Events US Navy's being mocked again by the Russian air force - Page 3 - GoFuckYourself.com

dyna mo · 05-19-2016, 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

I also was a kid and believed into supermen and superweapon.

There have been several underwater atomic tests: the BAKER shot in Bikini Atoll in 1946, the WIGWAM shot off California in 1955, the UMBRELLA shot and the WAHOO shot at Enewetak in 1958.

BAKER was a 20 kiloton atomic bomb detonated 200 feet below the surface in a shallow lagoon. It generated a 90 foot wave 1000 feet from the detonation. However, that wave was only 6 feet high 22000 feet from the detonation.

WIGWAM was a 30 kiloton atomic bomb detonated 2000 feet below the surface. The official report on WIGWAM does not mention any significant waves from the explosion.

UMBRELLA was a 8 kiloton atomic bomb detonated 150 feet below the surface. WAHOO was a 9 kiloton atomic bomb detonated 500 feet below the surface. The official reports on UMBRELLA and WAHOO do not mention any significant waves from the detonation.

The difference between the WIGWAM and WAHOO deep water tests is that the bubble created by the explosion broadens and can collapse before reaching the surface thus limiting the wave generated at the surface.

The following link show the conclusions of atomic testing on the damage effects on ships:

https://nige.files.wordpress.com/2009/06/caw1960-8.pdf

One conclusion is that underwater atomic explosions do damage at twice the distance as air or surface explosions. The damage is not so much due to waves but to the blast wave being transmitted through water to the ship hull and secondary effects like hogging.

One thing to note about all the underwater shots: fallout was limited by the water and in the case of the deep underwater explosions, little fallout was released in the air.

Compare the above tests to the 15 kiloton Hiroshima bomb. Severe damage to builds occurred within a 1 mile radius and firestorm was started with a radius of about 2 miles. The bomb did severe damage to a greater area than could be expected to be done with an underwater detonation.

NatalieK · 05-19-2016, 11:30 AM

The Russian air force are now flying over Estonia, Europe, intercepted by RAF Typhoons. I take it without need or permission?

RAF Typhoons intercept Russian aircraft near Estonia border

just a punk · 05-19-2016, 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by klinton

whats this ?

An ancient picture from your wiki article.

just a punk · 05-19-2016, 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

There have been several underwater atomic tests: the BAKER shot in Bikini Atoll in 1946, the WIGWAM shot off California in 1955, the UMBRELLA shot and the WAHOO shot at Enewetak in 1958.

There was also a T-15 project, but... how does it relate to the Rayleigh scattering? Ah?

Quote:

Originally Posted by GspotProductions

The Russian air force are now flying over Estonia, Europe, intercepted by RAF Typhoons.

They were always flying over Europe, because more than 40% of Europe is... located in Russia ;)

Why · 05-19-2016, 11:44 AM

i dont know why you use this "crony" stuff like its some kind of insult, every reasonably educated american knows where a lot of our money goes... to the war machine.

but at least we are real about it, your country is ran by mafioso's, KGB agents and oligarchs... how is that better?

make no doubt our war machine could kick the living fuck out of yours. so you can keep coming back with retarded as pie in the sky ideas about how you might be able to stand a chance and do a bit of damage, but long story short, RU is still a has been and its just a puppy trying to fuck our legs for attention.

just a punk · 05-19-2016, 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Why

but at least we are real about it, your country is ran by mafioso's, KGB agents and oligarchs... how is that better?

Not better at all. Same shit - different faces. If you think that I like Putin more than Obama, you are soooooo wrong

dyna mo · 05-19-2016, 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

There was also a T-15 project, but... how does it relate to the Rayleigh scattering? Ah?

They have always flying over Europe, because more than 40% of Europe is... located in Russia ;)

just poking holes in your nuclear tsunami strategy.

also, i'm not going to try and act like i'm a laser expert but according to google, USA is well on its way to viable laser weapons.

just a punk · 05-19-2016, 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

just poking holes in your nuclear tsunami strategy.

I did never mention anything about "nuclear tsunami strategy" and personally I do consider it pretty ineffective (too much efforts for a small effect). Please read the thread carefully. I've just posted a note that laser technologies are extremely limited by out atmosphere and every kid, who has learned basics of physics knows that. Believe me, the one don't has to be a rocket scientist to understand a principle of Rayleigh scattering. That's a standard middle school course. Yeah, at least in my country...

klinton · 05-19-2016, 11:56 AM

not that ancient, Lysenko theories were still believed 50-60 years ago in soviet official science.......

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

An ancient picture from your wiki article.

dyna mo · 05-19-2016, 12:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

I did never mention anything about "nuclear tsunami strategy" and personally I do consider it pretty ineffective (too much efforts for a small effect). Please read the thread carefully. I've just posted a note that laser technologies are extremely limited by out atmosphere and every kid, who has learned basics of physics knows that. Believe me, the one don't has to be a rocket scientist to understand a principle of Rayleigh scattering. That's a standard middle school course. Yeah, at least in my country...

i lump all you slav nuclear high fivvers together. you don't hesitate to bring up nukes, i don't differentiate the different types of nuclear attacks you threaten about, a nuke attack is a nuke attack.

just a punk · 05-19-2016, 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

i lump all you slav nuclear high fivvers together. you don't hesitate to bring up nukes, i don't differentiate the different types of nuclear attacks you threaten about, a nuke attack is a nuke attack.

I don't understand what you are trying to say. Perhaps my English is so weak for your clever ideas. Sorry.

Quote:

Originally Posted by klinton

not that ancient, Lysenko theories were still believed 50-60 years ago in soviet official science.......

Have no single idea about this shit. I'm not that old. I have no single idea who that Lysenko was and why should I know anything about him

dyna mo · 05-19-2016, 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

I did never mention anything about "nuclear tsunami strategy" and personally I do consider it pretty ineffective (too much efforts for a small effect). Please read the thread carefully. I've just posted a note that laser technologies are extremely limited by out atmosphere and every kid, who has learned basics of physics knows that. Believe me, the one don't has to be a rocket scientist to understand a principle of Rayleigh scattering. That's a standard middle school course. Yeah, at least in my country...

yes, keep regaling us with your wild stories about rayleigh scattering

Navy: New laser weapon works, ready for action - CNN.com

just a punk · 05-19-2016, 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

yes, keep regaling us with your wild stories about rayleigh scattering

Navy: New laser weapon works, ready for action - CNN.com

A steam engine works too, but it's very ineffective, just like those toy laser systems

P.S. I like how easily you rename a physical law into a "wild story". I feel the power of the famous American comics education

pimpmaster9000 · 05-19-2016, 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

There have been several underwater atomic tests: the BAKER shot in Bikini Atoll in 1946, the WIGWAM shot off California in 1955, the UMBRELLA shot and the WAHOO shot at Enewetak in 1958.

BAKER was a 20 kiloton atomic bomb detonated 200 feet below the surface in a shallow lagoon. It generated a 90 foot wave 1000 feet from the detonation. However, that wave was only 6 feet high 22000 feet from the detonation.

WIGWAM was a 30 kiloton atomic bomb detonated 2000 feet below the surface. The official report on WIGWAM does not mention any significant waves from the explosion.

UMBRELLA was a 8 kiloton atomic bomb detonated 150 feet below the surface. WAHOO was a 9 kiloton atomic bomb detonated 500 feet below the surface. The official reports on UMBRELLA and WAHOO do not mention any significant waves from the detonation.

The difference between the WIGWAM and WAHOO deep water tests is that the bubble created by the explosion broadens and can collapse before reaching the surface thus limiting the wave generated at the surface.

The following link show the conclusions of atomic testing on the damage effects on ships:

https://nige.files.wordpress.com/2009/06/caw1960-8.pdf

One conclusion is that underwater atomic explosions do damage at twice the distance as air or surface explosions. The damage is not so much due to waves but to the blast wave being transmitted through water to the ship hull and secondary effects like hogging.

One thing to note about all the underwater shots: fallout was limited by the water and in the case of the deep underwater explosions, little fallout was released in the air.

Compare the above tests to the 15 kiloton Hiroshima bomb. Severe damage to builds occurred within a 1 mile radius and firestorm was started with a radius of about 2 miles. The bomb did severe damage to a greater area than could be expected to be done with an underwater detonation.

thats some serious quora science right there

US fleet vs. 100s or 1000s of nukes....I would not bet on the US fleet

klinton · 05-19-2016, 12:27 PM

because its good to know history to better understand present, and not live like a cockroach whose only excitement is because of new phone, damn it !

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

Have no single idea about this shit. I'm not that old. I have no single idea who that Lysenko was and why should I know anything about him

Jman · 05-19-2016, 12:28 PM

Pretty cool clip. The chopper in the other video is Bad Ass

Horatio Caine · 05-19-2016, 12:28 PM

Two eastern european punks with big dreams

Lets drink to that!

dyna mo · 05-19-2016, 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio

thats some serious quora science right there

US fleet vs. 100s or 1000s of nukes....I would not bet on the US fleet

yes, in your shellshocked dream land you drop 1000s of nukes to sink a US flotilla.

Horatio Caine · 05-19-2016, 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

Ask Horatio Canine. I believe he won't charge more than a couple of food stamps for them ;)

Here you go: Florida Department of Children and Families

I would feel bad to charge anything at all for you dear wife Svetlana.

just a punk · 05-19-2016, 12:34 PM

NatalieK · 05-19-2016, 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jman

Pretty cool clip. The chopper in the other video is Bad Ass

I know & it gets so close to the ship right

~Evilin~ · 05-19-2016, 01:50 PM

..i do not want WW3.

woj · 05-19-2016, 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

I did never mention anything about "nuclear tsunami strategy" and personally I do consider it pretty ineffective (too much efforts for a small effect). Please read the thread carefully. I've just posted a note that laser technologies are extremely limited by out atmosphere and every kid, who has learned basics of physics knows that. Believe me, the one don't has to be a rocket scientist to understand a principle of Rayleigh scattering. That's a standard middle school course. Yeah, at least in my country...

what does Rayleigh scattering have to do with anything? gravity exists too, and yet engineers came up with solutions to make aircraft fly... that's what scientists/engineers do...

spend 2 minutes on google and you will find videos of laser weapons popping missiles / artillery shells / etc from miles away, here is one for example:

and that's with some weak-ass 10 kW proof-of-concept laser running from a back of a truck... now imagine harvesting even fraction of the 100s of MW that a nuclear reactor on a ship is generating into a laser beam and you will see where the technology is headed...

poncabare · 05-19-2016, 04:22 PM

ivan drago

just a punk · 05-19-2016, 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by woj

what does Rayleigh scattering have to do with anything? gravity exists too, and yet engineers came up with solutions to make aircraft fly... that's what scientists/engineers do...

spend 2 minutes on google and you will find videos of laser weapons popping missiles / artillery shells / etc from miles away, here is one for example:

Note my P.S. here: https://gfy.com/20906087-post90.html - you are not first who tries to use lasers for military purposes - these are technologies from 70's (been there, seen that, done that). So, good luck on learning physics. First of all just try to find out what efficiency does mean ;)

Quote:

Originally Posted by woj

now imagine harvesting even fraction of the 100s of MW that a nuclear reactor on a ship is generating into a laser beam and you will see where the technology is headed...

How old are you? The higher power does not mean the higher result when we are talking about lasers, operating in the atmosphere. Let me step to your level and explain it in a different way. Consider the laser beam power like a human body, falling down to the ground. It doesn't matter if it was 100 km or only 1 km height: the speed of that body will be the same - not more than 240 km/h. There are limits of atmosphere for both: falling bodies and laser beams.

Nitzer Ebb · 05-19-2016, 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ~Evilin~

..i do not want WW3.

Not going to happened. Russian oligarchs heavily vested in western economies and real estate. Most of them live or have their families in EU or USA. Putin is bluffing.

woj · 05-19-2016, 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

Note my P.S. here: https://gfy.com/20906087-post90.html - you are not first who tries to use lasers for military purposes - these are technologies from 70's (been there, seen that, done that). So, good luck on learning physics. First of all just try to find out what efficiency does mean ;)

what do your failed attempts at creating some advanced weapons have to do with anything? I know what efficiency is, care to clarify what it has to do with anything in this context?

woj · 05-19-2016, 04:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

How old are you? The higher power does not mean the higher result when we are talking about lasers, operating in the atmosphere. Let me step to your level and explain it in a different way. Consider the laser bean power like a human body, falling down to the ground. It doesn't matter if it was 100 km or only 100 meter height: the speed of that body will be the same - not more than 240 km/h. Are you surprised, professor? ;)

not surprised at all, obviously higher power means lower result... but only in Russia...

John_Galbani · 05-19-2016, 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

Note my P.S. here: https://gfy.com/20906087-post90.html - you are not first who tries to use lasers for military purposes - these are technologies from 70's (been there, seen that, done that). So, good luck on learning physics. First of all just try to find out what efficiency does mean ;)

How old are you? The higher power does not mean the higher result when we are talking about lasers, operating in the atmosphere. Let me step to your level and explain it in a different way. Consider the laser beam power like a human body, falling down to the ground. It doesn't matter if it was 100 km or only 1 km height: the speed of that body will be the same - not more than 240 km/h. There are limits of atmosphere for both: falling bodies and laser beams.

Do not forget russian internets satelites technology!

just a punk · 05-19-2016, 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by woj

not surprised at all, obviously higher power means lower result... but only in Russia...

Only on a planet which has such a thing like the atmosphere (e.g. Earth). You can't jump over the physical limits. Once again: how old are you and did you complete a middle school?

P.S. Even a power of explosion drops as a square-root of the distance. Getting back to your level: a power of a shock wave with a force of 100 Pa will be only 10 Pa in a meter away of it's epicenter. That's a world we live in... But you can always count on them:

Horatio Caine · 05-19-2016, 05:09 PM

Look at you go, Boris

3:07 AM
Friday, May 20, 2016 (GMT+3)
Time in Moscow, Russia

]

just a punk · 05-19-2016, 05:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Horatio Caine

]

I like this gif, thanks

Unfortunately I go to sleep at about 7 AM (

pimpmaster9000 · 05-19-2016, 05:25 PM

laser = technology fail...

missiles can be like 10 meters long, how hard would it be to fire TEN with say 3 meters worth of fuel and 7 meters of steel...melt that bitch! travelling at mach 15 the kinetic energy of the hit would vaporize a ship

fail

US army = fail

f
a
i
l

the americans did not think that one out, they acted on impulse, lucas made star wars, they got stoked "merica! lasers!"

fail...

pimpmaster9000 · 05-19-2016, 05:31 PM

or a shot gun type of missle with like 1000s of pool ball sized steel balls travelling at mach 15, the moment the missile is within the lasers puny range it bursts and swiss cheeses the waste of money US boaty mc boat face...

lasers = fail

fleet = sink

NatalieK · 05-19-2016, 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by woj

amazing machinery & equipment

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

Consider the laser beam power like a human body, falling down to the ground. It doesn't matter if it was 100 km or only 1 km height: the speed of that body will be the same - not more than 240 km/h. There are limits of atmosphere for both: falling bodies and laser beams.

Technically isn't it the power behind the laser that creates the distance due to the capacity of power inside. Yes, there are limitations, as you say. But with a larger pointer, the lens or the part of where the beam is shone & the power behind the laser, would create a further beam & project a hotter burn as it penetrates the object.
It's not the same as a person, small or big falling other wise you could estimate it similar to a feather falling against a round object weighing as much as a feather. The feather will float & drift down, the round object would fall direct, yet they weigh the same.

Although you're right about the different atmospheric pressures could change the speed & distance

just a punk · 05-19-2016, 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GspotProductions

amazing machinery & equipment

Doesn't this one look similar? ;)

That's a technology of 1980 (was already done by Soviets when I was a kid) and those are just military toys and nothing more.

Quote:

Originally Posted by GspotProductions

Technically isn't it the power behind the laser that creates the distance due to the capacity of power inside. Yes, there are limitations, as you say. But with a larger pointer, the lens or the part of where the beam is shone & the power behind the laser, would create a further beam & project a hotter burn as it penetrates the object.

It's hard to explain, but laser technologies work well as pew-pew guns in Sci-Fi movies only, but not on planet Earth. I've tried to explain in above, but seems it doesn't work for the people who calls physical law a "wild story". That's like speaking with people who've got their education in some village parish school.

Do you think why all world armies still use old good bullets and missiles instead of this:

There must be a reason, right?

woj · 05-19-2016, 05:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio

laser = technology fail...

missiles can be like 10 meters long, how hard would it be to fire TEN with say 3 meters worth of fuel and 7 meters of steel...melt that bitch! travelling at mach 15 the kinetic energy of the hit would vaporize a ship

fail

US army = fail

f
a
i
l

the americans did not think that one out, they acted on impulse, lucas made star wars, they got stoked "merica! lasers!"

fail...

missiles need to have sensors in front, unless they are guided from behind from the launching site...

sensors in front = trivially easy to burn them out
guided from behind = susceptible to electronic counter measures, jamming, etc

fail / fail

just a punk · 05-19-2016, 06:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by woj

missiles need to have sensors in front, unless they are guided from behind from the launching site...

sensors in front = trivially easy to burn them out
guided from behind = susceptible to electronic counter measures, jamming, etc

fail / fail

Inertial control, hyperbolic navigation etc? Not, haven't heard about that

woj · 05-19-2016, 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

Inertial control, hyperbolic navigation etc? Not, haven't heard about that

yea, against targets moving at 40mph+... good luck with that...

pimpmaster9000 · 05-19-2016, 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by woj

missiles need to have sensors in front, unless they are guided from behind from the launching site...

sensors in front = trivially easy to burn them out
guided from behind = susceptible to electronic counter measures, jamming, etc

fail / fail

5 tons of concrete travelling at mach 15 has the kinetic energy of 10 metric tons of TNT...ten such missiles are like 100 metric tons of TNT

They can hit approximately LOL you are not going to have a good time...

Now imagine ten of them loaded with metal balls like basketballs going your way...mach 15...a 40 kg ball would be equal to like 180lb of tnt at that speed...not a good time...

Fail\fail\fail

pimpmaster9000 · 05-19-2016, 06:15 PM

Also if the sensors are on the front the missile can fly up high as a mother fucker and when it is directly above, then down...str8 down with a payload of 20 tons of pig shit,thats 80tons TNT kinetic energy does not care LOL

woj · 05-19-2016, 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio

Also if the sensors are on the front the missile can fly up high as a mother fucker and then down...str8 down with a payload of 20 tons of pig shit, kinetic energy does not care LOL

yea, and hit the target within a mile if you are lucky...

strategy like that is only useful with nuclear weapons, but those are as useful as pulling out a grenade at a bar fight... yea, you will kill your adversary, but you will be dead too... completely pointless strategy, unless you are suicidal or have a way of stopping the 1000s of nukes that seconds later will be coming your way... which with current technology, no one does...

pimpmaster9000 · 05-19-2016, 06:32 PM

If I was pooty I would make massive 100 ton missiles that are filled with shit, they would fly up and then directly down and it would detonate say two miles above to scatter the shit and it would rain shit on you and you would be covered in 100s of tons of shit and would be forced to go home LOL

Horatio Caine · 05-19-2016, 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio

fail

US army = fail

f
a
i
l

Looks like it worked fine on your gypsy asses. 17 years later we can still hear butthurt serbs whining

Horatio Caine · 05-19-2016, 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio

If I was pooty I would make massive 100 ton missiles that are filled with shit, they would fly up and then directly down and it would detonate say two miles above to scatter the shit and it would rain shit on you and you would be covered in 100s of tons of shit and would be forced to go home LOL

That the whole place would look like Serbia !

pimpmaster9000 · 05-20-2016, 04:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Horatio Caine

That the whole place would look like Serbia !

I would "brown sky" the US fleet 24/7 they would be so shit soaked the USA would not want to take them back

Horatio Caine · 05-20-2016, 05:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio

I would "brown sky" the US fleet 24/7 they would be so shit soaked the USA would not want to take them back

You would run away. Thats what Serbs do

klinton · 05-20-2016, 05:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio

US army = fail

f
a
i
l

klinton · 05-20-2016, 05:18 AM

hahah briliant

Quote:

Originally Posted by Horatio Caine

]

klinton · 05-20-2016, 05:20 AM

you are smart lady !

I bet that you had A+ in school in physics

Quote:

Originally Posted by GspotProductions

amazing machinery & equipment

Technically isn't it the power behind the laser that creates the distance due to the capacity of power inside. Yes, there are limitations, as you say. But with a larger pointer, the lens or the part of where the beam is shone & the power behind the laser, would create a further beam & project a hotter burn as it penetrates the object.
It's not the same as a person, small or big falling other wise you could estimate it similar to a feather falling against a round object weighing as much as a feather. The feather will float & drift down, the round object would fall direct, yet they weigh the same.

Although you're right about the different atmospheric pressures could change the speed & distance

05-19-2016, 11:30 AM	#102
NatalieK Natalie K Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Spain Posts: 19,533	The Russian air force are now flying over Estonia, Europe, intercepted by RAF Typhoons. I take it without need or permission? RAF Typhoons intercept Russian aircraft near Estonia border __________________ My official site Custom vids Make money & get into the business First time girls Skype: GspotProductions - "Converting traffic into income since 2005"

05-19-2016, 12:28 PM	#116
Jman Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Canuckstikan Posts: 22,766	Pretty cool clip. The chopper in the other video is Bad Ass __________________ email: [email protected] Best AI Affiliate Program We also do WL at $0.00 upfront costs FantasyXXX.AI Teams: jean.francois.laverdiere TG: @jman1216

05-19-2016, 12:34 PM	#120
just a punk So fuckin' bored Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2003 Posts: 32,386	__________________ Obey the Cowgod

05-19-2016, 01:50 PM	#122
~Evilin~ 🔥Adult Design Team Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: [email protected] Posts: 2,070	..i do not want WW3. __________________ 🔥AI Porn Graphic Design \| Our mail: [email protected] \| Telegram: @DenzikZT

05-19-2016, 05:25 PM	#133
pimpmaster9000 Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2011 Posts: 26,732	laser = technology fail... missiles can be like 10 meters long, how hard would it be to fire TEN with say 3 meters worth of fuel and 7 meters of steel...melt that bitch! travelling at mach 15 the kinetic energy of the hit would vaporize a ship fail US army = fail f a i l the americans did not think that one out, they acted on impulse, lucas made star wars, they got stoked "merica! lasers!" fail... __________________ Report a suspicious cracker: Click Here

05-19-2016, 11:44 AM	#105
Why MFBA Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: PNW Posts: 7,230	i dont know why you use this "crony" stuff like its some kind of insult, every reasonably educated american knows where a lot of our money goes... to the war machine. but at least we are real about it, your country is ran by mafioso's, KGB agents and oligarchs... how is that better? make no doubt our war machine could kick the living fuck out of yours. so you can keep coming back with retarded as pie in the sky ideas about how you might be able to stand a chance and do a bit of damage, but long story short, RU is still a has been and its just a puppy trying to fuck our legs for attention.

05-19-2016, 12:28 PM	#117
Horatio Caine full-time aspiring rapper Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: Compton, CA Posts: 5,746	Two eastern european punks with big dreams Lets drink to that!

05-19-2016, 04:22 PM	#124
poncabare Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: carmel Posts: 2,552	ivan drago

05-19-2016, 05:09 PM	#131
Horatio Caine full-time aspiring rapper Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: Compton, CA Posts: 5,746	Look at you go, Boris 3:07 AM Friday, May 20, 2016 (GMT+3) Time in Moscow, Russia ]

05-19-2016, 05:31 PM	#134
pimpmaster9000 Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2011 Posts: 26,732	or a shot gun type of missle with like 1000s of pool ball sized steel balls travelling at mach 15, the moment the missile is within the lasers puny range it bursts and swiss cheeses the waste of money US boaty mc boat face... lasers = fail fleet = sink __________________ Report a suspicious cracker: Click Here

05-19-2016, 06:15 PM	#141
pimpmaster9000 Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2011 Posts: 26,732	Also if the sensors are on the front the missile can fly up high as a mother fucker and when it is directly above, then down...str8 down with a payload of 20 tons of pig shit,thats 80tons TNT kinetic energy does not care LOL

05-19-2016, 06:32 PM	#143
pimpmaster9000 Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2011 Posts: 26,732	If I was pooty I would make massive 100 ton missiles that are filled with shit, they would fly up and then directly down and it would detonate say two miles above to scatter the shit and it would rain shit on you and you would be covered in 100s of tons of shit and would be forced to go home LOL