Richard Realm Reviewers
 

Hey Richards Realm Reviewers !! how about a little fucking consistence in your gallery reviewing ?? one day a gallery template is just fine ... next day it's "too much on thumbs page". too much what ?? 16 thumbnails is too much ?? too many actual words for your free-loading surfers ?? y`all using a magic 8-ball for gallery approval ??

and it wasn't even a soulcash gallery/site. i already know y`all reject those on the spot ... :1orglaugh

well now you're never gonna get listed! LOL

rolf :1orglaugh

[chuckle] there IS that :1orglaugh

guess the morning crew just doesn't like totemcash stuff ...

I wouldn't say it in that many words, but the guy is right. Furthermore please update your software, as it sometimes catches a gallery as 'slow' when it loads with 10 mbps. Doing multiple tests would be better.

it's rofl

RichardsRealm turns down galleries?

glad to see i wasn't the only one..........i love RR and their traffic, but some of those reviewers are incredibly inconsistent........it depends who you get and some of them seem kinda cranky to me

Just be happy if you get listed and that's it.It's free traffic so don't bitch around.

The only time I got rejected for too many pics was with a 18 thumbs gallery.It's their decision and I never felt the need to bitch around about not getting listed when I get listed almost every day. :2 cents:

I love Richards Realm. David is a good reviewer. Can't blame him for the occasional slow load and it's really not his responsibility to launch a thorough investigation. If you think the problem has been solved just sub it again. Of all the big TGPs, I think RR is the easiest to get along with.

My galleries have been rejected lately for 'not loading fast enough'.

Out of over 300 MGP's i submit to, this is the only one that fails for this reason...

It's FREE traffic, don't forget that guys.They could change to FHGs too and you'd all cry about not getting any good traffic anymore.

johndoebob: yeah --it may be free traffic: but 99% of the traffic is non-buying free-loader traffic. it's not like 1 in 5 buys ...

and like i said: it's about consistency. like Bansheelinks said: some days those guys ( or gals ... ) accept nothing. this hapens to be a gallery template that they've been accepting ( or rejecting ) for months. only thing that changes is the content and the models name. so how is it one minute it's just fine --next minute it's "too much" ( and too much WHAT anyway ... ) ?

i've never really had a problem with them. they're one of the few, wait the only tgp that gets back to you and tells you why you're not listed so you can make adjustments.

RR has good policy that way and is a fine tgp without question, the point we're making is in some of the reviewing lately.........overall, of course, RR rocks and its why RR will be around 10 years from now........a fine tgp

A lot of smaller TGPs have that problem too simply because they're hosted on shitty servers.

Gotta say I don't get too many problems with RR. Once in a blue moon I get the too slow rejection but then there's every chance the Internet is being shitty between the reviewers ISP and one of my servers. Happens unfortunately.

And God forbid you use the word "slut" on your hardcore gallery.

anyone remember the old days on adultbuffet? when Kman used to post the decline reasons? holy shit, that was even funnier than his daily rant, or the gallery descriptions they used

But if you use FHGs it doesn't matter and they could do that. :2 cents:

As long as I get something for free I don't bitch around and question nothing, if you don't like them don't submit, easy like that.

I'd only would bitch around when I had a paid spot and they'd reject all my galleries for no real reason.

Log on to ICQ Biatch

those were hilarious..........made me wonder how much time he put into that really

*another funny read is gregpix's descrips :1orglaugh and bulldoglist's descips had me howling at times but he's since changed to categories

but they won't. richard's surfers expect new, free porn updated every hour or so. i don't think they can provide that many FHG's ...
so it's up to other webmasters to provide it. now --they may be going gangbusters with the paid spots. more power to `em. makes runing their business ( and probably their gallery reviewing ... ) a lot easier.

consistency would be nice . . . I submitted my first gallery to them in a year, and it was declined for the thumbs being too small (125x93)

It is the same size that my partner used, and hers was accepted, and I looked thru the list and found several galleries with smaller thumbs.

Well, it is his site, he can do what he wants I guess

baddog: and i bet you could re-submit that gallery in 12 hours and it would fly ... :winkwink:

For sure they could.Most of the galleries I see are just saved and edited FHGs.I run fake TGPs with FHGs + my own galleries and I update daily with ~20 fresh links.Just look at Sextronix's or Epic Cash's FHGs, they provide you with huge amounts of them. :2 cents:

Actually I had noticed this as well.... They are a awesome site though so when one of my galleries is accepted I don't really care about the ones that weren't :Graucho

well --yeah ... since that's the arguement you want to push: they COULD use sponsor FHG's. i imagine theHun could do it too ... but i really don't see that happening.

yeah, I thought about that . . . . the thing is that I have submitted galleries to him since he opened up, and have exchanged phone calls and emails with them several times over the years . . . when I sent an email this time I got no response :(

Jeeeeeez ever heard the saying "don't bite the hand that feeds you". LOL!

If anyone is interested we have a couple of really great Richard's Realms spots and banners still available. We can get your galleries/banners up ASAP and rocking with Richard's traffic! :thumbsup

http://www.gallerytrafficservice.com/rr.html

DH

The Hun is something different, they list ~100 galleries a day including lots of custom galleries,galleries from private paysites or just weird stuff that isn't connected to any site.That's what The Hun is fomous for and the often enourmous amount of pictures/clips that you can't find on any FHG. :2 cents:

baddog: at least you hear back from `em. i think the last time i got an e-mail back on a gallery rejection was in 2002 ...

DH: that works both ways. all of us webmasters feed richards new content every day too. and bottom line: richards traffic isn't what it was a year ago or two years ago. ... :winkwink:

and maybe y`all didn't read the first post right: i'm not bitching about not getting a listing. fuck --i'll just re-submit the damn gallery tonight and let the night crew approve it. i said consistency ...