64 Bit AMD seems to be the way to go over Intel P4 3.2 Ghz huh? - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

toddler · 01-31-2004, 11:38 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by boneprone

well these tests show that for encoding (not even multi tasking)
that the P4 is faster!

http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/2003...-guide-17.html

thats not quite right, as I've yet to see one of the EE chips IN a machine.

still the top line p4 does seem 30+ seconds faster. I'd be curious to know what mode these procs were running in to do the tests..;)

KRL · 01-31-2004, 11:55 PM

I don't trust tests run by sites and magazines that rely on advertising money from those companies whose products they are testing.

These tests can all be designed to skew results in favor of one or the other also.

Go to a store and do a side by side with the apps you run. That's the best way to really see the difference.

Trippekdick · 03-01-2004, 05:36 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by boneprone
Has the new windows XP for 64 bit been released yet?

no 32 windows 2003 hass 65

01-31-2004, 11:55 PM	#52
KRL Entrepreneur Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: USA Posts: 31,429	I don't trust tests run by sites and magazines that rely on advertising money from those companies whose products they are testing. These tests can all be designed to skew results in favor of one or the other also. Go to a store and do a side by side with the apps you run. That's the best way to really see the difference. __________________ If you would like to develop your domains, you can lease inexpensive foreign labor from the leaders in the field at iWebmasters.com TO LOWER YOUR COSTS AND INCREASE YOUR PRODUCTION! * * * * * * * * * * * * Domains Adult News KRL's Newsletter Biz Tips Just Listed Domains