nice girls !

the laws of physics are not looking good for lasers either...range plays a huge role because lasers scatter in the atmosphere, clouds and rain are catastrophic to directed energy...water absorbs it like a mother fucker...

but the main problem is not energy...its power...energy is how much money you have in the bank, power is how fast you can spend it...there is a maximum density of power that thin air can carry...this power will need to be focused on an opaque frequency, that scatters the least in the atmosphere...or at least in an opaque range of frequencies...if it is in a select frequency then it is easier to deflect with specialized mirrors or reflective paint...

they will be good short range weapons against less sophisticated missiles...they will cost a like a mother fucker to develop and will be useless in the navy because they work like shit under water so torpedos and subs raugh at them...in fighter planes they will have limited power because of the limited size of the power source you can put on a plane...

but they will be good for outer space and shit and making money for US gov cronies :thumbsup

did you ever read this?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superiority_(short_story)

"Superiority" is a science fiction short story by Arthur C. Clarke, first published in 1951. It depicts an arms race, and shows how the side which is more technologically advanced can be defeated, despite its apparent superiority, because of its own organizational flaws and its willingness to discard old technology without having fully perfected the new. Meanwhile, the enemy steadily built up a far larger arsenal of weapons that while more primitive were also more reliable. The story was at one point required reading for an industrial design course at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.[1]

Serbs will come on top :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

http://www.mtbserbia.com/gallery2/d/...oslje-4387.jpg

Thanks Obama

no the disappearing US middle class will :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

enjoy the crony gravy train that your country is becoming :thumbsup

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Have something against the Ukraine (only a complete idiot can't see their colors on the crashed plane)? That was a very dramatic story, actually.

http://i.imgur.com/iWKad22.jpg

How do you know that there was no radar lock and this was just a game of chicken show?

Talk about gullible, LMAO.

Exactly. Lasers are pretty cool for some Star Wars-like pew-pew movies, but they are pretty useless in the real life. The local GFY scientists don't learn physics (it's just considered as anti-God science in the US schools) and they have no idea that Rayleigh scattering is. Unfortunately, lasers work in the real world and they can't ignore the physical laws which say that the extinction coefficient is proportional to the fourth power of the wavelength, and nothing you can do to change that... But our American friends don't care about such a nonsense like physics - thy have Batman, Superman and... (a drum-roll here) him:

http://cache.reelz.com/assets/conten...orris-MIA2.jpg

:pimp :thumbsup

P.S. We also had projects like this, this, this, this or that but they are pretty useless (have a very low range of usability) because of... those nasty physical laws ;)

oh well, fuck those russian pilots, the lion does not concern himself with the opinions of the sheep.

russia is a has been, militarily speaking, the US could park our ships off thier coasts and knock anything out of the air or water that left their perimeter. they know this, thats why they are starting to try to keep us out of their "sphere".

america would make russia its bitch in a 1:1 conflict, direct or indirect.

A whole his family: Olga, Svetlana and... forgot the name of the 3rd one (

Sure thing: In a War With Russia NATO Doesn't Stand a Chance, Pentagon Fears It's Not Ready for a War With Putin, Russia Can Beat The U.S. In An Armed Conflict, Why America Can't Win WW III, U.S. vs. Russia: What a war would look like between the world's most fearsome militaries and blah-blah :winkwink:

http://media.comicbook.com/2016/01/c...war-164707.jpg

them US boats do not do well when hit by a tsunami caused by a nuclear bomb do they?...the debate is still open whether the 1883 krakatoa explosion caused a super sonic tsunami, but I am willing to bet that your entire fleet and all them waste of money jets do not do well when under water?...

its nice your government keeps telling you that you are #1 :thumbsup

it probably makes you feel better about the crony $$$$ going out of your pocket in to theirs :thumbsup

joint ruskie-serbian strategic tactical nuclear tsunami assault team meeting.

http://i.imgur.com/oIWkgGU.jpg

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh
look like a conspirators for sure

I will take the two younger ones. They look nice in pantyhose

Ask Horatio Canine. I believe he won't charge more than a couple of food stamps for them ;)

Here you go: Florida Department of Children and Families

Haven't I told you to stop posting my PRIVATE photos? Don't hack my computer anymore, pervert! :mad:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysenkoism
:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

whats this ?

There have been several underwater atomic tests: the BAKER shot in Bikini Atoll in 1946, the WIGWAM shot off California in 1955, the UMBRELLA shot and the WAHOO shot at Enewetak in 1958.

BAKER was a 20 kiloton atomic bomb detonated 200 feet below the surface in a shallow lagoon. It generated a 90 foot wave 1000 feet from the detonation. However, that wave was only 6 feet high 22000 feet from the detonation.

WIGWAM was a 30 kiloton atomic bomb detonated 2000 feet below the surface. The official report on WIGWAM does not mention any significant waves from the explosion.

UMBRELLA was a 8 kiloton atomic bomb detonated 150 feet below the surface. WAHOO was a 9 kiloton atomic bomb detonated 500 feet below the surface. The official reports on UMBRELLA and WAHOO do not mention any significant waves from the detonation.

The difference between the WIGWAM and WAHOO deep water tests is that the bubble created by the explosion broadens and can collapse before reaching the surface thus limiting the wave generated at the surface.

The following link show the conclusions of atomic testing on the damage effects on ships:

https://nige.files.wordpress.com/2009/06/caw1960-8.pdf

One conclusion is that underwater atomic explosions do damage at twice the distance as air or surface explosions. The damage is not so much due to waves but to the blast wave being transmitted through water to the ship hull and secondary effects like hogging.

One thing to note about all the underwater shots: fallout was limited by the water and in the case of the deep underwater explosions, little fallout was released in the air.

Compare the above tests to the 15 kiloton Hiroshima bomb. Severe damage to builds occurred within a 1 mile radius and firestorm was started with a radius of about 2 miles. The bomb did severe damage to a greater area than could be expected to be done with an underwater detonation.

The Russian air force are now flying over Estonia, Europe, intercepted by RAF Typhoons. I take it without need or permission?

RAF Typhoons intercept Russian aircraft near Estonia border

An ancient picture from your wiki article.

There was also a T-15 project, but... how does it relate to the Rayleigh scattering? Ah? :helpme

They were always flying over Europe, because more than 40% of Europe is... located in Russia ;)

i dont know why you use this "crony" stuff like its some kind of insult, every reasonably educated american knows where a lot of our money goes... to the war machine.

but at least we are real about it, your country is ran by mafioso's, KGB agents and oligarchs... how is that better?

make no doubt our war machine could kick the living fuck out of yours. so you can keep coming back with retarded as pie in the sky ideas about how you might be able to stand a chance and do a bit of damage, but long story short, RU is still a has been and its just a puppy trying to fuck our legs for attention.

Not better at all. Same shit - different faces. If you think that I like Putin more than Obama, you are soooooo wrong :1orglaugh

just poking holes in your nuclear tsunami strategy.

also, i'm not going to try and act like i'm a laser expert but according to google, USA is well on its way to viable laser weapons.

I did never mention anything about "nuclear tsunami strategy" and personally I do consider it pretty ineffective (too much efforts for a small effect). Please read the thread carefully. I've just posted a note that laser technologies are extremely limited by out atmosphere and every kid, who has learned basics of physics knows that. Believe me, the one don't has to be a rocket scientist to understand a principle of Rayleigh scattering. That's a standard middle school course. Yeah, at least in my country...

not that ancient, Lysenko theories were still believed 50-60 years ago in soviet official science.......

i lump all you slav nuclear high fivvers together. you don't hesitate to bring up nukes, i don't differentiate the different types of nuclear attacks you threaten about, a nuke attack is a nuke attack.

I don't understand what you are trying to say. Perhaps my English is so weak for your clever ideas. Sorry.

Have no single idea about this shit. I'm not that old. I have no single idea who that Lysenko was and why should I know anything about him :)

yes, keep regaling us with your wild stories about rayleigh scattering



Navy: New laser weapon works, ready for action - CNN.com

A steam engine works too, but it's very ineffective, just like those toy laser systems :2 cents:

P.S. I like how easily you rename a physical law into a "wild story". I feel the power of the famous American comics education :thumbsup

https://image.freepik.com/free-vecto...2147493624.jpg

thats some serious quora science right there :thumbsup

US fleet vs. 100s or 1000s of nukes....I would not bet on the US fleet :2 cents:

because its good to know history to better understand present, and not live like a cockroach whose only excitement is because of new phone, damn it !
:winkwink::winkwink:

Pretty cool clip. The chopper in the other video is Bad Ass

Two eastern european punks with big dreams :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Lets drink to that!

http://s018.radikal.ru/i514/1206/f1/e64881c0a58a.jpg

yes, in your shellshocked dream land you drop 1000s of nukes to sink a US flotilla.

I would feel bad to charge anything at all for you dear wife Svetlana.
:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

http://www.laserpointersafety.com/ne...en-cyclops.png

http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/...2246-15018.jpg

http://www.writeups.org/wp-content/u...rs-Early-a.jpg