Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

View Poll Results: Who would you vote for today?
Bush/cheney 22 22.45%
Kerry/Edwards 71 72.45%
Niether 5 5.10%
Voters: 98. You may not vote on this poll

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 07-07-2004, 02:48 PM   #51
Tom_PMs
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,049
50 Votes

The only less regulation that Bush likes is for is dismantling the Clean Air act.

No surprise though since when asked how history would remember his presidency, the best he could come up with was, "We wont know, we'll all be dead".

He hasn't veto'd a SINGLE spending plan placed on his desk while in office.

He hasnt fired ANYONE for the string of mistakes leading up to 9/11. People resigning for "personal reasons" are not the same. Even Rice said that when those planes went into those buildings is when we knew how serious the threats were. Yet the PDB that said "BIN LADEN DETERMINED TO ATTACK WITHIN THE UNITED STATES" was a "historical document". Fuck of course! It's SO vague!

But of course, they had *only* been in office for a mere 232 days...that excuses all mistakes apparently..

Oops, but I forgot.. He has made NO mistakes according to himself. What a brilliant humble man.


Good god, whats the use, LMAO!
Tom_PMs is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2004, 02:57 PM   #52
Tom_PMs
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,049
Quote:
you really dont need a link to know the dems love handing out money to all the lazy fuckers who love handouts.
You also dont need much to realise that this is not a PARTISAN issue, it's a competence issue.

I think when someone gives a number (ie: another 30 percent of your income), that it's specific enough to assume they read a plan of Kerry's that actually states it. I personally would like to read it, because such a plan might INDEED change how I vote. Not likely, but worth a shot.

You know it's pretty foolish to assume that nobody is going to have to pay for all the shit thats been spent since Bush has been in office if Bush wins again. Do you think if Bush somehow wins the election that you wont be paying your share of the billions given over to rebuild a country we destroyed on reasons that were admittedly wrong at best, and outright lies at worst? Thats just foolish.. it doesnt matter which party wins which election. We're paying, oh yes. For a long time.
Tom_PMs is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2004, 08:35 PM   #53
zanycash Pete
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: California
Posts: 1,023
Bump! Anyone care about international policy?
zanycash Pete is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2004, 08:55 PM   #54
boobmaster
So Fucking Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,185
Non-Americans should not be allowed to vote.
boobmaster is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2004, 09:58 PM   #55
kane
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
kane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: portland, OR
Posts: 20,684
Quote:
Originally posted by FunForOne
In case you are forgetting, Both parties are against the adult industry, and ummm, err.......... Kerry wants to take another 30 percent of your income and give it to the people who dont work at all.



Neither party can do anything to the industry except shake out the wannabees. The only thing legislation can do is make it harder for adult products to be obtained by minors on the internet or in the general public. This makes the real porn sites more valueable and most of the guys here will realize increased profits.

Why would people think that kerry is for the adult industry? Kerry's traditional ideas are to take away the profit margins in all industries to make the class system run smoother.

President Bush is for small business, he is better for the serious webmaster than Kerry, sorros, or H. Clinton.
this is actually only a part truth. Yes Kerry wants to shift tax cuts and take them away from the people that make a lot a give them to the people that don't. So depending on how much you make this is either good or bad for you. Really, if you are not making a lot a tax cut isn't going to give you much more money in the long run.

Neither party is for porn but so far the democrates have been a little more relaxed about it. Janet Reno said that the attorney gernerals office has a budget and they can't go after everything so they pick thier agenda. One of Clinton's agendas was going after militant religious groups the koresh. With bush they've made no secret that ashat was getting together a large group to go hard after porn but then the 9/11 attacks happened and they had to shift thier focus to that. If bush is re elected he will probably come after us in a hardcore way. Also, he may be appointing as many as 2-3 judges to the supreme court. The last COPA law was a 5-4 vote.

As for a law limiting the amount of free porn on the net being good for profits I have to disagree. For some it will be good but I think for most it will not. Any law the US passes will only affect 40% of the porn on the internet. The rest is owned/operated by non-US based people. So instead of having 10 free sites to pick from the surfers will only have 6. So this will reduce the amount of free porn on the net by 40% but I think all it will do is serve to make those sites that are non-US based even bigger and better. How may affiliate programs rely on US-based webmasters that submit TGP gallleries and make free sites or run TGP/link list sites? They can kiss most of that traffic goodbye.

In the end it may help weed out some people, the part timers and the hobbiest. But I think overall it would have a very bad effect on many more people.

just my 2 cents.

Last edited by kane; 07-07-2004 at 10:02 PM..
kane is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2004, 03:47 AM   #56
thatjen
Confirmed User
 
thatjen's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 290
Kerry/Edwards!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

duh
thatjen is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2004, 04:17 AM   #57
BlueDesignStudios
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 9,492
if I could vote, I'd be voting for anyone against bush
__________________

Blue Design Studios - Adult Design Specialists!
Email me for a free quote: [email protected]
BlueDesignStudios is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.