Originally Posted by woj (Post 20904221)

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

sounds like you need to pull up a map to refresh your memory of what countries are by the Baltic sea and then google what countries are in NATO?

http://magazynbieganie.pl/wp-content...ic-Sea-map.jpg

yea, NATO ships are "guests" in the Baltic sea... and yea "Baltics is a Russian region of influence"... good shit... haven't laughed so hard in weeks...

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 20903966)

It's a very different thing.

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 20903966)

Our pilots showed your navy guys how easily they will be sunk if they get a command to do it. It's a usual thing (a mutually common one), so relax already - as we say: no bomb was dropped down and no single animal was hurt ;)

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 20904335)

It's not different at all. We all do the identical stuff to each other. It's either submarines, planes, or ships. Russia likes to send bombers. But it's not like Russia hasn't sailed ships right up to the US coast.

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 20904335)

The ship was tracking the plane long before it was in missile range..

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 20904356)

Sorry, but that's not your territory and you don't control anything there. So it's very strange to watch such an unusual reaction from the Unlined States. You are not home and you are not welcomed here - get used with that.
And don't tell me about other "NATO countries" of Baltic - they just don't control anything there. When I say "don't" I mean it literally.

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20904035)

heads up dumbfuck, we didn't give shit. and still don't. just like we don't really give a shit about your nonsense here. at the end of the day USA is still #1.

you and those aircraft are like a drunk slavic gnat buzzing around my ear. annoying at most but hardly a threat.

Originally Posted by crucifissio (Post 20904389)

what are you losers doing in the baltic anyway? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 20904155)

Sounds like a text posted by a guy under drugs - too many words and no sense. Please try to be more specific and informative. Do you think that low-profile anti-ship cruise missiles can be stopped? For real?

P.S. If you have a contract with Jesus or Satan, so maybe...

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20904419)

Your translator is fucked up. I simply stated that ships like that one have defenses. Would they win, I never stated. And I wouldnt because it's ludicrous to try and argue that.

Nevertheless, you seem to think you have a guaranteed offensive weapon with 100% effectiveness. Ahahahahahahahaahahahahaha

Originally Posted by woj (Post 20904440)

Many US naval ships now have high powered lasers installed on them... it's still pretty new technology, performance is still limited, but even with this very early system they can successfully destroy many types of incoming missiles...

give it another decade or 2 for tech to improve and launching missiles will be as useful as launching rocks with a catapult.... :thumbsup

http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/dam/ass...-story-top.jpg

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 20904356)

Once again: a submarine mission is a hidden thing, while it's an open act of aggression. You have came to our waters (some call them the NATO waters because they have no idea on who really rules in Baltic) and you were warned. That's absolutely was normal and I don't see any reason for hysterics about it.

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 20904356)

Don't be that silly. A missile range is about 2500 kilo-fucking-meters. It "was tracked" my ass :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Originally Posted by woj (Post 20904440)

give it another decade or 2 for tech to improve and launching missiles will be as useful as launching rocks with a catapult.... :thumbsup

http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/dam/ass...-story-top.jpg

Originally Posted by crucifissio (Post 20904488)

give the russians 2 years and they will make mirrors...also the problem with lasers is that they are good at hitting something that is flying str8...but if it flies at say 20x the speed of sound like the russian topol m and does evasive manouvers and leaves decoys etc, its gonna be hella hard to hit it from a long distance...

in 20 years they will probably have fully reflective paint on missiles going like mach 50...

but the lasers are bound to make $$$ for the cronies in the US gov :thumbsup

Originally Posted by woj (Post 20904527)

laws of physics are not looking good for missiles... missiles are physical objects, so there is a limit on how fast you can make them fly, limit on how fast and how many you can produce, store, launch, etc... each one costs a pretty decent chunk of change... their performance will probably improve a bit, but any future gains will likely be modest at best...

lasers on the other hand in theory have unlimited range, unlimited power, speeds many orders of magnitude faster than any missile anyone could even theoretically dream up, unlimited supply of "shots", each one costing virtually nothing.. etc...

so I'll stand by my initial statement, lasers and other "directed energy" weapons are the future...

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 20904479)

You couldn't be more wrong here.

This isn't an act of aggression; It's a ship in international waters - Period.

Originally Posted by woj (Post 20904383)

were you in a coma for the past 30 years? still think it's the 70s or something? at one time Russia did indeed have some influence over the Baltic, but those times are long gone...

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20904419)

Your translator is fucked up. I simply stated that ships like that one have defenses.

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 20904479)

Any missile launched in the Baltic sea would instantly be tracked by half a dozen countries.

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 20904296)

Dear Horatio Canine, you so love to post drunk Russian idiots, but you can't answer to my questions on how those dirty Ivans were the first to the orbit and won the Space Race. How come that the States still use our rocket technologies for every step they made to the space? How come the ugly Soviet FREE Khrushchevkas you post here can stand a -40C winter while your barbie houses turn into a World's mockery because of some hurricane? How come???

How those drunk and useless VDS guys were able to spot and kill Amin in 24 hours, while your "brave" SF officers needed years to find out and kill Osama Bin Laden? It's the same country but different century and different equipment. What's wrong with you?

P.S. Even your wife - a mother of your daughter is a dirty drunk Russian whore/prostitute. How come and what's wrong with your head?

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 20904629)

What kind of aggression was that? A NATO ship has a right to be in the international waters. Yes, it can. A fighter-bomber can a same right to be there. Yes, it can! So what;s the question?

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 20904650)

Lasers are for computer games. Those are ones of the best real-working defense systems:



But I will not give a ruble for it against a low-profile supersonic cruise missile with 10 Hiroshimas on-board :2 cents:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 20904629)

What kind of aggression was that? A NATO ship has a right to be in the international waters. Yes, it can. A fighter-bomber can a same right to be there. Yes, it can! So what;s the question? The "quests" have approached our coast and we have simulated an attack off them. Nobody was killed, right? When the US ship entered our zone of influence it has given us a signal: "hey guys, we are here and we can attack you". We just answered: "even try to think about that". That's a usual military behavior. I really can't see a single problem with that. You ship was "intercepted" in the same maner like your fighter-jets intercept Russian bomber planes in the international airspace near your borders. Once again: what's a problem?



What happened?



Every ship has a defends, but there is no defends against cruise missiles. Especially with tactical nuke warheads because they don't need to make a direct hit. No one country has such a kind of defense (States, Russia, China or whatever). All those lasers, S400, Greyhounds etc are absolutely useless against a cruise missile flying with a super sonic speed at 20 meters. It will hit the target in a half of a second when it will just come into a range. I know some people are playing computer games where all-mighty pew-pew lasers can stop any missile, but the real life is not a game. You can't hit a bullet with another bullet.

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 20904479)

Any missile launched in the Baltic sea would instantly be tracked by half a dozen countries.

Originally Posted by Horatio Caine (Post 20904656)

Originally Posted by woj (Post 20904677)

yea, a radar guided gatling gun, that's some cutting edge 70s technology... :error

still usable against less sophisticated weapons, but it's a tech dead-end, just like hard drives, gasoline powered internal combustion engines, missiles, etc... :2 cents:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 20904686)

Your Olga looks better today :thumbsup Can you post Svetlana too, BTW?

Originally Posted by Horatio Caine (Post 20904713)

This is your best comeback Boris :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

https://c1.staticflickr.com/1/131/31...615f6f5cb9.jpg

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 20904686)

It's hard to detect even the ICBM launch if its not in the range of observation. You are a private, right? So I'm telling you this "secret" as the officer :)

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20904722)

so the big secret to military strategy only known to ruskie gfy officer is you have to see an object to detect an object.

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 20904716)

Can't see Olga there. Have you blew her and put under the bed? :helpme

Originally Posted by Horatio Caine (Post 20904734)

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

http://www.globaltimes.cn/Portals/0/...5726a4e6b6.jpg

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 20904743)

It doesn't matter if I speak it... The only question if Olga does speak it (umm, does she speak at all?) when you put your member out of her month :winkwink:

Originally Posted by Horatio Caine (Post 20904746)

Oh my god, this really hurts my e-feelings :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

http://img11.nnm.ru/0/7/a/1/6/47caca...6d7a04c1ea.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/...30_964x656.jpg

Originally Posted by Horatio Caine (Post 20904758)

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 20904764)

A husband of Olga (you?) Thanks (hmm..) for sharing again. I'm starting to worry about your daughter. Hope she's not on meth too :(

Originally Posted by Horatio Caine (Post 20904770)

http://www.dezinfo.net/images4/image...r_girls_02.jpg

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 20904686)

It would not. Stop playing computer games already. Nobody can detect a launch of a cruise missile. It's hard to detect even the ICBM launch if its not in the range of observation.

Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 20904686)

So I'm telling you this "secret" as an officer (a "veteran" as you call it) :)

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 20904809)

You don't seem to know much about the military. They had this technology since the 1960s:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missil...e_Alarm_System

They know days in advance before North Korea does a "test" and they can follow it every step of the way. LOL - the United States was able to find your lost K-129 submarine underwater in 1974.



You seem to have no working knowledge of how the military works at all.

Originally Posted by GspotProductions (Post 20904596)

this is absolutely correct. Once built, there is virtually no cost to firing 1000 lasers. This is the direction of the earths defence.

Regarding where the ship was, Rochard was correct in saying it was stupid for the pilots to fly so close, what if there was a problem with the plane, the US Navy would have been blamed, a stupid move considering there's plenty of Russian subs seen way closer than 40miles to the UK, British air force doesn't fly below the hard deck to buzz them :2 cents:

Originally Posted by woj (Post 20904527)

laws of physics are not looking good for missiles... missiles are physical objects, so there is a limit on how fast you can make them fly, limit on how fast and how many you can produce, store, launch, etc... each one costs a pretty decent chunk of change... their performance will probably improve a bit, but any future gains will likely be modest at best...

lasers on the other hand in theory have unlimited range, unlimited power, speeds many orders of magnitude faster than any missile anyone could even theoretically dream up, unlimited supply of "shots", each one costing virtually nothing.. etc...

so I'll stand by my initial statement, lasers and other "directed energy" weapons are the future...

Originally Posted by Horatio Caine (Post 20904656)

My dearest idiot Boris. Hurricanes come in states close to the ocean. Florida, S. Carolina. Warm states. They have no need for -40C insulation. No houses will stand 150 Mph winds. Including your legendary Russian mud huts.
The -40C can be seen in places like Duluth, Minnesota or Fargo, N. Dakota. Plenty of real estate there as well as people living in -40 conditions. I can bet my life savings they are doing 10 times better than you, your mother in law and her alcoholic daughter you married.

PS: i did not have any kids with my ex and we were never officially married. She is a bit different from traditional whore/prostitute wife you married. She was born in Sacramento in old believer Orthodox community. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Believers
She didn't taste alcohol until she was 26 years old. So why don't you go finish your bottle and eat leftover of dick you ate last night :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh


Russia

http://previews.123rf.com/images/laz...tock-Photo.jpg

Minnesota, US of A

http://st.hzcdn.com/simgs/63a1524f02...-landscape.jpg

Boris' hot squeeze

http://weirdrussia.com/wp-content/up...06-PkPdI2g.jpg

Russians in Sacramento

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Ue_yzAZPQA0/maxresdefault.jpg