google issues an explicit warning to tubes - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

TubeSubmitters · 01-30-2014, 12:43 AM

51 tubes!!

Arnox · 01-30-2014, 12:52 AM

Mm. I think sites will just have to implement a unique tagging system/content archive process to get around any issues. This'll just target direct clone tube sites, methinks.

If anyone's worried about their tube being shafted, be sure to see sig.

ContentPimp · 01-30-2014, 01:18 AM

I got a contact at google that I became friends with and I asked him about this. And he said they are going after sponsor hosted FLVs and the sites that are just fronts and 301 redirect based on category select. So basically, the legal tube clips, etc.

Google wants high user experience, and what my friend @ Google said means basically full movies, where the user will be happy. So in a way google is encouraging piracy in this area because users are only happy if they get long videos FREE.

PornDiscounts-V · 01-30-2014, 01:40 AM

What I find interesting with Bing is that the porn results are amazing. It is like Google circa 2006. I think I will start posting notices to my surfers on my sites, twitter accounts, etc about switching to Bing and about how Google is making it harder to find good porn.

Klen · 01-30-2014, 02:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ContentPimp

I got a contact at google that I became friends with and I asked him about this. And he said they are going after sponsor hosted FLVs and the sites that are just fronts and 301 redirect based on category select. So basically, the legal tube clips, etc.

Google wants high user experience, and what my friend @ Google said means basically full movies, where the user will be happy. So in a way google is encouraging piracy in this area because users are only happy if they get long videos FREE.

Wel,considering ilegall tubes dominate rankings already,nothing will change.

just a punk · 01-30-2014, 02:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rabbit

From 2 days ago: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogsp...value.html?m=1

Looks like the last few whipsawing updates for tubes were not the last ones

Google is a best example of such a site. It does not provide any unique content but shows us only the scrapped one from other sites. Especially if we are talking about pics and videos.

So let Google go and but itself first.

just a punk · 01-30-2014, 02:31 AM

Scrapped porn TGP by Google: https://www.google.com/search?q=porn...&tbm=isch&sa=X

Scrapped porn tube by Google: https://www.google.com/search?q=porn...urce=lnms&sa=X

So?

Arnox · 01-30-2014, 02:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

Scrapped porn TGP by Google: https://www.google.com/search?q=porn...&tbm=isch&sa=X

Scrapped porn tube by Google: https://www.google.com/search?q=porn...urce=lnms&sa=X

So?

Google would argue that they provide a quality algorithm for sorting through content, and as such, have created a unique experience for the user that they cannot get elsewhere.

Also, this is all implicit on the concept that Google wants search engine traffic - I doubt very much it gets very many hits at all from search engines.

just a punk · 01-30-2014, 02:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arnox

Google would argue that they provide a quality algorithm for sorting through content

Same as all the good affiliate sites do. They do aggregate content from various sources, sort it by niches, tags etc. Allows one to do search, display the content by number views, rating, comments etc. So why such a site is worse than Google? The only different is because it uses the content provided by affiliate programs, while Google simple steal it from other sites without any permissions and display it as image TGP and tubes.

Google is a thief. PERIOD.

Arnox · 01-30-2014, 03:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

Same as all the good affiliate sites do. They do aggregate content from various sources, sort it by niches, tags etc. Allows one to do search, display the content by number views, rating, comments etc. So why such a site is worse than Google? The only different is because it uses the content provided by affiliate programs, while Google simple steal it from other sites without any permissions and display it as image TGP and tubes.

Google is a thief. PERIOD.

Google is unlikely to attack these sites with its audit.

xpimp · 01-30-2014, 03:59 AM

i hope bing will become a serious competitor regards google but they don't index sites so quick as google does

John. · 01-30-2014, 04:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seth Manson

Am I the only one that sees this as a good thing?

Ding Ding Ding... and we have a winner

DarkTrader · 01-30-2014, 04:44 AM

yep, traffic is going up and sites returned to the index

PornDiscounts-V · 01-30-2014, 04:53 AM

Fucking roller coaster... Now I am back in Google...

Ramp · 01-30-2014, 08:34 AM

Don't get too happy about it. I doubt it will last long.

PornDiscounts-V · 01-30-2014, 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ramp

Don't get too happy about it. I doubt it will last long.

Stephen · 01-30-2014, 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeRoy

Seems like they want unique content on every site.

Don't YOU as a USER want unique content on every site?

Google is trying to give the customer what he or she wants.

Folks complain about "all the same sites showing up" but when G tries to fix this, the bitching follows.

Magnetron · 01-30-2014, 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephen

Don't YOU as a USER want unique content on every site?

Google is trying to give the customer what he or she wants.

Folks complain about "all the same sites showing up" but when G tries to fix this, the bitching follows.

And if one doesn't want to conform, you have the alternative of paying Google for advertising.

Rammann · 01-30-2014, 10:26 AM

I can't deal with google...

Antonio · 01-30-2014, 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

Google is a best example of such a site. It does not provide any unique content but shows us only the scrapped one from other sites. Especially if we are talking about pics and videos.

So let Google go and but itself first.

Exactly - their entire business model is based on scraped content.

It is time for them to die - with all the good they have done (and yes, they have done more good than any company could wish for), it is time for them to disappear from the face of the earth.

The Porn Nerd · 01-30-2014, 10:41 AM

Google has too much power.

barelist · 01-30-2014, 10:42 AM

Maybe already in place?

Google returns A LOT less tube results than Bing does for similar keywords...

IE:
https://www.google.com/#q=tori+black

http://www.bing.com/search?q=tori+bl...bs&form=QBR E

Kind of funny...

Google is all social media style results, Bing is all tubes.

I see the surfer liking the Bing results more, but what's better for us?!?!

01-30-2014, 10:51 AM

Screwgled again! Lol Bing is gonna be better soon and isn't sleeping with the govt like schmoogle.

lucas131 · 01-30-2014, 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by barelist

Maybe already in place?

Google returns A LOT less tube results than Bing does for similar keywords...

IE:
https://www.google.com/#q=tori+black

http://www.bing.com/search?q=tori+bl...bs&form=QBR E

Kind of funny...

Google is all social media style results, Bing is all tubes.

I see the surfer liking the Bing results more, but what's better for us?!?!

what i see is google offering some crappy info and fb spam, bing offering content, and it is possible to get into bings top results, because bing is not so spam friendly. bing ftw ...

barelist · 01-30-2014, 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lucas131

what i see is google offering some crappy info and fb spam, bing offering content, and it is possible to get into bings top results, because bing is not so spam friendly. bing ftw ...

True, we're pretty much page 2 for most of the keywords we care about on Bing. Just wish the traffic was there

BTW: If you're curious our Google traffic is 10x what Bings is right now.

Here's our traffic from both over the last few years, Google on top, Bing on bottom:

01-30-2014, 12:43 AM	#51
TubeSubmitters Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 2,683	51 tubes!! __________________ Buying sites with income, paying by paxum, hit me up

01-30-2014, 12:52 AM	#52
Arnox Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Radelaide Posts: 2,167	Mm. I think sites will just have to implement a unique tagging system/content archive process to get around any issues. This'll just target direct clone tube sites, methinks. If anyone's worried about their tube being shafted, be sure to see sig. __________________ Need Text? X Copywriters \| Adult Writing Service - [email protected]

01-30-2014, 01:18 AM	#53
ContentPimp Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 3,184	I got a contact at google that I became friends with and I asked him about this. And he said they are going after sponsor hosted FLVs and the sites that are just fronts and 301 redirect based on category select. So basically, the legal tube clips, etc. Google wants high user experience, and what my friend @ Google said means basically full movies, where the user will be happy. So in a way google is encouraging piracy in this area because users are only happy if they get long videos FREE. __________________ Blog Post Writing and Reviews are 2 cents per word & Titles and Gallery Descriptions 1 cent per word We also write Pay Site Reviews, SEO and Mainstream text www.contentpimp.info Contact me on ICQ at 400792466 Payoneer, Paxum and Paypal Accepted forms of Payment by the Pimp

01-30-2014, 01:40 AM	#54
PornDiscounts-V Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: L.A. Posts: 5,744	What I find interesting with Bing is that the porn results are amazing. It is like Google circa 2006. I think I will start posting notices to my surfers on my sites, twitter accounts, etc about switching to Bing and about how Google is making it harder to find good porn. __________________ Blog Posts - Contextual Links - Hardlinks on 600+ Blog Network * Handwritten * 180 C Class IPs * Permanent! * Many Niches! * Bulk Discounts! GFYPosts /at/ J2Media.net

01-30-2014, 02:31 AM	#57
just a punk So fuckin' bored Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2003 Posts: 32,387	Scrapped porn TGP by Google: https://www.google.com/search?q=porn...&tbm=isch&sa=X Scrapped porn tube by Google: https://www.google.com/search?q=porn...urce=lnms&sa=X So? __________________ Obey the Cowgod

01-30-2014, 03:59 AM	#61
xpimp Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2013 Posts: 824	i hope bing will become a serious competitor regards google but they don't index sites so quick as google does

01-30-2014, 04:44 AM	#63
DarkTrader Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2009 Posts: 267	yep, traffic is going up and sites returned to the index Last edited by DarkTrader; 01-30-2014 at 04:52 AM..

01-30-2014, 04:53 AM	#64
PornDiscounts-V Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: L.A. Posts: 5,744	Fucking roller coaster... Now I am back in Google... __________________ Blog Posts - Contextual Links - Hardlinks on 600+ Blog Network * Handwritten * 180 C Class IPs * Permanent! * Many Niches! * Bulk Discounts! GFYPosts /at/ J2Media.net

01-30-2014, 08:34 AM	#65
Ramp Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 4,464	Don't get too happy about it. I doubt it will last long.

01-30-2014, 10:26 AM	#69
Rammann Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2013 Posts: 40	I can't deal with google...

01-30-2014, 10:41 AM	#71
The Porn Nerd Living The Dream Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Inside a Monitor Posts: 19,662	Google has too much power. __________________ My Affiliate Programs: Porn Nerd Cash \| Porn Showcase \| Aggressive Gold Over 90 paysites to promote! Now on Teams: peabodymedia

01-30-2014, 10:42 AM	#72
barelist Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Texas Posts: 523	Maybe already in place? Google returns A LOT less tube results than Bing does for similar keywords... IE: https://www.google.com/#q=tori+black http://www.bing.com/search?q=tori+bl...bs&form=QBR E Kind of funny... Google is all social media style results, Bing is all tubes. I see the surfer liking the Bing results more, but what's better for us?!?! __________________ http://www.barelist.com http://www.twitter.com/barelist Last edited by barelist; 01-30-2014 at 10:44 AM..

01-30-2014, 10:51 AM	#73
VanDahl Guest Posts: n/a	Screwgled again! Lol Bing is gonna be better soon and isn't sleeping with the govt like schmoogle.