|
|
|
||||
|
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: QC
Posts: 5,829
|
2257 remark....
If 2257 affects secondary distributors of sexual material, such as webmasters using thumbs to link to hosted galleries, wouldn't it also mean that video stores (be it rental places or purchase points) along with corner stores that sell erotic magazines all fall under the same category and also become secondary distributors, requiring places such as 7/11 to be able to provide access to 2257 documents for the models featured in the magazines they sell?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 332
|
__________________
Check out My Black XXX sites |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Chafed.
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Face Down in Pussy
Posts: 18,041
|
Only if they print the pictures on their walls?
Technically you can't look at the skin mags until after you buy and leave the store. But what the fuck do I know. This whole thing has me spinning. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: QC
Posts: 5,829
|
Quote:
Correct me if I am wrong. If it doesn't apply to video stores, it then couldn't possibly apply to a TGP with non-nude thumbs linking to content because only AFTER you click the thumb do you see the content. no? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 4,517
|
It says nothing about secondary distribution, it is secondary production that is mentioned.
Video / book stores are not producing anything, they are merely distributing it. However, let's say they ripped this month's hottest DVD to make a commercial out of it to play on monitors throughout the store... then, (copyright laws aside), they would need to have the docs, as they have now (re-)produced something and are secondary producers. Putting a text link up on your site = distribution Putting a linked image up on your site = reproduction |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: QC
Posts: 5,829
|
Quote:
There goes the hun, growing again. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 4,517
|
Quote:
The law pertains to images on your server, not to what you are linked to. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: QC
Posts: 5,829
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 4,517
|
Quote:
Edit: You should / probably will still be required to have a 2257 statement listing your reasons for exception. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The Windy City
Posts: 8,403
|
text links rock for more than one reason
![]()
__________________
Build a Massive Traffic Network, Hands FREE, Totally Automated |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 2,368
|
so does this mean that a regular tgp needs to have the actual links to each site's 2257 compliance listed somewhere on the site?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: QC
Posts: 5,829
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The Windy City
Posts: 8,403
|
Quote:
Ludicrous I tell ya, ludicrous
__________________
Build a Massive Traffic Network, Hands FREE, Totally Automated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: QC
Posts: 5,829
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 4,517
|
Quote:
Remember though, under the new revisions, banners are subject to compliance as well, not just "content" images. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: QC
Posts: 5,829
|
Quote:
I hope all this is clarified before the law is voted. When is it supposed to be voted, and if it is acceptted it goes live August 24th right? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 2,368
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Tube groupie.
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: LoScandalous, CA
Posts: 13,482
|
As I understand it - if you have a thumb displayed in your site - even if hot-linked...you need 2257.
|
|
|
|