Frames vs hahahahahahas - wich one is better and why?? - GoFuckYourself.com

Kamilla36D · 03-24-2003, 07:44 PM

I wanted to have an easy to navigate site in my new members area, but can't decide if I should choose a regular frame or an hahahahahaha... does it matter? Are there alot of browsers that won't see hahahahahahas?

Any feed back would help!

Thanks guys!!
kisses, Kamilla

Kamilla36D · 03-24-2003, 07:46 PM

oops - damn message board that takes out script names lol
What I tried to post was I-Frames (hope that works)

Thanks again
kamilla

Libertine · 03-24-2003, 07:48 PM

Go for normal frames. Iframes are fairly limited, and do not really give great possibilities when you want to use them for a navigation system.

Kamilla36D · 03-24-2003, 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by punkworld
Go for normal frames. Iframes are fairly limited, and do not really give great possibilities when you want to use them for a navigation system.

hmmm really? how so? I'm using i-frames on my webmaster site http://www.ClickForWebmasters.com and it look fine to me, nor have I gotten any complaints... something I should know?
I've heard that i-frames might not show up in older browsers but I've heard the same for regular frames so I was just wondering what the pros/cons were for each

Thanks for taking the time to post

kisses, Kamilla

Libertine · 03-24-2003, 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kamilla36D

hmmm really? how so? I'm using i-frames on my webmaster site http://www.ClickForWebmasters.com and it look fine to me, nor have I gotten any complaints... something I should know?
I've heard that i-frames might not show up in older browsers but I've heard the same for regular frames so I was just wondering what the pros/cons were for each

Thanks for taking the time to post
kisses, Kamilla

What's on that site could be done with normal tables as well, so iframes don't really add something there. In such a case, I would go for neither frames nor hahahahahahas, but plain html instead.
With frames, however, you can add a small nav menu at the top of the page, so surfers can quickly jump to any section of the site from wherever they are. (I'd still go for neither frames nor iframes but for plain html, but that's just me)

The amount of people not able to see iframes is quite small, though, so not really something to worry about.

Kamilla36D · 03-24-2003, 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by punkworld

What's on that site could be done with normal tables as well, so iframes don't really add something there. In such a case, I would go for neither frames nor hahahahahahas, but plain html instead.
With frames, however, you can add a small nav menu at the top of the page, so surfers can quickly jump to any section of the site from wherever they are. (I'd still go for neither frames nor iframes but for plain html, but that's just me)

The amount of people not able to see iframes is quite small, though, so not really something to worry about.

Actually I do need frames on that site so I only have to update the 2 menus on each side once - not on every page ;)
I will most likly be adding stuff as my new site grows and having to update every page is just not an option - frames rules!

Just wanted to know if there were any pros/cons with each option before I continue building

Thanks again
Kamilla

Libertine · 03-24-2003, 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kamilla36D

Actually I do need frames on that site so I only have to update the 2 menus on each side once - not on every page ;)
I will most likly be adding stuff as my new site grows and having to update every page is just not an option - frames rules! Just wanted to know if there were any pros/cons with each option before I continue building

Thanks again
Kamilla

SSI or PHP includes can do that job as well

G Sharp · 03-24-2003, 08:29 PM

i-frames does not work in the nutscrape er Netscape environment, other than that i-frames is nice and flexible.

Kamilla36D · 03-24-2003, 11:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by G Sharp
i-frames does not work in the nutscrape er Netscape environment, other than that i-frames is nice and flexible.

wow

I had no idea - thanks for the info!!

kisses, Kamilla

03-24-2003, 07:44 PM	#1
Kamilla36D Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: YourSearchNow.com - Search Me! ;-) Posts: 605	Frames vs hahahahahahas - wich one is better and why?? I wanted to have an easy to navigate site in my new members area, but can't decide if I should choose a regular frame or an hahahahahaha... does it matter? Are there alot of browsers that won't see hahahahahahas? Any feed back would help! Thanks guys!! kisses, Kamilla __________________ YourSearchNow.com Advertise 1c/click - 60% affiliate program - unique exit link program ClickForWebmasters.com Amateur niche toplists, PicPost and Resource

03-24-2003, 07:46 PM	#2
Kamilla36D Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: YourSearchNow.com - Search Me! ;-) Posts: 605	oops - damn message board that takes out script names lol What I tried to post was I-Frames (hope that works) Thanks again kamilla __________________ YourSearchNow.com Advertise 1c/click - 60% affiliate program - unique exit link program ClickForWebmasters.com Amateur niche toplists, PicPost and Resource

03-24-2003, 07:48 PM	#3
Libertine sex dwarf Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 17,860	Go for normal frames. Ifra<b></b>mes are fairly limited, and do not really give great possibilities when you want to use them for a navigation system. __________________ /(bb\|[^b]{2})/

03-24-2003, 08:29 PM	#8
G Sharp So Fucking Banned Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 1,343	i-frames does not work in the nutscrape er Netscape environment, other than that i-frames is nice and flexible.