Non-nude underage sites are illegal - GoFuckYourself.com

Lensman · 08-26-2002, 01:56 PM

Looks like Jim from Life Styles Photo is facing life in prison:

http://www.msnbc.com/news/737804.asp?0dm=C15QN

High Quality · 08-26-2002, 02:02 PM

ouch..that sucks

Fletch XXX · 08-26-2002, 02:04 PM

Said it long ago, about time.

klik · 08-26-2002, 02:06 PM

LOL funny pics.. you see a blur of the cops goin out the door.

GFED · 08-26-2002, 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Fletch XXX
Said it long ago, about time.

ldinternet · 08-26-2002, 02:08 PM

Seems like they're going to make an example of him.

But, play with fire...

Dopy · 08-26-2002, 02:09 PM

What do they expect from using girls aged 8 - 14. I wondered how long it would be before those ped magnets got busted.
Pity they can't do something about the Russian shit too, but I guess those guys are rubbing their hands together now.

slackor · 08-26-2002, 02:11 PM

A new niche? Webmasters-getting-arrested-live-webcams?

Quote:

Originally posted by klik
LOL funny pics.. you see a blur of the cops goin out the door.

Daymare · 08-26-2002, 02:14 PM

"ALL THREE CASES involve operators of ?model? sites who crossed the legal line, either by possessing child pornography ? a violation of federal law " well, there was real KP in it.. so yeah, he's going to jail.

marzzo · 08-26-2002, 02:21 PM

I've seen non-nude sites promoting Tawnee Stone and Lightspeed sites, it's been posted on their webmaster board too, I'm surprised they allow it

eroswebmaster · 08-26-2002, 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Fletch XXX
Said it long ago, about time.

There is nothing in this article that says that "non-nude sites are illegal."

Each case has more involved than just your basic underage model site.

If there is real cp involved it has nothing to do with what is seriously becoming a problem and that is the underage niche.

Now if congress can enact some sort of law that will deal with this issue without violating civil rights then great.

But I seriously doubt this...even with the nude underage sites at this point in time as long as their is no gratuitous display of genitals or any sexual overtones then all the photographer has to claim is it's art and if he can prove that then he may win on appeal.

GFED · 08-26-2002, 02:25 PM

Is that the same guy that shoots for SC? I saw a link on their support board a while back that he got busted for CP.

SR · 08-26-2002, 02:39 PM

Good stuff
Lock up those child abuser.
Those kinda people have a hard time in prison

HeadPimp · 08-26-2002, 02:49 PM

All I can say is what a dumb ass...

lawpal · 08-26-2002, 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by HeadPimp
All I can say is what a dumb ass...

DITTO

Fletch XXX · 08-26-2002, 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by eroswebmaster

There is nothing in this article that says that "non-nude sites are illegal."

I was referriong to the countless posts I have made on this subject and thread after thread I started about it.

I no longer argue it.

I said it long ago, they should be illegal, that is true.

shen_kid · 08-26-2002, 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by marzzo
I've seen non-nude sites promoting Tawnee Stone and Lightspeed sites, it's been posted on their webmaster board too, I'm surprised they allow it

they make a lot too

booker · 08-26-2002, 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by eroswebmaster

Now if congress can enact some sort of law that will deal with this issue without violating civil rights then great.

But I seriously doubt this...even with the nude underage sites at this point in time as long as their is no gratuitous display of genitals or any sexual overtones then all the photographer has to claim is it's art and if he can prove that then he may win on appeal.

A person under the age of 18 cannot sign a consent form without their parent's approval. That law is on the books. In order to have their photos taken and sold for profit on the internet, they must at least sign a model release form. Are their parents co-signing?

And on a subjective note, the article reads, "including some as young as 8 or 9 ? wearing revealing attire and striking suggestive poses." If you have to look at 8 year old girls to get off there's something wrong.. and a 12 year old girl in fishnets isn't art.

I said it before and I'll say it again, as in many walks of life, there is a terrible understanding of the law in the adult industry. Misconception and misunderstanding can lead to a lot of trouble.

shen_kid · 08-26-2002, 02:56 PM

so,,,, this site(or this kind of site) is illegal?
http://www.thenntgp.com/

Steve · 08-26-2002, 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by High Quality
ouch..that sucks

Why does it suck to lock up a CP piece of shit? Explain to me how shutting down crap like that "sucks".

payrollpete · 08-26-2002, 02:57 PM

Money will make and break you

eroswebmaster · 08-26-2002, 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by booker

A person under the age of 18 cannot sign a consent form without their parent's approval. That law is on the books. In order to have their photos taken and sold for profit on the internet, they must at least sign a model release form. Are their parents co-signing?

Well that is part of the issue.
If not then they are in violation of laws other than running a "non-nude" site.

Quote:

And on a subjective note, the article reads, "including some as young as 8 or 9 ? wearing revealing attire and striking suggestive poses." If you have to look at 8 year old girls to get off there's something wrong.. and a 12 year old girl in fishnets isn't art.

I've already answered this in my post. CP does not = nude.
You can photograph a fully clothed minor but if you focus and zoom in on the genitals you can be charged and convicted for producing cp, it's all about context.

If the guys were taking photographs that are judged to be gratuitous in nature they will get the punishment they deserve.

Now regarding art your example of a 12 year old in fishnets is a bit one sided.
We all know the implied sexual overtones of any female in fishnets.
Now if you have a completely nude girl even younger than 18 in an environment that does not scream sex, that might be considered art. We can judge on an individual basis that it is not art, but it will be up to the supreme court to judge on a constitutionality basis and they have already done so.

Quote:

I said it before and I'll say it again, as in many walks of life, there is a terrible understanding of the law in the adult industry. Misconception and misunderstanding can lead to a lot of trouble.

Yep there is a terrible misunderstanding of law in this industry and this does not exclude you.

greentea · 08-26-2002, 03:04 PM

I agree they should be illegal and shutdown!

People that profit from this are the WORST SCUM!

I think CCBILL & IBILL should take the initiative and STOP proccesing for these sites, since 90% of them bill with these two companys.

Of course they wont, we all know there making Big $$$$$ from it.

Wizzo · 08-26-2002, 03:07 PM

"Grady, 42, has pleaded innocent to 886 felony counts of violating a state statute against sexual exploitation of children"

Damn, that's ALOT of counts...

eroswebmaster · 08-26-2002, 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Fletch XXX

I was referriong to the countless posts I have made on this subject and thread after thread I started about it.

I no longer argue it.

I said it long ago, they should be illegal, that is true.

sorry man wasn't trying to bring you back into the debate

I just hate to see such a misleading post by one of the leaders in the adult industry...that being Lensman.

The problem still exists and will continue to exist unless someone makes common sense legislation that actually attacks the issues, the problems and doesn't do a wholesale sweep of constitutional rights under the rug.

NitroPhil · 08-26-2002, 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by marzzo
I've seen non-nude sites promoting Tawnee Stone and Lightspeed sites, it's been posted on their webmaster board too, I'm surprised they allow it

Who says we allow it?

from the Lightspeedcash FAQ/Terms page:

"However, we do not allow links from password trading/hacking/warez sites, or any site that promotes or depicts beastiality, rape, torture, underage models or content, or any other illegal or unethical content."

I don't link to anyone from any of my sites that has any questionable content, and I have terminated lots of webmasters for violating our terms.

Steve Lightspeed

Scootermuze · 08-26-2002, 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by greentea

I think CCBILL & IBILL should take the initiative and STOP proccesing for these sites, since 90% of them bill with these two companys.

Of course they wont, we all know there making Big $$$$$ from it.

If these sites were taken down for legal reasons, then the billing companies, which charge for access to these sites, are accessories to the crimes as well as dealers in that they buy wholesale and sell retail.

Further.. thanks to a nephew of mine who I booted off of my system, I saw that the teen chat rooms on Yahoo, and probably other servers are loaded with 12 and 14 year old girls that are constantly flashing for the boys, who are probably lots of old sick fucks goin into the rooms posing as teen boys. It may be ok for my nephew in that he's 15, but not on my system.. no way.. no how..

marzzo · 08-26-2002, 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by NitroPhil

Who says we allow it?

from the Lightspeedcash FAQ/Terms page:

"However, we do not allow links from password trading/hacking/warez sites, or any site that promotes or depicts beastiality, rape, torture, underage models or content, or any other illegal or unethical content."

I don't link to anyone from any of my sites that has any questionable content, and I have terminated lots of webmasters for violating our terms.

Steve Lightspeed

I didn't say that you allowed it, I just followed a link posted by one of the LS webmasters to a NN site that had Tawnee banners on it, he was asking questions on the board with his link for all to see.

Maybe you did shut him down, I dunno. It was a couple of months ago.

Living For Today · 08-26-2002, 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by marzzo

I didn't say that you allowed it, I just followed a link posted by one of the LS webmasters to a NN site that had Tawnee banners on it, he was asking questions on the board with his link for all to see.

Maybe you did shut him down, I dunno. It was a couple of months ago.

Non Nude does not mean under 18 ;)

Rictor · 08-26-2002, 05:11 PM

Don't confuse the bad nonnude sites with the good nonnude sites. There are a few nonnude sites that only list galleries of sponsor content that shows obviously legal girls in bras and panties. These sites are good for webmasters since the less nudity you show in your gallery...the more likely the surfer is to click through to the actual site to see the nudity.

Ex. You make a free site full of Lightspeed galleries of Tawnee Stone and XXX Raimi in bra and panty shots. The conversions on this traffic would be great.

I've been thinking of making a nonnude site like this for a while now. Using Lightspeed galleries and the content from a couple other sponsors.

JackFoley · 08-26-2002, 05:20 PM

^ I've been doing this for a long time and it works well even though I don't get a lot of traffic. I used to have snapshots of girls 16-18 on my site (I started my non-nude "career" when I was 17), and I even promoted Jim Grady's sites for awhile (don't tell the FBI) but in the end I could see why most people equate non-nude sites with child porn, and I finally changed all my sites to 18+ content and adult sponsors.

I think what people are complaining about are sites like Teenplanet.org that continue to use underage content, while simply switching sponsors from True Teen Babes/True Teen Cams to Tawnee Stone, etc.

crack · 08-26-2002, 06:13 PM

Well - IMHO most preteen stuff is plain brainfucking, are they popular?
Look at numberZ:

http://inventory.overture.com/d/sear...ateurpages.com
77821

http://inventory.overture.com/d/sear...teenplanet.org
6132

That's 10x more typein/SE traffic to 'forced traffic' site compared to teen stuff.

Those sites are not popular (replace ?term= to your non nude teen favorite and see),
Some forces are just brainwashing ppl and getting this shit out to the press.
Ppl need busty nice looking babes and not CP.

SteveLightspeed · 03-18-2003, 03:38 PM

Latest development in this story:

"Grady Acquitted of Child Porn Charges"

http://www.avn.com/articles/11942.html

Fletch XXX · 03-18-2003, 03:42 PM

blast from the past.

xanx · 03-18-2003, 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Lightspeed
Latest development in this story:

"Grady Acquitted of Child Porn Charges"

http://www.avn.com/articles/11942.html

I don't support CP in anway but I did see that comming.. They need to change the law not try and fudge existing statues..

MrPopup · 03-18-2003, 03:48 PM

The wrost fucking part is that when you click on the link, a fucking FLASH window opens up with an underage model trying to sell a mobile phone.

iggysick · 03-18-2003, 03:50 PM

love some teenz :D

foreverjason · 03-18-2003, 03:53 PM

Quote:

There is nothing in this article that says that "non-nude sites are illegal."

Each case has more involved than just your basic underage model site.

Exactly

traffictrader · 03-18-2003, 03:56 PM

I"ll all about 1st amendment freedoms, and if these guys had just been non-nude site operaters, i'd be furious about these arrests. However, from the sounds of that article, all these guys were actual sickos who had real child porn on their hard-drives, even if they weren't selling it on their sites.

I hope these guys get solidary cells, cuz no one, no matter how bad a person, deserves what happens to kiddie porn pedaphiles in prison.

rooster · 03-18-2003, 04:02 PM

anyone that gets off looking at a ten year old in a swimsuit needs a bullet to the head.

Jamdin · 03-18-2003, 04:09 PM

So should stores stop selling bikinis to underage girls? For they are encouraging girls to look too sexy while they are at the beach. Should there be seperate pools & beaches...one for adults & one for kids?

Morgan · 03-18-2003, 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by shen_kid
so,,,, this site(or this kind of site) is illegal?
http://www.thenntgp.com/

all circle jerk sites should be illegal!

NastyJack · 03-18-2003, 04:19 PM

I always report sites that have questionable content - no matter what! Sometimes I let the webmaster know about my intentions in hope that he'll come around and see my point of view and to date I've been very successful in getting these sites to change they're content.

Actually I have a 100% success rate!

What I do is tell them that I'm a well know, respected webmaster in the adult community and that unless they remove the content in question that they are going to hear from the adult industry <YOU!!!>. Of course most of these sites don't actually have child porn but they where very suggestive.

I have to tell you that at times I've wonder what I would do if someone called my bluff since I know for a fact that most of you don't like to get involved in shit like this.

Anyway - buddy thought that he would get away with taking advantage of under age girls/boys and personally I believe that it will help those kids in the future - knowing that this pervert is behind bars I mean.

Good job - keep taking those bastards down!

Regards
NastyJack

Gallardo · 03-18-2003, 04:20 PM

Machete_ · 03-18-2003, 04:22 PM

"? including some as young as 8 or 9 ? wearing revealing attire and striking suggestive poses"

That kind of says it all

Dugmor · 03-18-2003, 04:27 PM

I totally agree all Non-nude "underage" sites should be illegal !

This article was written July 11, 2002 and CC Bill has done made sure to clean up and not process for any sites that promote any Non nude sites that promote underage models !

Please do not think all non nude sites have under age models !

Non Nude is a niche and there are a lot legal Non Nude sites and Non Nude webmasters that are respected for not trading with underage Non Nude sites !

Lensman posted this 08-26-2002 09:56 PM ....... so this is old news !

eroswebmaster · 03-18-2003, 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by NastyJack

Anyway - buddy thought that he would get away with taking advantage of under age girls/boys and personally I believe that it will help those kids in the future - knowing that this pervert is behind bars I mean.

Good job - keep taking those bastards down!

Regards
NastyJack

Dude you are that dense aren't you?

Did you not read the article that says he was "NOT GUILTY?"

That he was acquitted of all charges.

Not one girl testified that he did anything wrong, and the one girl that started the whole mess by claiming she was 17 when he took nude photos of her and touched her was proven to be a liar.

Wake up and smell the crack you're smoking boy.

12clicks · 03-18-2003, 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Lightspeed
Latest development in this story:

"Grady Acquitted of Child Porn Charges"

http://www.avn.com/articles/11942.html

too bad.

eroswebmaster · 03-18-2003, 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Dugmor
I totally agree all Non-nude "underage" sites should be illegal !

Sorry man but that's a broad stroke to be painting.

In America we have this thing called the constitution and it protects all kinds of speech including the speech we don't like or agree with.

I think every case should be judged on it's own merits. If a site has been found to be crossing the line then go after the bastards with a vengance.

stocktrader23 · 03-18-2003, 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by NastyJack
I always report sites that have questionable content - no matter what! Sometimes I let the webmaster know about my intentions in hope that he'll come around and see my point of view and to date I've been very successful in getting these sites to change they're content.

Actually I have a 100% success rate!

What I do is tell them that I'm a well know, respected webmaster in the adult community and that unless they remove the content in question that they are going to hear from the adult industry <YOU!!!>. Of course most of these sites don't actually have child porn but they where very suggestive.

I have to tell you that at times I've wonder what I would do if someone called my bluff since I know for a fact that most of you don't like to get involved in shit like this.

Anyway - buddy thought that he would get away with taking advantage of under age girls/boys and personally I believe that it will help those kids in the future - knowing that this pervert is behind bars I mean.

Good job - keep taking those bastards down!

Regards
NastyJack

NJ, you are a complete idiot. First of all he was found not guilty. Second, you report sites that are questionable. Any site is questionably illegal in the adult world and when you piss on enough webmasters have fun when they all claim shit about your site. You had rape sites linked on your site for a fact a while back yet you turn people in YOU think have questionable content.

GO FUCK YOURSELF WITH A RUSTY FUCKING POLE DIPSHIT.

08-26-2002, 01:56 PM	#1
Lensman GFY Chaperone Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Adult.com Posts: 9,846	Non-nude underage sites are illegal Looks like Jim from Life Styles Photo is facing life in prison: http://www.msnbc.com/news/737804.asp?0dm=C15QN

08-26-2002, 02:02 PM	#2
High Quality Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Vegas Posts: 5,741	ouch..that sucks __________________ RecurCash.com - Averaging $38/sale with 60% revshare in the first 4 months alone! Convert your TEEN traffic today @ better than 1:500 guaranteed. ICQ me: 18287590!

08-26-2002, 02:04 PM	#3
Fletch XXX GFY HALL OF FAME DAMMIT!!! Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: that 504 Posts: 60,840	Said it long ago, about time. __________________ Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site? Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About me

08-26-2002, 02:25 PM	#12
GFED Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 8,121	Is that the same guy that shoots for SC? I saw a link on their support board a while back that he got busted for CP. __________________ https://www.flow.page/savethechildren

08-26-2002, 02:57 PM	#21
payrollpete Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Seattle, WA Posts: 1,527	Money will make and break you __________________ <a href="http://www.techiemedia.com"><img src="http://banners.techiemedia.net/techie120.gif">

08-26-2002, 02:06 PM	#4
klik Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: san diego Posts: 5,092	LOL funny pics.. you see a blur of the cops goin out the door.

08-26-2002, 02:08 PM	#6
ldinternet Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2001 Posts: 8,245	Seems like they're going to make an example of him. But, play with fire...

08-26-2002, 02:09 PM	#7
Dopy Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Puerto Del Carmen, Lanzarote, Canary Islands Posts: 1,572	What do they expect from using girls aged 8 - 14. I wondered how long it would be before those ped magnets got busted. Pity they can't do something about the Russian shit too, but I guess those guys are rubbing their hands together now.

08-26-2002, 02:14 PM	#9
Daymare Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2002 Posts: 2,674	"ALL THREE CASES involve operators of ?model? sites who crossed the legal line, either by possessing child pornography ? a violation of federal law " well, there was real KP in it.. so yeah, he's going to jail.

08-26-2002, 02:21 PM	#10
marzzo Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 2,134	I've seen non-nude sites promoting Tawnee Stone and Lightspeed sites, it's been posted on their webmaster board too, I'm surprised they allow it

08-26-2002, 02:39 PM	#13
SR Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: The Netherlands Posts: 2,239	Good stuff Lock up those child abuser. Those kinda people have a hard time in prison

08-26-2002, 02:49 PM	#14
HeadPimp Bad Mo-Fo Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Seattle, WA Posts: 2,772	All I can say is what a dumb ass...

08-26-2002, 02:56 PM	#19
shen_kid Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada Posts: 199	so,,,, this site(or this kind of site) is illegal? http://www.thenntgp.com/

08-26-2002, 03:04 PM	#23
greentea Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: South Florida Posts: 6,580	I agree they should be illegal and shutdown! People that profit from this are the WORST SCUM! I think CCBILL & IBILL should take the initiative and STOP proccesing for these sites, since 90% of them bill with these two companys. Of course they wont, we all know there making Big $$$$$ from it. __________________ blunts

08-26-2002, 03:07 PM	#24
Wizzo 2011 GFY Hall of Fame! Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: Back in Texas! Posts: 15,224	"Grady, 42, has pleaded innocent to 886 felony counts of violating a state statute against sexual exploitation of children" Damn, that's ALOT of counts... __________________ Looking for Opportunity!

08-26-2002, 05:11 PM	#30
Rictor Old Timer Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Indianapolis Posts: 12,208	Don't confuse the bad nonnude sites with the good nonnude sites. There are a few nonnude sites that only list galleries of sponsor content that shows obviously legal girls in bras and panties. These sites are good for webmasters since the less nudity you show in your gallery...the more likely the surfer is to click through to the actual site to see the nudity. Ex. You make a free site full of Lightspeed galleries of Tawnee Stone and XXX Raimi in bra and panty shots. The conversions on this traffic would be great. I've been thinking of making a nonnude site like this for a while now. Using Lightspeed galleries and the content from a couple other sponsors.

08-26-2002, 05:20 PM	#31
JackFoley Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Pac-land Posts: 858	^ I've been doing this for a long time and it works well even though I don't get a lot of traffic. I used to have snapshots of girls 16-18 on my site (I started my non-nude "career" when I was 17), and I even promoted Jim Grady's sites for awhile (don't tell the FBI) but in the end I could see why most people equate non-nude sites with child porn, and I finally changed all my sites to 18+ content and adult sponsors. I think what people are complaining about are sites like Teenplanet.org that continue to use underage content, while simply switching sponsors from True Teen Babes/True Teen Cams to Tawnee Stone, etc. __________________ SUBMIT \| TRADE \| CONTACT

08-26-2002, 06:13 PM	#32
crack Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Posts: 100	Well - IMHO most preteen stuff is plain brainfucking, are they popular? Look at numberZ: http://inventory.overture.com/d/sear...ateurpages.com 77821 http://inventory.overture.com/d/sear...teenplanet.org 6132 That's 10x more typein/SE traffic to 'forced traffic' site compared to teen stuff. Those sites are not popular (replace ?term= to your non nude teen favorite and see), Some forces are just brainwashing ppl and getting this shit out to the press. Ppl need busty nice looking babes and not CP. __________________ There is a crack in everything. That's how the light gets in.

03-18-2003, 03:38 PM	#33
SteveLightspeed Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Lightspeedworld Posts: 7,940	Latest development in this story: "Grady Acquitted of Child Porn Charges" http://www.avn.com/articles/11942.html

03-18-2003, 03:42 PM	#34
Fletch XXX GFY HALL OF FAME DAMMIT!!! Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: that 504 Posts: 60,840	blast from the past. __________________ Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site? Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About me

03-18-2003, 03:48 PM	#36
MrPopup Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: on the internet Posts: 3,783	The wrost fucking part is that when you click on the link, a fucking FLASH window opens up with an underage model trying to sell a mobile phone. __________________ <table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3" border="1" bgcolor="#008000"><tr><td><font size=3>Gone</font></td></tr></table>

03-18-2003, 03:50 PM	#37
iggysick Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Croatia Posts: 8,743	love some teenz :D __________________ Site ground - Holiday promotion! Domain and hosting for a year only $9.95! And a chance to win Ipad2!

03-18-2003, 03:56 PM	#39
traffictrader Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: ICQ# 93507395 Posts: 1,331	I"ll all about 1st amendment freedoms, and if these guys had just been non-nude site operaters, i'd be furious about these arrests. However, from the sounds of that article, all these guys were actual sickos who had real child porn on their hard-drives, even if they weren't selling it on their sites. I hope these guys get solidary cells, cuz no one, no matter how bad a person, deserves what happens to kiddie porn pedaphiles in prison. __________________

03-18-2003, 04:02 PM	#40
rooster Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 2,384	anyone that gets off looking at a ten year old in a swimsuit needs a bullet to the head.

03-18-2003, 04:09 PM	#41
Jamdin Registered User Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Kansas Posts: 3,560	So should stores stop selling bikinis to underage girls? For they are encouraging girls to look too sexy while they are at the beach. Should there be seperate pools & beaches...one for adults & one for kids?

03-18-2003, 04:19 PM	#43
NastyJack Registered User Join Date: Dec 2002 Posts: 1,291	I always report sites that have questionable content - no matter what! Sometimes I let the webmaster know about my intentions in hope that he'll come around and see my point of view and to date I've been very successful in getting these sites to change they're content. Actually I have a 100% success rate! What I do is tell them that I'm a well know, respected webmaster in the adult community and that unless they remove the content in question that they are going to hear from the adult industry <YOU!!!>. Of course most of these sites don't actually have child porn but they where very suggestive. I have to tell you that at times I've wonder what I would do if someone called my bluff since I know for a fact that most of you don't like to get involved in shit like this. Anyway - buddy thought that he would get away with taking advantage of under age girls/boys and personally I believe that it will help those kids in the future - knowing that this pervert is behind bars I mean. Good job - keep taking those bastards down! Regards NastyJack

03-18-2003, 04:20 PM	#44
Gallardo Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 188

03-18-2003, 04:22 PM	#45
Machete_ WINNING! Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 14,579	"? including some as young as 8 or 9 ? wearing revealing attire and striking suggestive poses" That kind of says it all

03-18-2003, 04:27 PM	#46
Dugmor The Traffic Cowboy Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: BP4L - Vice Prez Posts: 7,679	I totally agree all Non-nude "underage" sites should be illegal ! This article was written July 11, 2002 and CC Bill has done made sure to clean up and not process for any sites that promote any Non nude sites that promote underage models ! Please do not think all non nude sites have under age models ! Non Nude is a niche and there are a lot legal Non Nude sites and Non Nude webmasters that are respected for not trading with underage Non Nude sites ! Lensman posted this 08-26-2002 09:56 PM ....... so this is old news ! __________________ JesusEmpire - The Most Trusted Mobile Marketing Service SMS Verification codes for 850+ websites including: Tinder - Bumble - Twitter - TikTok - Instagram - Facebook Last edited by Dugmor; 03-18-2003 at 04:29 PM..