![]() |
Quote:
aah.. yeah, you'd need 800" for that :) mwahah! i love gm! an excerpt from their site about jeg coughlin's monster cavalier. that's right, with the same motor you can get in a brand new cavalier. where's ford's 850+ hp 2.0 zetec? lol. i'm sure it could happen, with a lot of effort, but the thought of a zx2 with 850 hp is for some reason more amusing than a cavalier :) Quote:
|
You have any clue what it cost Jeg and his family to win that championship? Try 3 million.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If I won a Vette I would sell it and buy a real car :) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Thx. |
Quote:
|
Number1Thumb, i hate people like u... i mean who gives a shit about ur gay ford which got no style, no look, cheap, fucking unreliable car (go look costumer reports), no comfort, i can go on forever and you THINK u cool in it? lol. Also dont diss imports, cuz they will eat ur little ford alive, ever saw what can be done to supra's on a stock internals ?if not go look... btw they will beat ur stang plus you can ride in it not walk home after urshit breaks
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
At a fordchips dyno day in Denver a bone stock 03 Cobra dynoed 385rwhp, verified bone stock by 3 of the tuners. That is more then enough of a power advantage to nullify the weight difference, don't you think? Car currently ran a best of 12.53, 2 weeks ago, with about $1300 in mods (most of it on stainless exhaust - Magnaflow for life) - and I admit that I am not the best stick driver, I am used to racing autos. How many miles was on yours? Basing from the averages that I have seen (from the Mustang club I am a member of) they seem to be dynoing around 369rwhp on average, some weaker some stronger). I'm sorry but a C5 Vette more then likely dynos around 325rwhp (Basing this off estimation, since LS1, LS6, etc are usually under rated), and it does have a aero dynamic and weight advantage, which makes it pretty damn close. IBoth are stock high 12 second cars. But stock for stock, ON MY EXPERIENCES OBSERVING AT THE TRACK, 03 cobras are beating C5's more often then not. Your mileage may vary. The point is the Ford GT is not meant to compete with vettes, because they are not even remotely in the same class. I know a Z06 vette is faster, but a C5 isn't. |
mods mods mods...fuck you loser!
Post STOCK dyno numbers of the feared 2003 Cobra. STOCK dyno numbers! :1orglaugh |
because, how many unreliable cars you see produced by bmw,acura,mb,audi,etc? now how many by ford,chev,etc ? the ratio becomes huge, now how the fuck will they produce another car when all(most) their products suck ? simple example, you suck at making websites, now you want to make amazing one with complicated java and php scripts, you think you will finish it right /? also i've read about their high end cobra svt to being discontinued due to many problems
|
Quote:
And rofl, CONSUMER REPORTS? You base your opinions on cars from magazines where 90% of the info is contributed by soccer moms? WTF. I remember reading consumer reports regarding a Trans AM WS6 a while back and some of the complaints were that it was too noisy - i mean wtf? I have respect for some imports, as long as they don't try to make their car look like it came straight out of the fast and the furious. But he's right, big ass wings that probably at 25 lbs of weight on FWD cars? Totally retarded. I would rather own a Mustang, Camaro, Trans Am, Cobra, Vette and the likes then some "LANCER EVO" or "WRX STi".. or any luxury car. They are fun, fast and raw. I don't want heated leather seats, I don't want voice activated crap, I don't want a 4,500 pound piece of shit that can go over railroad tracks at 60 and feel like it is floating on clouds. |
Quote:
baahahah... i can respect a well-done import. not the kind with the fake exhaust and the speed-adding apc stickers. as fast as supras are, they are not going to beat a big block ford like he's got. 8.30 on a mostly stock-motored supra? a supra with a stock bottom end, even if by some miracle (or 500hp nitrous) will NOT be reliable, and it will most likely blow something after a few runs. i can get to 10.5 in my mazda truck reliably, and cheaply. maybe even to 10. but getting into the 9's, it's no longer going to stay reliable. and, i can build a big block chevy motor on $2000 and blow the doors off most imports with $10000 invested. oh crap, that motor will be reliable, too. what do you think i could do to that BBC with $10000? about the tune of 800-900 horsepower. there is NO replacement for displacement. i love toyotas, and hate fords, but that was a very ignorant comment. that's the kind of person i see here in town with a fake vtec civic trying to race a vintage stingray, or a muscle car with a 6-71 out the hood. yeah, i've seen a stock neon with one slight modification be put to the 10's. but that one modification was 500hp of nitrous, and it lived for 3 runs, then blew. |
Quote:
But regardless, there is something you need to understand. SVT created a car for tuners and racers, and put it out of the factory with much less power then it is capable of to keep insurance costs and other red tape down. Have you seen the gains simply by removing the air silencer? You have to respect 450rwhp for what little it costs to get there. |
Bottom line is put up or shut up. That is directed to the Ford fanatics.... :Graucho
And I am talking STOCK. Why do all the ford guys have to jump into car threads with what their MODDED cars can do vs. STOCK cars? :1orglaugh |
New GT. Aren't they only building 3? Is it faster than 3.9 seconds 0-60 like this?
http://www.adult.com/lens/newviper.jpg |
Quote:
How is it put up or shut up? I'm assuming that 03 isn't yours and you just found it on the net, how about you search for the rest that are not dynoing unusually low? (Aka, something that was not dynoed at 6000 feet altitude). |
Quote:
Until then, put up or shut up. This thread is getting tedious........and boring. Post a stock Cobra doing 450 rwhp with an air fuddy removed. :1orglaugh |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
i agree about soccer moms and lancer and wrx with u... but im not talking about your car, i'm talking about general production.... lets say if u take 1000 hondas or bmw or audi and 1000 fords and drive them up to 200,000km, i can bet anything that much more imports or german cars will come there then ford, see my point ? about wrx i agree it's a peice of shit with pink sti logo BUT they are quick 300hp from intercooled engine with 4 wheel drive system.
|
Quote:
And I hope your question wasn't a 'jab' at the GT40 because I specifically remember you in a past GT thread stating "Remember this thread, I will own one". By the way, rumor is that they are looking at more like 590horsepower instead of the projected 500, so I'm assuming faster then 3.9 is not out of the question if the rest of the car is engineered well. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
But yeah, I know LS1's are wicked, but I do consider new cams past the 'hardly any mods' stage and I don't think most people can get a LS1 that high N/A without cams. I love the LS1 engine mind you, I just get tired of the perpetual insult ford threads by elitists =) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
bullshit. yeah, for a time american cars may not have been as reliable as a 70's honda cvcc, but that's not the case anymore. i've seen proof. nice cars, shitty cars, whatever. i sold american cars. i had an old chevy celebrity, was my first car, and try as hard as i could, i could not make that car die. i went way over oil changes every time. once i went about 18000 miles without an oil change. no shit, one of my friends bought the stupid piece of shit and she's still driving it. most reliable car i've probably owned. always started, and it was WAY cheaper than an import to fix. same with my other domestics. quite reliable, and when they did break, i spent 1/3-1/2 of what i spent to fix an import. $400 for a timing belt? fuck that, i've got a CHAIN. with today's design, and even moderately decent maintenance, a car will live a long time. 100k miles is nothing. wonder why they started putting the extra digits on the odometer? that's why. poorly maintain any car, and it will degenerate rapidly. especially a vw. |
Quote:
I believe a lot of complains about American cars come from people who buy sub 10k cars and are amazed that the quality is not the same as a 30k+ car. As for german and japanese cars lasting longer, I wouldn't know I have never owned one ;) I do respect most cars, it's the owners that piss me off -_- |
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://www.mvpmotorsports.com/merchant/8sec.shtml this will eat ur gayass ford anyday 1200rwhp. 6 cylinders. No NOS. |
i swear i would take acura 3.2 type s over ur 8sec peice of shit
|
Quote:
you think you can make a supra hook better than a mustang? hardly. the mustang is much more suspension-mod friendly. and where the hell do you find 90/10 drag shocks and springs for a supra? how do you fit 10 or 12" slicks under a supra without cutting it all sorts of up? how's a manual supra going to shift better than an automatic with a strip kit? i'd rather have 250 hp in my truck than the 85 the factory rates it for. i'd say that's better. a little history on the ls1. gm originally introduced 4 versions of the engine, ranging from 450hp to 600hp. the 600hp model was named the "coffin" version, for what reasons i do not know. i believe this was the motor that is used in the c5r race car, but i can't verify that (btw, you can order all the parts for the c5r, unassembled, if you want one - for i think about $125k). i am under the impression a cam change is not necessary for the 450hp. i may be wrong, but everything i've read/heard is "minor modifications" - which i would not classify as a cam change, either. basically, i understood it that the breathing on both ends of that motor is fairly awful. opening up the air intake system, and helping out the exhaust will add a ton. the factory exhaust manifolds are fairly decent on the lsX, but they could still use help. hey, since we're talking about factory perfomance bullshit, anyone hear about gm's crazy crate motor? it's supposed to go in the cien. dunno if it did. i believe it is a northstar, v12, that is about the _same physical size_ as a v8. 750 emissions-legal horsepower. yeah. lol.. hard to believe i, of all people, am sticking up for a ford. |
Wicked:thumbsup
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://www.roushperf.com/mustanghome.htm |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
41 fucking psi? i don't think even the few turbo funny cars are running that. 25 maybe. put 41psi on a v8 :). you can no longer argue import reliability at 41 psi of boost, that thing needs a rebuild every weekend. a note on the supra head gaskets... you might want to look for an exact number, but, if you over-torque the bolts, that is known to fix many a head gasket woes. i've heard countless people doing that, and it working reliably. i almost bought a supra, so i did the research. over torque the bolts, the head gasket won't blow anymore. :warning |
Quote:
|
Quote:
you're probably not familiar with the eternal ford vs. chevy rivalry. and hey, what's wrong with spending $30k on a 15year-old american muscle car to make it very fast, and very nice? :Graucho |
Quote:
I'm not trying to prove to you that I own the car or what I ran, I'm trying to fucking tell you what it is capable of, I could care less about impressing some self righteous retard on GFY. Well regardless, this is my last reply to you, because while you may think your dissaproval or disbelief matters.. it doesn't =) Hope to meet you at the track some day! |
Quote:
your sig speaks miles about you. yo :1orglaugh |
Quote:
eh, gotta disagree with that. i don't think you can make a car in the low 8's reliable, unless it's that new 1001hp 0-180 in under 8 seconds or whatever bugatti. most cars out there just won't do it, unfortunately. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
A-fuckin'-men! |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:17 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123