	it would take me a year to read through this thread now! __________________ Legit mailing and optin databases - Adult,Casino&Pharmacy. ICQ: 272-745-001 - EMail:[email protected] Adult payments allowed! on your site or between webmasters! www.YowCow.com

11-05-2004, 06:08 AM	#415
Drake Hello world! Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 12,508	I stated 3 conditions in this beginnging of the thread upon which I would agree with the evolution as the explanation of all life as we see it and experience it today. If all these were met I would have no problem with it. But when you talk about millions of years, you're asking for mass extrapolations, each of which come into question.

11-05-2004, 06:22 AM	#438
CET Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 2,754	OK folks, it's way passed my bedtime. It's been fun and keep fighting the good fight. Just don't go for religious propoganda. "In religion, to question is herasy. In science, to question is required." - Anonymous __________________ Alt Journals, Blogs for Perverts! Fitness and nutrition writer, and UNIX/Linux Sys Ad in training "Just as a man who has fallen into a heap of filth ought to seek the great pond of water covered with lotuses, which is near by: even so seek thou for the great deathless lake of Nirvana to wash off the defilement of wrong. If the lake is not sought, it is not the fault of the lake."

11-05-2004, 06:29 AM	#441
Drake Hello world! Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 12,508	Nysus, will tackle this later. It's late here CET, Colin, Stock, Johnny, guys, nice discussion. I'm happy you can take what I gave you and support your arguments. Let us keep questioning. I will re-iterate. Science is the key as far as I'm concerned. I ONLY take issue with evolutionary theory. None of us are going to the stake because none of us are religious. This was merely a learning exercise. Thanks, and g'night phew

11-05-2004, 06:31 AM	#442
ADL Colin Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Tube Titans, USA Posts: 11,929	Same here. Heading to the gym. Thanks for the discussion. See ya all later. Mike, try this book and let me know what you think. "The Ancestor's Tale" by Dawkins. Brand new. __________________ Adult Date Link - $50 PPS starting NOW! -- good and JUICY! skype = "adultdatelink"

11-05-2004, 06:32 AM	#444
Basic_man Programming King Pin Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Montreal Posts: 27,360	And 51% of them voted for Bush ! __________________ UUGallery Builder - automated photo/video gallery plugin for Wordpress! Stop looking! Checkout Naked Hosting, online since 1999 !

11-05-2004, 06:34 AM	#445
Joe Citizen Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 4,552

11-05-2004, 06:36 AM	#446
titmowse Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: TEXAS Posts: 5,320	it was a good thread. __________________ I still love everybody

11-05-2004, 07:19 AM	#448
Johny Traffic Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 5,461	This has been my longest thread so far Thanks everyone, shame I couldnt push it over the ten page mark __________________ hosted flv's, hosted galleries, morphing rss feeds, free content, free sites, hosted blog