LOL, Rumsfeld is a dumbass
 

After United States basicaly told United Nations to go fuck themselfs he has a nerve to brag that Iraqi military dont treat US prisoners according to Geneva convention.

the Geneva convention has nothing ot do wit hthe UN so shut your fucking hole bitch and stop starting dumbass threads.... ALL OF YOU. SUCK MY MANCOCK.

Actually I was amused at the one comment Rumsfeld made.. I got a Borg Flashback... "Resistance is futile".


I am dyslexic of borg, your ass will be laminated.

from the mouths of morons

You stupid fuck, Geneva convention is an Internation Law Act.
So is United Nation resolutions. USA is a member of United Nations and UN didn't approve this war. So USA and UK broke the international law.

SO according to you.... Once you break a law all other laws are thrown our the window???


Please go have a logic shake and come back when your feeling well again.

Anybody see him on Meet the Press this morning? He was sweating... the current situation doest sound to good right now.

:1orglaugh

international law..

the UN is like having criminals have a say in who gets arrested.. :1orglaugh

wow what clever responses you come up with monkey

WHen your right you don't need to be clever.

WTF are you talking about ?
USA broke the International Law and now they bitch that Iraq doesn't play by the rules.

:1orglaugh

Try evolving Monkey Man.

Your wife is dead

Hahahahahahahaha.

Hahaha I see that.
Someone give this guy a banana and a place in a protected home before he hurts others or himself.

hypocrits. they expect iraq to follow what the UN says, but they don't have to.

the geneva convention wasn't from the UN i don't believe

The US and UK have NOT broken ANY International Laws.
UN Resolution 678 gives the US and her allies FULL permission to go into Iraq and use whatever means necessary to rid the country of weapons that go against the UN resolutions... resolution 687 specifically tells us to CONTINUE using whatever means necessary to enforce 678.
Those resolutions were never revoked.

If you're going to run your mouth, know what the fuck you're talking about.

Carrie: didn't the Bush administration refuse to follow the Geneva Convention with regards to Al Qaeda and Taliban prisoners?

I SEE 4 LIGHTS!!!!!!!

you are the one talking out of your ass.

UN Resolution 678 was adopted by the UN Security Council at its 2963rd meeting on 29 November 1990 :1orglaugh

Shusssssssshhhhh..... Silence please...... Quiet .... ( no, not you :thumbsup ) .

The US haven't declare war to Afghanistan ( that is their official response ... lol ). So why the soldiers in Afghanistan ????

LOL....

Ouch!!!!

BTW Carrie, are you blond???

Serge? :1orglaugh

mmh, that had to do with the Kuwait invasion.... nothing with suspecting Iraq of having weapon of mass destuction...

You are an idiot...

Hmmm ....good argument.

I saw video on MSNBC yesterday of a reporter walking around Iraqi POW's and putting the camera right into their faces. One guy had a blanket over his head and the cameraman got down low to look up into the guys face. The reporter even walked up to a POW and picked up some of his person things and showed them to the camera. There were US soldiers escorting the reporter around the POW's.

Cant find the video on MSNBC.com now.. it was there yesterday.

I also saw this video but it was on cnn last night. The reporter was pointing out that they had slippers and one was eating army rations, which he picked up and showed the camera

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Bwahahahhahahahahahahaahh

Can I steal that line from you? Keep in mind that no matter what you answer, I'll steal it from you anyways.

But everytime I use it, I'll give you credit.

"Hey idiot, go have a logic shake and call me when you feel better. (MonkeyMan)"

Let's just hope that Iraq considers them POWs and *not* "illegal combatants".

actually you just backed her arguement up 100%
The resolution was adopted giving definate timelines and allowing for military action if not met. This resolution was never revoked, meaning it is still in effect today. The US did not go against the UN at all, seeing as this resolution was either unanimously agreed upon by all delegates or damn close to all of them.

The UN is a joke and waste of money. The US alone pays 25% of their operations. Countries can break laws and they don't do shit!

Hello ? after that resolution had been adopted, the action was taken - the Gulf War.

A week ago UN had a new resolution that US and UK refused to vote on and just invaded Iraq.

Hello??

and has already been noted in another thread "france" was already on to veto the new resolution immediately. Which is why it was not voted on. why bother when you know its not going thru?

The existing resolution was all that was written up til then. That resolution is just being enforced. I dont particularly like the way bush has done a lot of things, but saying the govt was doing something illegal attacking is just wrong. Their real reasons for war may be wrong, but they had legal right to enforce that resolution.

They dont need international support or permission to invade Iraq. They just wanted it. I think giving the Iraqi military a warning reguarding captured US/British soilders was fair enough.

Your free trade script is not working.... http://www.pileofturds.com

That's humor...

1 country (france) can not veto a resolution and make it not pass.
All countries vote on a resolution. And US/UK/Spain just started the war without any voting because they knew other countries would vote against that war.

whether what the US/UK is doing is against International Law is a moot point. There is no court to try the case (no thanks to the US :)).

There are many "experts" who claim Intl law has been broken, and many who claim it hasn't

Jedi...

First search for the ceasefire agreements that Iraq signed
Second Search for what a ceasefire MEANS
Third, Search for WHO the Iraqi's signed the ceasefire WITH
Fourth, Have your humble pie quietly

(You'll learn more if YOU search them out instead of whining for links to be handed to you AND you might even learn to research before you make yourself out to be an expert and then turn into a fool)

And solly Chalie, ONE country CAN Veto ANY resolution in front of the Security Council, IF they are one of the permenent nations.

Who made FRANCE one (perm member) is beyond me tho. :1orglaugh Must have been an inside joke that has backfired.

I think France AND Russia have some tallllll 'splaining to do and very soon too!

oh and by the way the UN security council is formed. There is no way the security council can find US or UK in breach of UN resolutions because they can automatically veto anything that goes through there :)

Thanks Gemini, I was just looking for where I had seen that bit that you said =P

These guys want to espouse all sorts of nonsense about the UN and related things Nuclei, but so far not many of them have been even in the ballpark with their rants. Its a shame that someone who was taught this BS in High School TWENTY TWO YEARS ago has hung onto more of the knowledge than they bothered to learn. :Graucho

there, you said it.
USA invaded Iraq knowing that France was going to veto agains the war. They didnt get green light from the UN security council.

The fact is the resolution never made it to vote. Whatever the reason is not even relevant due to the previous resolution giving the US full power to attack.

Period.

Argue all you wish, but it will not change the facts.

Have fun arguing with yourself in this thread :1orglaugh

Geneva Convention... Guantanomo Bay... hmmm.