![]() |
Your right it s a virginia plate . I lived there did you know
|
Quote:
|
50
TUPAC IS ALIVE |
Saw about a month ago good shit if they only priced it around 70k
|
FUCK
|
Ya ok let me run out for ya p00p no problem. 1 hour to get to the shop
|
ok, why do all these different states have like 6 billion license plates? i think oregon is that way too, as many license plate designs as there are on the road. we have 2. vehicles all have the same design (they recently forced all farm/commercial light truck licenses to use the car plates), and all the gov't/large commercial/historical/etc plates look the same.
oh, forgot one. if you want to pay $70 extra you can get university plates, so 3 designs. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
alright, if it posts 8.30's, you're faster. but is it really that impressive to have a car like that, and it's less than a second faster than a civic in the quarter? |
Ya ok I dont your right, http://www.woodsracingengines.com Geez you oughta know my email by know I submit everyday to ya. But since your anti-Ford I guess thats over HUH?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
discontinuing business because he doesn't like fords? i dunno about you, but a ford guy brings a car into my shop, i fix it, take the dough, and watch it get smoked next weekend :Graucho |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
this car is prototype and from what i understand (although drunk) it will remain like this. This is nothing more than the continue of GT40 and GT60 (if i remember well). Real supercars with unrealistic price ranges. Let me find some GT40 pics......
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Nothin special or unique. What unique a stock F-Body with flowmaster's? I dont understand. OR how about the rear spoilers on front wheel drive civics ? I guess I dont understand
|
http://www.supercars.net/cars/1968@$Ford@$GT40%20Mk1%20Gulfg.html
http://www.supercars.net/cars/2002@$Ford@$GT40%20Conceptg.html http://www.supercars.net/cars/1995@$Ford@$GT90%20Conceptg.html amazing cars, but they have lots of mechanical problems like all prototypes. GT40 of 1968 was produced in very limited parts and I know a guy had bought this car back then. |
no, actually, despite what i say about ricers, i HATE them. especially the ones with 4" exits and fake type-r stickers. i hate them. i talk more shit about imports around here than anyone i know. unfortunately, i have to work on a lot of them. the civic i'm talking about is just about business. you know, in other countries, those cars are their pro/street? this car is gutted, pizza cutters on the rear, fatties on the front, fiberglass front clip.
but here's something to think about. i haven't done this, because i depend on my truck for a daily driver, it has really low miles, and i'm going to keep it stock for quite a while (until i can get my other projects finished). it's a mazda b2200. we've seen it, it's been proven, for about $1500 i can make my truck a fairly reliable daily driver in the mid 10's. not bad for a $1500 conversion, and i'm not talking about throwing in a v8. the main problem is the rear end. we've already shattered the rear end a few times in another b2200 with a 90 v6 chev conversion. they're only meant for about 100 hp. the nice thing is, the mazdas and chevy shares the same 6-bolt wheel pattern. so, throw a nice 12-bolt under it (although keeping the mazda motor). so, take $1500 from whatever you've spent, and i bet i could get the truck in the low 8's. not bad for a completely stock-looking (besides some mandatory wider rear tires) rice-grinder. i'll always take a nice v8 over a rice grinder. but my oooollld chevy truck was showing its age, and eating gas like a mofo so i needed something a little more reliable and preferrably easier on gas. |
Quote:
i think the car would be very sweet, if they could get it in a reasonable price range (say, $40k or below?). kinda like they're trying to make a new pantera ;) |
Quote:
|
The truck would never hook. What were the 60' times?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
i know traction would be a HUGE problem. if i was really going to go that route, i'd do it right. it's too low for slapper bars. it's got a 3" drop, and i get stuck in car washes. the rear springs are down too far. probably what i'd do is tub it and get some decent meat out back, and use ladder bars. a 4-link is too much work. then, put drag shocks/springs on it. i'd have to redo the front suspension though, because it uses torsion bars. not sure how i'd do that without a strut front end or some shit, but i wouldn't REALLY want to get into that. this is, after all, a daily driver. the other problem is the overall weight of the vehicle. usually low weight is good, but the new motor would probably actually reduce the front end weight, so the only hope really is just to get as much on the back as possible. |
Quote:
but again, you can't achieve that with just a run-of-the-mill sooper hoop ricer crap wing. their aerodynamics aren't built for downforce. |
Quote:
|
Drag racing, can you pick a more boring sport:2 cents:
|
1.5g's at launch is not that boring to me. But to each his own
|
nah, you don't need a 4link to do 8's. ladder bars. 4links take to long to dial in, i'm impatient :). i don't have anything in the 8's right now, but i know some people that do, and they all swear by the ladder bars.
the 409 impala was a BBC. it actually comes from my project car (as lame as that is), my iroc that i'm dropping in a 409 SBC. but, actually it might end up being a 406. or, i've toyed with 415, but i kinda want to keep the revs up. going to go 406, 6-speed trans, 12-bolt rear. and actually, i'm toying with the idea of keeping the 10-bolt. prior to common belief, you CAN make a 10-bolt survive power. my block is actually a 2-bolt, but i think i will leave it that way. the mains aren't as strong themselves with a 2-bolt, but the block is. gm put a lot of extra material in the bottom end of the 2-bolt sbc so it would hold up. worse comes to worse, i'll install splayed caps and have basically the strongest reused block style available. but, gm rates the 2-bolt to 650hp, and they always rate hp #'s low. the car is going to be a driver mainly, with weekend trips to the strip and curvies, so i'm keeping the iroc suspension (but modded), and the motor will be around 500hp n/a. not bad for a driver. it's a slow project, because my car's been sitting in my garage too much. our shop's kinda small, and it's usually full. i think i'm going to just buy some land outside town and build me a big, nice shop for my projects. i've got 1 triumph, 2 old 40-50 trucks, and a 40's delivery van i want to turn into a sweet show van for events. the big shop would be nice. my "racecar" project i've been thinking about doing someday for some real fun... a 97-ish cavalier 2-door with a blown, nitrous 696. yeah. |
Dude you definitely do not want a ladder bar car in the 8's. No way. I been drag racing for 12 years and have seen the ladder bars constantly stuck and locked on launch. Bad move. We run with Jon Kaase if you know him. The absloute finest big inch Ford engine builder in the country. http://www.jonkaaseracingengines.com/ we have been buildin the 800 inch IHRA motors that dominate the Chevys and Dodge boys "fake Hemi" that they have revised. Which is a ford wedge head. But the chevy and dodge boys complained enough and got their rule changes so they have a shot at a championshiip in IHRA this year. The big inch (800") motors have belonged to Ford for ever and dont see that changin anytime soon
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
They don't care about the performance of cars, they care about how rich it makes them look. And FYI, to all you 'haters' ford already has a car competing with a Vette, its called the 03/04/06 Cobra. Z06 > 03 > C5. And don't give me that crap about how they aren't even in the same league, the vettes interior is total garbage for a car of that price. I bet it pisses all these dumbshits off to know that there are people out there that aren't impressed with their 80k 'luxury sedans' -_- |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Hey as a cheap muscle car a Mustang is ok, but a Ford supercar, please its still a Ford built by the same hicks, with the same people making the parts no thanks. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Here is mine, that a stock Cobra isn't faster then a stock vette. If you know the weight of both cars, and the HP difference you will understand, if not, you are yet another idiot who probably rides a moped. 350hp stock 2003 Cobra. http://www.mafterburner.com/images/dynoscan006.jpg |
That thing is fucking dog ugly...
|
hrm, never heard of that ladder bar problem. but, i only personally talk much with a handful of people that run 8's. most of the nicer cars are around the 10's. street cars, in other words.
haven't heard about the new ford 800 inchers. but, then again i honestly don't pay a ton of attention to the mopar motors either. we don't get to rebuild a ton of motors around here, since probably 70% of our clientele is ricers. unfortunately we have to compete with the likes of speedway motors. the gearheads in this area are very entrenched in their ways, and there are a lot of good hotrod speed shops around here. but no import shops to speak of, besides a stereo shop that claims they're the shit for speed parts. if, by speed parts you mean a fake cold-air intake and altezza tailights. i'm much more familiar with the chevy builders, like lunati and ligenfelter. if i remember right, lunati was #2 in pro street to hit 200mph in the quarter. i wish he would have been first, he was hitting 198, but not cutting it. he's got that sweet-ass "street legal" green '68 camaro. the first one to hit 200 (201 to be exact) was "the ghost" - a white 95-ish fuel injected camaro. i think that guy (can't %@#$ remember his name now) was one of the few "pioneers" of sorts to use fuel injection in p/s as well. lunati doesn't to this day, i don't think. sad, they should :). i think a ford guy was the first to use the turbo setup though. there were 2 first cars using turbos, a 95-ish stang and a '57 chevy. can't remember which one is first. i've been around computers too damn much lately :( i couldn't imagine driving a 2000 horsepower car though, like a lot of the 696 chevy's are. what a rush. someday, i shall be strapped behind such a monster. maybe the cavalier. the original idea was a metro hatchback, but that was way too gay, and the cavalier i can drive down and meet the ricers. see if they'd be dumb enough to race. believe me, they are. |
Quote:
|
the ls1/ls6 is such an amazing motor, with such amazing capabilities. gm is holding back sooooo much with that car.
did anyone see some of the concept cars and race cars gm has out? besides the incredibly frightening 2.2 ecotech-powered drag cavalier, there was a 500hp n/a firebird ls6 with gm-installed 300hp of nitrous. unfortunately they won't be producing that one :( |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:17 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123