And people wonder why terrorists want to destroy the USA - GoFuckYourself.com

Joe Sixpack · 05-26-2003, 03:54 AM

http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/....us/index.html

"WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Bush administration is considering taking a hard-line approach toward the government of Iran that could include efforts to destabilize Tehran's Islamic regime, a State Department official told CNN on Sunday..."

Bobby Fissure · 05-26-2003, 04:10 AM

Reshaping the Middle East for Israel. Who would have thought?

Serge_Oprano · 05-26-2003, 04:15 AM

and as always,
it's nice to see why real Australian players don't post bullshit,
they are busy making money

http://www.carlajayne.com/couriermail_may03/index.html

while idiots like 6 packs save the world
;-))))

yall · 05-26-2003, 04:15 AM

Isreal is the reason for every political argument in the universe. If there is life somewhere other than earth, and an uprising happened, I would blame Isreal.

Libertine · 05-26-2003, 04:17 AM

Hey, they're doing it all for the good of those damn sand******s. The towelheads just don't know what's best for them, but Dubya most certainly does - christianity & capitalism or death, baby!

yall · 05-26-2003, 04:18 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by punkworld
Hey, they're doing it all for the good of those damn sand******s. The towelheads just don't know what's best for them, but Dubya most certainly does - christianity & capitalism or death, baby!

Maybe, but you can remove the "Christianity" part.

Joe Sixpack · 05-26-2003, 04:21 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Serge_Oprano
and as always,
it's nice to see why real Australian players don't post bullshit,
they are busy making money

http://www.carlajayne.com/couriermail_may03/index.html

while idiots like 6 packs save the world
;-))))

What gave you the bizzare idea that I would ever want to be considered a "player"?

Serge_Oprano · 05-26-2003, 04:22 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Joe Sixpack

What gave you the bizzare idea that I would ever want to be considered a "player"?

you can't...you don't have brains, stemina and street smarts for that...

Joe Sixpack · 05-26-2003, 04:23 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Serge_Oprano

you can't...you don't have brains, stemina and street smarts for that...

Like I said, its not an ambition of mine.

Paul Markham · 05-26-2003, 04:25 AM

This sounds absolutely reasonable, the Iran government has for a long time not been at war with the US or any other country, it has also not held any US embassy prisoners. Plus it has not invaded anywhere else.

Also it tried to get involved in the politics of a neighboring country that had been invaded. It me have been concerned to the stability of this country and the likelihood of their country using WMDs against is AGAIN.

So I see Mr. Bush has the perfect right to destabilize the elected government. Anyway they are towel heads so who cares?

Plus do there supporters give one cent to the Bush re-election fund, like those nice guys from Israel? Have you seen what those saints are thinking about in Israel? They are going to give back some of the land they "liberated" from the towel heads.

And keep giving $$$$$$$$$ to the "Re-elect Bush fund"

Paul Markham · 05-26-2003, 04:27 AM

See here is your proof what kind of people Bush is up against.

Quote:

The United States had planned to send its own representative to the meeting, but canceled "because of concerns of an al Qaeda link," the U.S. official said.

"We know al Qaeda individuals are inside Iran," the official said. "But what is the definition of custody? If they are in Iran, free to plan and direct attacks, such as the Saudi bombings, and are able to receive visitors and updates and other information, that is not custody. That is safe haven."

This information comes direct from the same source that told us of the Iraqi's WMDs.

Proof enough I think.

Serge_Oprano · 05-26-2003, 04:28 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Joe Sixpack

Like I said, its not an ambition of mine.

it doesn't matter if it is or if it isn't...

you just can't do it even if you try...but you know that already,
you tried
;-)))

Joe Sixpack · 05-26-2003, 04:29 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Serge_Oprano

it doesn't matter if it is or if it isn't...

you just can't do it even if you try...but you know that already,
you tried
;-)))

Errrr... no I didn't.

Bobby Fissure · 05-26-2003, 04:32 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Serge_Oprano
you can't...you don't have brains, stemina and street smarts for that...

You do not possess one of the aformentioned qualities and yet it didn't stop you.

yall · 05-26-2003, 04:35 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Bobby Fissure

You do not possess one of the aformentioned qualities and yet it didn't stop you.

Not to mention the dumbass can't spell.

kenny · 05-26-2003, 04:35 AM

Terroist want to destroy the United States. They can fucking "want" until hell freezes over.

As long as the majority of american citizens support a war on terroism, countries that interfer with the operation will be dealt with. It is no secert. They can cooperate or not.

Serge_Oprano · 05-26-2003, 04:52 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Bobby Fissure

You do not possess one of the aformentioned qualities and yet it didn't stop you.

hmmm...brush your teeth before I cum in your mouth next time...

Libertine · 05-26-2003, 04:52 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by kenny
Terroist want to destroy the United States. They can fucking "want" until hell freezes over.

As long as the majority of american citizens support a war on terroism, countries that interfer with the operation will be dealt with. It is no secert. They can cooperate or not.

Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.

Serge_Oprano · 05-26-2003, 04:53 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by yall
Not to mention the dumbass can't spell.

...and this si why I love GFY...

evie · 05-26-2003, 04:55 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by kenny
Terroist want to destroy the United States. They can fucking "want" until hell freezes over.

As long as the majority of american citizens support a war on terroism, countries that interfer with the operation will be dealt with. It is no secert. They can cooperate or not.

Exactly.

But I think what you meant to say was ". They can cooperate or we will blow them all to hell"

Especially if that nice, honest Mr Bush says they are the enemy.

Paul again in Eva's machine.

funkmaster · 05-26-2003, 05:10 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Serge_Oprano

...and this si why I love GFY...

... same here !!

... and no, I am not going to comment on that great brizzy article ...

kenny · 05-26-2003, 05:16 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by evie
Exactly.

But I think what you meant to say was ". They can cooperate or we will blow them all to hell"

Especially if that nice, honest Mr Bush says they are the enemy.

Paul again in Eva's machine.

There is truth to that, you take a large group of people the bell curve drops. Goverments are large groups of people. No society is perfect. Is bush honest? I seriously don't think he is doing it for kicks. I don't know the things he knows I am not presented with the inteligence he has. He could be dishonest, I can't say for sure. Its your opinion that he is dishonest, and you probably have good reason for it. The same applies for my opinions.

kenny · 05-26-2003, 05:23 AM

When Bush is out of office and the war on terroism remains. I wonder how some people will react. Will they just start throwing darts at the new president. Will they realize that it is bigger then one man

theking · 05-26-2003, 05:29 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by evie
Exactly.

But I think what you meant to say was ". They can cooperate or we will blow them all to hell"

Especially if that nice, honest Mr Bush says they are the enemy.

Paul again in Eva's machine.

I will say it for him.

The USA is at war...and from day one of this war the President has stated that you are either with us or against us...so any nation that does not "cooperate" is subject to have the hell blown out of them. I do not know how this administration...with the backing of Congress...the Court and the people could have made this any clearer from the beginning of this war. It has been stated that this war will continue for 10-30 years.

SexySarah · 05-26-2003, 05:31 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking

I will say it for him.

The USA is at war...and from day one of this war the President has stated that you are either with us or against us...so any nation that does not "cooperate" is subject to have the hell blown out of them. I do not know how this administration...with the backing of Congress...the Court and the people could have made this any clearer from the beginning of this war. It has been stated that this war will continue for 10-30 years.

evie · 05-26-2003, 05:39 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking

I will say it for him.

The USA is at war...and from day one of this war the President has stated that you are either with us or against us...so any nation that does not "cooperate" is subject to have the hell blown out of them. I do not know how this administration...with the backing of Congress...the Court and the people could have made this any clearer from the beginning of this war. It has been stated that this war will continue for 10-30 years.

Exactly now this guy has his finger on the pulse of things.

"Unless you back us in what ever we tell you is the truth you are against us and probably terrorist to boot."

Do you think before the US declares war on the rest of the world they could start showing us some evidence?

Yesterday I just thought you were smoking dope now I don't know what the fuck you're on, Angel Dust?

CHARLY

theking · 05-26-2003, 05:51 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by evie
Exactly now this guy has his finger on the pulse of things.

"Unless you back us in what ever we tell you is the truth you are against us and probably terrorist to boot."

Do you think before the US declares war on the rest of the world they could start showing us some evidence?

Yesterday I just thought you were smoking dope now I don't know what the fuck you're on, Angel Dust?

CHARLY

You just don't get it do you. The evidence was 9/11...and the President declared war...with the backing of Congress...the Court and the people. Any country that presents the appearance of being hostile towards the USA is subject to pay severe consequences. What fucking part of that do you not understand?

funkmaster · 05-26-2003, 05:53 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking

You just don't get it do you. The evidence was 9/11..

... most of the hijackers came from saudi arabia not iraq though ...

SexySarah · 05-26-2003, 05:54 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking

You just don't get it do you. The evidence was 9/11...and the President declared war...with the backing of Congress...the Court and the people. Any country that presents the appearance of being hostile towards the USA is subject to pay severe consequences. What fucking part of that do you not understand?

kenny · 05-26-2003, 05:54 AM

The fact in this matter is that Iraq wasn't cooperating for shit. They could of destroyed those weapons in the last minute, they could have gave them to somebody else. If they never had them, all they had to do is present the UN will detailed information on how, when, where they destroyed them. Using such weapons agaisnt the United States would result in more Iraqi troops being killed opposed to american soilders, being that the military is well prepared to under go such a attack. Not only that, but then the rest of the world would come down on them as well. Iraq was trying to play physcological warfare by attemping to make the public lose support through the media. That was the only chance they had. Saddam is gone but his physcological war continues on. Probably the smartest move he could of made, because now we got people saying "where is the evidence?". If it really was propaganda from the USA wouldn't they have planted the weapons by now?
I think the war on Iraq served multiple purposes. They unleased a awesome military might and put hostile countries in check. It is the war on terroism.

It could be propaganda from Iraq it could be from the US. I know one thing for certain. Nobody here lnows exactly what the fuck went down

Joe Sixpack · 05-26-2003, 05:58 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by kenny
Probably the smartest move he could of made, because now we got people saying "where is the evidence?". If it really was propaganda from the USA wouldn't they have planted the weapons by now?

Oh yeah that's right... where are those weapons of mass distraction?

yall · 05-26-2003, 05:59 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Serge_Oprano

...and this si why I love GFY...

I think you love the cock.

theking · 05-26-2003, 06:02 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by funkmaster

... most of the hijackers came from saudi arabia not iraq though ...

The point about 9/11 is not where individual hijackers come from. The point of 9/11 is...attacks on the continental USA will not be tolerated...and the terrorists are from Muslim countries.

There were multiple reasons for the invasion of Iraq and one of those reasons was to send a message to the Muslim countries...get your act together or face the consequences. The USA will dismantle every Muslim country, one by one, if they are perceived to be hostile towards the USA...including Saudi Arabia.

kenny · 05-26-2003, 06:16 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Joe Sixpack

Oh yeah that's right... where are those weapons of mass distraction?

Seriously though, the propaganda can work both ways. Bush delivers a 48 hour warning, Sadam had the weapons moved as planned. His sons withdraw 1 billion dollars from the Iraqi national bank on the 18th. They all leave the country. They fight with phycological warfare in attempt to make the american public lose support, being that there is no way they can win using military force. Worse case they are hiding in another country with a fortune and the United States comes up empty handed, making them look bad.
Or it can very well be weapons of mass distraction. I dont know the exact truth in the matter. You don't know the exact truth in the matter. So lets set here on a adult webmaster board and fire our opinions with no chance to prove the exact events.

escorpio · 05-26-2003, 06:16 AM

Now that's the Joe Sixpack I know!
It had been so long since you posted any inflammatory bullshit I thought you were on medication.

Joe Sixpack · 05-26-2003, 06:23 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by escorpio
Now that's the Joe Sixpack I know!
It had been so long since you posted any inflammatory bullshit I thought you were on medication.

I wish!

Mmmmmm.... medication.

Bobby Fissure · 05-26-2003, 06:23 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking
The point about 9/11 is not where individual hijackers come from. The point of 9/11 is...attacks on the continental USA will not be tolerated...and the terrorists are from Muslim countries.

Iraq was a secular nation under Saddam. Alcohol was sold freely and women didn't have to wear a veil. It was the most Westernized of all Arab nations before the first Gulf War.

If a couple of nutters from Portugal bombed a building in Washington, would you support the invasion of Spain?

theking · 05-26-2003, 06:34 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Bobby Fissure

Iraq was a secular nation under Saddam. Alcohol was sold freely and women didn't have to wear a veil. It was the most Westernized of all Arab nations before the first Gulf War.

If a couple of nutters from Portugal bombed a building in Washington, would you support the invasion of Spain?

Saddam attempted to make Iraq a secular nation but it was, and is populated by Muslims. If any country is hostile towards the USA and is providing safe harbor...or financial aid to terrorists...they are subject to having their country dismantled.

I will repeat that the reasons for the invasion of Iraq were multiple and primarily strategic in nature. Saddam was a fool and made himself and his country a likely and easy first target.

Living For Today · 05-26-2003, 06:36 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Serge_Oprano
and as always,
it's nice to see why real Australian players don't post bullshit,
they are busy making money

http://www.carlajayne.com/couriermail_may03/index.html

while idiots like 6 packs save the world
;-))))

good links. thanks serge.

kenny · 05-26-2003, 06:36 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Bobby Fissure

Iraq was a secular nation under Saddam. Alcohol was sold freely and women didn't have to wear a veil. It was the most Westernized of all Arab nations before the first Gulf War.

If a couple of nutters from Portugal bombed a building in Washington, would you support the invasion of Spain?

If someone from spain did that today nothing will happen to spain. However if spain was a dictatorship, the dictator had a violent history supported terroism. Was known to interfer with the interst of the united states, then people would have a different view on spain.
Goverments that support networks of terrorism, finace networks of terroism, need to change. They will be changed one way or the other. Cut of the terroist money flow, give them no safe place to operate, put them under pressure no matter where they go. It is the war on terroism. Change or remove the goverments that provide them safe haven and they will go away. They can't operate if they are to busy running and hiding, trying to get money. etc.

SexySarah · 05-26-2003, 06:37 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking

Saddam attempted to make Iraq a secular nation but it was, and is populated by Muslims. If any country is hostile towards the USA and is providing safe harbor...or financial aid to terrorists...they are subject to having their country dismantled.

I will repeat that the reasons for the invasion of Iraq were multiple and primarily strategic in nature. Saddam was a fool and made himself and his country a likely and easy first target.

why do you post here?

seriously - why?

SABAI · 05-26-2003, 07:01 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by kenny
The fact in this matter is that Iraq wasn't cooperating for shit. They could of destroyed those weapons in the last minute, they could have gave them to somebody else. If they never had them, all they had to do is present the UN will detailed information on how, when, where they destroyed them. Using such weapons agaisnt the United States would result in more Iraqi troops being killed opposed to american soilders, being that the military is well prepared to under go such a attack. Not only that, but then the rest of the world would come down on them as well. Iraq was trying to play physcological warfare by attemping to make the public lose support through the media. That was the only chance they had. Saddam is gone but his physcological war continues on. Probably the smartest move he could of made, because now we got people saying "where is the evidence?". If it really was propaganda from the USA wouldn't they have planted the weapons by now?
I think the war on Iraq served multiple purposes. They unleased a awesome military might and put hostile countries in check. It is the war on terroism.

It could be propaganda from Iraq it could be from the US. I know one thing for certain. Nobody here lnows exactly what the fuck went down

fuck that there is ,TODAY, no evidence whatsoever that iraq had forbidden weapons....

and as for the "you are either with us or against us " thing its exactly what hitler used to say

sad country

theking · 05-26-2003, 07:04 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SABAI

fuck that there is ,TODAY, no evidence whatsoever that iraq had forbidden weapons....

and as for the "you are either with us or against us " thing its exactly what hitler used to say

sad country

Iraq admitted to having them but said they had destroyed them...1441 demanded they prove that they had destroyed them. They presented zero proof that they had destroyed them. Why do you think they would not provide the proof?

I don't recall the statement "you are either with us or against us" being attributed to Hilter. Are your 100% postive about your statement? I think it was more like "I am against you".

funkmaster · 05-26-2003, 07:06 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SABAI

and as for the "you are either with us or against us " thing its exactly what hitler used to say

... he never had to point that out.

FlyingIguana · 05-26-2003, 07:11 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking

Iraq admitted to having them but said they had destroyed them...1441 demanded they prove that they had destroyed them. They presented zero proof that they had destroyed them. Why do you think they would not provide the proof?

I don't recall the statement "you are either with us or against us" being attributed to Hilter. Are your 100% postive about your statement?

all the tree huggers want proof. yet they disregard the fact that the UN and inspectors said iraq was hiding something from them and not allowing the inspectors to do their job.

if you can clear your name by providing proof and you don't, then obviously you have something to hide.

kenny · 05-26-2003, 07:18 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SABAI

fuck that there is ,TODAY, no evidence whatsoever that iraq had forbidden weapons....

and as for the "you are either with us or against us " thing its exactly what hitler used to say

sad country

The same "sad" country that liberated France when Germans where sippin coffee in paris?

Iraq offered no proof. The UN was in deadlock, countries that Iraq owed money to was opposed to the war for that reason alone. Why didn't Iraq show proof? I already offered one possible motive.

SexySarah · 05-26-2003, 07:27 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by kenny

The same "sad" country that liberated France when Germans where sippin coffee in paris?

countries change I'm sure you'll agree

the world keeps turning

60 odd years ago the US was fighting japan

now the US and japan are huge trading partners

things change

countries change both for the better and worse

if we're going to keep quoting long past events, didn't the french help liberate the US from the british all those years ago?

kenny · 05-26-2003, 07:52 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SexySarah

countries change I'm sure you'll agree

the world keeps turning

60 odd years ago the US was fighting japan

now the US and japan are huge trading partners

things change

countries change both for the better and worse

if we're going to keep quoting long past events, didn't the french help liberate the US from the british all those years ago?

Point taken. I just find it ironic how someone can call the worlds most powerfull nation "sad". How can removing a man from power a man responsible for mass murder of countless thousands be viewed as "sad". Even if there was no weapons of mass destruction removing him from power was nothing less then the best thing to happen to Iraq.

Backov · 05-26-2003, 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by kenny

Point taken. I just find it ironic how someone can call the worlds most powerfull nation "sad". How can removing a man from power a man responsible for mass murder of countless thousands be viewed as "sad". Even if there was no weapons of mass destruction removing him from power was nothing less then the best thing to happen to Iraq.

I don't recall anyone removing Bush from power..

OH! You mean the OTHER guy that mass-murdered 10s of thousands of Iraqis. Saddam. Ok.

Bush: Worst President Ever. Let's just hope he goes down as a buffoon instead of another Hitler. If he remains in power much longer I am afraid for what's going to happen.

Mike AI · 05-26-2003, 09:57 AM

Terrorist would want to destory the US no matter what our policy in the middle east was. They see people as either believers, or infidels*.....

Iran has been a chief exporter of terrorism for decades, it has also work to destabilize the middle east and the world. Putting pressure on Iran is the next logical step after removing Saddam. IF we can remove the dictators in Iran with political and other non-military pressure, that would be fantastic.

The United States has made a commitment to stabilize the region, just like we did in Europe and Asian after WWII.

It will take a long time and a major commitment of troops and cash, but in the long term free markets, free minds, free gov't will make the world and hence the US strongers and more stable.

The best part of this is, all the crybaby anti-US, anti-Israel cannot do anything about it.... It is the wave of the 21st Century...

The United States only needs its superior military might on special occasions - normally we can conquer lands with mere ideas, and concepts.... liberal democracy, open markets, freedom.

* Quick note everyone on GFY would be considered and infidel, and subject to death.

05-26-2003, 03:54 AM	#1
Joe Sixpack So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Australia Posts: 3,793	And people wonder why terrorists want to destroy the USA http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/....us/index.html "WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Bush administration is considering taking a hard-line approach toward the government of Iran that could include efforts to destabilize Tehran's Islamic regime, a State Department official told CNN on Sunday..."

05-26-2003, 04:17 AM	#5
Libertine sex dwarf Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 17,860	Hey, they're doing it all for the good of those damn sand******s. The towelheads just don't know what's best for them, but Dubya most certainly does - christianity & capitalism or death, baby! __________________ /(bb\|[^b]{2})/

05-26-2003, 04:25 AM	#10
Paul Markham Too old to care Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws. Posts: 52,943	This sounds absolutely reasonable, the Iran government has for a long time not been at war with the US or any other country, it has also not held any US embassy prisoners. Plus it has not invaded anywhere else. Also it tried to get involved in the politics of a neighboring country that had been invaded. It me have been concerned to the stability of this country and the likelihood of their country using WMDs against is AGAIN. So I see Mr. Bush has the perfect right to destabilize the elected government. Anyway they are towel heads so who cares? Plus do there supporters give one cent to the Bush re-election fund, like those nice guys from Israel? Have you seen what those saints are thinking about in Israel? They are going to give back some of the land they "liberated" from the towel heads. And keep giving $$$$$$$$$ to the "Re-elect Bush fund" __________________ Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500. PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70 Last edited by charly; 05-26-2003 at 04:30 AM..

05-26-2003, 04:35 AM	#16
kenny Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2002 Posts: 7,245	Terroist <b>want</b> to destroy the United States. They can fucking "want" until hell freezes over. As long as the majority of american citizens support a war on terroism, countries that interfer with the operation will be dealt with. It is no secert. They can cooperate or not.

05-26-2003, 05:54 AM	#30
kenny Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2002 Posts: 7,245	The fact in this matter is that Iraq wasn't cooperating for shit. They could of destroyed those weapons in the last minute, they could have gave them to somebody else. If they never had them, all they had to do is present the UN will detailed information on how, when, where they destroyed them. Using such weapons agaisnt the United States would result in more Iraqi troops being killed opposed to american soilders, being that the military is well prepared to under go such a attack. Not only that, but then the rest of the world would come down on them as well. Iraq was trying to play physcological warfare by attemping to make the public lose support through the media. That was the only chance they had. Saddam is gone but his physcological war continues on. Probably the smartest move he could of made, because now we got people saying "where is the evidence?". If it really was propaganda from the USA wouldn't they have planted the weapons by now? I think the war on Iraq served multiple purposes. They unleased a awesome military might and put hostile countries in check. It is the war on terroism. It could be propaganda from Iraq it could be from the US. I know one thing for certain. Nobody here lnows exactly what the fuck went down Last edited by kenny; 05-26-2003 at 06:02 AM..

05-26-2003, 04:10 AM	#2
Bobby Fissure Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 380	Reshaping the Middle East for Israel. Who would have thought?

05-26-2003, 04:15 AM	#3
Serge_Oprano So Fucking Banned Join Date: Feb 2002 Posts: 9,820	and as always, it's nice to see why real Australian players don't post bullshit, they are busy making money http://www.carlajayne.com/couriermail_may03/index.html while idiots like 6 packs save the world ;-))))

05-26-2003, 04:15 AM	#4
yall Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 175	Isreal is the reason for every political argument in the universe. If there is life somewhere other than earth, and an uprising happened, I would blame Isreal.

05-26-2003, 05:23 AM	#23
kenny Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2002 Posts: 7,245	When Bush is out of office and the war on terroism remains. I wonder how some people will react. Will they just start throwing darts at the new president. Will they realize that it is bigger then one man

05-26-2003, 06:16 AM	#35
escorpio I love to racism, bro! Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: USA! USA! USA! Posts: 23,127	Now that's the Joe Sixpack I know! It had been so long since you posted any inflammatory bullshit I thought you were on medication. __________________ Unvaxxed, still alive.

05-26-2003, 09:57 AM	#50
Mike AI Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Elysian Fields Posts: 3,624	Terrorist would want to destory the US no matter what our policy in the middle east was. They see people as either believers, or infidels..... Iran has been a chief exporter of terrorism for decades, it has also work to destabilize the middle east and the world. Putting pressure on Iran is the next logical step after removing Saddam. IF we can remove the dictators in Iran with political and other non-military pressure, that would be fantastic. The United States has made a commitment to stabilize the region, just like we did in Europe and Asian after WWII. It will take a long time and a major commitment of troops and cash, but in the long term free markets, free minds, free gov't will make the world and hence the US strongers and more stable. The best part of this is, all the crybaby anti-US, anti-Israel cannot do anything about it.... It is the wave of the 21st Century... The United States only needs its superior military might on special occasions - normally we can conquer lands with mere ideas, and concepts.... liberal democracy, open markets, freedom. Quick note everyone on GFY would be considered and infidel, and subject to death. __________________ Make big money on your Domains! Why wait 40 days to get paid with the other guys? Parked.com pays the most for your traffic, and cuts checks twice a month!