**** WTC Owner Admits to Demolition of Building 7 on 9/11!!! ****

[wonton]

Here is an article with video that you might find interesting. For more than two years, conspiracy "nuts" have been contending that Building 7 of the World Trade Center complex (a block away from the twin towers) was purposefully demolished in an industrial-type, controlled demolition. No planes hit that building and very little debris from the twin towers landed on it. There was only a small fire on the upper floor. It is important to note that no modern steel skyscraper in history has collapsed due to fire.
Skyscrapers just don't fall down as any civil engineer will tell you. Yet on 9/11 three skyscrapers collapsed in one day, with one of them (building 7) falling for no apparent reason. Even when building 7 fell, major news anchors like Dan Rather reported live that it looked like a "controlled demolition".

To make a long story short, conspiracy theorists jumped all over the video of building 7. The US government conducted a "study" and quickly determined that the building probably collapsed due to some unkown reason (eventhough the only fires were on the upper floors). They absolutely denied any planned demolition. But now, two years later, the owner of the World Trade Centre site, Larry Silverstein, admits in a PBS documentary that they did in fact demolish building 7 on 9/11! Of course the major media is not focussing on this story. And the big question remains - how did they demolish the building on the afternoon of 9/11 when it is a known fact that it takes a couple of days to carefully rig a building for a controlled demolition; and that is under "normal" conditions. On 9/11 there was total chaos, fires that had to be put out and hundreds of dead firemen earlier in the day. When in the world did they get a chance to wire the entire building for collapse? If they did wire it, this could only have been done on a prior day. That's my conspiracy rant for the day! :-)

Video of WTC Owner Admitting to Demolition of Building 7

Article about WTC owner and building 7 demolition

[Babaganoosh]

[wonton]

There are also videos on that page of the actual building 7 collapse and other videos of controlled industrial demolitions for comparison.

[axelcat]

very interesting

[NoCarrier]

INFOWARS.COM

WOW!!!!

IT'S ON THE INTERNET

THEY HAVE TONS OF SHOCKING ARTICLES AND PICTURES!!!

IT MUST BE TRUE!!!

[Rich]

Originally posted by Mystery Man
ok answer is then: insurance fraud

Wow, that's some seriously balsey insurance fraud. What good thinking, to have the explosive in place just in case a plane hits the building next door.

[.nihilist]

Originally posted by NoCarrier

INFOWARS.COM

WOW!!!!

IT'S ON THE INTERNET

THEY HAVE TONS OF SHOCKING ARTICLES AND PICTURES!!!

IT MUST BE TRUE!!!

[Babaganoosh]

Absolute horseshit. This amounts to nothing more than taking something out of context. Stop with the stupid conspiracy theory threads already.

[Loryn]

KEEP TRYING LITTLE MAN!!!! YOU WILL NEVER SUCCEED IN BRING AMERICAN DOWN!!!!

[stocktrader23]

Originally posted by NoCarrier

INFOWARS.COM

WOW!!!!

IT'S ON THE INTERNET

THEY HAVE TONS OF SHOCKING ARTICLES AND PICTURES!!!

IT MUST BE TRUE!!!

WATCH THE CLIP
(window media file)
Click play to view the PBS documentary segment where Silverstein admits they pulled WTC Building 7


Emphasis on PB FUCING S

[J-Reel]

[kmanrox]

i thought we lost only 2 buildings?

that's what i get for thinking again... damnitall

[rocki]

hmmm that is interesting... maybe it was planned out for that day, not knowing what was going to happen to the WTC...

[stocktrader23]

Originally posted by rocki
hmmm that is interesting... maybe it was planned out for that day, not knowing what was going to happen to the WTC...

[Rich]

Originally posted by Loryn-Adult.com
KEEP TRYING LITTLE MAN!!!! YOU WILL NEVER SUCCEED IN BRING AMERICAN DOWN!!!!

Why would a guy trying to figure out who killed 3000 Americans be trying to bring America down? Do you actually listen to yourself of do you just quote Ann Coulter? Do you even know what's going on with the inquiry into 9/11? No, you have no idea? What a fucking shock.

[Dirty F]

Originally posted by NoCarrier

INFOWARS.COM

WOW!!!!

IT'S ON THE INTERNET

THEY HAVE TONS OF SHOCKING ARTICLES AND PICTURES!!!

IT MUST BE TRUE!!!

[Rich]

Hmm, that was the building with all the Enron/Arthur Anderson documents wasn't it?

[wonton]

Originally posted by NoCarrier

INFOWARS.COM

WOW!!!!

IT'S ON THE INTERNET

THEY HAVE TONS OF SHOCKING ARTICLES AND PICTURES!!!

IT MUST BE TRUE!!!


Not really. All information, from whatever source, should be judged on its own merits. As it so happens, many of infowars other articles are indeed true as they are simply reprints of associated press articles and articles from mainstream media around the world. And this particular topic is simply video from a PBS documentary. So your post could just as easily said:

PBS

Wow!!!

THAT'S A PUBLIC STATION OWNED BY THE US GOVERNMENT AND US TAXPAYERS

THEY PRODUCE LOTS OF SERIOUS DOCUMENTARIES AND RERUN A LOT OF BRITISH SITCOMS!!!

IT MUST BE TRUE!!!


But as you can see, such pathetic attempts to discredit factual information just shows the lack of intellectual weapons at your disposal.

[wonton]

Originally posted by Rich
Hmm, that was the building with all the Enron/Arthur Anderson documents wasn't it?

Yup. Also housed offices for the CIA and ATF and many documents related to Enron, Arthur Anderson, International terrorism and other intelligence matters were stored there.

[wonton]

Originally posted by Armed & Hammered
Absolute horseshit. This amounts to nothing more than taking something out of context. Stop with the stupid conspiracy theory threads already.

Maybe my horseshit detector is not working properly today but please point out the apparent "incorrect" context.

- On 9/11 video is taken from news organizations around the world showing building 7 collapse for no apparent reason.

- Since 9/11 Government, FDNY, WTC spokespeople all deny any pre-planned demolition of building 7

- Conspiracy researchers continue to pound the government and media with questions on building 7 collapse.

- Two years after 9/11, WTC owner finally admits that they did indeed demolish building 7 on 9/11.


The context is clear - they lied! And if they could lie about demolishing building 7, then what about the twin towers? Even the architect of those buildings contend that they were designed to withstand impacts from jet crashes and says it is a mystery to him why the towers collapsed that day.

[Babaganoosh]

- On 9/11 video is taken from news organizations around the world showing building 7 collapse for no apparent reason.

Tons of debris raining down on the building thus weakening the structure isn't a reason? Add a fire to that and it's a wonder that the building stood as long as it did.

- Since 9/11 Government, FDNY, WTC spokespeople all deny any pre-planned demolition of building 7

Because there WAS NO planned demolition of building 7.

- Conspiracy researchers continue to pound the government and media with questions on building 7 collapse.

As expected. That's what conspiracy nutcases do. It's their life.

- Two years after 9/11, WTC owner finally admits that they did indeed demolish building 7 on 9/11.

Where? Where did the owner EVER admit this? That is the statement you are not understanding. Watch the video and listen carefully. His statement is quite clear to me. The fire chief said that he didn't think they were going to be able to get the fire under control. The owner, already upset about the great loss of life wanted to avoid putting more firefighters in harm's way and requested that the FIREFIGHTERS be pulled. There was no order to demolish the building. They were just asked to let it go.

See a doctor man. Really. Paranoia is a sign of much more serious problems.

[Rob]

On word for you: Thermite

That's some nasty shit!

[wonton]

Originally posted by Armed & Hammered
- On 9/11 video is taken from news organizations around the world showing building 7 collapse for no apparent reason.


Where? Where did the owner EVER admit this? That is the statement you are not understanding. Watch the video and listen carefully. His statement is quite clear to me. The fire chief said that he didn't think they were going to be able to get the fire under control. The owner, already upset about the great loss of life wanted to avoid putting more firefighters in harm's way and requested that the FIREFIGHTERS be pulled. There was no order to demolish the building. They were just asked to let it go.

See a doctor man. Really. Paranoia is a sign of much more serious problems.

Wrong! I suggest you see a doctor because you suffer from myopia. Watch the entire documentary. The phrase "pull the building" means demolish the building. This is common parlance in the world of industrial demolition. On that very documentary, just before they *demolish* the burnt out remains of building 6, a worker says quite plainly that they are going to "pull" building 6.

Larry Silverstein uses the exact same terminology in the same context. They agreed to "pull" building 7, i.e. demolish it. The video of building 7 is completely consistant with a timed demolition. And I will repeat what I said before: NO MODERN SKYSCRAPER IN HISTORY HAS COLLAPSED DUE TO FIRE. Yet building 7 collapses due to some small fires on the upper floors - IMPOSSIBLE!!!

[TurboTrucker]

Yeah cause skyscrapers get hit by fully loaded jets all the time.

It is important to note that no modern steel skyscraper in history has collapsed due to fire.

[KRL]

You honestly think while the WTC towers were collapsing with Fireman still inside, the Firemen on the outside would take the time, energy and risk to setup and execute a building demolition on the site while their brothers were buried alive?

That would just not happen in a million years.

[MadCap]

Originally posted by TurboTrucker
Yeah cause skyscrapers get hit by fully loaded jets all the time.

no shit man its not like a plane full of jet fuel is used for testing steel.


what a dumb ass comment about it never happening before

[wonton]

Originally posted by TurboTrucker
Yeah cause skyscrapers get hit by fully loaded jets all the time.

Building 7 was NOT hit by any jets!!! That is the point!!!

Only the twin towers were hit by fuel-laden airplanes.

Building 7 was located a block away from the twin towers and was only hit by some small debris that landed on the roof. The fires in building 7 were small and were confined to the top floors. Yet the building collapsed, as in a controlled demolition, as if its support beams were strategically blown away. And then the building collapses from the bottom first.

[wonton]

Originally posted by MadCap





no shit man its not like a plane full of jet fuel is used for testing steel.


what a dumb ass comment about it never happening before

What a dumb ass comment coming from you, seeing that building 7, unlike the twin towers, was NEVER HIT BY A JET!!!

There were only two jet crashes in New York that day, not three!!

Dumb ass.

[wonton]

Originally posted by KRL
You honestly think while the WTC towers were collapsing with Fireman still inside, the Firemen on the outside would take the time, energy and risk to setup and execute a building demolition on the site while their brothers were buried alive?

That would just not happen in a million years.

And that's exactly the point! I do not believe for a second that The New York city fire dept. rigged the demolition charges as Silverstein seems to imply. There just was not any time that day to rig such a complex operation. It is clear that building 7 was rigged some time before 9/11. That much is obvious.

[funkmaster]

Originally posted by rocki
hmmm that is interesting... maybe it was planned out for that day, not knowing what was going to happen to the WTC...

... that's right, they would have taken it down anyway. so what ??

[wonton]

Originally posted by funkmaster


... that's right, they would have taken it down anyway. so what ??

Right....the owner of the WTC just happens to rig building 7 for demolition, eventhough tenants have leases in that space for years longer, and not tell anyone. What was he planning to do? Blow it up for the 4th of July?

Or is it more likely, as many have contended for two years, that 9/11 was not an intelligence failure - it was a stunning intelligence success. The entire operation was funded, managed and engineered by the US government. They created a Pearl Harbor like event as the only way to gain mass support for a perpetual global war - a war designed to pilfer all remaining oil reserves on the planet and secure it for America.

The deeper you dig, the more you see the obvious - all towers of the WTC complex were rigged prior to 9/11 for controlled demolitions. They left no stones unturned. Even if the planes on 9/11 missed their targets, those towers would have been taken down anyway and they would have simply blamed it on Bin Laden's "bombs" that were placed in the buildings.

Two years after 9/11 the evidence continues to pile up to show that the government's story is the ultimate conspiracy theory and that the real culprits have gone unpunished.

But the government never lies right? Of course not! Watergate never happened. The Pentagon Papers never happened. There are tons of weapons of mass distruction in Iraq.....

[funkmaster]

Originally posted by wonton


Right....the owner of the WTC just happens to rig building 7 for demolition, eventhough tenants have leases in that space for years longer, and not tell anyone. What was he planning to do? Blow it up for the 4th of July?

Or is it more likely, as many have contended for two years, that 9/11 was not an intelligence failure - it was a stunning intelligence success. The entire operation was funded, managed and engineered by the US government. They created a Pearl Harbor like event as the only way to gain mass support for a perpetual global war - a war designed to pilfer all remaining oil reserves on the planet and secure it for America.

The deeper you dig, the more you see the obvious - all towers of the WTC complex were rigged prior to 9/11 for controlled demolitions. They left no stones unturned. Even if the planes on 9/11 missed their targets, those towers would have been taken down anyway and they would have simply blamed it on Bin Laden's "bombs" that were placed in the buildings.

Two years after 9/11 the evidence continues to pile up to show that the government's story is the ultimate conspiracy theory and that the real culprits have gone unpunished.

But the government never lies right? Of course not! Watergate never happened. The Pentagon Papers never happened. There are tons of weapons of mass distruction in Iraq.....

... I was not serious with my comment, you scare me.

[MadCap]

Originally posted by wonton


And that's exactly the point! I do not believe for a second that The New York city fire dept. rigged the demolition charges as Silverstein seems to imply. There just was not any time that day to rig such a complex operation. It is clear that building 7 was rigged some time before 9/11. That much is obvious.

Your trying to tell me that somone rigged that building with explosive charges before 911 and no one knew about it. Man you have to be the dumbest motherfucker alive if you believe that shit.

[Babaganoosh]

Originally posted by wonton


Wrong! I suggest you see a doctor because you suffer from myopia. Watch the entire documentary. The phrase "pull the building" means demolish the building. This is common parlance in the world of industrial demolition. On that very documentary, just before they *demolish* the burnt out remains of building 6, a worker says quite plainly that they are going to "pull" building 6.

Larry Silverstein uses the exact same terminology in the same context. They agreed to "pull" building 7, i.e. demolish it. The video of building 7 is completely consistant with a timed demolition. And I will repeat what I said before: NO MODERN SKYSCRAPER IN HISTORY HAS COLLAPSED DUE TO FIRE. Yet building 7 collapses due to some small fires on the upper floors - IMPOSSIBLE!!!

You obviously lack the intelligence to comprehend what you are hearing. I pity you.

[MadCap]

dude and after those other two buldings you know those 110 floor one right nextdoor you dont think the otherone was fucked. youre a piece of work dude. Get a clue man.

[stocktrader23]

Originally posted by MadCap



Your trying to tell me that somone rigged that building with explosive charges before 911 and no one knew about it. Man you have to be the dumbest motherfucker alive if you believe that shit.

If he's the dumbest motherfucker alive then what does that make the people who don't think we could have stopped the planes from slamming through the towers? Our military could have easily taken out those planes if they had only tried.

[wonton]

Originally posted by funkmaster


... I was not serious with my comment, you scare me.

Be afraid. Be very afraid...

[Greg B]

Look, both sides of this argument get nowhere by calling names and insulting.

If you listen to Larry Silverstein he says "We decided to pull." that can be interpreted as meaning to ' pull out '. When you're in a dangerous situation you don't always use the entire phrase.

The collapse of these big buildings does raise a question to the uniformity of the collapse. Modern construction allows for a building to fall in on itself instead of laterally minimizing the damage to surrounding areas. Had the twin towers fallen laterally there would have been 4 times the damage and perhaps casualties.

These buildings housed numerous incandescents and explosive materials. We still don't know how many bombs the terrorists may have planted over a long period of time.

It'll take the experts awhile longer to figure out what happened but that doesn't mean we should shy away from alternate analysis. We know for a fact that our government has been compromised before by people using our trust to fuck us over, perform ghoulish experiments on us and downright murder us.

The numbers of these victims is in the tens of millions going all the way back to the 50's.

That doesn't mean we can go off half assed and accuse people of things without proper objective investigation.

Trust, but verify.

[MadCap]

Originally posted by stocktrader23


If he's the dumbest motherfucker alive then what does that make the people who don't think we could have stopped the planes from slamming through the towers? Our military could have easily taken out those planes if they had only tried.

I could probably agree with you there but saying that this guy rigged this bulding to come down. is just insane.

[wonton]

Originally posted by MadCap



Your trying to tell me that somone rigged that building with explosive charges before 911 and no one knew about it. Man you have to be the dumbest motherfucker alive if you believe that shit.

The CIA and other government agencies had offices in building 7 and had total access. You're telling me that it would be impossible for a skilled team to enter the building at 3 a.m. and place small military-grade detonators on the support columns of the building?

Navy seal and Delta force teams specifically train for such missions and can clandestinely rig a building for demolition within a few hours. The charges they lay are camaflouged and virtually undetectable. That isn't science fiction. It's real life. You can even pick that up from the Discovery Channel for Christ sake.

[Babaganoosh]

Originally posted by Greg B
Look, both sides of this argument get nowhere by calling names and insulting.

If you have put up with this jerkoff's drivel as long as the rest of us, you would understand the need for insults and possibly a few "your mama" jokes.

[wonton]

Originally posted by Armed & Hammered


You obviously lack the intelligence to comprehend what you are hearing. I pity you.

Tsk. Tsk. No counter argument? How predictable.

[MadCap]

Originally posted by Greg B
Look, both sides of this argument get nowhere by calling names and insulting.

If you listen to Larry Silverstein he says "We decided to pull." that can be interpreted as meaning to ' pull out '. When you're in a dangerous situation you don't always use the entire phrase.

The collapse of these big buildings does raise a question to the uniformity of the collapse. Modern construction allows for a building to fall in on itself instead of laterally minimizing the damage to surrounding areas. Had the twin towers fallen laterally there would have been 4 times the damage and perhaps casualties.

These buildings housed numerous incandescents and explosive materials. We still don't know how many bombs the terrorists may have planted over a long period of time.

It'll take the experts awhile longer to figure out what happened but that doesn't mean we should shy away from alternate analysis. We know for a fact that our government has been compromised before by people using our trust to fuck us over, perform ghoulish experiments on us and downright murder us.

The numbers of these victims is in the tens of millions going all the way back to the 50's.

That doesn't mean we can go off half assed and accuse people of things without proper objective investigation.

Trust, but verify.

I see your point man but the statment he made about the bulding being rigged before 911 is just an outrage. And he deserves to get flamed for it. And he is a dumbass if he believes that plain and simple

[wonton]

Originally posted by Greg B
Look, both sides of this argument get nowhere by calling names and insulting.

If you listen to Larry Silverstein he says "We decided to pull." that can be interpreted as meaning to ' pull out '. When you're in a dangerous situation you don't always use the entire phrase.

The collapse of these big buildings does raise a question to the uniformity of the collapse. Modern construction allows for a building to fall in on itself instead of laterally minimizing the damage to surrounding areas. Had the twin towers fallen laterally there would have been 4 times the damage and perhaps casualties.

These buildings housed numerous incandescents and explosive materials. We still don't know how many bombs the terrorists may have planted over a long period of time.

It'll take the experts awhile longer to figure out what happened but that doesn't mean we should shy away from alternate analysis. We know for a fact that our government has been compromised before by people using our trust to fuck us over, perform ghoulish experiments on us and downright murder us.

The numbers of these victims is in the tens of millions going all the way back to the 50's.

That doesn't mean we can go off half assed and accuse people of things without proper objective investigation.

Trust, but verify.

Well said. There are GFYers that can read and think independently. There is hope yet...

honestly now

what would you believe

the US Government + Media?

or the internet

it's a no-brainer

[Babaganoosh]

Originally posted by wonton


Tsk. Tsk. No counter argument? How predictable.

What would be the point? Will I ever be able to convince you that not everything is a conspiracy? Will any amount of arguing ever convince you that your theories are ridiculous?

[MadCap]

Originally posted by wonton


The CIA and other government agencies had offices in building 7 and had total access. You're telling me that it would be impossible for a skilled team to enter the building at 3 a.m. and place small military-grade detonators on the support columns of the building?

Navy seal and Delta force teams specifically train for such missions and can clandestinely rig a building for demolition within a few hours. The charges they lay are camaflouged and virtually undetectable. That isn't science fiction. It's real life. You can even pick that up from the Discovery Channel for Christ sake.

You need to move to a shack in montana where you belong. lay off the drugs for a while to bro

[mpulse]

Very interesting...maybe there was more than just explosives helping out!! Just released photo...



Makes you wonder...

[MadCap]

Originally posted by Armed & Hammered


If you have put up with this jerkoff's drivel as long as the rest of us, you would understand the need for insults and possibly a few "your mama" jokes.

Exactly.

[EscortBiz]

50 CIA agents will arrest Wonton