Europe is spiritually bankrupt

[boobmaster]

http://www.time.com/time/europe/maga...457339,00.html

[detoxed]

shut the fuck up, you are on my ignore list so i dont know what you said, but shut the fuck up

[Crypt]

Shut up retard

[CJswe]

Which is to be considered a good thing!
kinda tired of being force fed hollywoods religion.
if i don't hear the phrase "god" in another series i'll be on top of the world

[TheJimmy]

Originally posted by Crypt
Shut up retard

it's a shame the relgious are so intolerant of everything that is not a mirror copy of their beliefs...

it's a shame that everyone is so intolerant of intolerant people...

[Corona]

"The reason the world is so fucked up is because we're undergoing evolution. And the reason our institutions, our traditional religions are all crumbling is because they're no longer relevant. So it's time for us to create a new philosophy and perhaps even a new religion." -- Bill Hicks

[Manowar]

Originally posted by Corona
"The reason the world is so fucked up is because we're undergoing evolution. And the reason our institutions, our traditional religions are all crumbling is because they're no longer relevant. So it's time for us to create a new philosophy and perhaps even a new religion." -- Bill Hicks

nice quote

[tony286]

I think here people are more spiritually bankrupt, they just put on the I believe in God show here better.

[xlogger]

Originally posted by Crypt
Shut up retard

What did boobmaster do to get all this love?

[Crypt]

Originally posted by xlogger
What did boobmaster do to get all this love?

He waste our air ;)

[boobmaster]

Originally posted by Corona
"The reason the world is so fucked up is because we're undergoing evolution. And the reason our institutions, our traditional religions are all crumbling is because they're no longer relevant. So it's time for us to create a new philosophy and perhaps even a new religion." -- Bill Hicks

Evolution is a lie and MR. Hicks is a secular humanist/atheist. Evolution is IMPOSSIBLE. See sig.

[boobmaster]

[Crypt]

Originally posted by boobmaster

I know, like 200 other ppl on your ignore list ;)

But i know you read it anyway ;) thats the funny part ;)

[sacX]

Originally posted by boobmaster
Evolution is a lie and MR. Hicks is a secular humanist/atheist. Evolution is IMPOSSIBLE. See sig.

You don't understand your own quote. Evolution is a process that has been observed many times in nature, it has VERY strong evidence.

I bet your mate Hoyle even believes in evolution. What he's suggesting is that the very first instance of life is a very very unlikely occurrence, that's got little to do with evolution.

[Corona]

Originally posted by sacX
You don't understand your own quote. Evolution is a process that has been observed many times in nature, it has VERY strong evidence.

I bet your mate Hoyle even believes in evolution. What he's suggesting is that the very first instance of life is a very very unlikely occurrence, that's got little to do with evolution.

Very true.

And boobmaster the evolution that he was talking about in that quote was not physical evolution.

[uchase/webpry]

Originally posted by sacX
You don't understand your own quote. Evolution is a process that has been observed many times in nature, it has VERY strong evidence.

I bet your mate Hoyle even believes in evolution. What he's suggesting is that the very first instance of life is a very very unlikely occurrence, that's got little to do with evolution.

How can so much sense come out of someone in germany?

[boobmaster]

Originally posted by sacX
You don't understand your own quote. Evolution is a process that has been observed many times in nature, it has VERY strong evidence.

I bet your mate Hoyle even believes in evolution. What he's suggesting is that the very first instance of life is a very very unlikely occurrence, that's got little to do with evolution.

You are correct. The quote in my sig has to do with abiogenesis, not with evolution as a process. However, the VAST MAJORITY of evolutionists believe in abiogenesis. Hoyle was pointing out that this is impossible.

I agree that there is significant evidence for evolution as a process, specifically MICROevolution. There is comparatively little evidence supporting MACROevolution. The fossil record bares that out.

[detoxed]

I love my ignore list

[boobmaster]

Originally posted by uchase/webpry
How can so much sense come out of someone in germany?

He used the word 'mate', so maybe he's an imposter. MATE is so Aussie/British.

[boobmaster]

Originally posted by detoxed
I love my ignore list

I thought you were going to sell me one of your sites. I guess you changed your mind.

[Bansheelinks]

Originally posted by boobmaster
Evolution is a lie. Evolution is IMPOSSIBLE. See sig.

Are you for fuckin' real or the GFY village idiot?

[sacX]

Originally posted by boobmaster
You are correct. The quote in my sig has to do with abiogenesis, not with evolution as a process. However, the VAST MAJORITY of evolutionists believe in abiogenesis. Hoyle was pointing out that this is impossible.

I agree that there is significant evidence for evolution as a process, specifically MICROevolution. There is comparatively little evidence supporting MACROevolution. The fossil record bares that out.

well "little" evidence for macro-evolution is better than 0 evidence for creationism. :-)

[boobmaster]

Originally posted by Bansheelinks


Are you for fuckin' real or the GFY village idiot?

I'd be happy to debate evolution with you all day.

[DarkBob]

Originally posted by boobmaster
I'd be happy to debate evolution with you all day.

why don't you do it somewhere else, no one else gives a fuck

[boobmaster]

Originally posted by sacX
well "little" evidence for macro-evolution is better than 0 evidence for creationism. :-)

The complexity of the simplest living organism argues for design. The complexity in nature argues for design. The dependencies in nature argue for design. Evidence for a creator is EVERYWHERE. Open your eyes, you blind fool.

[boobmaster]

Originally posted by DarkBob
why don't you do it somewhere else, no one else gives a fuck

Really? One of the most significant questions to face mankind and you don't give a fuck? You are a simple man, aren't you?

[Bansheelinks]

Originally posted by boobmaster


The complexity of the simplest living organism argues for design. The complexity in nature argues for design. The dependencies in nature argue for design. Evidence for a creator is EVERYWHERE. Open your eyes, you blind fool.

jesus christ, another fuckin' creationist.........

go watch "Inherit the Wind"........maybe you'll learn something about the blindness of religious intolerance based on myth....

the height of hilarity...........a creationist attempting, feebly of course, to use science to justify his/her mythology

[DarkBob]

Originally posted by boobmaster
Really? One of the most significant questions to face mankind and you don't give a fuck? You are a simple man, aren't you?

If you say so.

[boobmaster]

Originally posted by Bansheelinks
jesus christ, another fuckin' creationist.........

go watch "Inherit the Wind"........maybe you'll learn something about the blindness of religious intolerance based on myth....

the height of hilarity...........a creationist attempting, feebly of course, to use science to justify his/her mythology

... and what are your credentials? Where did you get your degree?

[Bansheelinks]

.........is it any surprise to anyone that your this blind, myopic republican who follows around this administration like a lamb to the slaughter?

you're a contradiction............what are you doing in this industry anyways? you should be running some crazy religious blog somewhere instead.

[boobmaster]

Originally posted by Bansheelinks
.........is it any surprise to anyone that your this blind, myopic republican who follows around this administration like a lamb to the slaughter?

you're a contradiction............what are you doing in this industry anyways? you should be running some crazy religious blog somewhere instead.

... again, I ask you, what are your academic credentials?

[sacX]

Originally posted by boobmaster


The complexity of the simplest living organism argues for design. The complexity in nature argues for design. The dependencies in nature argue for design. Evidence for a creator is EVERYWHERE. Open your eyes, you blind fool.

That's pretty poor logic. What designed the designer then?

[sacX]

a billion years of oceans of primoridal soup, volatile environment, and you end up with sub-microsopic virii and perhaps some algae.
Not particularly complex at all.

[Bansheelinks]

boobmaster, i've taken note of your posts in the past, mostly so i can laugh my ass off at someone like you who is so moronic in his belief systems. that'd be the day that i'm even baited into a serious discussion with a right-wing fanatic like you are.

seriously, maybe it'll take the DOJ, that you know and serve so well, to come after you to snap you out of your fog. and thats the last I'll address an issue that is a waste of everyone's time because the question has been scientifically answered adequately a long time ago. but you creationists refuse to admit this evidence and its not up to me to educate you on this matter. a complete waste of time............as if you'd listen anyways.

so

[boobmaster]

Originally posted by sacX
That's pretty poor logic. What designed the designer then?

Noone, because he is OUTSIDE of space and time. Beginnings and endings are only relevant within time.

[boobmaster]

Originally posted by sacX
a billion years of oceans of primoridal soup, volatile environment, and you end up with sub-microsopic virii and perhaps some algae.
Not particularly complex at all.

Life from Nonlife? VERY COMPLEX. Sorry! There was no biotic soup.

[Bansheelinks]

Originally posted by boobmaster
Noone, because he is OUTSIDE of space and time. Beginnings and endings are only relevant within time.

you just made my above point for me. how can you argue with someone who makes up bullshit rules like this.............."Because he is outside space and time." You have ventured out of science and into philosophical speculation where "anything goes" because "he is outside of space and time." you're a waste of time.

[sacX]

Originally posted by boobmaster
Noone, because he is OUTSIDE of space and time. Beginnings and endings are only relevant within time.

well that's a nice belief, but that's all it is.

[sacX]

Originally posted by boobmaster
Life from Nonlife? VERY COMPLEX. Sorry! There was no biotic soup.

the ocean now is a biotic soup, SORRRRRRRRRRRY. BURN!

[Joe Citizen]

This bullshit's been heard 1000 times before and refuted 1000 times before.



You guys are wasting your time.

Booby would be denying gravity if the Bible said so.

[boobmaster]

Originally posted by Bansheelinks
boobmaster, i've taken note of your posts in the past, mostly so i can laugh my ass off at someone like you who is so moronic in his belief systems. that'd be the day that i'm even baited into a serious discussion with a right-wing fanatic like you are.

seriously, maybe it'll take the DOJ, that you know and serve so well, to come after you to snap you out of your fog. and thats the last I'll address an issue that is a waste of everyone's time because the question has been scientifically answered adequately a long time ago. but you creationists refuse to admit this evidence and its not up to me to educate you on this matter. a complete waste of time............as if you'd listen anyways.

so

Not even the most diehard evolutionist would take your position.

IT HAS NEVER BEEN SHOWN HOW LIFE COULD HAVE POSSIBLY ARISEN FROM NON-LIFE. NEVER

Abiogenesis is a myth and you are a fool who desparately needs to believe that he will not have to give an account of his life before the living God.

[Bansheelinks]

Originally posted by Joe Citizen
This bullshit's been heard 1000 times before and refuted 1000 times before.



You guys are wasting your time.

Booby would be denying gravity if the Bible said so.

have to agree with you Joe.........thats the end of checking back on this idiotic thread for me...........

[boobmaster]

Originally posted by sacX
the ocean now is a biotic soup, SORRRRRRRRRRRY. BURN!

Do you think that life could spontaneously generate itself today?

[titmowse]

Originally posted by detoxed
shut the fuck up, you are on my ignore list so i dont know what you said, but shut the fuck up

i might be in love

[Bansheelinks]

Originally posted by boobmaster
Not even the most diehard evolutionist would take your position.

IT HAS NEVER BEEN SHOWN HOW LIFE COULD HAVE POSSIBLY ARISEN FROM NON-LIFE. NEVER

Abiogenesis is a myth and you are a fool who desparately needs to believe that he will not have to give an account of his life before the living God.

[Bansheelinks]

i'm a just shakin' all over!

[sacX]

Originally posted by boobmaster
Do you think that life could spontaneously generate itself today?

of course, the world is not an inert environment.

[boobmaster]

Originally posted by Bansheelinks
have to agree with you Joe.........thats the end of checking back on this idiotic thread for me...........

Good. Fuck off. You need to believe there is no God because to believe otherwise means you're going to HELL.

Tell me how the first living organism got here.

[sacX]

Originally posted by boobmaster
Not even the most diehard evolutionist would take your position.

IT HAS NEVER BEEN SHOWN HOW LIFE COULD HAVE POSSIBLY ARISEN FROM NON-LIFE. NEVER

Abiogenesis is a myth and you are a fool who desparately needs to believe that he will not have to give an account of his life before the living God.

God has NEVER been shown to exist, and will NEVER be proved.

At least with abiogeneisis it is a theory that can be tested.

[boobmaster]

Originally posted by sacX
of course, the world is not an inert environment.

Every evolutionist working on the theory today would disagree with you. Abiogenesis could not happen in this environment.