GFY Conspiracy Theorists, Where are the Tracks? - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

TheSquealer · 10-28-2012, 09:01 PM

Annoying little facts....

Quote:

Originally Posted by helterskelter808

helterskelter808 · 10-28-2012, 10:33 PM

The laser reflectors could have been left by unmanned missions.

uno · 10-29-2012, 01:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VenusBlogger

These are not conspiracy anymore, THEY ARE FACTS NOW.

1) JFK was killed by CIA+FBI

2) Man never landed on Moon, it was filmed in Hollywood Studios. That answers the question: "Why haven't we go back to the moon" -> You can't go "BACK" to a place where you have never been before.

3) World Trade Center was demolished by BUSH Administration, as clearly displayed on Oliver Stone movie.

Of course, to see the TRUTH, you need Let your USA Patriotic Sentiment on a side, otherwise, you would think that someone is trying to hit your reputation and you will react. Something that probably people like ROBBIE or Some Hippie from California, will never understand.

PAIRIOD.

I can't even imagine more ways that you'd be wrong.

Phoenix · 10-29-2012, 01:57 AM

the only thing i have to say about the moon missions is that they definitely filmed some of it in arizona.
i suspect that a lot of the footage was damaged from outside the safety of the pod. So they filmed what hey needed to...no conspiracy needed...they just didnt want to be embarrassed that they forgot to protect the camera that was outside with them on their suits.

Dirty F · 10-29-2012, 02:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix

the only thing i have to say about the moon missions is that they definitely filmed some of it in arizona.
i suspect that a lot of the footage was damaged from outside the safety of the pod. So they filmed what hey needed to...no conspiracy needed...they just didnt want to be embarrassed that they forgot to protect the camera that was outside with them on their suits.

Please show me the proof. We'll be on every news channel by tonight! Ofcourse you have proof right?

JFK · 10-29-2012, 02:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty F

You have to be pretty fucking mentally retarded to think the moon landing and the landings after that were faked. Fucking imbeciles.
Conspiracy theorists...fucking sad group of people.

Well then, let's just close the tread, is this your Final answer ?

Phoenix · 10-29-2012, 02:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty F

Please show me the proof. We'll be on every news channel by tonight! Ofcourse you have proof right?

Franck..nobody owes you proof...you want to refute something? go look for your own proof i am wrong.

there is a 2 mile stage in arizona of the moon landing..that is a fact.

i dont feel like looking for it.however ill point you in the direction.
the maker of the camera they used for outside the space capsule mentioned that they never did anything special to the camera equipment....just painted it grey.
So when they were outside filming, they lost that footage...no conspiracy here...just a small over sight.

Dirty F · 10-29-2012, 02:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix

Franck..nobody owes you proof...you want to refute something? go look for your own proof i am wrong.

there is a 2 mile stage in arizona of the moon landing..that is a fact.

i dont feel like looking for it.however ill point you in the direction.
the maker of the camera they used for outside the space capsule mentioned that they never did anything special to the camera equipment....just painted it grey.
So when they were outside filming, they lost that footage...no conspiracy here...just a small over sight.

Damn, that's a lot of words for saying "as usual i'm full of shit, as usual i don't have any proof whatsoever".

You have been a dumbass conspiracy theorist for many years now. You've claimed the most crazy stuff and never ever shown any proof. You're so fucking pathetic.

You and all those othet conspiracy imbeciles are all the same. Making absurd claims 24/7 because everyone needs to "wake up" but when asked for proof they will always give you shit. They don't feel the need to show any proof. Find it yourself.
You really don't see how fucking dumb that looks to normal people.
How old are you now?

Phoenix · 10-29-2012, 02:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty F

Damn, that's a lot of words for saying "as usual i'm full of shit, as usual i don't have any proof whatsoever".

You have been a dumbass conspiracy theorist for many years now. You've claimed the most crazy stuff and never ever shown any proof. You're so fucking pathetic.

You and all those othet conspiracy imbeciles are all the same. Making absurd claims 24/7 because everyone needs to "wake up" but when asked for proof they will always give you shit. They don't feel the need to show any proof. Find it yourself.
You really don't see how fucking dumb that looks to normal people.
How old are you now?

franck..i know you are not normal people...so i am not overly worried.

go fuck your hat

you are a crazy fuck...i love fucking with you

Dirty F · 10-29-2012, 02:42 AM

Oh and ofcourse the gool ol "i don't have to show you any proof. Instead you prove to me my claims are wrong".

Typical conspiracy theorist and also religious behaviour.
You know the already lost the argument when they pull that one.

Dirty F · 10-29-2012, 02:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix

franck..i know you are not normal people...so i am not overly worried.

go fuck your hat

you are a crazy fuck...i love fucking with you

Fucking idiot.

Phoenix · 10-29-2012, 02:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty F

Fucking idiot.

thanks man

btw...they did film something in arizona...are you suggesting they built a 2 mile stage for no reason?

missed you franck

Dirty F · 10-29-2012, 03:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix

thanks man

btw...they did film something in arizona...are you suggesting they built a 2 mile stage for no reason?

missed you franck

What kind of fucking argument is that? God, you people are dumb.

Phoenix · 10-29-2012, 03:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty F

What kind of fucking argument is that? God, you people are dumb.

i dont argue with you franck

TheSquealer · 10-29-2012, 04:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix

Franck..nobody owes you proof...you want to refute something? go look for your own proof i am wrong.

there is a 2 mile stage in arizona of the moon landing..that is a fact.

Funny that one could be so confident in such a thing, yet there isn't anything easily found online other than other conspiracy idiots insisting its true.

Also convenient that you can make outlandish claims and then demand its on others to prove you wrong. Very Paul Markham like.

Dirty F · 10-29-2012, 04:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer

Also convenient that you can make outlandish claims and then demand its on others to prove you wrong. Very Paul Markham like.

Yup, conspiracy nutters love to use that one.

grumpy · 10-29-2012, 06:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Max Potential

look, no profile, second weight and footprint.

helterskelter808 · 10-29-2012, 07:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty F

Oh and ofcourse the gool ol "i don't have to show you any proof. Instead you prove to me my claims are wrong".

And? It should be easy, right? Unless you don't have the first clue about the subject, and just like endlessly whining for attention, like a tiresome needy kid.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer

Funny that one could be so confident in such a thing, yet there isn't anything easily found online other than other conspiracy idiots insisting its true.

Perhaps it's not true, but the idea that if something isn't easily found online then it must not exist is pretty stupid, frankly. Are you saying you don't believe NASA built moon landing sets on Earth?

notjoe · 10-29-2012, 08:20 AM

Fuck the moon landing. I want to know how they get the caramel in to the chocolate.

TheSquealer · 10-29-2012, 08:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by helterskelter808

Perhaps it's not true, but the idea that if something isn't easily found online then it must not exist is pretty stupid, frankly. Are you saying you don't believe NASA built moon landing sets on Earth?

I'm saying that when someone randomly proclaims that the moon is made of unicorn tears and that its an established fact, that maybe some supporting evidence could be provided rather than leaving it to sane people to do homework. That's how science works. You don't get to make random proclaimations. You draw conclusions based on the evidence and you present your work for scrutiny.

Rochard · 10-29-2012, 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VenusBlogger

2) Man never landed on Moon, it was filmed in Hollywood Studios. That answers the question: "Why haven't we go back to the moon" -> You can't go "BACK" to a place where you have never been before.

If the moon landings were filmed in a studio, how come there are no tracks?

Phoenix · 10-29-2012, 08:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer

I'm saying that when someone randomly proclaims that the moon is made of unicorn tears and that its an established fact, that maybe some supporting evidence could be provided rather than leaving it to sane people to do homework. That's how science works. You don't get to make random proclaimations. You draw conclusions based on the evidence and you present your work for scrutiny.

i think you should spend more time being mad about what i say for fun on here
and less time working.

enjoy
i used to do it full time...im bored as fuck in china right now.
i put moon landing conspiracy into google and spout off whatever the first site says.

then...let franck go to work.

dont get caught up in the sideshow dude.

however...i do stand by my proclamation...they filmed some stuff on earth...because it is just easier....not all the film shot up on the moon was good enough to release.
btw...since this isnt an actual science forum...i am free to say such things without proof.

the board is called gofuckyourself..lol

i win...now im going to sleep

Phoenix · 10-29-2012, 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

If the moon landings were filmed in a studio, how come there are no tracks?

the only logical refute i have seen so far

christ dont give the others any help..or this place wont be any fun at all

devilspost · 10-29-2012, 09:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

If the moon landings were filmed in a studio, how come there are no tracks?

The set designers didn't think of it.

Besides that I have seen arguments that it takes moister to create tracks, so there should not be any well formed tracks.

Watch the video posted the above and you will not have faith in the official story.

helterskelter808 · 10-29-2012, 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix

i think you should spend more time being mad about what i say for fun on here

then...let franck go to work.

I think Franck actually put me on ignore a while back, for a post (about a giant eyeball) that was quite obviously not serious.

Quote:

however...i do stand by my proclamation...they filmed some stuff on earth...because it is just easier....not all the film shot up on the moon was good enough to release.

That's possible, but the pictures and video are really the only evidence man was on the moon. Everything else could possibly (I don't know everything they did) have been done with unmanned missions.

PR_Glen · 10-29-2012, 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix

the only thing i have to say about the moon missions is that they definitely filmed some of it in arizona.
i suspect that a lot of the footage was damaged from outside the safety of the pod. So they filmed what hey needed to...no conspiracy needed...they just didnt want to be embarrassed that they forgot to protect the camera that was outside with them on their suits.

I don't think its out of the realm of possibility for that to be true for at least the first mission. but its still pretty thin on evidence though.

helterskelter808 · 10-29-2012, 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by devilspost

The set designers didn't think of it.

Besides that I have seen arguments that it takes moister to create tracks, so there should not be any well formed tracks.

Watch the video posted the above and you will not have faith in the official story.

Funny thing is conspiracy "nuts" are willing to look at evidence and consider the possibilty there might be another explanation. People who prefer to be told what to think usually flat out refuse to even entertain the possibility they might be being lied to. Even by people (the authorities) who are proven liars.

Penny24Seven · 10-29-2012, 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

If the moon landings were filmed in a studio, how come there are no tracks?

HA exactly, I was reading waiting for that by someone. I thought the car weighed very little on the moon and even bounced some. There would be more tracks on stage then on the moon then

PR_Glen · 10-29-2012, 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by devilspost

The set designers didn't think of it.

Besides that I have seen arguments that it takes moister to create tracks, so there should not be any well formed tracks.

Watch the video posted the above and you will not have faith in the official story.

no.. you don't get credibility by saying: "go watch this random home made video from the internet." That isn't evidence, that isn't a sound argument and that's not how adults come to conclusions.

The only thing I don't have faith in is the future of society if people like yourself continue to confuse mindless drivel such as this as evidence for anything.

helterskelter808 · 10-29-2012, 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brian837

HA exactly, I was reading waiting for that by someone

https://gfy.com/showpost.php?p=19278941&postcount=40

Dirty F · 10-29-2012, 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix

i think you should spend more time being mad about what i say for fun on here
and less time working.

enjoy
i used to do it full time...im bored as fuck in china right now.
i put moon landing conspiracy into google and spout off whatever the first site says.

then...let franck go to work.

dont get caught up in the sideshow dude.

however...i do stand by my proclamation...they filmed some stuff on earth...because it is just easier....not all the film shot up on the moon was good enough to release.
btw...since this isnt an actual science forum...i am free to say such things without proof.

the board is called gofuckyourself..lol

i win...now im going to sleep

Ever wonder why so many people think you conspiracy freaks are total fucking idiots?

devilspost · 10-29-2012, 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Glen

no.. you don't get credibility by saying: "go watch this random home made video from the internet." That isn't evidence, that isn't a sound argument and that's not how adults come to conclusions.

The only thing I don't have faith in is the future of society if people like yourself continue to confuse mindless drivel such as this as evidence for anything.

Did you watch the documentary I posted above?

The best evidence he showed is that it would have been impossible for the astronauts to move around inside and get in and out of the capsule with all their gear. Not to mention all the other dumb shit.

JFK · 10-29-2012, 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by devilspost

Did you watch the documentary I posted above?

The best evidence he showed is that it would have been impossible for the astronauts to move around inside and get in and out of the capsule with all their gear. Not to mention all the other dumb shit.

come on now, stop making sense

helterskelter808 · 10-29-2012, 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Glen

no.. you don't get credibility by saying: "go watch this random home made video from the internet." That isn't evidence, that isn't a sound argument and that's not how adults come to conclusions.

I haven't seen the video, but presumably it's more than some guy saying "I don't think we got to the moon", but rather someone looking at available evidence and questioning it.

Of course, if it was, say, a Youtube video of the Mythbusters guys, with the help of NASA, actually demonstrating step by step that the Moon landings can be simulated on earth, while arguing that it really happened, that's different, right? Because they're saying what you want to believe.

Rochard · 10-29-2012, 01:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by devilspost

The set designers didn't think of it.

That doesn't make sense. They didn't need to think of it. They wheeled the rover into the studio, it's sand, with gravity, and thus in the studio there would be tracks.

PAR · 10-29-2012, 01:28 PM

Phoenix:
You mean the same area that NASA uses to test, film etc in AZ and has for years...
The one they are constantly showing testing on TV, Press and their own site..
You mean that 2 mile staging area... The same area they tested the MARs rover...

Cinder Lake - Black Point Lava Flow in Arizona

Because NASA has never staged or tested anything in AZ nor have they documented any of this testing because they would never have a testing and staging area...
We must now all bow down to Frank as their is no proof of NASA ever having a staging grounds in AZ...

And such an area would never be public knowledge
http://www.nasa.gov/exploration/anal...s/archive.html

PR_Glen · 10-29-2012, 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by helterskelter808

I haven't seen the video, but presumably it's more than some guy saying "I don't think we got to the moon", but rather someone looking at available evidence and questioning it.

Of course, if it was, say, a Youtube video of the Mythbusters guys, with the help of NASA, actually demonstrating step by step that the Moon landings can be simulated on earth, while arguing that it really happened, that's different, right? Because they're saying what you want to believe.

so because mythbusters made a show that lacks credibility than it was a fake cover up?

did you really think i was going to come back here using fucking mythbusters as credible evidence?

i'm embarrassed I even come to this message board. I need to get out of here for real.

PR_Glen · 10-29-2012, 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by devilspost

Did you watch the documentary I posted above?

The best evidence he showed is that it would have been impossible for the astronauts to move around inside and get in and out of the capsule with all their gear. Not to mention all the other dumb shit.

yeah, you are right, they figured out how to travel in space but overlooked the part where they exit the fucking capsule.. you cracked the case sherlock. We better tell 60 minutes so they can run the expose.

are the video dwellers available for comment on their earth shattering discovery?

devilspost · 10-29-2012, 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

That doesn't make sense. They didn't need to think of it. They wheeled the rover into the studio, it's sand, with gravity, and thus in the studio there would be tracks.

They could have wheeled it on set, then raked out the sand later. Because some dummy didn't think about how it would not make sense. If you have ever been on a set you know shit happens

devilspost · 10-29-2012, 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Glen

yeah, you are right, they figured out how to travel in space but overlooked the part where they exit the fucking capsule.. you cracked the case sherlock. We better tell 60 minutes so they can run the expose.

are the video dwellers available for comment on their earth shattering discovery?

Show me where 60 minutes ever questioned American Exceptionalism. That is all the moon landing bullshit is.

helterskelter808 · 10-29-2012, 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Glen

did you really think i was going to come back here using fucking mythbusters as credible evidence?

A Mythbusters video would be considerably more evidence than you've posted so far, which is zilch.

Dirty F · 10-29-2012, 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PAR

Phoenix:
You mean the same area that NASA uses to test, film etc in AZ and has for years...
The one they are constantly showing testing on TV, Press and their own site..
You mean that 2 mile staging area... The same area they tested the MARs rover...

Cinder Lake - Black Point Lava Flow in Arizona

Because NASA has never staged or tested anything in AZ nor have they documented any of this testing because they would never have a testing and staging area...
We must now all bow down to Frank as their is no proof of NASA ever having a staging grounds in AZ...

And such an area would never be public knowledge
http://www.nasa.gov/exploration/anal...s/archive.html

Ofcourse they have a testing area. Every idiot knows that.

DBS.US · 10-29-2012, 04:26 PM

The people that believe man walked on the moon are the same people that buy AFF memberships.

DBS.US · 10-29-2012, 04:33 PM

The mission was real but the rocks where fake?
http://www.theepochtimes.com/n2/worl...ake-22067.html

Rochard · 10-29-2012, 06:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by devilspost

They could have wheeled it on set, then raked out the sand later. Because some dummy didn't think about how it would not make sense. If you have ever been on a set you know shit happens

Again, does not make sense. Why would they intentionally remove the tracks?

Rochard · 10-29-2012, 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DBS.US

The mission was real but the rocks where fake?
http://www.theepochtimes.com/n2/worl...ake-22067.html

Did you not read the article where it says that no moon rocks were given away, and the only rocks collected were very, very small?

DBS.US · 10-29-2012, 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by helterskelter808

If the rover is light enough, and it would presumably be lighter on the moon than on earth, it could have been picked up and moved by the astronauts themselves. After all, even if it was faked on earth, there'd be marks where it was pushed on to the set. What would be the point in covering them up?

Anyway here's an example LRO image showing the rover was capable of leaving track marks still visible to this day (if you believe it):

We can send a man to the moon but that's the best photo of the tracks NASA can come up with?

Phoenix · 10-29-2012, 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PAR

Phoenix:
You mean the same area that NASA uses to test, film etc in AZ and has for years...
The one they are constantly showing testing on TV, Press and their own site..
You mean that 2 mile staging area... The same area they tested the MARs rover...

Cinder Lake - Black Point Lava Flow in Arizona

Because NASA has never staged or tested anything in AZ nor have they documented any of this testing because they would never have a testing and staging area...
We must now all bow down to Frank as their is no proof of NASA ever having a staging grounds in AZ...

And such an area would never be public knowledge
http://www.nasa.gov/exploration/anal...s/archive.html

ha...thanks man...but as you know im only in this thread to fuck around.

mission accomplished

2012 · 10-29-2012, 07:23 PM

10-28-2012, 08:50 PM	#51
2012 So Fucking What Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 17,189	__________________ best host: Webair \| best sponsor: Kink \| best coder: 688218966 \| Go Fuck Yourself

10-29-2012, 01:57 AM	#55
Phoenix BACON BACON BACON Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Poems everybody, the laddie fancies himself a poet Posts: 35,457	the only thing i have to say about the moon missions is that they definitely filmed some of it in arizona. i suspect that a lot of the footage was damaged from outside the safety of the pod. So they filmed what hey needed to...no conspiracy needed...they just didnt want to be embarrassed that they forgot to protect the camera that was outside with them on their suits. __________________ Skype Phoenixskype1 Telegram PhoenixBrad https://quantads.io

10-29-2012, 04:26 PM	#94
DBS.US Geo Cities Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: North Captiva Island, Florida USA Posts: 11,830	The people that believe man walked on the moon are the same people that buy AFF memberships. __________________ Make a Free Chaturbate White Label site in 34 minutes and be making money tonight

10-29-2012, 04:33 PM	#95
DBS.US Geo Cities Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: North Captiva Island, Florida USA Posts: 11,830	The mission was real but the rocks where fake? http://www.theepochtimes.com/n2/worl...ake-22067.html __________________ Make a Free Chaturbate White Label site in 34 minutes and be making money tonight

10-29-2012, 07:23 PM	#100
2012 So Fucking What Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 17,189	__________________ best host: Webair \| best sponsor: Kink \| best coder: 688218966 \| Go Fuck Yourself

10-28-2012, 10:33 PM	#53
helterskelter808 So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 3,405	The laser reflectors could have been left by unmanned missions.

10-29-2012, 02:42 AM	#61
Dirty F Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Posts: 59,204	Oh and ofcourse the gool ol "i don't have to show you any proof. Instead you prove to me my claims are wrong". Typical conspiracy theorist and also religious behaviour. You know the already lost the argument when they pull that one.

10-29-2012, 08:20 AM	#70
notjoe Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2002 Location: Toronto, Canada Posts: 5,599	Fuck the moon landing. I want to know how they get the caramel in to the chocolate.

10-29-2012, 01:28 PM	#87
PAR Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 1,835	Phoenix: You mean the same area that NASA uses to test, film etc in AZ and has for years... The one they are constantly showing testing on TV, Press and their own site.. You mean that 2 mile staging area... The same area they tested the MARs rover... Cinder Lake - Black Point Lava Flow in Arizona Because NASA has never staged or tested anything in AZ nor have they documented any of this testing because they would never have a testing and staging area... We must now all bow down to Frank as their is no proof of NASA ever having a staging grounds in AZ... And such an area would never be public knowledge http://www.nasa.gov/exploration/anal...s/archive.html