Non-nude underage "model" sites... - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

psyko514 · 05-22-2003, 12:42 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by peaceful
I don't understand why people keep talking as if the models are victim. They make huge bucks there. They could be models when they grow up, which is one of the best jobs in the world.

There are many other things that are dangers for minor. School bully, thief, burglar, kidnappers. Dead penalty are not imposed for those heinous crime and you guys are rambling about some guy helping models earn a living.

The problem is that they're not really models. In fact, many of the girls don't have model potential (unless you count porn modelling).

Generally, the "models" are big breasted teens and all they do on the site is shake their ass and tits.

peteinoz · 05-22-2003, 12:55 AM

all I know.. if it was on the oprah show.. she's as guilty as all the rest.. she would of made a nice buck out of it exploiting the same 12 year old as the mother did.. while putting down the mother for doing the same..

thats my

worth

rowan · 05-22-2003, 01:13 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Bulworth
I think they're legal, but "sketchy" is a good word to use. I'll be honest, as a 23 year old guy, I find some of the late teen models for these sites being spammed to usenet are pretty cute. One in particular "Lalana Model" is damn fine, no idea if she's 18 or not, but she's hot. Sorry but it's in my genes!

You might want to revise your opinion.

"14 year old lalana"

Braces, almost without exception, scream 'underage' to me...

polish_aristocrat · 05-22-2003, 01:22 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by psyko514

For the record, I wasn't interested in doing an underage non-
if you check the site mentioned above, christinamodel.com, you'll see that they come even closer to child porn then cindymodel.com does. it basically a 16/17 year old top-heavy girl wearing plunging necklines and thongs. cindymodel.com is much less offensive then this site. and the same guy runs a whole network of sites with at least half a dozen other girls.

I also checked the site KRL referred to and there's even more CP for me. She's 13 now. Do her parent really think she will be a model, or rather a model like Tawnee Stone in future... ?

UnseenWorld · 05-22-2003, 01:31 AM

I think if you do non-nude, you don't want to do porn, too. One or the other. But as people seem to see: the non-nude stuff is pretty questionable even if it is legal. Does MET kind of mix the two? Underage chicks non-nude or in "tasteful" nude spreads mixed with 18+ girls doing naughties? I wouldn't do that, personally. I'll do any 18 year old no matter how young she looks, but I wouldn't touch a 17 year old for any money, even if the non-nudes weren't even sexy. There is this one site out there I run into all the time that puts up underage girls just barely clothed. The poses aren't pornographic, but the clothing is extremely skimpy and the poses appeal to fetishes like leg and butt and panty. That does make me wonder where the girls' parents are.

slavdogg · 05-22-2003, 02:25 AM

i saw that Oprah show, i couldnt believe how ignorant her mom and uncle were.

A lot of people including myself wish those sites were shut down, but in reality there is no legal grounds to stop it. Unless there is illegal activity behind them.

05-22-2003, 01:31 AM	#55
UnseenWorld Confirmed User Join Date: May 2001 Location: Portland, OR, USA Posts: 5,279	I think if you do non-nude, you don't want to do porn, too. One or the other. But as people seem to see: the non-nude stuff is pretty questionable even if it is legal. Does MET kind of mix the two? Underage chicks non-nude or in "tasteful" nude spreads mixed with 18+ girls doing naughties? I wouldn't do that, personally. I'll do any 18 year old no matter how young she looks, but I wouldn't touch a 17 year old for any money, even if the non-nudes weren't even sexy. There is this one site out there I run into all the time that puts up underage girls just barely clothed. The poses aren't pornographic, but the clothing is extremely skimpy and the poses appeal to fetishes like leg and butt and panty. That does make me wonder where the girls' parents are. __________________ SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.

05-22-2003, 02:25 AM	#56
slavdogg Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2001 Posts: 3,570	i saw that Oprah show, i couldnt believe how ignorant her mom and uncle were. A lot of people including myself wish those sites were shut down, but in reality there is no legal grounds to stop it. Unless there is illegal activity behind them. __________________ Adult Traffic for Sale

05-22-2003, 12:55 AM	#52
peteinoz Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: AU Posts: 183	all I know.. if it was on the oprah show.. she's as guilty as all the rest.. she would of made a nice buck out of it exploiting the same 12 year old as the mother did.. while putting down the mother for doing the same.. thats my worth