of course. it was a silly attempt at a trap to begin with.

oh, let's all come together on common ground so i can school all y'all.


:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

we've got real worldwide concerns going into 2014, see fukashima, but op still clings to wtc7. why? just to be right.

let's all gather round and get educated by a conspiracy nutter while we're getting dosed with radioactivity from the fuka nightmare.

makes fucking sense.

says who? The building burned for hours, they said fuck it just pull the guys out of there. It is not worth the risk after losing so many people already today.
This is like bitching about what kind of tires were on the car JFK was riding in the day he was shot and arguing over that.

:2 cents::2 cents::thumbsup

I'll confess, I'm preparing for the usual debates with relatives over Christmas, I want to see what you guys throw at me so I'll have the answers ready :1orglaugh

Please continue :thumbsup

Uh hello... even NIST admits free fall now...

:D

That is close to the truth. Building 7 had a huge amount of damage done to one side and it was beginning to lean. Firefighters were talking back and forth about their fear of the building falling so the dicision to "pull" the firefighters out was made.

:thumbsup

This is why I expected some of the Official Story people to have joined us with at least that belief :2 cents:

Hahahaha man I feel for your family. Them dreading having to endure you over the holidays and the annoying bullshit they're going to have to put up with as a captive audience of real people instead of the lonely soapbox mutterings thrown into a forum where you're not wanted that you have to generally rely on for attention.
Man.. poor folk. And you getting super excited about your chance to parade your delusions in the flesh and relishing in sitting in the topic like a stagnant fart while everyone else is trying to eat with one or two trying to politely spar after a few drinks with the crazy cousin/uncle as it's the only way to glean some enjoyment out of the unfortunate situation.
lol PLANNING the family Christmas conversation.. What a sad, sad, lonely, pathetic ghost of a life.

Uh hello... there were no firefighters in the building to "pull" for hours before the collapse...

:D

Fiddy freefalls.

When relatives make constant trips to the kitchen for 'more wine' - its a polite excuse to laugh behind the door.

I doubt you will find much argument with that assessment.

It used to be like that, but they're slowly coming round, loads are anti-vax now after me chipping away at them all these years :2 cents:

Exactly...they had all been "pulled" before the building collapsed. Their conversations about the damage that was done...and the building leaning are all tape recorded. There are photographs showing the hugh gash in the side of the building leading down to one corner of the building. If I remember correctly it was a gash 18 floors long.

Introduction to Free Fall

A free falling object is an object that is falling under the sole influence of gravity. Any object that is being acted upon only by the force of gravity is said to be in a state of free fall. There are two important motion characteristics that are true of free-falling objects:
•Free-falling objects do not encounter air resistance.
•All free-falling objects (on Earth) accelerate downwards at a rate of 9.8 m/s/s (often approximated as 10 m/s/s for back-of-the-envelope calculations)


There is nothing in that video that even resembles free fall.

You're a fruitcake.

I doubt that your chipping away has had anything but a negative affect...and even if some are slowly coming round to your way of thinking you should be ashamed for adding more idiots to the population.

I am surprised the relatives go through the trouble of going anywhere the OP is; I know I'd find something better to do, like pick the fleas off rabid raccoons.

considering he managed to win 861 million on an insurance settlement, i bet he was talking about firefighters.

Well his appearance probably makes it more of a religious day for them...because when he shows up I am certain they say "Oh my God"...but then again it could be "Goddammit".

People want to believe that their government is all knowing and looking out for them...just as God.

People still believe in that pigshit religion despite the obvious and overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

Do you really think that the majority of idiots will ever accept that their government is against them?

NO

Whoah whoah whoah.. You've got it completely and utterly ass backwards. Normal rational people think government is somewhat ineffectual, doesn't live up to it's promises, is often well meaning but also corrupt and compromised.

In the "rational corner" we have hundreds of displays of the government being inept and myopic.. fucking take your pick from the Obamacare website to the Hurricane Katrina emergency response to weapons of mass destruction.

Rational people think the government is inept, it's the conspiracy nutjobs that think the government is God. It's the nutjobs that think a government that can spend hundreds of millions on a healthcare website that doesn't work and can't keep a presidential blow job secret can rig 3 buildings with explosives over months with a team of 50 people without tens of thousands of people noticing and have nothing leak - A godlike government literally causing ACTS OF GOD with haarp induced earthquakes!

LOL clueless. Conspiracies are literally a religion - it's a way of giving meaning to the largely random acts in our world and replacing a sky daddy with a smoke filled room daddy that pulls all the strings and makes things happen. No problem with individual conspiracies but it's a religion to the 9/11+haarp+contrails+SandyHook+ANYTHING THATHAPPENSATALL crowd. It's the rabbit hole. It's like their naive mind is blown the first time they learn not everything is as it seems and they flip out and go the other extreme and for example, can't immediately tell David Icke is a raving tard or raking in cash from gullible conspirasheeple.

Cos you were there right ?

The real question in all of this is why ?

If you believe the crackpot falseflag bullshit - then you have a motive for 9/11, but what was the motive for WTC7 ?

Was the flag of destroying the twin towers not false enough ?

There was evidence and investigations in WTC7 which needed to be destroyed :2 cents:

I'm quite a helpful chap at times, they are grateful that I opened their eyes to the reality of vaccines :2 cents:

The timing shows that WTC7 fell at freefall :2 cents:

What evidence ?

Hear...hear!

Damn straight! But the OP is either a huge troll or just plain retarded, sitting all day looking for corruption and conspiracies where there are none rather than face the fact that right outside his door shit is going down he should be more worried about:
http://www.transparency.org/cpi2013/results

There is only 50 countries on the planet more corrupt than his, and the US ain't one of em.

Nailed it.

Here is a whole page of RATIONAL arguments debunking the whole WTC7 conspiracy bullshit that no conspiracy theorist will ever consider because it goes against their preformed conclusions.

http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm

That's a good page, thanks!




:thumbsup:thumbsup



.

fuck you building 7, everybody say they have correct data now...

he was talking about the firemen in the building dimwit... watch the whole clip, the bong resin shouldn't interfere once you understand the context of that whole conversation...

I guess there is hope that your family will just die out from lack of medical care.

is that right.

you know there is documents that show when the building was evacuated

and then there is documents showing when the building fell

and these times are hours apart

but you got a chance to call me a dimwit

you can call it a day :thumbsup

so let's be real clear-

conspiracy nutters think the decision to topple wtc 7 was a short convo between the bldg owner and the fire chief

He could be lying, right? But here is the corroborating evidence...


:1orglaugh

It's nuts that they're still trying to spin this, telling us that an apple is an orange :1orglaugh

It was a long convo between Silverstein and the insurance company, he wanted to see if he'd still get paid if the building went down via controlled demo, given that the plane which was meant to hit it got delayed in airport congestion. :2 cents:

Silverstein is a 'Lucky' man