300

Bastard.

302

You REALLY think Saddam needs all his weapons JUST to threaten his OWN people? - All his's gone through for 12 years JUST to keep his own people in line? You really believe that?

Bit of an Over-Kill won't it be? Pardon the Pun.

Invading Egypt compared to Iraq? -
Let's just pretend you didn't make such an asinine comparison.

Who is he threatening to attack?

And what are you thoughts about the Saudis?

Under international law it is illegal to invade a sovereign state unless they have attacked you or are about to attack you. If the US invades Iraq without the support of the UN it will be committing an illegal act.

oh well....



:1orglaugh

You are fucking kidding me right?

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/...004766310.html

First Israel, who knows when us.

No, it was a simple statement of fact. It *is* illegal to unilaterally attack another nation unless it attacks you first or it's clear that attack is imminent. The only exception is if the action is approved by the UN.

Your point?

The US and the UK say that they intend to invade Iraq because Saddam will not destroy his weapons of mass destruction. I have not heard anyone claim that they're doing so to cut-off Saddam's funding to the families of Palestinian terrorists.

Following your logic, it would be OK for any state which feels threatened by the US's weapons of mass destruction and bellicose attitude (and there are many!) to attack the US!

\

The Administration said from the beginning that it did not have to go to the UN to act. The Administration, will be merely imposing the terms of the cease fire that the UN imposed upon Iraq in 1991, so no it will not be acting illegally. In addition Iraq has been committing acts of war weekly since 1991 in that it has repeatedly fired upon coalition forces (the USA and the British). In addition Saddam has more than once called for the killing of Americans where ever they may be found so a case can be made that he his an imminent threat to the security of US assets abroad and even mainland. Legalities are usually open for interpretation.

We allow a certain amount of Iraqi oil to be sold for food and medicine. In addition Iraqi has side stepped this program and sold additional oil. Saddam decided to spend the money on things other than medicine, such as continuing to build Palaces. It is Saddam allowing his people to die, no one else.

Very true :thumbsup

Okie dokie. Suicide bombers and Sept 11th...

Oh yeah, the US has paid families of Nuclear Physists for their sacraficing their lives for ALLAH and to rid the world of the infidels.

Blah blah blah.

Hmm...

http://www.forbes.com/2003/02/26/billionaireland.html

Says here that Saddam is worth at least 2 BILLION dollars. Hmm... I'm wondering how he accumulated that much money, all while his people are short of food and proper medicine. Surely, he's too humane to steal donated supplies and sell them for personal gain.

my god.

Who?

my christian god who will no doubt strike you all down for all your sinning.

There's a big storm outside...

Looks like I might be first! :helpme

there's a special place waiting for you, in my god's hell. hehehehehehe.

I wasn't talking about Saddam, I was talking about having sanctions on importing medicine. They should allow us to sell it to Iraqi hospitals.

Damn man! Getting a little frisky tonight, eh?

We do not have sanctions against medicine. Saddam chooses not to buy medicine, and chooses to spend the money on other things.

Ding ding ding! We have a winner!