GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Plenty of jobs, lazy Americans just don't want them (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1076290)

Gozarian 07-30-2012 06:23 PM

This message is hidden because JohnnyClips is on your ignore list.

;)

bean-aid 07-30-2012 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnnyClips (Post 19093839)
:1orglaugh:1orglaugh That's $89,100 for sitting around and picking your nose!!

900X52 weeks is not 89K... that is a fail :2 cents:

Gozarian 07-30-2012 06:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beaner (Post 19093858)
900X52 weeks is not 89K... that is a fail :2 cents:

JC fail wow that is not unusual

johnnyloadproductions 07-30-2012 07:53 PM

I had a friend that got laid off of his welding job of $40k a year.
He has a back burner case come up and he was looking at doing 6 months in jail and with 6 months until check in time he figured he'd just sit and wait on his ass playing Grand Theft Auto multiplayer for 6-8 hour stretches at a time.
On unemployment he was making roughly the equivalent of $10 an hour for a 40 hours work week. Why bother to get another job? He didn't feel like working 2nd shift again. He got up to 240 pounds and this was only at 5'5". When he got out of county jail he weighted 160.

The longest clocked work week I've ever done was 73 hours. They wouldn't let me work more than that but there was one stretch where I went into my welding job for 40+ days straight.
What got depressing was going into work at 7pm, getting out at 7am then going to sleep at 10am and waking up at 6pm and realize in an hour you have to be at work.
Tears began rolling down my eyes because the only social life I had were the breaks permitted with the other people who were pissed off because they were stuck there for life.

It's so important to map out your day and figure out what you want or you'll just be an old, angry, and grumpy man like the rest of that bunch in that shop (which wasn't even union btw).

anexsia 07-30-2012 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shahab6 (Post 19092311)
a one bedroom min rent is $1400 around here, even very bad neighborhoods. It's around $800, plus other expenses. minimum wage cannot even pay one month of rent. Minimum wage was meant for high school students, and very desperate people. For a career. It's a joke.

Damn :( When I turned 19 I got a 1 bedroom apartment around here for $600/month...the neighborhood was really ghetto but I was always working or at school so it didn't matter to me plus they kept the apartments really clean inside.

SuckOnThis 07-30-2012 08:12 PM

Corporate welfare costs this country 4X compared to welfare for the poor and look what people are bitching about. The FOX propaganda machine is quite effective.

Paul Markham 07-31-2012 12:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony286 (Post 19093445)
Back then one third of the work force was union and it affected all jobs. You try and live in your means on $9 an hr. My grandfather pressed womens coats, he made enough to buy a house my grandmother didnt work and they had four kids. And he paid for two weddings, pressing ladies coats.My brother is a big right winger, he travels alot for work. He is sitting there and the guys behind him are talking on the plane. The one guy is baffled he cant find hoards of people to work for the $10 an hr jobs he has. My brother said he wanted to turn around and say you try living on $10 an hr.

And that job is very likely now being done in the Far East and the dicks heads here screaming get a job will be buying the coats.

The world has changed in terms of employment. The problem is some people's thinking hasn't. In saying "get a job" when they don't have the qualifications to do most on offer, people are now looking at unemployment as a life style and the solutions are useless and outdated.

Paul Markham 07-31-2012 12:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gozarian (Post 19093631)
Payroll taxes we pay are 45.1% (16.5% employee contribution, 28.6% employer contribution) and government cant understand why the 60% of workers are black market employees. If they reduce that burden by half the black market employees would suddenly appear on the books and government will be awash in cash.

Only if all the people working "off the books" returned to working on the books. Go do the sums.

If they catch and penalise those paying the illegal workers money, big fines that discouraged the practice. Then there would be a better response.

Paul Markham 07-31-2012 12:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jesus H Christ (Post 19094086)
Second, when you employed someone (back then) you weren't nailed with high medical/dental, employment tax, sick days/vacation, demanded production profit sharing etc costs. So now that $10 an hr job is actually an $18 an hour job for the employer so an employee can use their vital skills to point to a product in a aisle or ask what CC are you going to use to pay your cable bill.

So that's the situation. What's the solution?

Quote:

I don't think that's by choice? 60% of Americans live in rural areas and why Wall-Mart is so popular. They simply drove out their competition and usually the only game in town. I actually don't like shopping there because I want to support my local businesses, but for ammo and fishing product prices? - hard to beat man.
So you buy from local shops selling only American made goods?

Still you state the problem, tell us the solution.

kane 07-31-2012 12:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jesus H Christ (Post 19094086)
Because back then your grandfather remembered what it was like living in/through the depression. Remember, when WWII broke out 30% of the recruits who tried to join the military were declined due to malnutrition symptoms/issues. In short, every dime spent was almost always on the bare necessities or applied to generating more income, ie., investment.

Second, when you employed someone (back then) you weren't nailed with high medical/dental, employment tax, sick days/vacation, demanded production profit sharing etc costs. So now that $10 an hr job is actually an $18 an hour job for the employer so an employee can use their vital skills to point to a product in a aisle or ask what CC are you going to use to pay your cable bill.

This is actually a good point about one of the major issues we are facing as a country. If an employer didn't provide health insurance they might be able to pay more, but even with that extra money most people wouldn't be able to afford the insurance on their own. The out of control upward spiraling cost of health insurance in general in one of those things that is bleeding into all sectors of our economy and life in this country.



Quote:

I don't think that's by choice? 60% of Americans live in rural areas and why Wall-Mart is so popular. They simply drove out their competition and usually the only game in town. I actually don't like shopping there because I want to support my local businesses, but for ammo and fishing product prices? - hard to beat man.
It is a crazy catch 22. If you work at Walmart chances are the only place you can afford to shop is Walmart. Local can cost a decent amount more. I live in a small town and we have three grocery stores. Two of them are big chains and have almost the exact same prices. The third is a locally owned store. It does decent because it was here before either of the chain stores were and it has local produce and local meet so it has some good support. But their prices are often 20% higher so if you are on a budget you likely end up choosing one of the other two stores.

JFK 07-31-2012 02:04 AM

one fitty lazy bastards:pimp

Paul Markham 07-31-2012 02:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane (Post 19094612)
This is actually a good point about one of the major issues we are facing as a country. If an employer didn't provide health insurance they might be able to pay more, but even with that extra money most people wouldn't be able to afford the insurance on their own. The out of control upward spiraling cost of health insurance in general in one of those things that is bleeding into all sectors of our economy and life in this country.

Agreed. The cost of Health Care in the US is a prime argument against privatisation. Countries with a Government supplied Health Care system often provide a better system for a lot less money for all citizens..

tony286 07-31-2012 03:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jesus H Christ (Post 19094086)
Because back then your grandfather remembered what it was like living in/through the depression. Remember, when WWII broke out 30% of the recruits who tried to join the military were declined due to malnutrition symptoms/issues. In short, every dime spent was almost always on the bare necessities or applied to generating more income, ie., investment.

Second, when you employed someone (back then) you weren't nailed with high medical/dental, employment tax, sick days/vacation, demanded production profit sharing etc costs. So now that $10 an hr job is actually an $18 an hour job for the employer so an employee can use their vital skills to point to a product in a aisle or ask what CC are you going to use to pay your cable bill.



I don't think that's by choice? 60% of Americans live in rural areas and why Wall-Mart is so popular. They simply drove out their competition and usually the only game in town. I actually don't like shopping there because I want to support my local businesses, but for ammo and fishing product prices? - hard to beat man.

Actually the 50's on you had vacations, time off and benefits were coming in. I remember in the sixties my dad had all of that and since he worked for a bank ,he got low low interest mortgages. No the big difference was a CEO was happy making 50x the avg worker not 500x.
My Dad told me about the recession in the 70's not one person was laid off, salaries were frozen but no one was getting fired. It was considered a loss of face for a CEO to lay people off. They would have anniversary pins and you had people there up to 50 yrs. Back then they were people not human capital.

Barefootsies 07-31-2012 04:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony286 (Post 19095054)
No the big difference was a CEO was happy making 50x the avg worker not 500x.

Agreed. That shit is whack.

Buff 07-31-2012 06:22 AM

If you dismantled the welfare state completely, including social security, medicare, medicaid, food stamps, etc. -- all of it -- this would be a self-correcting problem within weeks.

You want more government? This is more government. And it's going to keep getting worse.

Rochard 07-31-2012 07:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony286 (Post 19095054)
My Dad told me about the recession in the 70's not one person was laid off, salaries were frozen but no one was getting fired. It was considered a loss of face for a CEO to lay people off. They would have anniversary pins and you had people there up to 50 yrs. Back then they were people not human capital.

The recession in the 1970s wasn't nearly as bad as what we just went through.

L-Pink 07-31-2012 07:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barefootsies (Post 19095062)
That shit is whack.

Damn Scooter, did you type that while riding your skateboard? lol

.

tony286 07-31-2012 07:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19095379)
The recession in the 1970s wasn't nearly as bad as what we just went through.

Of course not.But it didnt help the mass laying off of people. Our economy is based on spending. Germany took less of a hit because of the action they took instead of having a layoff blood bath.

http://www.economist.com/blogs/freee...ry_comparisons
"Germany proceeded to protect its labour market from major disruption by the great recession, through the use of its "short work" labour sharing programme. Firms were encouraged to cut hours rather than jobs, and workers facing reduced work hours were provided an income subsidy. The result? Germany's huge output fall produced only a labour market wiggle."

Barefootsies 07-31-2012 07:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony286 (Post 19095398)
Of course not.But it didnt help the mass laying off of people. Our economy is based on spending. Germany took less of a hit because of the action they took instead of having a layoff blood bath.

Instead of investing in war, and corporate bail outs, what are your thoughts on doing a 2012 versus of "The New Deal" with massive government spending on public works projects? By that I mean, repairing and upgrading this country's infrastructure that is crumbling? Not pork barrel bullshit.

:helpme

Paul Markham 07-31-2012 08:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buff (Post 19095268)
If you dismantled the welfare state completely, including social security, medicare, medicaid, food stamps, etc. -- all of it -- this would be a self-correcting problem within weeks.

You want more government? This is more government. And it's going to keep getting worse.

I think you should take this idea to the poorer areas of your city. :thumbsup

It's about as stupid a theory I've heard here for a while.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barefootsies
Instead of investing in war, and corporate bail outs, what are your thoughts on doing a 2012 versus of "The New Deal" with massive government spending on public works projects? By that I mean, repairing and upgrading this country's infrastructure that is crumbling? Not pork barrel bullshit.

Let's look at the alternatives.

Private enterprise are in the business of reducing costs, the workforce is a major cost. Reduce it and you have more for the shareholders.

The notion that tax cuts will produce a turn around is dead in the water. It's just those who are taxed want more and fuck anyone else who suffers. The extra spending will result in extra imports. Most businesses will not employ more, they will gear up and produce more with the same work force. Unless they absolutely have to. See above for why.

Public spending is always an employer who takes on more people than it needs. Just the nature of the beast. It won't open factories in China or any 3rd World Country like private enterprise does. It has to buy goods made in the US where possible. A 21st century version of The New Deal, will provide for the country so much. The Hoover Dam provides for LA and Vegas. Solar panels in the deserts and South America could provide all the day time electricity for the US. Stumbling block is the Private enterprise owned electricity companies. :Oh crap

And I'm sure there are other schemes that could be started by the Government to get economies moving again. One is Bank Loans. The Banks were bailed out after the crash with a huge amount of tax payers money on the understanding that the money would be fed into the economy via loans. Only a small part of it was. Same is happening in the UK. I believe banks are part of private enterprise. :Oh crap

I never thought I would think like this, it's just the last 10 or so years that I've seen the big businesses lose all morals and ethics to line their own pockets that I've changed. And I am in no way calling for Communism, just to do what is needed when required.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:45 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123