US Navy's being mocked again by the Russian air force
 

US Navy released this a few weeks ago, obviously Russian air force trying to annoy the US Navy in the Baltics...



on this sky news clip, it shows a helicopter only 100 feet away from the ship!

Planes Fly Close To USS Donald Cook In The Baltic Sea


I thought there was a flight deck to stop low flying planes, but I have a single prop plane flies not even 100 meters from off my balcony once or twice a month! :2 cents:

I saw this a few days ago. The yanks were sitting 70 miles off the coast.

If the Russians had missile ship sitting 70 miles off the coast of the USA, we would be in WW3

I hope the pilot got a medal!

you're damn right, I hadn't heard this.... so the US navy were "buzzing" (word used by sky news) the Russians really!

40 miles are well within international waters. This is also in the Baltic Sea where we have reason to be right now.

For what purpose would Russia be 40 miles off the coast of the United States? Even though here, they had bombers within 10 miles of American air space on our Independence Day: July Fourth message not the first from Russian bombers - CNNPolitics.com

Russia is toying and taunting like children. The United States is staying calm and collected like an adult.

that's the story from april?

http://i2.cdn.turner.com/dr/hln/www/...04/tan-mom.jpg
thanks for the news leather face

Shit like that has been happening for years! Longer than your old wrinkled cooter

who's that? I've lovely soft skin if that was meant to be against me... :1orglaugh :thumbsup

True is that. At the moment with all the war in Syria, The US & British navy are going to be there, if anything, good for the Russians. Yes, the Russians have taken the piss going so close on fly bys & with the helicopter hovering!

I think the latest sky news has only just been released. It was tweeted only an hour ago :2 cents:

Doesn't the Russian Navy park nuclear submarines off the coast of the United States on a regular basis? I think it's a bit childish to be dive bombing military ships no matter what the circumstances.

I have to admit, I had some very opinionated thoughts of what I thought Russians were until I went to work for Dating Factory. Working with Dating Factory for the past five years has really changed my thoughts and opinions of the world, and Russians & Ukrainians specifically. They are no different than anyone else. They have the same exact hopes, dreams, and goals in life. Instead of playing silly games with each other, we should be welcoming each other with open arms. Instead of parking nuclear submarines and missile ships off each other's coasts and then dive bombing them, we should be welcoming each other's military ships into each other's ports. Russia should invite US Navy ships to their ports, show us their cities, and in return we open up our ships to their public. (Yeah, I know the difficulties here but if they can open up ships to the public in the US for fleet week, they can do it in foreign countries too.) In return, we do the same for the Russians. And the Chinese.

That poindexter calling out the positions of the jets makes this video extra pathetic.

he he he

yes more spam from Gary

The US are just being mellow as fuck, not willing to start shit. It's just a matter of time before US has enough of these assclown's silly tricks and shoot their ass down

then the russkies gonna whine again like when the Turks shot down their jet over Syria

Yes

Its an old story

Come on Gary, when you spam, try to find things more recent.

Spam spam spam

yup :thumbsup

One second of missile lock and the pilots would have shit their pants.

you know it, but that's why their fucking with the US navy.... naughty of them :(

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh
I know, I know. Washington is actually located on Baltic coast.:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1or glaugh:1orglaugh

We need to bring back this guy.

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-9Fh6L7y4kb..._053Pyxurz.jpg

Baltics is a Russian region of influence, so I'm not surprised. The Americans would do the same thing to Russian ships somewhere in Gulf of Mexico. And to be honest. They did nothing wrong: just the air simulation of a ship sinking - not a big deal :2 cents:

This one will fit the situation much better:

http://img05.deviantart.net/13d1/i/2...78-d74ivzp.png

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

President Drumpf will overreact to this a few months into his presidency and start WWIII. :2 cents:

pretty sure all kinds of information is being observed on both sides of the encounters. Both navies are trying to learn something for advantage. :2 cents:

then the ruskies should knock it the fuck off.

you are turning into BlackAssMonkey Posting months old Ebony News Articles

It's a very different thing. Your nuclear subs do the same to Russia, Chinese ones doing the same as well etc and one against of each other... Those are hidden operations, and if a mouse was caught by a cat, she's "busted".

Here we have a case of open enemy patrolling near our shore. So when the US propaganda says that Russian bombers were "intercepted" near the US territory (not inside of it!) it means the same that Russians are doing to your ships near the Russian borders - it's just a sort of interception - our pilots showed your navy guys how easily they will be sunk if they get a command to do it. It's a usual thing (a mutually common one), so relax already - as we say: no bomb was dropped down and no single animal was hurt ;)

Once again: Baltic is a Russian zone of influence. So when you read such sort of news, try to reflect them to your own country. Like "Russian strategic bombers were intercepted by the US jet-fighters near the East Cost..." You don't like our cruise missile launchers near your borders, so why we would happy of your ships so close to our land?

wait, so you think those ruskie aircraft snuck up on that US Navy boat? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

How dare russians fly their jets near their own country over US warships? That makes me angry as fuckkkkkkk! Taunting US warships defending the US of A in the balitcs!

Eric needs to give putin boot for good life!

Yep. Just easily using a single anti-ship cruise missile. Ok if one is not enough, they will send out a second one, like this:



That's a rather old video (the modern ones are secret and you won't find them on youtube), but you can to see the concept - a single missile and no ship anymore... Today just a small mosquito (SS-N-22 Sunburn) can kill an elephant easily. In case if it's not a single ship but some aircraft carrier group, a tactical nuke warhead will be used. I think you know that the result will is very predictable...

P.S. It's 21st century, so nobody needs Kamikazes anymore - remember it - a small cruise missile with a power of 10 Hiroshimas (not a big deal for a modern tactical missile) will sink down a whole aircraft carrier group :winkwink:

heads up dumbfuck, we didn't give shit. and still don't. just like we don't really give a shit about your nonsense here. at the end of the day USA is still #1.

you and those aircraft are like a drunk slavic gnat buzzing around my ear. annoying at most but hardly a threat.

they don't need to buzz the deck to deliver that weapon. and it's not a guaranteed strike, we certainly have counter-measures.

those rusky pilots were like drunk frat boys, they didn't get away with anything. they didn't slip through any defenses. this is like britney spears getting out of the car without any panties, look at me.

Against the low-profile cruise missiles with tactical nuke warheads? Good luck then :thumbsup :thumbsup :thumbsup

http://screenrant.com/wp-content/upl...er-Soldier.jpg

P.S. I also was a kid like you and believed into supermen and superweapon. Unfortunately I've grown up, was to army (in your country I would be called a "veteran") and I know what reality is not a cartoon or a comics. A "counter-measure" my ass :2 cents:

P.P.S. Boy, if you think that the US ships (doesn't matter how many) are invulnerable in the Russian zones of influence, you live in a Barbie house. The same applies to the Russian ships in the US zones of influence - both will go down to the sea bottom in a couple of minutes. And don't forget that Russia still has the most advanced rocket/missile systems in the world. Your ships are just "guests" in Baltic and that was demonstrated by Russian pilots - you were "intercepted".

i couldn't give 1 single fuck how many plates of borscht you served your komrades while serving mother ruskyville.

drunk ruskie, also, i never once claimed pie in the sky USA defenses. i simply stated that the USA has counter measures and there's no guarantee any ruskie anti-ship weapon would be a guaranteed sink/strike/etc.

i also simply stated that drunk rusky jet pilots don't need to buzz the deck to deliver that weapon.

you're too much a rusky patriot to realize those are facts.

Sounds like a text posted by a guy under drugs - too many words and no sense. Please try to be more specific and informative. Do you think that low-profile anti-ship cruise missiles can be stopped? For real?

P.S. If you have a contract with Jesus or Satan, so maybe...

well, if any of the sides would decide to use nuclear cruise missiles on targets like aircraft carriers, and so on... that would met with counterstrike from other side...probably also nuclear... which would lead to more counterattacks from both sides ->> end of the world :1orglaugh:1orglaugh
I don't know actually if there is counter measure for any attack both from Russia and US..if any of the sides will decide to target something, they may send 5, 10 or 40 cruise missiles... for such power no anti aircraft sistem will be sufficient, as it will take only one missile that will hit the target......
so I see no possibility of open war between countries like China, US/ NATO, Russia and maybe few others

Boris is our resident weapons expert :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

http://empirenews.net/wp-content/upl...ggressions.jpg

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

sounds like you need to pull up a map to refresh your memory of what countries are by the Baltic sea and then google what countries are in NATO?

http://magazynbieganie.pl/wp-content...ic-Sea-map.jpg

yea, NATO ships are "guests" in the Baltic sea... and yea "Baltics is a Russian region of influence"... good shit... haven't laughed so hard in weeks...

Nothing will happen. I mean literally - NOTHING. If it will be used in a zone of the influence (e.g. by the States near the Mexico waters or by Chinese near Taiwan). The Same applied to Baltic, by the way. I'm here to remind that the tactical nukes is only weapon aimed against aircraft carrier groups according to the official Russian military doctrine. I have not invented it. I've just learned it.

Sounds like learn that the zone of influence mean, idiot.

Boris Yeltsin is dead. Hist happens :(

Yap, that's who was behind 9/11. Now tell me a peasant, was he punished for that in the US of A?

No? For Real? Once again: it's the guy who funded radical Islamists in Afghanistan. What the United States of America did to punish that bloody motherfucker?

Yeah, blame "drunk Russian Ivans", clown - they did it to the twins in NYC ;)

nice one by russia!

http://img.timeinc.net/time/photoess...008/yip_29.jpg

http://images20.fotki.com/v106/photo...34800wi-vi.jpg

Dear Horatio Canine, you so love to post drunk Russian idiots, but you can't answer to my questions on how those dirty Ivans were the first to the orbit and won the Space Race. How come that the States still use our rocket technologies for every step they made to the space? How come the ugly Soviet FREE Khrushchevkas you post here can stand a -40C winter while your barbie houses turn into a World's mockery because of some hurricane? How come???

How those drunk and useless VDS guys were able to spot and kill Amin in 24 hours, while your "brave" SF officers needed years to find out and kill Osama Bin Laden? It's the same country but different century and different equipment. What's wrong with you?

P.S. Even your wife - a mother of your daughter is a dirty drunk Russian whore/prostitute. How come and what's wrong with your head?

Denmark - NATO
Estonia - NATO
Latvia - NATO
Finland - cooperating with NATO, military pact with Sweden
Germany - NATO
Lithuania - NATO
Poland - NATO
Russia
Sweden - military pact with Finland

Leading contributor to NATO: United States

Hmm.

It's not different at all. We all do the identical stuff to each other. It's either submarines, planes, or ships. Russia likes to send bombers. But it's not like Russia hasn't sailed ships right up to the US coast.

The ship was tracking the plane long before it was in missile range.

And this a "no harm, no foul" situation. You do not buzz military ships. Ever. That's common sense. That's all you need is a drone flying off the ship or a helicopter, and suddenly you have a crash over a military warship.

Once again: a submarine mission is a hidden thing, while it's an open act of aggression. You have came to our waters (some call them the NATO waters because they have no idea on who really rules in Baltic) and you were warned. That's absolutely was normal and I don't see any reason for hysterics about it.

Don't be that silly. A missile range is about 2500 kilo-fucking-meters. It "was tracked" my ass :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Ok, I'll go down to your level. The missile could be launched from Moscow and it would find it's target there... The jets just shown their hand over your head. Sorry, but that's not your territory and you don't control anything there. So it's very strange to watch such an unusual reaction from the Unlined States. You are not home and you are not welcomed here - get used with that.
And don't tell me about other "NATO countries" of Baltic - they just don't control anything there. When I say "don't", I mean it literally.

were you in a coma for the past 30 years? still think it's the 70s or something? at one time Russia did indeed have some influence over the Baltic, but those times are long gone...

what are you losers doing in the baltic anyway? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Watching drunk ruskie jet pilots act like idiots. Duh.

Your translator is fucked up. I simply stated that ships like that one have defenses. Would they win, I never stated. And I wouldnt because it's ludicrous to try and argue that.

Nevertheless, you seem to think you have a guaranteed offensive weapon with 100% effectiveness. Ahahahahahahahaahahahahaha

Many US naval ships now have high powered lasers installed on them... it's still pretty new technology, performance is still limited, but even with this very early system they can successfully destroy many types of incoming missiles...

give it another decade or 2 for tech to improve and launching missiles will be as useful as launching rocks with a catapult.... :thumbsup

http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/dam/ass...-story-top.jpg

I am not a Navy guy, so I do not know much about anti missile defense when it comes to ships... but I believe most US Navy ships have "automated gatling guns" that can throw a serious amount of lead to fuck up any incoming missiles.

On the other hand, I believe in the 1970s and 1980s the plans were to take out aircraft carrier groups with small tactical nukes... You don't need to hit a ship, just get close to it and make it worthless for the next one thousand years...