![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Websites that post images obtained from usenet do have a problem. 1) The images are not licensed to them, so that's copyright infringement, which is a civil issue, and the copyright owner could take legal action 2) Displaying images without 2257 falls under Federal jurisdiction, and a conviction means 5 years in jail (ie. felony). Item #2 should really make websites that display usenet images be very concerned because if a copyright owner has been frustrated at the fact that their images are being stolen, and don't have the money to sue for infringement, they can let the Federal government take aim. -brandon |
John Ashhahahahaha,
This sick fuck has to go away ! OMG :feels-hot What's next ? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
2257 & The Markham Order. Confused? Worried? Not sure what to do? We're gonna speak with Brandon from fightthepatent.com and 2257lookup.com AND Hammer from The Porn Professors is gonna stop by.
Check out the video feed today at 3PM EST/2PM CST/12PM PST/8PM GMT and join in the chat at http://www.theronstewartshow.com/live/ynot.php OR, you can access just the chat at irc.theadultwebmaster.com channel-#ynotradio |
Quote:
|
Quote:
ayup. Acacia is something that you deal with financially (whether you fight them or settle with them). 2257 violation, you deal with it in a federal prison with a felony conviction... apples and oranges :) -brandon |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
For website owners outside of the US, how do we stand?
For example, we are based in the UK, most models and performers are also from the UK but our servers and billing company run from the US - does that mean we fall in this new law?? If we don't but have affiliates from the US, do they need all the ID paperwork in order to comply with this new law? |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:29 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123