Quote:
Originally posted by eroswebmaster
Now if congress can enact some sort of law that will deal with this issue without violating civil rights then great.
But I seriously doubt this...even with the nude underage sites at this point in time as long as their is no gratuitous display of genitals or any sexual overtones then all the photographer has to claim is it's art and if he can prove that then he may win on appeal.
|
A person under the age of 18 cannot sign a consent form without their parent's approval. That law is on the books. In order to have their photos taken and sold for profit on the internet, they must at least sign a model release form. Are their parents co-signing?
And on a subjective note, the article reads, "including some as young as 8 or 9 ? wearing revealing attire and striking suggestive poses." If you have to look at 8 year old girls to get off there's something wrong.. and a 12 year old girl in fishnets isn't art.
I said it before and I'll say it again, as in many walks of life, there is a terrible understanding of the law in the adult industry. Misconception and misunderstanding can lead to a lot of trouble.