Latina Representing...Survivor - GoFuckYourself.com

Nanda · 12-14-2003, 08:08 PM

Sandra, Won Survivor tonight! So glad that she represented us latinas and one her million!!! She was never voted against and won 6-1!!!
QUE VIVA LATINO AMERICA!!!

[Brian] · 12-14-2003, 08:10 PM

SKULL · 12-14-2003, 08:12 PM

Latin Pride......

Bansheelinks · 12-14-2003, 08:20 PM

Sure sure...........Sandra was mediocre.......never won one single challenge........

I said it in another thread..........the show is flawed and rewards mediocrity.........if you are a real competitor, you become a thread and mediocre weaklings vote you off

a flawed show

Feline · 12-14-2003, 08:41 PM

HEARTBREAKER · 12-14-2003, 08:42 PM

good for her

Meta Ridley · 12-14-2003, 08:42 PM

Posted from another thread:

<i>Jon is funny - after they all just got done telling Sandra she got to where she is by being lazy and riding on the coattails of others, Jon comes up and asks her if she thought she represented Puerto Ricans well. Haha , what a dick.
</i>

PersianKitty · 12-14-2003, 08:43 PM

Frickin A

I knew I shouldn't come to the board until 10PM PST. I thought maybe people would be thoughtful toward people in the later timezones and not spoil it.

Don't say I didn't have to look in the thread. If anyone's been watching the title tells all.

At least she's from Ft Lewis...just 15 minutes from me.

Meta Ridley · 12-14-2003, 08:45 PM

haha - yeah way to go poster.

Nanda · 12-14-2003, 09:07 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by PersianKitty

I knew I shouldn't come to the board until 10PM PST. I thought maybe people would be thoughtful toward people in the later timezones and not spoil it.

Don't say I didn't have to look in the thread. If anyone's been watching the title tells all.

Quote:

Originally posted by Meta Ridley
haha - yeah way to go poster.

If you look at the name of my title it DOES not say she won it simply says Latina representing survivor..not once in the title thread did I say she won....

PersianKitty · 12-14-2003, 09:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Nanda

If you look at the name of my title it DOES not say she won it simply says Latina representing survivor..not once in the title thread did I say she won....

Like it could mean anything else on the night the announce the winner.

- AFN - · 12-14-2003, 10:16 PM

She should be featured in 8thstreetlatinas.com ND would make BAYUUUUUUUUUUUUUUNK!

spooky181 · 12-14-2003, 10:49 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Nanda

If you look at the name of my title it DOES not say she won it simply says Latina representing survivor..not once in the title thread did I say she won....

What the fuck else would it mean!! thanks for ruining it for others.. How about just posting a thread tiled "survivor"

FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK

Dax · 12-14-2003, 11:00 PM

What is the big deal?? Im a spic and Im not excited over a girl winning some tv show..

CDSmith · 12-14-2003, 11:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Bansheelinks
Sure sure...........Sandra was mediocre.......never won one single challenge........

I said it in another thread..........the show is flawed and rewards mediocrity.........if you are a real competitor, you become a thread and mediocre weaklings vote you off

a flawed show

Sorry, but I disagree with this. The show in NOT flawed, and even one of the smaller weaker girls can win out over the big strong bruisers. The show is geared to incorporate not only physical stamina but it plays on human nature, greed, deception, forsight and cunning. Sandra simply flew in under the radar while the others were all concerned about eliminating others. A huge part of the 'game' is to play people off of each other in a way that keeps the focus off of yourself... Sandra did that the best of all of them. Period.

Look at that Osten guy. Built like an NFL wide-receiver, strong as an ox, yet his mental strength just wasn't there.... he wimped out and went crawling home. Then look at 3 out of the 8 women who played the game, stuck it out and made it to the final four. Buddy, talk to some of the people who have been on the show, ask them how hard the experience was on them physically and mentally... they ALL say the same thing.

Flawed? I don't think so. Your thinking is flawed though.

Bansheelinks · 12-15-2003, 04:36 PM

Its flawed........

Did you watch the show and listen? When ppl get threatened by those that win the challenges, be it big Rupert or little Darrah, they are banded up and booted out by those that CANNOT win challenges, be they mental or physical.

It has nothing to do with size alone......it has to do with those that are successful being tossed out by those that ARE NOT successful......

why? because in the end, they want to be up against others that are mediocre in the challenges, mediocre like they are.....

in that sense, of course its ok for a contestant to think this way..........thats how you win the game, by booting out the big threats.

and thats the flaw...........its slanted towards rewarding mediocrity & punishing excellence. Thus you have Rupert being booted because he was so dominating, and Darrah, for winning 3 challenges in a row. All the contestants said Darrah had to go because of it.

CDSmith · 12-15-2003, 04:55 PM

That's part of the game, it's not a flaw. If you aren't smart enough to know when to "be successful" and when to shut your mouth and lay low, you lose. Dude, that's the way the game goes..... and frankly, when you have a group of people and only one can ultimately endure, your skills of deception will always come into play. Sorry, again I have to say, there is no flaw. It's just part of the game.

If Rupert or Darrah where able to keep winning immunity their successfulness would have been rewarded, btw. They weren't, and they weren't able to see how the others were plotting against them, so they lost. Hey, if you can't cut it, you're out. That's the way it goes. Calling the game flawed because someone isn't able to play the game is just stupid.

Bansheelinks · 12-16-2003, 01:51 PM

CDSmith wrote:

That's part of the game, it's not a flaw. If you aren't smart enough to know when to "be successful" and when to shut your mouth and lay low, you lose.

*******************************

LOL........you just made my point for me CD Smith......

"if you aren't smart enough to know when to be successful....."

And as if someone is going to win EVERY immunity challenge. But if you win most, and dominate, you're history. I know what the show is about, CD, and I know its smarter to even throw challenges if you have a good alliance and are seen as a threat.

BUT THATS MY POINT! The show rewards the mediocre. Why do you think we have had so many coattail riders as of late? Or people who couldn't catch fish or light a fire if their lives depended on it. Even Sandra admitted this.

They have another show based on the same premise as Survivor, yet there isn't any dependancy on survival skills and toughness. Its called Big Brother and is played in a house. There its all about human politics and such. Survivor has become just like it......the one that wins the human politics wins. It has nothing to do with surviving on an island, or even bettering your tribemates in competitions anymore, as one cannot win every immunity challenge.

The game is slanted in favor of mediocrity.

Sandra, like it or not, was mediocre in many respects. She could hardly swim, won ZERO challenges, had poor interpersonal skills.

She herself admitted they went after others because there were "bigger fish to fry". She was entertaining and I liked her, but lets be honest, she was a mediocre player.

12-14-2003, 08:08 PM	#1
Nanda Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: African Safari Posts: 5,310	Latina Representing...Survivor Sandra, Won Survivor tonight! So glad that she represented us latinas and one her million!!! She was never voted against and won 6-1!!! QUE VIVA LATINO AMERICA!!! __________________ My Ex-husband SKULL-BUITRE ran off to Colombia with OUR money and screwed me after I helped him build OUR business. He is hiding in Colombia and never paid the settlement $ from our divorce! Last edited by Nanda; 12-14-2003 at 08:10 PM..

12-14-2003, 08:10 PM	#2
[Brian] Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: Orange County, CA Posts: 1,523	olè __________________ HerbalRevenue - Exciting new enhancement program ICQ: 391113064

12-14-2003, 08:12 PM	#3
SKULL Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: The Moon Posts: 1,953	Latin Pride...... __________________ www.traffic-trades.com

12-14-2003, 08:42 PM	#6
HEARTBREAKER Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2003 Posts: 2,984	good for her __________________ An Adult IT Staffing Solutions Company email: [email protected] icq: 418366319 Tel.#: 1-702-940-0789 (U.S. Toll Free)

12-14-2003, 08:42 PM	#7
Meta Ridley Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: The land of ruleface and kickass Posts: 3,433	Posted from another thread: <i>Jon is funny - after they all just got done telling Sandra she got to where she is by being lazy and riding on the coattails of others, Jon comes up and asks her if she thought she represented Puerto Ricans well. Haha , what a dick. </i> __________________ [email protected]

12-14-2003, 08:20 PM	#4
Bansheelinks Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 6,023	Sure sure...........Sandra was mediocre.......never won one single challenge........ I said it in another thread..........the show is flawed and rewards mediocrity.........if you are a real competitor, you become a thread and mediocre weaklings vote you off a flawed show

12-14-2003, 08:41 PM	#5
Feline Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2003 Posts: 141

12-14-2003, 08:43 PM	#8
PersianKitty Meow Media Inc. Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: In the valley of the sun, cactus, tacos, tequila, and nod Posts: 7,785	Frickin A I knew I shouldn't come to the board until 10PM PST. I thought maybe people would be thoughtful toward people in the later timezones and not spoil it. Don't say I didn't have to look in the thread. If anyone's been watching the title tells all. At least she's from Ft Lewis...just 15 minutes from me. __________________ Wondering what webmaster programs PK uses? Check them out here!

12-14-2003, 08:45 PM	#9
Meta Ridley Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: The land of ruleface and kickass Posts: 3,433	haha - yeah way to go poster. __________________ [email protected]

12-14-2003, 10:16 PM	#12
- AFN - Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: NYC Baaaabeee Posts: 3,101	She should be featured in 8thstreetlatinas.com ND would make BAYUUUUUUUUUUUUUUNK! __________________ cat cash* \| tr -d '\r' \| tr -s '/n' > money

12-14-2003, 11:00 PM	#14
Dax Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: USA Posts: 3,161	What is the big deal?? Im a spic and Im not excited over a girl winning some tv show..

12-15-2003, 04:36 PM	#16
Bansheelinks Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 6,023	Its flawed........ Did you watch the show and listen? When ppl get threatened by those that win the challenges, be it big Rupert or little Darrah, they are banded up and booted out by those that CANNOT win challenges, be they mental or physical. It has nothing to do with size alone......it has to do with those that are successful being tossed out by those that ARE NOT successful...... why? because in the end, they want to be up against others that are mediocre in the challenges, mediocre like they are..... in that sense, of course its ok for a contestant to think this way..........thats how you win the game, by booting out the big threats. and thats the flaw...........its slanted towards rewarding mediocrity & punishing excellence. Thus you have Rupert being booted because he was so dominating, and Darrah, for winning 3 challenges in a row. All the contestants said Darrah had to go because of it.

12-15-2003, 04:55 PM	#17
CDSmith Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: May 2001 Location: My network is hosted at TECHIEMEDIA.net ...Wait, you meant where am I located at? Oh... okay, I'm in Winnipeg, Canada. Oops. :) Posts: 51,460	That's part of the game, it's not a flaw. If you aren't smart enough to know when to "be successful" and when to shut your mouth and lay low, you lose. Dude, that's the way the game goes..... and frankly, when you have a group of people and only one can ultimately endure, your skills of deception will always come into play. Sorry, again I have to say, there is no flaw. It's just part of the game. If Rupert or Darrah where able to keep winning immunity their successfulness would have been rewarded, btw. They weren't, and they weren't able to see how the others were plotting against them, so they lost. Hey, if you can't cut it, you're out. That's the way it goes. Calling the game flawed because someone isn't able to play the game is just stupid. __________________ *Promote Wildmatch, ImLive, Sexier.com, and more!!* ALWAYS THE HIGHEST PAYOUTS: Big Bux/ImLive SIGNUP ON NOW!!! Put some PUSSYCA$H in your pocket. ICQ me at: 31024634

12-16-2003, 01:51 PM	#18
Bansheelinks Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 6,023	CDSmith wrote: That's part of the game, it's not a flaw. If you aren't smart enough to know when to "be successful" and when to shut your mouth and lay low, you lose. ******************************* LOL........you just made my point for me CD Smith...... "if you aren't smart enough to know when to be successful....." And as if someone is going to win EVERY immunity challenge. But if you win most, and dominate, you're history. I know what the show is about, CD, and I know its smarter to even throw challenges if you have a good alliance and are seen as a threat. BUT THATS MY POINT! The show rewards the mediocre. Why do you think we have had so many coattail riders as of late? Or people who couldn't catch fish or light a fire if their lives depended on it. Even Sandra admitted this. They have another show based on the same premise as Survivor, yet there isn't any dependancy on survival skills and toughness. Its called Big Brother and is played in a house. There its all about human politics and such. Survivor has become just like it......the one that wins the human politics wins. It has nothing to do with surviving on an island, or even bettering your tribemates in competitions anymore, as one cannot win every immunity challenge. The game is slanted in favor of mediocrity. Sandra, like it or not, was mediocre in many respects. She could hardly swim, won ZERO challenges, had poor interpersonal skills. She herself admitted they went after others because there were "bigger fish to fry". She was entertaining and I liked her, but lets be honest, she was a mediocre player.