CCBill & Epoch Scrubbing Question? - GoFuckYourself.com

JamesL · 09-11-2003, 05:45 AM

Is there any point using either of these processors to backup the other?

I have no experience of Epoch but I know that CCBill scrub pretty hard and I would like to have a less strict backup processor if possible.

Fabien · 09-11-2003, 05:53 AM

Both do "bro" !

But use CCBILL first, then EPOCH

JamesL · 09-11-2003, 06:29 AM

Thanks for the reply.

You would think that if they both work off the same scrubbing criteria then a surfer would get declined or accepted on either but not get a different result between the two.

corvette · 09-11-2003, 07:44 AM

Proprietary scrubbing systems are inherently going to be different. What is flagged and the score that it is assigned, assessment criteria, weights, etc?not to mention differences in the ?negative? database.

They were created differently

So you know, years ago, we were not satisfied with the outsourced scrubbing that we were using and decided to create our own, Vscrub, which I am familiar with the architecture of, and imo, works very well

JamesL · 09-11-2003, 08:28 AM

Thanks Corvett.

I love CCBill and have been with you guys for years with no plans to move but you do seem to scrub harder than some other processors.

OY · 09-11-2003, 08:38 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by corvett
Proprietary scrubbing systems are inherently going to be different. What is flagged and the score that it is assigned, assessment criteria, weights, etc?not to mention differences in the ?negative? database.

They were created differently

Very true, very true.

Answer = MPA2

myneid · 09-11-2003, 09:55 AM

in my experience in hte past month here watching ccbill as a secondary processor to epoch. ccbill kicks ass as a secondary processor. doing way better than i expected converting epochs declines with no chargebacks in a month and only a couple credits.

09-11-2003, 05:45 AM	#1
JamesL Registered User Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Sunny England Posts: 33	CCBill & Epoch Scrubbing Question? Is there any point using either of these processors to backup the other? I have no experience of Epoch but I know that CCBill scrub pretty hard and I would like to have a less strict backup processor if possible.

09-11-2003, 07:44 AM	#4
corvette Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: scottsdale Posts: 7,880	Proprietary scrubbing systems are inherently going to be different. What is flagged and the score that it is assigned, assessment criteria, weights, etc?not to mention differences in the ?negative? database. They were created differently So you know, years ago, we were not satisfied with the outsourced scrubbing that we were using and decided to create our own, Vscrub, which I am familiar with the architecture of, and imo, works very well __________________ If you need a good company for check writing services, then check out checkissuing, and for webhosting, check out Phoenix NAP

09-11-2003, 09:55 AM	#7
myneid Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 736	in my experience in hte past month here watching ccbill as a secondary processor to epoch. ccbill kicks ass as a secondary processor. doing way better than i expected converting epochs declines with no chargebacks in a month and only a couple credits. __________________ Tanguy 0x7a69 inc. Programmer/President/CEO http://www.0x7a69.com A Leader in Programming since 1996 PHP, Ruby on Rails, MySQL, PCI DSS, and any Technical Consulting

09-11-2003, 05:53 AM	#2
Fabien Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 4,787	Both do "bro" ! But use CCBILL first, then EPOCH

09-11-2003, 06:29 AM	#3
JamesL Registered User Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Sunny England Posts: 33	Thanks for the reply. You would think that if they both work off the same scrubbing criteria then a surfer would get declined or accepted on either but not get a different result between the two.

09-11-2003, 08:28 AM	#5
JamesL Registered User Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Sunny England Posts: 33	Thanks Corvett. I love CCBill and have been with you guys for years with no plans to move but you do seem to scrub harder than some other processors.