Richard Realm Reviewers - GoFuckYourself.com

berg.the.red · 09-08-2004, 08:38 AM

Hey Richards Realm Reviewers !! how about a little fucking consistence in your gallery reviewing ?? one day a gallery template is just fine ... next day it's "too much on thumbs page". too much what ?? 16 thumbnails is too much ?? too many actual words for your free-loading surfers ?? y`all using a magic 8-ball for gallery approval ??

and it wasn't even a soulcash gallery/site. i already know y`all reject those on the spot ...

Easton · 09-08-2004, 08:39 AM

well now you're never gonna get listed! LOL

Basic_man · 09-08-2004, 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Easton
well now you're never gonna get listed! LOL

rolf

berg.the.red · 09-08-2004, 08:46 AM

[chuckle] there IS that

guess the morning crew just doesn't like totemcash stuff ...

bluff · 09-08-2004, 08:51 AM

I wouldn't say it in that many words, but the guy is right. Furthermore please update your software, as it sometimes catches a gallery as 'slow' when it loads with 10 mbps. Doing multiple tests would be better.

bluff · 09-08-2004, 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Basic_man
rolf

it's rofl

Jdoughs · 09-08-2004, 08:54 AM

RichardsRealm turns down galleries?

Bansheelinks · 09-08-2004, 08:58 AM

glad to see i wasn't the only one..........i love RR and their traffic, but some of those reviewers are incredibly inconsistent........it depends who you get and some of them seem kinda cranky to me

johndoebob · 09-08-2004, 08:58 AM

Just be happy if you get listed and that's it.It's free traffic so don't bitch around.

The only time I got rejected for too many pics was with a 18 thumbs gallery.It's their decision and I never felt the need to bitch around about not getting listed when I get listed almost every day.

escorpio · 09-08-2004, 09:03 AM

I love Richards Realm. David is a good reviewer. Can't blame him for the occasional slow load and it's really not his responsibility to launch a thorough investigation. If you think the problem has been solved just sub it again. Of all the big TGPs, I think RR is the easiest to get along with.

Scott McD · 09-08-2004, 09:03 AM

My galleries have been rejected lately for 'not loading fast enough'.

Out of over 300 MGP's i submit to, this is the only one that fails for this reason...

johndoebob · 09-08-2004, 09:06 AM

It's FREE traffic, don't forget that guys.They could change to FHGs too and you'd all cry about not getting any good traffic anymore.

berg.the.red · 09-08-2004, 09:06 AM

johndoebob: yeah --it may be free traffic: but 99% of the traffic is non-buying free-loader traffic. it's not like 1 in 5 buys ...

and like i said: it's about consistency. like Bansheelinks said: some days those guys ( or gals ... ) accept nothing. this hapens to be a gallery template that they've been accepting ( or rejecting ) for months. only thing that changes is the content and the models name. so how is it one minute it's just fine --next minute it's "too much" ( and too much WHAT anyway ... ) ?

FlyingIguana · 09-08-2004, 09:07 AM

i've never really had a problem with them. they're one of the few, wait the only tgp that gets back to you and tells you why you're not listed so you can make adjustments.

Bansheelinks · 09-08-2004, 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by johndoebob
It's FREE traffic, don't forget that guys.They could change to FHGs too and you'd all cry about not getting any good traffic anymore.

RR has good policy that way and is a fine tgp without question, the point we're making is in some of the reviewing lately.........overall, of course, RR rocks and its why RR will be around 10 years from now........a fine tgp

Tipsy · 09-08-2004, 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Scott McD
My galleries have been rejected lately for 'not loading fast enough'.

Out of over 300 MGP's i submit to, this is the only one that fails for this reason...

A lot of smaller TGPs have that problem too simply because they're hosted on shitty servers.

Gotta say I don't get too many problems with RR. Once in a blue moon I get the too slow rejection but then there's every chance the Internet is being shitty between the reviewers ISP and one of my servers. Happens unfortunately.

lazycash · 09-08-2004, 09:09 AM

And God forbid you use the word "slut" on your hardcore gallery.

Steve · 09-08-2004, 09:10 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by FlyingIguana
i've never really had a problem with them. they're one of the few, wait the only tgp that gets back to you and tells you why you're not listed so you can make adjustments.

anyone remember the old days on adultbuffet? when Kman used to post the decline reasons? holy shit, that was even funnier than his daily rant, or the gallery descriptions they used

johndoebob · 09-08-2004, 09:10 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by berg.the.red
johndoebob: yeah --it may be free traffic: but 99% of the traffic is non-buying free-loader traffic. it's not like 1 in 5 buys ...

But if you use FHGs it doesn't matter and they could do that.

As long as I get something for free I don't bitch around and question nothing, if you don't like them don't submit, easy like that.

I'd only would bitch around when I had a paid spot and they'd reject all my galleries for no real reason.

WicKed NinJas · 09-08-2004, 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by escorpio
I love Richards Realm. David is a good reviewer. Can't blame him for the occasional slow load and it's really not his responsibility to launch a thorough investigation. If you think the problem has been solved just sub it again. Of all the big TGPs, I think RR is the easiest to get along with.

Log on to ICQ Biatch

Bansheelinks · 09-08-2004, 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Steve
anyone remember the old days on adultbuffet? when Kman used to post the decline reasons? holy shit, that was even funnier than his daily rant, or the gallery descriptions they used

those were hilarious..........made me wonder how much time he put into that really

*another funny read is gregpix's descrips

and bulldoglist's descips had me howling at times but he's since changed to categories

berg.the.red · 09-08-2004, 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by johndoebob
But if you use FHGs it doesn't matter and they could do that.

but they won't. richard's surfers expect new, free porn updated every hour or so. i don't think they can provide that many FHG's ...
so it's up to other webmasters to provide it. now --they may be going gangbusters with the paid spots. more power to `em. makes runing their business ( and probably their gallery reviewing ... ) a lot easier.

baddog · 09-08-2004, 09:18 AM

consistency would be nice . . . I submitted my first gallery to them in a year, and it was declined for the thumbs being too small (125x93)

It is the same size that my partner used, and hers was accepted, and I looked thru the list and found several galleries with smaller thumbs.

Well, it is his site, he can do what he wants I guess

berg.the.red · 09-08-2004, 09:23 AM

baddog: and i bet you could re-submit that gallery in 12 hours and it would fly ...

johndoebob · 09-08-2004, 09:24 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by berg.the.red
but they won't. richard's surfers expect new, free porn updated every hour or so. i don't think they can provide that many FHG's ...
so it's up to other webmasters to provide it. now --they may be going gangbusters with the paid spots. more power to `em. makes runing their business ( and probably their gallery reviewing ... ) a lot easier.

For sure they could.Most of the galleries I see are just saved and edited FHGs.I run fake TGPs with FHGs + my own galleries and I update daily with ~20 fresh links.Just look at Sextronix's or Epic Cash's FHGs, they provide you with huge amounts of them.

block · 09-08-2004, 09:26 AM

Actually I had noticed this as well.... They are a awesome site though so when one of my galleries is accepted I don't really care about the ones that weren't

berg.the.red · 09-08-2004, 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by johndoebob
For sure they could.Most of the galleries I see are just saved and edited FHGs.I run fake TGPs with FHGs + my own galleries and I update daily with ~20 fresh links.Just look at Sextronix's or Epic Cash's FHGs, they provide you with huge amounts of them.

well --yeah ... since that's the arguement you want to push: they COULD use sponsor FHG's. i imagine theHun could do it too ... but i really don't see that happening.

baddog · 09-08-2004, 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by berg.the.red
baddog: and i bet you could re-submit that gallery in 12 hours and it would fly ...

yeah, I thought about that . . . . the thing is that I have submitted galleries to him since he opened up, and have exchanged phone calls and emails with them several times over the years . . . when I sent an email this time I got no response

GTS Mark · 09-08-2004, 09:48 AM

Jeeeeeez ever heard the saying "don't bite the hand that feeds you". LOL!

If anyone is interested we have a couple of really great Richard's Realms spots and banners still available. We can get your galleries/banners up ASAP and rocking with Richard's traffic!

http://www.gallerytrafficservice.com/rr.html

DH

johndoebob · 09-08-2004, 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by berg.the.red
well --yeah ... since that's the arguement you want to push: they COULD use sponsor FHG's. i imagine theHun could do it too ... but i really don't see that happening.

The Hun is something different, they list ~100 galleries a day including lots of custom galleries,galleries from private paysites or just weird stuff that isn't connected to any site.That's what The Hun is fomous for and the often enourmous amount of pictures/clips that you can't find on any FHG.

berg.the.red · 09-08-2004, 09:57 AM

baddog: at least you hear back from `em. i think the last time i got an e-mail back on a gallery rejection was in 2002 ...

DH: that works both ways. all of us webmasters feed richards new content every day too. and bottom line: richards traffic isn't what it was a year ago or two years ago. ...

and maybe y`all didn't read the first post right: i'm not bitching about not getting a listing. fuck --i'll just re-submit the damn gallery tonight and let the night crew approve it. i said consistency ...

09-08-2004, 08:38 AM	#1
berg.the.red Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Right Here. Right Now. Posts: 596	Richard Realm Reviewers Hey Richards Realm Reviewers !! how about a little fucking consistence in your gallery reviewing ?? one day a gallery template is just fine ... next day it's "too much on thumbs page". too much what ?? 16 thumbnails is too much ?? too many actual words for your free-loading surfers ?? y`all using a magic 8-ball for gallery approval ?? and it wasn't even a soulcash gallery/site. i already know y`all reject those on the spot ... __________________ Need a Dedicated Box with BALLS ? How about a Dedicated Server starting at just $49 per month.

09-08-2004, 08:39 AM	#2
Easton Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Phoenix, AZ Posts: 9,825	well now you're never gonna get listed! LOL __________________ New models booked and shot every week... MILFs, pornstars and teens. Girls for every niche and project. Looking for high-quality affordable exclusive content? Check me out at Easton Content for all the details.

09-08-2004, 08:46 AM	#4
berg.the.red Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Right Here. Right Now. Posts: 596	[chuckle] there IS that guess the morning crew just doesn't like totemcash stuff ... __________________ Need a Dedicated Box with BALLS ? How about a Dedicated Server starting at just $49 per month.

09-08-2004, 08:54 AM	#7
Jdoughs Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Great White North Posts: 5,794	RichardsRealm turns down galleries? __________________ LinkSpun - Premier Adult Link Trading Community - ICQ - 464/\281/\250 Be Seen By New Webmasters/Affiliates * Target out webmasters/affiliates based on niches your sites are for less than $20 a month. AmeriNOC - Proudly hosted @ AmeriNOC!

09-08-2004, 08:58 AM	#9
johndoebob Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 3,405	Just be happy if you get listed and that's it.It's free traffic so don't bitch around. The only time I got rejected for too many pics was with a 18 thumbs gallery.It's their decision and I never felt the need to bitch around about not getting listed when I get listed almost every day. __________________

09-08-2004, 08:51 AM	#5
bluff Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Bluffville Posts: 6,253	I wouldn't say it in that many words, but the guy is right. Furthermore please update your software, as it sometimes catches a gallery as 'slow' when it loads with 10 mbps. Doing multiple tests would be better.

09-08-2004, 08:58 AM	#8
Bansheelinks Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 6,023	glad to see i wasn't the only one..........i love RR and their traffic, but some of those reviewers are incredibly inconsistent........it depends who you get and some of them seem kinda cranky to me

09-08-2004, 09:03 AM	#10
escorpio I love to racism, bro! Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: USA! USA! USA! Posts: 23,120	I love Richards Realm. David is a good reviewer. Can't blame him for the occasional slow load and it's really not his responsibility to launch a thorough investigation. If you think the problem has been solved just sub it again. Of all the big TGPs, I think RR is the easiest to get along with. __________________ Unvaxxed, still alive.

09-08-2004, 09:03 AM	#11
Scott McD Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Glasgow, Scotland Posts: 67,795	My galleries have been rejected lately for 'not loading fast enough'. Out of over 300 MGP's i submit to, this is the only one that fails for this reason... __________________ I Buy My High Quality Traffic Here, You Should Too!

09-08-2004, 09:06 AM	#12
johndoebob Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 3,405	It's FREE traffic, don't forget that guys.They could change to FHGs too and you'd all cry about not getting any good traffic anymore. __________________

09-08-2004, 09:07 AM	#14
FlyingIguana aspiring banker Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: toronto Posts: 10,870	i've never really had a problem with them. they're one of the few, wait the only tgp that gets back to you and tells you why you're not listed so you can make adjustments.

09-08-2004, 09:09 AM	#17
lazycash Troll Patrol Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Local Socal Posts: 15,214	And God forbid you use the word "slut" on your hardcore gallery. __________________ "WTF, on google you can find the answer to every question in human history, EXCEPT how to convert cams.. Its crazy..." VenusBlogger

09-08-2004, 09:18 AM	#23
baddog So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: the beach, SoCal Posts: 107,089	consistency would be nice . . . I submitted my first gallery to them in a year, and it was declined for the thumbs being too small (125x93) It is the same size that my partner used, and hers was accepted, and I looked thru the list and found several galleries with smaller thumbs. Well, it is his site, he can do what he wants I guess

09-08-2004, 09:23 AM	#24
berg.the.red Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Right Here. Right Now. Posts: 596	baddog: and i bet you could re-submit that gallery in 12 hours and it would fly ... __________________ Need a Dedicated Box with BALLS ? How about a Dedicated Server starting at just $49 per month.

09-08-2004, 09:26 AM	#26
block Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Winnipeg, Canada - cough check sig cough Posts: 1,258	Actually I had noticed this as well.... They are a awesome site though so when one of my galleries is accepted I don't really care about the ones that weren't __________________ ICQ - 19961769

09-08-2004, 09:48 AM	#29
GTS Mark Vrume Mark Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Toronto, Canada Posts: 20,912	Jeeeeeez ever heard the saying "don't bite the hand that feeds you". LOL! If anyone is interested we have a couple of really great Richard's Realms spots and banners still available. We can get your galleries/banners up ASAP and rocking with Richard's traffic! http://www.gallerytrafficservice.com/rr.html DH

09-08-2004, 09:57 AM	#31
berg.the.red Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Right Here. Right Now. Posts: 596	baddog: at least you hear back from `em. i think the last time i got an e-mail back on a gallery rejection was in 2002 ... DH: that works both ways. all of us webmasters feed richards new content every day too. and bottom line: richards traffic isn't what it was a year ago or two years ago. ... and maybe y`all didn't read the first post right: i'm not bitching about not getting a listing. fuck --i'll just re-submit the damn gallery tonight and let the night crew approve it. i said consistency ... __________________ Need a Dedicated Box with BALLS ? How about a Dedicated Server starting at just $49 per month.