LOL, Rumsfeld is a dumbass - GoFuckYourself.com

DarkJedi · 03-23-2003, 09:50 AM

After United States basicaly told United Nations to go fuck themselfs he has a nerve to brag that Iraqi military dont treat US prisoners according to Geneva convention.

MonkeyMan · 03-23-2003, 09:51 AM

the Geneva convention has nothing ot do wit hthe UN so shut your fucking hole bitch and stop starting dumbass threads.... ALL OF YOU. SUCK MY MANCOCK.

LadyMischief · 03-23-2003, 09:55 AM

Actually I was amused at the one comment Rumsfeld made.. I got a Borg Flashback... "Resistance is futile".

I am dyslexic of borg, your ass will be laminated.

freeme · 03-23-2003, 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by DarkJedi
After United States basicaly told United Nations to go fuck themselfs he has a nerve to brag that Iraqi military dont treat US prisoners according to Geneva convention.

from the mouths of morons

DarkJedi · 03-23-2003, 09:57 AM

You stupid fuck, Geneva convention is an Internation Law Act.
So is United Nation resolutions. USA is a member of United Nations and UN didn't approve this war. So USA and UK broke the international law.

MonkeyMan · 03-23-2003, 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by DarkJedi
You stupid fuck, Geneva convention is an Internation Law Act.
So is United Nation resolutions. USA is a member of United Nations and UN didn't approve this war. So USA and UK broke the international law.

SO according to you.... Once you break a law all other laws are thrown our the window???

Please go have a logic shake and come back when your feeling well again.

DearAbby · 03-23-2003, 10:00 AM

Anybody see him on Meet the Press this morning? He was sweating... the current situation doest sound to good right now.

bristol · 03-23-2003, 10:01 AM

international law..

the UN is like having criminals have a say in who gets arrested..

Filter · 03-23-2003, 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MonkeyMan
the Geneva convention has nothing ot do wit hthe UN so shut your fucking hole bitch and stop starting dumbass threads.... ALL OF YOU. SUCK MY MANCOCK.

wow what clever responses you come up with monkey

MonkeyMan · 03-23-2003, 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Filter

wow what clever responses you come up with monkey

WHen your right you don't need to be clever.

DarkJedi · 03-23-2003, 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MonkeyMan
SO according to you.... Once you break a law all other laws are thrown our the window???

Please go have a logic shake and come back when your feeling well again.

WTF are you talking about ?
USA broke the International Law and now they bitch that Iraq doesn't play by the rules.

Joe Sixpack · 03-23-2003, 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MonkeyMan
WHen your right you don't need to be clever.

Try evolving Monkey Man.

MonkeyMan · 03-23-2003, 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Joe Sixpack

Try evolving Monkey Man.

Your wife is dead

Hahahahahahahaha.

Filter · 03-23-2003, 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MonkeyMan
WHen your right you don't need to be clever.

Hahaha I see that.
Someone give this guy a banana and a place in a protected home before he hurts others or himself.

FlyingIguana · 03-23-2003, 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by DarkJedi
After United States basicaly told United Nations to go fuck themselfs he has a nerve to brag that Iraqi military dont treat US prisoners according to Geneva convention.

hypocrits. they expect iraq to follow what the UN says, but they don't have to.

the geneva convention wasn't from the UN i don't believe

Carrie · 03-23-2003, 10:08 AM

The US and UK have NOT broken ANY International Laws.
UN Resolution 678 gives the US and her allies FULL permission to go into Iraq and use whatever means necessary to rid the country of weapons that go against the UN resolutions... resolution 687 specifically tells us to CONTINUE using whatever means necessary to enforce 678.
Those resolutions were never revoked.

If you're going to run your mouth, know what the fuck you're talking about.

Gutterboy · 03-23-2003, 10:10 AM

Carrie: didn't the Bush administration refuse to follow the Geneva Convention with regards to Al Qaeda and Taliban prisoners?

Dildozer · 03-23-2003, 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by LadyMischief
Actually I was amused at the one comment Rumsfeld made.. I got a Borg Flashback... "Resistance is futile".

I am dyslexic of borg, your ass will be laminated.

I SEE 4 LIGHTS!!!!!!!

DarkJedi · 03-23-2003, 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Carrie
The US and UK have NOT broken ANY International Laws.
UN Resolution 678 gives the US and her allies FULL permission to go into Iraq and use whatever means necessary to rid the country of weapons that go against the UN resolutions... resolution 687 specifically tells us to CONTINUE using whatever means necessary to enforce 678.
Those resolutions were never revoked.

If you're going to run your mouth, know what the fuck you're talking about.

you are the one talking out of your ass.

UN Resolution 678 was adopted by the UN Security Council at its 2963rd meeting on 29 November 1990

directfiesta · 03-23-2003, 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Gutterboy
Carrie: didn't the Bush administration refuse to follow the Geneva Convention with regards to Al Qaeda and Taliban prisoners?

Shusssssssshhhhh..... Silence please...... Quiet .... ( no, not you

) .

The US haven't declare war to Afghanistan ( that is their official response ... lol ). So why the soldiers in Afghanistan ????

MonkeyMan · 03-23-2003, 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Dildozer

I SEE 4 LIGHTS!!!!!!!

LOL....

directfiesta · 03-23-2003, 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by DarkJedi

you are the one talking out of your ass.

UN Resolution 678 was adopted by the UN Security Council at its 2963rd meeting on 29 November 1990

Ouch!!!!

BTW Carrie, are you blond???

Joe Sixpack · 03-23-2003, 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MonkeyMan
Your wife is dead

Hahahahahahahaha.

Serge?

xxxdesign-net · 03-23-2003, 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Carrie
The US and UK have NOT broken ANY International Laws.
UN Resolution 678 gives the US and her allies FULL permission to go into Iraq and use whatever means necessary to rid the country of weapons that go against the UN resolutions... resolution 687 specifically tells us to CONTINUE using whatever means necessary to enforce 678.
Those resolutions were never revoked.

If you're going to run your mouth, know what the fuck you're talking about.

mmh, that had to do with the Kuwait invasion.... nothing with suspecting Iraq of having weapon of mass destuction...

greentea · 03-23-2003, 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by DarkJedi
After United States basicaly told United Nations to go fuck themselfs he has a nerve to brag that Iraqi military dont treat US prisoners according to Geneva convention.

You are an idiot...

DarkJedi · 03-23-2003, 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by greentea

You are an idiot...

Hmmm ....good argument.

Zebra · 03-23-2003, 11:27 AM

I saw video on MSNBC yesterday of a reporter walking around Iraqi POW's and putting the camera right into their faces. One guy had a blanket over his head and the cameraman got down low to look up into the guys face. The reporter even walked up to a POW and picked up some of his person things and showed them to the camera. There were US soldiers escorting the reporter around the POW's.

Cant find the video on MSNBC.com now.. it was there yesterday.

thefreakybeaver · 03-23-2003, 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Zebra
I saw video on MSNBC yesterday of a reporter walking around Iraqi POW's and putting the camera right into their faces. One guy had a blanket over his head and the cameraman got down low to look up into the guys face. The reporter even walked up to a POW and picked up some of his person things and showed them to the camera. There were US soldiers escorting the reporter around the POW's.

Cant find the video on MSNBC.com now.. it was there yesterday.

I also saw this video but it was on cnn last night. The reporter was pointing out that they had slippers and one was eating army rations, which he picked up and showed the camera

hottoddy · 03-23-2003, 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by DarkJedi
You stupid fuck, Geneva convention is an Internation Law Act.
So is United Nation resolutions. USA is a member of United Nations and UN didn't approve this war. So USA and UK broke the international law.

LadyMischief · 03-23-2003, 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Dildozer

I SEE 4 LIGHTS!!!!!!!

Bwahahahhahahahahahahaahh

psyko514 · 03-23-2003, 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MonkeyMan
Please go have a logic shake and come back when your feeling well again.

Can I steal that line from you? Keep in mind that no matter what you answer, I'll steal it from you anyways.

But everytime I use it, I'll give you credit.

"Hey idiot, go have a logic shake and call me when you feel better. (MonkeyMan)"

Baal · 03-23-2003, 11:57 AM

Let's just hope that Iraq considers them POWs and *not* "illegal combatants".

nuclei · 03-24-2003, 02:54 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by DarkJedi

you are the one talking out of your ass.

UN Resolution 678 was adopted by the UN Security Council at its 2963rd meeting on 29 November 1990

actually you just backed her arguement up 100%
The resolution was adopted giving definate timelines and allowing for military action if not met. This resolution was never revoked, meaning it is still in effect today. The US did not go against the UN at all, seeing as this resolution was either unanimously agreed upon by all delegates or damn close to all of them.

SoulJah · 03-24-2003, 02:56 AM

The UN is a joke and waste of money. The US alone pays 25% of their operations. Countries can break laws and they don't do shit!

DarkJedi · 03-24-2003, 02:57 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by nuclei

actually you just backed her arguement up 100%
The resolution was adopted giving definate timelines and allowing for military action if not met. This resolution was never revoked, meaning it is still in effect today. The US did not go against the UN at all, seeing as this resolution was either unanimously agreed upon by all delegates or damn close to all of them.

Hello ? after that resolution had been adopted, the action was taken - the Gulf War.

A week ago UN had a new resolution that US and UK refused to vote on and just invaded Iraq.

nuclei · 03-24-2003, 03:02 AM

Hello??

and has already been noted in another thread "france" was already on to veto the new resolution immediately. Which is why it was not voted on. why bother when you know its not going thru?

The existing resolution was all that was written up til then. That resolution is just being enforced. I dont particularly like the way bush has done a lot of things, but saying the govt was doing something illegal attacking is just wrong. Their real reasons for war may be wrong, but they had legal right to enforce that resolution.

kenny · 03-24-2003, 03:06 AM

They dont need international support or permission to invade Iraq. They just wanted it. I think giving the Iraqi military a warning reguarding captured US/British soilders was fair enough.

DaLord · 03-24-2003, 03:07 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MonkeyMan

I suck DaLord's cock cause I'm a small timer

Your free trade script is not working.... http://www.pileofturds.com

That's humor...

DarkJedi · 03-24-2003, 03:09 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by nuclei
Hello??

and has already been noted in another thread "france" was already on to veto the new resolution immediately. Which is why it was not voted on. why bother when you know its not going thru?

The existing resolution was all that was written up til then. That resolution is just being enforced. I dont particularly like the way bush has done a lot of things, but saying the govt was doing something illegal attacking is just wrong. Their real reasons for war may be wrong, but they had legal right to enforce that resolution.

1 country (france) can not veto a resolution and make it not pass.
All countries vote on a resolution. And US/UK/Spain just started the war without any voting because they knew other countries would vote against that war.

sacX · 03-24-2003, 03:27 AM

whether what the US/UK is doing is against International Law is a moot point. There is no court to try the case (no thanks to the US

).

There are many "experts" who claim Intl law has been broken, and many who claim it hasn't

Gemini · 03-24-2003, 03:27 AM

Jedi...

First search for the ceasefire agreements that Iraq signed
Second Search for what a ceasefire MEANS
Third, Search for WHO the Iraqi's signed the ceasefire WITH
Fourth, Have your humble pie quietly

(You'll learn more if YOU search them out instead of whining for links to be handed to you AND you might even learn to research before you make yourself out to be an expert and then turn into a fool)

And solly Chalie, ONE country CAN Veto ANY resolution in front of the Security Council, IF they are one of the permenent nations.

Who made FRANCE one (perm member) is beyond me tho.

Must have been an inside joke that has backfired.

I think France AND Russia have some tallllll 'splaining to do and very soon too!

sacX · 03-24-2003, 03:29 AM

oh and by the way the UN security council is formed. There is no way the security council can find US or UK in breach of UN resolutions because they can automatically veto anything that goes through there

nuclei · 03-24-2003, 03:36 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Gemini
And solly Chalie, ONE country CAN Veto ANY resolution in front of the Security Council, IF they are one of the permenent nations.
[/B]

Thanks Gemini, I was just looking for where I had seen that bit that you said =P

Gemini · 03-24-2003, 03:50 AM

These guys want to espouse all sorts of nonsense about the UN and related things Nuclei, but so far not many of them have been even in the ballpark with their rants. Its a shame that someone who was taught this BS in High School TWENTY TWO YEARS ago has hung onto more of the knowledge than they bothered to learn.

DarkJedi · 03-24-2003, 03:55 AM

there, you said it.
USA invaded Iraq knowing that France was going to veto agains the war. They didnt get green light from the UN security council.

nuclei · 03-24-2003, 04:02 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by DarkJedi
there, you said it.
USA invaded Iraq knowing that France was going to veto agains the war. They didnt get green light from the UN security council.

The fact is the resolution never made it to vote. Whatever the reason is not even relevant due to the previous resolution giving the US full power to attack.

Period.

Argue all you wish, but it will not change the facts.

Have fun arguing with yourself in this thread

nike · 03-24-2003, 05:03 AM

Geneva Convention... Guantanomo Bay... hmmm.

03-23-2003, 09:50 AM	#1
DarkJedi No Refunds Issued. Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: GFY Posts: 28,300	LOL, Rumsfeld is a dumbass After United States basicaly told United Nations to go fuck themselfs he has a nerve to brag that Iraqi military dont treat US prisoners according to Geneva convention.

03-23-2003, 09:55 AM	#3
LadyMischief Orgasms N Such! Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Oakville, Ontario Posts: 18,135	Actually I was amused at the one comment Rumsfeld made.. I got a Borg Flashback... "Resistance is futile". I am dyslexic of borg, your ass will be laminated. __________________ ICQ 3522039 Content Manager - orgasm.com [email protected]

03-24-2003, 03:02 AM	#36
nuclei old school fart Industry Role: Join Date: May 2001 Location: Florida Posts: 1,015	Hello?? and has already been noted in another thread "france" was already on to veto the new resolution immediately. Which is why it was not voted on. why bother when you know its not going thru? The existing resolution was all that was written up til then. That resolution is just being enforced. I dont particularly like the way bush has done a lot of things, but saying the govt was doing something illegal attacking is just wrong. Their real reasons for war may be wrong, but they had legal right to enforce that resolution. __________________ The next generation of SEO

03-24-2003, 03:27 AM	#41
Gemini Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: o-HI-o Posts: 7,183	Jedi... First search for the ceasefire agreements that Iraq signed Second Search for what a ceasefire MEANS Third, Search for WHO the Iraqi's signed the ceasefire WITH Fourth, Have your humble pie quietly (You'll learn more if YOU search them out instead of whining for links to be handed to you AND you might even learn to research before you make yourself out to be an expert and then turn into a fool) And solly Chalie, ONE country CAN Veto ANY resolution in front of the Security Council, IF they are one of the permenent nations. Who made FRANCE one (perm member) is beyond me tho. Must have been an inside joke that has backfired. I think France AND Russia have some tallllll 'splaining to do and very soon too! __________________ <center><a target="_blank" href="http://dev.datedollars.com/index.php?s=signup&aid=535&cfg=aac"><img border="0" src="http://216.130.172.224/gfy/gsig.gif" width="490" height="100"></a><br><a href="http://dev.datedollars.com/index.php?s=signup&aid=535&cfg=aac" target="_blank"><b><font face="Arial"><font color="#FF99FF"> Buy me away from Slavedriver Smokey!<br>It's May Sig Sweeps!<font></b></center>

03-24-2003, 03:50 AM	#44
Gemini Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: o-HI-o Posts: 7,183	These guys want to espouse all sorts of nonsense about the UN and related things Nuclei, but so far not many of them have been even in the ballpark with their rants. Its a shame that someone who was taught this BS in High School TWENTY TWO YEARS ago has hung onto more of the knowledge than they bothered to learn. __________________ <center><a target="_blank" href="http://dev.datedollars.com/index.php?s=signup&aid=535&cfg=aac"><img border="0" src="http://216.130.172.224/gfy/gsig.gif" width="490" height="100"></a><br><a href="http://dev.datedollars.com/index.php?s=signup&aid=535&cfg=aac" target="_blank"><b><font face="Arial"><font color="#FF99FF"> Buy me away from Slavedriver Smokey!<br>It's May Sig Sweeps!<font></b></center> Last edited by Gemini; 03-24-2003 at 03:54 AM..

03-23-2003, 09:51 AM	#2
MonkeyMan So Fucking Banned Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: New York.... Not the city... Up north further. Its about a six hour drive to the city from here. I don't like the city much. The air is not as clean, but they do have better strip clubs. Posts: 1,026	the Geneva convention has nothing ot do wit hthe UN so shut your fucking hole bitch and stop starting dumbass threads.... ALL OF YOU. SUCK MY MANCOCK.

03-23-2003, 09:57 AM	#5
DarkJedi No Refunds Issued. Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: GFY Posts: 28,300	You stupid fuck, Geneva convention is an Internation Law Act. So is United Nation resolutions. USA is a member of United Nations and UN didn't approve this war. So USA and UK broke the international law.

03-23-2003, 10:00 AM	#7
DearAbby Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: NoCal Posts: 979	Anybody see him on Meet the Press this morning? He was sweating... the current situation doest sound to good right now.

03-23-2003, 10:01 AM	#8
bristol Registered User Join Date: Dec 2002 Posts: 61	international law.. the UN is like having criminals have a say in who gets arrested..

03-23-2003, 10:08 AM	#16
Carrie Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Virgin - nee Posts: 3,162	The US and UK have NOT broken ANY International Laws. UN Resolution 678 gives the US and her allies FULL permission to go into Iraq and use whatever means necessary to rid the country of weapons that go against the UN resolutions... resolution 687 specifically tells us to CONTINUE using whatever means necessary to enforce 678. Those resolutions were never revoked. If you're going to run your mouth, know what the fuck you're talking about.

03-23-2003, 10:10 AM	#17
Gutterboy So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Dis Posts: 4,751	Carrie: didn't the Bush administration refuse to follow the Geneva Convention with regards to Al Qaeda and Taliban prisoners?

03-23-2003, 11:27 AM	#27
Zebra Banned from Kimmy's couch Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Down at Fraggle Rock Posts: 5,091	I saw video on MSNBC yesterday of a reporter walking around Iraqi POW's and putting the camera right into their faces. One guy had a blanket over his head and the cameraman got down low to look up into the guys face. The reporter even walked up to a POW and picked up some of his person things and showed them to the camera. There were US soldiers escorting the reporter around the POW's. Cant find the video on MSNBC.com now.. it was there yesterday.

03-23-2003, 11:57 AM	#32
Baal Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: SoCal Posts: 696	Let's just hope that Iraq considers them POWs and not "illegal combatants".

03-24-2003, 02:56 AM	#34
SoulJah Registered User Join Date: Nov 2002 Posts: 83	The UN is a joke and waste of money. The US alone pays 25% of their operations. Countries can break laws and they don't do shit!

03-24-2003, 03:06 AM	#37
kenny Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2002 Posts: 7,245	They dont need international support or permission to invade Iraq. They just wanted it. I think giving the Iraqi military a warning reguarding captured US/British soilders was fair enough.

03-24-2003, 03:27 AM	#40
sacX Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: New Zealand Posts: 2,998	whether what the US/UK is doing is against International Law is a moot point. There is no court to try the case (no thanks to the US ). There are many "experts" who claim Intl law has been broken, and many who claim it hasn't

03-24-2003, 03:29 AM	#42
sacX Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: New Zealand Posts: 2,998	oh and by the way the UN security council is formed. There is no way the security council can find US or UK in breach of UN resolutions because they can automatically veto anything that goes through there

03-24-2003, 03:55 AM	#45
DarkJedi No Refunds Issued. Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: GFY Posts: 28,300	there, you said it. USA invaded Iraq knowing that France was going to veto agains the war. They didnt get green light from the UN security council.

03-24-2003, 05:03 AM	#47
nike Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: London Posts: 189	Geneva Convention... Guantanomo Bay... hmmm.